Negative numbers are represented using DW_OP_consts along with signed representation
of the number as the argument.
Test case IR is generated using Fortran front-end.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99273
This is needed for Fortran assumed shape arrays whose dimensions are
defined as,
- 'count' is taken from array descriptor passed as parameter by
caller, access from descriptor is defined by type DIExpression.
- 'lowerBound' is defined by callee.
The current alternate way represents using upperBound in place of
count, where upperBound is calculated in callee in a temp variable
using lowerBound and count
Representation with count (DIExpression) is not only clearer as
compared to upperBound (DIVariable) but it has another advantage that
variable count is accessed by being parameter has better chance of
survival at higher optimization level than upperBound being local
variable.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99335
This patch improves salvageDebugInfoImpl by allowing it to salvage arithmetic
operations with two or more non-const operands; this includes the GetElementPtr
instruction, and most Binary Operator instructions. These salvages produce
DIArgList locations and are only valid for dbg.values, as currently variadic
DIExpressions must use DW_OP_stack_value. This functionality is also only added
for salvageDebugInfoForDbgValues; other functions that directly call
salvageDebugInfoImpl (such as in ISel or Coroutine frame building) can be
updated in a later patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91722
The LiveDebugValues and LiveDebugVariables implementations for handling
DBG_VALUE_LIST instructions can be simplified significantly if they do not have
to deal with any duplicated operands, such as a DBG_VALUE_LIST that uses the
same register multiple times in its expression. This patch adds a function,
replaceArg, that can be used to simplify a DIExpression in the case of
duplicated operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83896
This patch adds a new metadata node, DIArgList, which contains a list of SSA
values. This node is in many ways similar in function to the existing
ValueAsMetadata node, with the difference being that it tracks a list instead of
a single value. Internally, it uses ValueAsMetadata to track the individual
values, but there is also a reasonable amount of DIArgList-specific
value-tracking logic on top of that. Similar to ValueAsMetadata, it is a special
case in parsing and printing due to the fact that it requires a function state
(as it may reference function-local values).
This patch should not result in any immediate functional change; it allows for
DIArgLists to be parsed and printed, but debug variable intrinsics do not yet
recognize them as a valid argument (outside of parsing).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88175
Rewrites test to use correct architecture triple; fixes incorrect
reference in SourceLevelDebugging doc; simplifies `spillReg` behaviour
so as to not be dependent on changes elsewhere in the patch stack.
This reverts commit d2000b45d0.
This patch adds a new instruction that can represent variadic debug values,
DBG_VALUE_VAR. This patch alone covers the addition of the instruction and a set
of basic code changes in MachineInstr and a few adjacent areas, but does not
correctly handle variadic debug values outside of these areas, nor does it
generate them at any point.
The new instruction is similar to the existing DBG_VALUE instruction, with the
following differences: the operands are in a different order, any number of
values may be used in the instruction following the Variable and Expression
operands (these are referred to in code as “debug operands”) and are indexed
from 0 so that getDebugOperand(X) == getOperand(X+2), and the Expression in a
DBG_VALUE_VAR must use the DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator to pass arguments into the
expression.
The new DW_OP_LLVM_arg operator is only valid in expressions appearing in a
DBG_VALUE_VAR; it takes a single argument and pushes the debug operand at the
index given by the argument onto the Expression stack. For example the
sub-expression `DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 0` has the meaning “Push the debug operand at
index 0 onto the expression stack.”
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82363
Based on the comments in the code, the idea is that AsmPrinter is
unable to produce entry value blocks of arbitrary length, such as
DW_OP_entry_value [DW_OP_reg5 DW_OP_lit1 DW_OP_plus]. But the way the
Verifier check is written it also disallows DW_OP_entry_value
[DW_OP_reg5] DW_OP_lit1 DW_OP_plus which seems to overshoot the
target.
Note that this patch does not change any of the safety guards in
LiveDebugValues — there is zero behavior change for clang. It just
allows us to legalize more complex expressions in future patches.
rdar://73907559
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95990
New dwarf operator DW_OP_LLVM_implicit_pointer is introduced (present only in LLVM IR)
This operator is required as it is different than DWARF operator
DW_OP_implicit_pointer in representation and specification (number
and types of operands) and later can not be used as multiple level.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84113
The main change is to add a 'IsDecl' field to DIModule so
that when IsDecl is set to true, the debug info entry generated
for the module would be marked as a declaration. That way, the debugger
would look up the definition of the module in the gloabl scope.
Please see the comments in llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dimodule.ll
for what the debug info entries would look like.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93462
This is needed to support fortran assumed rank arrays which
have runtime rank.
Summary:
Fortran assumed rank arrays have dynamic rank. DWARF TAG
DW_TAG_generic_subrange is needed to support that.
Testing:
unit test cases added (hand-written)
check llvm
check debug-info
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89218
LLVM rejects DWARF operator DW_OP_over. This DWARF operator is needed
for Flang to support assumed rank array.
Summary:
Currently LLVM rejects DWARF operator DW_OP_over. Below error is
produced when llvm finds this operator.
[..]
invalid expression
!DIExpression(151, 20, 16, 48, 30, 35, 80, 34, 6)
warning: ignoring invalid debug info in over.ll
[..]
There were some parts missing in support of this operator, which are
now completed.
Testing
-added a unit testcase
-check-debuginfo
-check-llvm
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89208
This patch adds support for DWARF attribute DW_AT_rank.
Summary:
Fortran assumed rank arrays have dynamic rank. DWARF attribute
DW_AT_rank is needed to support that.
Testing:
unit test cases added (hand-written)
check llvm
check debug-info
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89141
This patch adds support for representing Fortran `character(n)`.
Primarily patch is based out of D54114 with appropriate modifications.
Test case IR is generated using our downstream classic-flang. We're in process
of upstreaming flang PR's but classic-flang has dependencies on llvm, so
this has to get in first.
Patch includes functional test case for both IR and corresponding
dwarf, furthermore it has been manually tested as well using GDB.
Source snippet:
```
program assumedLength
call sub('Hello')
call sub('Goodbye')
contains
subroutine sub(string)
implicit none
character(len=*), intent(in) :: string
print *, string
end subroutine sub
end program assumedLength
```
GDB:
```
(gdb) ptype string
type = character (5)
(gdb) p string
$1 = 'Hello'
```
Reviewed By: aprantl, schweitz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86305
Summary:
This support is needed for the Fortran array variables with pointer/allocatable
attribute. This support enables debugger to identify the status of variable
whether that is currently allocated/associated.
for pointer array (before allocation/association)
without DW_AT_associated
(gdb) pt ptr
type = integer (140737345375288:140737354129776)
(gdb) p ptr
value requires 35017956 bytes, which is more than max-value-size
with DW_AT_associated
(gdb) pt ptr
type = integer (:)
(gdb) p ptr
$1 = <not associated>
for allocatable array (before allocation)
without DW_AT_allocated
(gdb) pt arr
type = integer (140737345375288:140737354129776)
(gdb) p arr
value requires 35017956 bytes, which is more than max-value-size
with DW_AT_allocated
(gdb) pt arr
type = integer, allocatable (:)
(gdb) p arr
$1 = <not allocated>
Testing
- unit test cases added
- check-llvm
- check-debuginfo
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83544
This patch upgrades DISubrange to support fortran requirements.
Summary:
Below are the updates/addition of fields.
lowerBound - Now accepts signed integer or DIVariable or DIExpression,
earlier it accepted only signed integer.
upperBound - This field is now added and accepts signed interger or
DIVariable or DIExpression.
stride - This field is now added and accepts signed interger or
DIVariable or DIExpression.
This is required to describe bounds of array which are known at runtime.
Testing:
unit test cases added (hand-written)
check clang
check llvm
check debug-info
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80197
This patch adds support for DWARF attribute DW_AT_data_location.
Summary:
Dynamic arrays in fortran are described by array descriptor and
data allocation address. Former is mapped to DW_AT_location and
later is mapped to DW_AT_data_location.
Testing:
unit test cases added (hand-written)
check llvm
check debug-info
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79592
llvm rejects DWARF operator DW_OP_push_object_address.This DWARF
operator is needed for Flang to support allocatable array.
Summary:
Currently llvm rejects DWARF operator DW_OP_push_object_address.
below error is produced when llvm finds this operator.
[..]
invalid expression
!DIExpression(151)
warning: ignoring invalid debug info in pushobj.ll
[..]
There are some parts missing in support of this operator, need to
be completed.
Testing
-added a unit testcase
-check-debuginfo
-check-llvm
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79306
This patch extends DIModule Debug metadata in LLVM to support
Fortran modules. DIModule is extended to contain File and Line
fields, these fields will be used by Flang FE to create debug
information necessary for representing Fortran modules at IR level.
Furthermore DW_TAG_module is also extended to contain these fields.
If these fields are missing, debuggers like GDB won't be able to
show Fortran modules information correctly.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79484
The current strategy LICM uses when sinking for debuginfo is
that of picking the debug location of one of the uses.
This causes stepping to be wrong sometimes, see, e.g. PR45523.
This patch introduces a generalization of getMergedLocation(),
that operates on a vector of locations instead of two, and try
to merge all them together, and use the new API in LICM.
<rdar://problem/61750950>
When compiling
```
struct S {
float w;
};
void f(long w, long b);
void g(struct S s) {
int w = s.w;
f(w, w*4);
}
```
I get Assertion failed: ((!CombinedExpr || CombinedExpr->isValid()) && "Combined debug expression is invalid").
That's because we combine two epxressions that both end in DW_OP_stack_value:
```
(lldb) p Expr->dump()
!DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 32, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 64, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_stack_value)
(lldb) p Param.Expr->dump()
!DIExpression(DW_OP_constu, 4, DW_OP_mul, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 32, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 64, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_stack_value)
(lldb) p CombinedExpr->isValid()
(bool) $0 = false
(lldb) p CombinedExpr->dump()
!DIExpression(4097, 32, 5, 4097, 64, 5, 16, 4, 30, 4097, 32, 5, 4097, 64, 5, 159, 159)
```
I believe that in this particular case combining two stack values is
safe, but I didn't want to sink the special handling into
DIExpression::append() because I do want everyone to think about what
they are doing.
Patch by Adrian Prantl.
Fixes PR45181.
rdar://problem/60383095
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76164
LLVM currently supports CSK_MD5 and CSK_SHA1 source file checksums in
debug info. This change adds support for CSK_SHA256 checksums.
The SHA256 checksums are supported by the CodeView debug format.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75785
In order for dsymutil to collect .apinotes files (which capture
attributes such as nullability, Swift import names, and availability),
I want to propose adding an apinotes: field to DIModule that gets
translated into a DW_AT_LLVM_apinotes (path) nested inside
DW_TAG_module. This will be primarily used by LLDB to indirectly
extract the Swift names of Clang declarations that were deserialized
from DWARF.
<rdar://problem/59514626>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75585
This is part of PR44213 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
When importing (system) Clang modules, LLDB needs to know which SDK
(e.g., MacOSX, iPhoneSimulator, ...) they came from. While the sysroot
attribute contains the absolute path to the SDK, this doesn't work
well when the debugger is run on a different machine than the
compiler, and the SDKs are installed in different directories. It thus
makes sense to just store the name of the SDK instead of the absolute
path, so it can be found relative to LLDB.
rdar://problem/51645582
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75646
Previously we would also accept DISubprograms that matched in name
only, but this doesn't appear to be necessary any more.
I did a Full and Thin LTO build of Clang and it completed without a warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75213
in C++ templates."
This was reverted in 802b22b5c8 due to
missing .bc file and a chromium bot failure.
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1057559#c1
This revision address both of them.
Summary:
This patch adds support for debuginfo generation for defaulted
parameters in clang and also extends corresponding DebugMetadata/IR to support this feature.
Reviewers: probinson, aprantl, dblaikie
Reviewed By: aprantl, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73462
The Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll test is failing:
FAIL: LLVM :: Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll (5894 of 36324)
******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1'; /usr/local/google/home/thakis/src/llvm-project/out/gn/bin/llvm-dis -o - /usr/local/google/home/thakis/src/llvm-project/llvm/test/Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll.bc | /usr/local/google/home/thakis/src/llvm-project/out/gn/bin/FileCheck /usr/local/google/home/thakis/src/llvm-project/llvm/test/Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll
--
Exit Code: 2
Command Output (stderr):
--
It looks like the Bitcode/DITemplateParameter-5.0.ll.bc file was never checked in.
This reverts commit c2b437d53d.
in C++ templates.
Summary:
This patch adds support for debuginfo generation for defaulted
parameters in clang and also extends corresponding DebugMetadata/IR to support this feature.
Reviewers: probinson, aprantl, dblaikie
Reviewed By: aprantl, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73462
[this re-applies c0176916a4
with the correct commit message and phabricator link]
This addresses point 1 of PR44213.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
The DW_AT_LLVM_sysroot attribute is used for Clang module debug info,
to allow LLDB to import a Clang module from source. Currently it is
part of each DW_TAG_module, however, it is the same for all modules in
a compile unit. It is more efficient and less ambiguous to store it
once in the DW_TAG_compile_unit.
This should have no effect on DWARF consumers other than LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71732
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
This reverts commit 1f3dd83cc1, reapplying
commit bb1b0bc4e5.
The original commit failed on some builds seemingly due to the use of a
bracketed constructor with an std::array, i.e. `std::array<> arr({...})`.
Previously, LLVM had no functional way of performing casts inside of a
DIExpression(), which made salvaging cast instructions other than Noop
casts impossible. This patch enables the salvaging of casts by using the
DW_OP_LLVM_convert operator for SExt and Trunc instructions.
There is another issue which is exposed by this fix, in which fragment
DIExpressions (which are preserved more readily by this patch) for
values that must be split across registers in ISel trigger an assertion,
as the 'split' fragments extend beyond the bounds of the fragment
DIExpression causing an error. This patch also fixes this issue by
checking the fragment status of DIExpressions which are to be split, and
dropping fragments that are invalid.
The DebugVariable class is a class declared in LiveDebugValues.cpp which
is used to uniquely identify a single variable, using its source
variable, inline location, and fragment info to do so. This patch moves
this class into DebugInfoMetadata.h, making it available in a much
broader scope.
DIExpressions with shift operators should not be fragmented for the same
reason as arithmetic operators: carry over cannot be expressed from one
fragment to the other, so an invalid result would be produced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70601
Summary:
Also, replace the SmallVector with a normal C array.
Reviewers: vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70498
DIExpression::isImplicit() did not handle DW_OP_LLVM_fragment
correctly. It was scanning the elements in the expression by
iterating from the end. But we do not know the position of
ops unless we iterate from the beginning of the expression,
since DW_OP:s and their operands are stored flat in the expression
list. The old code also assumed that a DW_OP_LLVM_fragment
only occupied one element in the expression list, but it actually
occupies three elements.
Summary:
Internally in LLVM's metadata we use DW_OP_entry_value operations with
the same semantics as DWARF; that is, its operand specifies the number
of bytes that the entry value covers.
At the time of emitting entry values we don't know the emitted size of
the DWARF expression that the entry value will cover. Currently the size
is hardcoded to 1 in DIExpression, and other values causes the verifier
to fail. As the size is 1, that effectively means that we can only have
valid entry values for registers that can be encoded in one byte, which
are the registers with DWARF numbers 0 to 31 (as they can be encoded as
single-byte DW_OP_reg0..DW_OP_reg31 rather than a multi-byte
DW_OP_regx). It is a bit confusing, but it seems like llvm-dwarfdump
will print an operation "correctly", even if the byte size is less than
that, which may make it seem that we emit correct DWARF for registers
with DWARF numbers > 31. If you instead use readelf for such cases, it
will interpret the number of specified bytes as a DWARF expression. This
seems like a limitation in llvm-dwarfdump.
As suggested in D66746, a way forward would be to add an internal
variant of DW_OP_entry_value, DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value, whose operand
instead specifies the number of operations that the entry value covers,
and we then translate that into the byte size at the time of emission.
In this patch that internal operation is added. This patch keeps the
limitation that a entry value can only be applied to simple register
locations, but it will fix the issue with the size operand being
incorrect for DWARF numbers > 31.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, djtodoro, NikolaPrica
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: jyknight, fedor.sergeev, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67492
llvm-svn: 374881
Amy Huang