This patch fixes LWG2874. It is based on the original patch by Zoe Carver
originally uploaded at D81417.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81417
This will avoid typos like `_LIBCPP_STD_VERS` (<future>) or using `#if TEST_STD_VER > 17` without including "test_macros.h".
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99515
This patch implements 2802. Requires _Deleter to have call operator and be move constructible. Based on D62233.
Refs PR37637.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62274
This patch updates `allocate_shared` to call `allocator_traits::construct`
when creating the object held inside the shared_pointer, and
`allocator_traits::destroy` when destroying it. This resolves
the part of P0674R1 that was originally filed as LWG2070.
This change is landed separately from the rest of P0674R1 because it is
incredibly tricky from an ABI perspective.
This is the reason why this change is so tricky is that we previously
used EBO in a compressed pair to store both the allocator and the object
type stored in the `shared_ptr`. However, starting in C++20, P0674
requires us to use Allocator construction for initializing the object type.
That requirement rules out the use of the EBO for the object type, since
using the EBO implies that the base will be initialized when the control
block is initialized (and hence we can't do it through Allocator construction).
Hence, supporting P0674 requires changing how we store the object type
inside the control block, which we do while being ABI compatible by using
some trickery with a properly aligned char buffer.
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR41900
Supersedes https://llvm.org/D62760
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91201
When the allocator is only explicitly convertible from other specializations
of itself, the new version of std::allocate_shared would not work because
it would try to do an implicit conversion. This patch fixes the problem
and adds a test so that we don't fall into the same trap in the future.
Checking that `T` is constructible from `Args...` is technically not
required by the Standard, although any implementation will obviously
error out if that's not satisfied. However, this check is incompatible
with using Allocator construction in the control block (upcoming change
as part of implementing P0674), so I'm removing it now to reduce the
upcoming diff as much as possible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93246
This simplifies the implementation, and it appears to be equivalent since
make_shared was allocating memory with std::allocator anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93071
This will fix remaining failures on gcc-9 buildbot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/101.
gcc-8 and gcc-9 do not support constexpr destructors nor constexpr allocation.
Fix gcc warnings: -Wconversion, -Wpragmas.
- Several -Wshadow warnings
- Several places where we did not initialize our base class explicitly
- Unused variable warnings
- Some tautological comparisons
- Some places where we'd pass null arguments to functions expecting
non-null (in unevaluated contexts)
- Add a few pragmas to turn off spurious warnings
- Fix warnings about declarations that don't declare anything
- Properly disable deprecation warnings in ext/ tests (the pragmas we
were using didn't work on GCC)
- Disable include_as_c.sh.cpp because GCC complains about C++ flags
when compiling as C. I couldn't find a way to fix this one properly,
so I'm disabling the test. This isn't great, but at least we'll be
able to enable warnings in the whole test suite with GCC.
When porting libc++ to embedded systems, it can be useful to drop support
for localization, which these systems don't implement or care about.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90072
It appears that the released version of clang that supports constexpr
destructors is clang 10 and the oldest one that accepts -std=c++2a is 5,
so mark these as UNSUPPORTED for clang-5 to clang-9.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89704
We're technically not allowed by the Standard to call ::operator new in
constexpr functions like __libcpp_allocate. Clang doesn't seem to complain
about it, but GCC does.
This commit adds std::construct_at, and marks various members of
std::allocator_traits and std::allocator as constexpr. It also adds
tests and turns the existing tests into hybrid constexpr/runtime tests.
Thanks to Richard Smith for initial work on this, and to Michael Park
for D69803, D69132 and D69134, which are superseded by this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68364
This implements the part of P0619R4 related to the default allocator.
This is incredibly important, since otherwise there is an ABI break
between C++17 and C++20 w.r.t. the default allocator's size_type on
platforms where std::size_t is not the same as std::make_unsigned<std::ptrdiff_t>.
We don't support GCC in C++03 mode, and Clang provides rvalue references
even in C++03 mode. So there's effectively no supported compiler that
doesn't support rvalue references.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84943
Add shared_ptr tests where the element type and pointer type aren't 'convertible' but are 'compatible'.
Responding to a comment from D81414.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81532
All compilers supported by libc++ have rvalues in C++03 mode so, there is no need for this non-rvalue overload.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80881
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
* improve coverage in `span`'s "conversion from `std::array`" test, while eliminating MSVC diagnostics about `testConstructorArray<T>() && testConstructorArray<const T, T>()` being redundant when `T` is already `const`.
* Remove use of `is_assignable` that triggers UB due to an insufficiently-complete type argument in `std::function`'s assignment operator test.
* Don't test that `shared_ptr` initialization from an rvalue triggers the lvalue aliasing constructor on non-libc++; this is not the case for Standard Libraries that implement LWG-2996. (Ditto, I'd simply remove this but it's your library ;).)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80030
Implements P0414R2:
* Adds support for array types in std::shared_ptr.
* Adds reinterpret_pointer_cast for shared_ptr.
Re-committing now that the leaking tests are fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62259
Implements P0414R2:
* Adds support for array types in std::shared_ptr.
* Adds reinterpret_pointer_cast for shared_ptr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62259
This patch adds deduction guides to <memory> to allow deducing
construction of shared_ptrs from unique_ptrs, and from weak_ptrs
and vice versa, as specified by C++17.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69603
Tests that require support for Clang-verify are already marked as such
explicitly by their extension, which is .verify.cpp. Requiring the use
of an explicit Lit feature is, after thought, not really helpful.
This is a change in design: we have been bitten in the past by tests not
being enabled when we thought they were. However, the issue was mostly
with file extensions being ignored. The fix for that is not to blindly
require explicit features all the time, but instead to report all files
that are in the suite but that don't match any known test format. This
can be implemented in a follow-up patch.
Instead of having different names for the same Lit feature accross code
bases, use the same name everywhere. This NFC commit is in preparation
for a refactor where all three projects will be using the same Lit
feature detection logic, and hence it won't be convenient to use
different names for the feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78370
By renaming .fail.cpp tests that don't need clang-verify to .compile.fail.cpp,
the new test format will not try to compile these tests with clang-verify,
and the old test format will work just the same. However, this allows
removing a workaround that requires parsing each test looking for
clang-verify markup.
After this change, a .fail.cpp test should always have clang-verify markup.
When clang-verify is not supported by the compiler, we will just check that
these tests fail to compile. When clang-verify is supported, these tests
will be compiled with clang-verify whether they have markup or not (so
they should have markup, or they will fail).
This simplifies the test suite and also ensures that all of our .fail.cpp
tests provide clang-verify markup. If it's impossible for a test to have
clang-verify markup, it can be moved to a .compile.fail.cpp test, which
are unconditionally just checked for compilation failure.
The libc++ test suite has a lot of old Lit features used to XFAIL tests
and mark them as UNSUPPORTED. Many of them are to workaround problems on
old compilers or old platforms. As time goes by, it is good to go and
clean those up to simplify the configuration of the test suite, and also
to reflect the testing reality. It's not useful to have markup that gives
the impression that e.g. clang-3.3 is supported, when we don't really
test on it anymore (and hence several new tests probably don't have the
necessary markup on them).
We had a workaround because GCC 5 does not evaluate static assertions
that are dependent on template parameters. This commit removes the
workaround and marks the corresponding tests as unsupported with GCC 5.
This has the benefit of bringing the new and the old test formats closer
without having to carry a workaround for an old compiler in the new
test format.
The testing script used to test libc++ historically did not like directories
without any testing files, so these tests had been added. Since this is
not necessary anymore, we can now remove these files. This has the benefit
that the total number of tests reflects the real number of tests more
closely, and we also skip some unnecessary work (especially relevant when
running tests over SSH).
However, some nothing_to_do.pass.cpp tests actually serve the purpose of
documenting that an area of the Standard doesn't need to be tested, or is
tested elsewhere. These files are not removed by this commit.
Removal done with:
import os
import itertools
for (dirpath, dirnames, filenames) in itertools.chain(os.walk('./libcxx/test'),
os.walk('./libcxxabi/test')):
if len(filenames + dirnames) > 1 and \
any(p == 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp' for p in filenames):
os.remove(os.path.join(dirpath, 'nothing_to_do.pass.cpp'))
Forcing -Werror and other warnings means that the test suite isn't
actually testing what most people are seeing in their code -- it seems
better and less arbitrary to compile these tests as close as possible
to the compiler default instead.
Removing -Werror also means that we get to differentiate between
diagnostics that are errors and those that are warnings, which makes
the test suite more precise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76311
Some tests do not fail at all when -verify is not supported, unless some
arbitrary warning flag is added to make them fail. We currently used
-Werror=unused-result to make them fail, but doing so makes the test
suite a lot more inscrutable. It seems better to just disable those
tests when -verify is not supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76256
Summary:
Android's libc uses new/delete internally and these are counted, so
the counter needs to be reset to zero at the start of the test.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, #libc, ldionne
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Subscribers: dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76091
Louis Dionne