Move the findDbg* functions into lib/IR/DebugInfo.cpp from
lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp.
D99169 adds a call to a function (findDbgUsers) that lives in
lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp (LLVMTransformUtils) from lib/IR/Value.cpp
(LLVMCore). The Core lib doesn't include TransformUtils. The builtbots caught
this here: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/109/builds/12664. This patch
moves the function, and the 3 similar ones for consistency, into DebugInfo.cpp
which is part of LLVMCore.
Reviewed By: dblaikie, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100632
Pseudo probes, when scattered in a block, can be chained dependencies of other regular DAG nodes and block DAG combine optimizations. To fix this, scattered probes in a block are grouped and placed at the beginning of the block. This shouldn't affect the profile quality.
Test Plan:
Reviewed By: wenlei, wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100002
Follow up to a6d2a8d6f5. These were found by simply grepping for "::assume", and are the subset of that result which looked cleaner to me using the isa/dyn_cast patterns.
This is no-functional-change intended (NFC), but needed to allow
optimizer passes to use the API. See D98898 for a proposed usage
by SimplifyCFG.
I'm simplifying the code by removing the cl::opt. That was added
back with the original commit in D19488, but I don't see any
evidence in regression tests that it was used. Target-specific
overrides can use the usual patterns to adjust as necessary.
We could also restore that cl::opt, but it was not clear to me
exactly how to do it in the convoluted TTI class structure.
Fixed section of code that iterated through a SmallDenseMap and added
instructions in each iteration, causing non-deterministic code; replaced
SmallDenseMap with MapVector to prevent non-determinism.
This reverts commit 01ac6d1587.
This caused non-deterministic compiler output; see comment on the
code review.
> This patch updates the various IR passes to correctly handle dbg.values with a
> DIArgList location. This patch does not actually allow DIArgLists to be produced
> by salvageDebugInfo, and it does not affect any pass after codegen-prepare.
> Other than that, it should cover every IR pass.
>
> Most of the changes simply extend code that operated on a single debug value to
> operate on the list of debug values in the style of any_of, all_of, for_each,
> etc. Instances of setOperand(0, ...) have been replaced with with
> replaceVariableLocationOp, which takes the value that is being replaced as an
> additional argument. In places where this value isn't readily available, we have
> to track the old value through to the point where it gets replaced.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88232
This reverts commit df69c69427.
Change was reverted in commit 8d20f2c2c6 because it was causing an infinite loop. 9228f2f32 fixed the root issue in the code structure, this change just reapplies the original change w/adaptation to the new code structure.
This fixes the bug demonstrated by the test case in the commit message of 8d20f2c2 (which was a revert of cf82700). The root issue was that we have two transforms which are inverses of each other. We use one for simple induction variables (where we can use the post-inc form), and the other for everything else. The problem was that the two transforms could disagree about whether something was an induction variable.
The reverted commit made a change to one of the matcher routines which was used for one of the two transforms without updating the other matcher. However, it's worth noting the existing code w/o the reverted change also has cases where the decision could differ between the two paths.
The fix is simply to consolidate the code such that two paths must agree by construction, and to add an assert to catch any potential future re-divergence.
Triggering the infinite loop requires side stepping the SunkAddrs cache. The SunkAddrs cache has the effect of suppressing the iteration in the common case, but there are codepaths through CGP which restart iteration and clear this cache.
Unfortunately, I have not been able to construct a standalone IR test case for this. The original test case is a c++ program which when compiled by clang demonstrates the infinite loop, but all of my attempts at extracting an IR test case runnable through opt/llc have failed to reproduce. (Including capturing the IR at point of the transform itself!) I have no idea what weird state clang is creating here.
I also tried creating a test case by hand, but gave up after about an hour of trying to find the right combination to dance through multiple transforms to create the end result needed to trip the bug.
This reverts commit cf82700af8 due to a compile timeout when building the following with `clang -O2`:
```
template <class, class = int> class a;
struct b {
using d = int *;
};
struct e {
using f = b::d;
};
class g {
public:
e::f h;
e::f i;
};
template <class, class> class a : g {
public:
long j() const { return i - h; }
long operator[](long) const noexcept;
};
template <class c, class k> long a<c, k>::operator[](long l) const noexcept {
return h[l];
}
template <typename m, typename n> int fn1(m, n, const char *);
int o, p;
class D {
void q(const a<long> &);
long r;
};
void D::q(const a<long> &l) {
int s;
if (l[0])
for (; l.j(); ++s) {
if (l[s])
while (fn1(o, 0, ""))
;
r = l[s] / p;
}
}
```
This removes some (but not all) uses of type-less CreateGEP()
and CreateInBoundsGEP() APIs, which are incompatible with opaque
pointers.
There are a still a number of tricky uses left, as well as many
more variation APIs for CreateGEP.
LSR prefers to schedule iv increments just before the latch. The recent 80511565 broadened this to moving increments in the original IR. This pointed out a robustness problem with the CGP transform.
When we have a use of an induction increment outside of the loop (we canonicalize away from this form, but it happens e.g. unanalyzeable loops) we'd avoid performing the uadd/usub transform. Interestingly, all of these involve moving the increment closer to it's operands, so there's no concern about dominating all uses. We can handle that case cheaply, resulting in a more robust transform.
This patch updates the various IR passes to correctly handle dbg.values with a
DIArgList location. This patch does not actually allow DIArgLists to be produced
by salvageDebugInfo, and it does not affect any pass after codegen-prepare.
Other than that, it should cover every IR pass.
Most of the changes simply extend code that operated on a single debug value to
operate on the list of debug values in the style of any_of, all_of, for_each,
etc. Instances of setOperand(0, ...) have been replaced with with
replaceVariableLocationOp, which takes the value that is being replaced as an
additional argument. In places where this value isn't readily available, we have
to track the old value through to the point where it gets replaced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88232
In the NFC commit 8d835f42a5, the check for `!L` is
moved to a separate function `getIVIncrement` which, instead of using `BO->getParent()`,
uses `PN->getParent()`. However, these two basic blocks are not necessarily the same.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49466 demonstrates a case where `PN` is contained in
a loop while `BO` is not, causing the null-pointer dereference in `L->getLoopLatch()`.
This patch checks whether both `BO` and `PN` belong to the same loop before entering `getIVIncrement`.
Reviewed By: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98144
This patch updates DbgVariableIntrinsics to support use of a DIArgList for the
location operand, resulting in a significant change to its interface. This patch
does not update all IR passes to support multiple location operands in a
dbg.value; the only change is to update the DbgVariableIntrinsic interface and
its uses. All code outside of the intrinsic classes assumes that an intrinsic
will always have exactly one location operand; they will still support
DIArgLists, but only if they contain exactly one Value.
Among other changes, the setOperand and setArgOperand functions in
DbgVariableIntrinsic have been made private. This is to prevent code from
setting the operands of these intrinsics directly, which could easily result in
incorrect/invalid operands being set. This does not prevent these functions from
being called on a debug intrinsic at all, as they can still be called on any
CallInst pointer; it is assumed that any code directly setting the operands on a
generic call instruction is doing so safely. The intention for making these
functions private is to prevent DIArgLists from being overwritten by code that's
naively trying to replace one of the Values it points to, and also to fail fast
if a DbgVariableIntrinsic is updated to use a DIArgList without a valid
corresponding DIExpression.
This is a compile time optimization for d9e93e8e5. Not sure this matters or not, but why not do it just in case.
This does involve querying TLI with a potentially invalid addressing mode for the using instruction, but since we don't actually pass the using instruction to the TLI callback, that should be fine.
This is a compile time optimization for d9e93e8e5. As pointed out in post dommit review on the original review (D96399), there was a moderately large compile time regression with this patch and the eager computation of domtree on matcher construction is the first obvious candidate for why.
CodeGenPrepare currently first removes empty blocks, then in a loop
performs other optimizations. One of those optimizations is the removal
of call instructions that invoke @llvm.assume, which can create new
empty blocks.
This means that when a branch only contains a call to __builtin_assume(),
the empty branch will survive into MIR, and will then only be
half-removed by MIR-level optimizations (e.g. removing the branch but
leaving the condition intact).
Fix it by eliminating @llvm.expect builtin calls before removing empty
blocks.
Reviewed By: bkramer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97848
This patch enables the case where we do not completely eliminate offset.
Supposedly in this case we reduce live range overlap that never harms, but
since there are doubts this is true, this goes as a separate change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96399
Reviewed By: reames
While optimizing the memory instruction, we sometimes need to add
offset to the value of `IV`. We could avoid doing so if the `IV.next` is
already defined at the point of interest. In this case, we may get two
possible advantages from this:
- If the `IV` step happens to match with the offset, we don't need to add
the offset at all;
- We reduce overlap of live ranges of `IV` and `IV.next`. They may stop overlapping
and it will lead to better register allocation. Even if the overlap will preserve,
we are not introducing a new overlap, so it should be a neutral transform (Disabled
this patch, will come with follow-up).
Currently I've only added support for IVs that get decremented using `usub`
intrinsic. We could also support `AddInstr`, however there is some weird
interaction with some other transform that may lead to infinite compilation
in this case (seems like same transform is done and undone over and over).
I need to investigate why it happens, but generally we could do that too.
The first part only handles case where this reuse fully elimiates the offset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96399
Reviewed By: reames
The patch did not account for one corner case where cmp does not dominate
the loop latch. This patch adds this check, hopefully it's cheap because
the CFG does not change during the transform, so DT queries should be
executed quickly.
If you see compile time slowness from this, please revert.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96119
Function `replaceMathCmpWithIntrinsic` artificially limits the scope
of the optimization, setting a requirement of two instructions be in
the same block, due to two reasons:
- usage of DT for more general check is costly in terms of compile time;
- risk of creating a new value that lives through multiple blocks.
Because of this, two semantically equivalent tests may be or not be the
subject of this opt depending on where the binary operation is located.
See `test/CodeGen/X86/usub_inc_iv.ll` for motivation
There is one important particular case where this limitation is too strict:
it is when the binary operation is the increment of the induction variable.
As result, the application of this opt becomes fragile and highly reliant on
where other passes decide to place IV increment. In most cases, they place
it in the end of the latch block, killing the opt opportunity (when in fact it
does not matter where to insert the actual instruction).
This patch handles this particular case separately.
- The detector does not use dom tree and has constant cost;
- The value of IV or IV.next lives through all loop in any case, so this should not
create a new unexpected long-living value.
As result, the transform becomes more robust. It also seems to lead to
better code generation in some cases (see `test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-loop-exit-cond.ll`).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96119
Reviewed By: spatel, reames
This patch is a part of D93817 and makes transformations in CodeGen use poison for shufflevector/insertelem's initial vector element.
The change in CodeGenPrepare.cpp is fine because the mask of shufflevector should be always zero.
It doesn't touch the second element (which is poison).
The change in InterleavedAccessPass.cpp is also fine becauses the mask is of the form <a, a+m, a+2m, .., a+km> where a+km is smaller than
the size of the first vector operand.
This is guaranteed by the caller of replaceBinOpShuffles, which is lowerInterleavedLoad.
It calls isDeInterleaveMask and isDeInterleaveMaskOfFactor to check the mask is the desirable form.
isDeInterleaveMask has the check that a+km is smaller than the vector size.
To check my understanding, I added an assertion & added a test to show that this optimization doesn't fire in such case.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94056
Recently a few patches are made to move towards using select i1 instead of and/or i1 to represent "a && b"/"a || b" in C/C++.
"a && b" in C/C++ does not evaluate b if a is false whereas 'and a, b' in IR evaluates b and uses its result regardless of the result of a.
This is problematic because it can cause miscompilation if b was an erroneous operation (https://llvm.org/pr48353).
In C/C++, the result is simply false because b is not evaluated, but in IR the result is poison.
The discussion at D93065 has more context about this.
This patch makes two branch-splitting optimizations (one in SelectionDAGBuilder, one in CodeGenPrepare) recognize
select form of and/or as well using m_LogicalAnd/Or.
Since it is CodeGen, I think this is semantically ok (at least as safe as what codegen already did).
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93853
As mentioned in D93793, there are quite a few places where unary `IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector(X, Mask)` can be used
instead of `IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector(X, Undef, Mask)`.
Let's update them.
Actually, it would have been more natural if the patches were made in this order:
(1) let them use unary CreateShuffleVector first
(2) update IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector to use poison as a placeholder value (D93793)
The order is swapped, but in terms of correctness it is still fine.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93923
Clang FE currently has hot/cold function attribute. But we only have
cold function attribute in LLVM IR.
This patch adds support of hot function attribute to LLVM IR. This
attribute will be used in setting function section prefix/suffix.
Currently .hot and .unlikely suffix only are added in PGO (Sample PGO)
compilation (through isFunctionHotInCallGraph and
isFunctionColdInCallGraph).
This patch changes the behavior. The new behavior is:
(1) If the user annotates a function as hot or isFunctionHotInCallGraph
is true, this function will be marked as hot. Otherwise,
(2) If the user annotates a function as cold or
isFunctionColdInCallGraph is true, this function will be marked as
cold.
The changes are:
(1) user annotated function attribute will used in setting function
section prefix/suffix.
(2) hot attribute overwrites profile count based hotness.
(3) profile count based hotness overwrite user annotated cold attribute.
The intention for these changes is to provide the user a way to mark
certain function as hot in cases where training input is hard to cover
all the hot functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92493
optimizeGatherScatterInst does nothing specific to fixed length vectors
but uses FixedVectorType to extract the number of elements. This patch
simply updates the code to use VectorType and getElementCount instead.
For testing I just copied Transforms/CodeGenPrepare/X86/gather-scatter-opt.ll
replacing `<4 x ` with `<vscale x 4`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92572
Text section prefix is created in CodeGenPrepare, it's file format independent implementation, text section name is written into object file in TargetLoweringObjectFile, it's file format dependent implementation, port code of adding text section prefix to text section name from ELF to COFF.
Different with ELF that use '.' as concatenation character, COFF use '$' as concatenation character. That is, concatenation character is variable, so split concatenation character from text section prefix.
Text section prefix is existing feature of ELF, it can help to reduce icache and itlb misses, it's also make possible aggregate other compilers e.g. v8 created same prefix sections. Furthermore, the recent feature Machine Function Splitter (basic block level text prefix section) is based on text section prefix.
Reviewed By: pengfei, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92073
AFAICT all other set/map are correctly cleared in `runOnFunction`.
With assertion enabled this causes a crash when the module is freed and potentially if a later pass delete the instruction (not observed in real world though). Without assertion this can potentially cause confusing result when running on a new Function/Module.
Reviewed By: loladiro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84031
This change introduces a new IR intrinsic named `llvm.pseudoprobe` for pseudo-probe block instrumentation. Please refer to https://reviews.llvm.org/D86193 for the whole story.
A pseudo probe is used to collect the execution count of the block where the probe is instrumented. This requires a pseudo probe to be persisting. The LLVM PGO instrumentation also instruments in similar places by placing a counter in the form of atomic read/write operations or runtime helper calls. While these operations are very persisting or optimization-resilient, in theory we can borrow the atomic read/write implementation from PGO counters and cut it off at the end of compilation with all the atomics converted into binary data. This was our initial design and we’ve seen promising sample correlation quality with it. However, the atomics approach has a couple issues:
1. IR Optimizations are blocked unexpectedly. Those atomic instructions are not going to be physically present in the binary code, but since they are on the IR till very end of compilation, they can still prevent certain IR optimizations and result in lower code quality.
2. The counter atomics may not be fully cleaned up from the code stream eventually.
3. Extra work is needed for re-targeting.
We choose to implement pseudo probes based on a special LLVM intrinsic, which is expected to have most of the semantics that comes with an atomic operation but does not block desired optimizations as much as possible. More specifically the semantics associated with the new intrinsic enforces a pseudo probe to be virtually executed exactly the same number of times before and after an IR optimization. The intrinsic also comes with certain flags that are carefully chosen so that the places they are probing are not going to be messed up by the optimizer while most of the IR optimizations still work. The core flags given to the special intrinsic is `IntrInaccessibleMemOnly`, which means the intrinsic accesses memory and does have a side effect so that it is not removable, but is does not access memory locations that are accessible by any original instructions. This way the intrinsic does not alias with any original instruction and thus it does not block optimizations as much as an atomic operation does. We also assign a function GUID and a block index to an intrinsic so that they are uniquely identified and not merged in order to achieve good correlation quality.
Let's now look at an example. Given the following LLVM IR:
```
define internal void @foo2(i32 %x, void (i32)* %f) !dbg !4 {
bb0:
%cmp = icmp eq i32 %x, 0
br i1 %cmp, label %bb1, label %bb2
bb1:
br label %bb3
bb2:
br label %bb3
bb3:
ret void
}
```
The instrumented IR will look like below. Note that each `llvm.pseudoprobe` intrinsic call represents a pseudo probe at a block, of which the first parameter is the GUID of the probe’s owner function and the second parameter is the probe’s ID.
```
define internal void @foo2(i32 %x, void (i32)* %f) !dbg !4 {
bb0:
%cmp = icmp eq i32 %x, 0
call void @llvm.pseudoprobe(i64 837061429793323041, i64 1)
br i1 %cmp, label %bb1, label %bb2
bb1:
call void @llvm.pseudoprobe(i64 837061429793323041, i64 2)
br label %bb3
bb2:
call void @llvm.pseudoprobe(i64 837061429793323041, i64 3)
br label %bb3
bb3:
call void @llvm.pseudoprobe(i64 837061429793323041, i64 4)
ret void
}
```
Reviewed By: wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86490
OCHyams