Use `_LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS` instead of `_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS` for a template
class.
This fixes the nodiscard_extensions.pass.cpp and a couple
func.search.default test cases when built in MSVC/DLL configurations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99932
This makes no attempt yet to look into the why/what for each of them,
but makes the CI configuration useful for tracking further regressions.
After looking into each case, they can either be fixed, or converted
into UNSUPPORTED: windows or XFAIL: windows, once the cause is known
and explained.
A number of the filesystem cases can be fixed by patches that are
currently in review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99095
Implement the resolution of LWG2993. Replace a deleted constructor
with a constructor that SFINAEs away in appropriate circumstances.
Also, now that the constructor is templated, we must have an
explicit deduction guide to make CTAD work.
Some tests have been merged in from Agustín Bergé's D40259.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92725
LWG reflector consensus is that this was a bug in libc++.
(In particular, MSVC also will fix it in their STL, soon.)
Bug originally discovered by Logan Smith.
Also fix `std::function<const void()>`, which should work
the same way as `std::function<void()>` in terms of allowing
"conversions" from non-void types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94452
"LLVM Buildbot on libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian" is not happy
with default-initializing the `double` member of `A` in a constexpr
function. At least I'm pretty sure that's what it's complaining about.
- std::reference_wrapper
- std::function
- std::mem_fn
While I'm here, remove _VSTD:: qualification from calls to `declval`
because it takes no arguments and thus isn't susceptible to ADL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92884
This is needed when running the tests in Freestanding mode, where main()
isn't treated specially. In Freestanding, main() doesn't get mangled as
extern "C", so whatever runtime we're using fails to find the entry point.
One way to solve this problem is to define a symbol alias from __Z4mainiPPc
to _main, however this requires all definitions of main() to have the same
mangling. Hence this commit.
We don't support GCC in C++03 mode, and Clang provides rvalue references
even in C++03 mode. So there's effectively no supported compiler that
doesn't support rvalue references.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84943
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
* improve coverage in `span`'s "conversion from `std::array`" test, while eliminating MSVC diagnostics about `testConstructorArray<T>() && testConstructorArray<const T, T>()` being redundant when `T` is already `const`.
* Remove use of `is_assignable` that triggers UB due to an insufficiently-complete type argument in `std::function`'s assignment operator test.
* Don't test that `shared_ptr` initialization from an rvalue triggers the lvalue aliasing constructor on non-libc++; this is not the case for Standard Libraries that implement LWG-2996. (Ditto, I'd simply remove this but it's your library ;).)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80030
Tests that require support for Clang-verify are already marked as such
explicitly by their extension, which is .verify.cpp. Requiring the use
of an explicit Lit feature is, after thought, not really helpful.
This is a change in design: we have been bitten in the past by tests not
being enabled when we thought they were. However, the issue was mostly
with file extensions being ignored. The fix for that is not to blindly
require explicit features all the time, but instead to report all files
that are in the suite but that don't match any known test format. This
can be implemented in a follow-up patch.
By renaming .fail.cpp tests that don't need clang-verify to .compile.fail.cpp,
the new test format will not try to compile these tests with clang-verify,
and the old test format will work just the same. However, this allows
removing a workaround that requires parsing each test looking for
clang-verify markup.
After this change, a .fail.cpp test should always have clang-verify markup.
When clang-verify is not supported by the compiler, we will just check that
these tests fail to compile. When clang-verify is supported, these tests
will be compiled with clang-verify whether they have markup or not (so
they should have markup, or they will fail).
This simplifies the test suite and also ensures that all of our .fail.cpp
tests provide clang-verify markup. If it's impossible for a test to have
clang-verify markup, it can be moved to a .compile.fail.cpp test, which
are unconditionally just checked for compilation failure.
This allows both the old and the new testing formats to handle these
tests with modules enabled.
We also include the modules flags in the %{flags} substitution, which
means that .sh.cpp tests in the old format and all tests in the new
format will use modules flags when enabled.
We had a workaround because GCC 5 does not evaluate static assertions
that are dependent on template parameters. This commit removes the
workaround and marks the corresponding tests as unsupported with GCC 5.
This has the benefit of bringing the new and the old test formats closer
without having to carry a workaround for an old compiler in the new
test format.
The testing script used to test libc++ historically did not like directories
without any testing files, so these tests had been added. Since this is
not necessary anymore, we can now remove these files. This has the benefit
that the total number of tests reflects the real number of tests more
closely, and we also skip some unnecessary work (especially relevant when
running tests over SSH).
However, some nothing_to_do.pass.cpp tests actually serve the purpose of
documenting that an area of the Standard doesn't need to be tested, or is
tested elsewhere. These files are not removed by this commit.
Removal done with:
import os
import itertools
for (dirpath, dirnames, filenames) in itertools.chain(os.walk('./libcxx/test'),
os.walk('./libcxxabi/test')):
if len(filenames + dirnames) > 1 and \
any(p == 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp' for p in filenames):
os.remove(os.path.join(dirpath, 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp'))
Forcing -Werror and other warnings means that the test suite isn't
actually testing what most people are seeing in their code -- it seems
better and less arbitrary to compile these tests as close as possible
to the compiler default instead.
Removing -Werror also means that we get to differentiate between
diagnostics that are errors and those that are warnings, which makes
the test suite more precise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76311
Summary:
Android's libc uses new/delete internally and these are counted, so
the counter needs to be reset to zero at the start of the test.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, #libc, ldionne
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Subscribers: dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76091
This patch qualifies calls to ref and cref inside ref(reference_wrapper<T>)
and cref(reference_wrapper<T>), respectively. These previously unqualified
calls could break in the presence of user functions called ref/cref inside
associated namespaces: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/8VfprT
Fixes PR44398.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74287
We don't support GCC 4 and older according to the documentation, so
we should pretend it doesn't exist.
This is a re-application of r372787.
llvm-svn: 372916
This also reverts:
- r372778: [libc++] Implement LWG 3158
- r372782: [libc++] Try fixing tests that fail on GCC 5 and older
- r372787: Purge mentions of GCC 4 from the test suite
Reason: the change breaks compilation of LLVM with libc++, for details see
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/libcxx-dev/2019-September/000599.html
llvm-svn: 372832
Louis Dionne