Summary:
This patch registers OpenMPOpt as a Module pass in addition to a CGSCC
pass. This is so certain optimzations that are sensitive to intact
call-sites can happen before inlining. The old `openmpopt` pass name is
changed to `openmp-opt-cgscc` and `openmp-opt` calls the Module pass.
The current module pass only runs a single check but will be expanded in
the future.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99202
Lookup tables generate non PIC-friendly code, which requires dynamic relocation as described in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45244
This patch adds a new pass that converts lookup tables to relative lookup tables to make them PIC-friendly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94355
Retry of 330619a3a6 that includes a clang test update.
Original commit message:
If we run passes before lowering llvm.expect intrinsics to metadata,
then those passes have no way to act on the hints provided by llvm.expect.
SimplifyCFG is the known offender, and we made it smarter about profile
metadata in D98898 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98898>.
In the motivating example from https://llvm.org/PR49336 , this means we
were ignoring the recommended method for a programmer to tell the compiler
that a compare+branch is expensive. This change appears to solve that case -
the metadata survives to the backend, the compare order is as expected in IR,
and the backend does not do anything to reverse it.
We make the same change to the old pass manager to keep things synchronized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100213
If we run passes before lowering llvm.expect intrinsics to metadata,
then those passes have no way to act on the hints provided by llvm.expect.
SimplifyCFG is the known offender, and we made it smarter about profile
metadata in D98898.
In the motivating example from https://llvm.org/PR49336 , this means we
were ignoring the recommended method for a programmer to tell the compiler
that a compare+branch is expensive. This change appears to solve that case -
the metadata survives to the backend, the compare order is as expected in IR,
and the backend does not do anything to reverse it.
We make the same change to the old pass manager to keep things synchronized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100213
Lookup tables generate non PIC-friendly code, which requires dynamic relocation as described in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45244
This patch adds a new pass that converts lookup tables to relative lookup tables to make them PIC-friendly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94355
Lookup tables generate non PIC-friendly code, which requires dynamic relocation as described in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45244
This patch adds a new pass that converts lookup tables to relative lookup tables to make them PIC-friendly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94355
Summary:
The IR is saved in its print form before each pass is started and a
signal handler is registered. If the compilation crashes, the signal
handler will print the saved IR to dbgs(). This option
can be modified using -print-module-scope to get the IR for the complete
module. Note that this option only works with the new pass manager.
Author: Jamie Schmeiser <schmeise@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed By: aeubanks (Arthur Eubanks) yrouban (Yevgeny Rouban)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86657
Lookup tables generate non PIC-friendly code, which requires dynamic relocation as described in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45244
This patch adds a new pass that converts lookup tables to relative lookup tables to make them PIC-friendly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94355
D96109 was recently submitted which contains the refactored implementation of
-funique-internal-linakge-names by adding the unique suffixes in clang rather
than as an LLVM pass. Deleting the former implementation in this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98234
We have the `enable-loopinterchange` option in legacy pass manager but not in NPM.
Add `LoopInterchange` pass to the optimization pipeline (at the same position as before)
when `enable-loopinterchange` is turned on.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98116
We're running into undefined references using ThinLTO with -O0 on
Windows/Chrome. This fixes that.
This matches the legacy PM.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97414
-O1 and above do dont call real optimizer pipeline in ThinLTO PreLink.
Also clang can't add PostLink OptimizerLastEPCallbacks for in-process ThinLTO.
This results in missing sanitizer passes with ThinLTO.
Simple working solution is just call OptimizerLastEPCallbacks
at the end of buildThinLTOPreLinkDefaultPipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96320
For ThinLTO, PreLink ICP is skipped to favor better profile annotation during LTO PostLink. This change applies the same tweak for MonoLTO. Note that PreLink ICP not only makes PostLink profile annotation harder, it is also uncoordinated with PostLink ICP so duplicated ICP could happen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97028
This enables use of MemorySSA instead of MemDep in MemCpyOpt. To
allow this without significant compile-time impact, the MemCpyOpt
pass is moved directly before DSE (in the cases where this was not
already the case), which allows us to reuse the existing MemorySSA
analysis.
Unlike the MemDep-based implementation, the MemorySSA-based MemCpyOpt
can also perform simple optimizations across basic blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94376
The NPM LTO pipeline has a lot of fixme's and missing passes, causing a
lot of regressions after the switch in c70737b. Notably unrolling and
vectorization were both disabled, but many other passes are missing
compared to the old pass manager. This attempt to enable the most
obvious missing passes like the unroller, vectorization and other loop
passes, fixing the existing FIXME comments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96780
The PrepareForLTO stage of LoopRotate tries to avoid unrolling loops
with calls that might be inlined later. See D94232 where this was
introduced.
We didn't catch all occurances of the LoopRotatePass in the New Pass
Manager, so the original regression in astar returned with the pass
manager switch.
The GPUDivergenceAnalysis is now renamed to just "DivergenceAnalysis"
since there is no conflict with LegacyDivergenceAnalysis. In the
legacy PM, this analysis can only be used through the legacy DA
serving as a wrapper. It is now made available as a pass in the new
PM, and has no relation with the legacy DA.
The new DA currently cannot handle irreducible control flow; its
presence can cause the analysis to run indefinitely. The analysis is
now modified to detect this and report all instructions in the
function as divergent. This is super conservative, but allows the
analysis to be used without hanging the compiler.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96615
It seems nicer to list passes given a flag rather than displaying all
passes in opt --help.
This is awkwardly structured because a PassBuilder is required, but
reusing the PassBuilder in runPassPipeline() doesn't work because we
read the input IR before getting to runPassPipeline(). So printing the
list of passes needs to happen before reading the input IR. If we remove
the legacy PM code in main() and move everything from NewPMDriver.cpp
into opt.cpp, we can create the PassBuilder before reading IR and check
if we should print the list of passes and exit. But until then this hack
seems fine.
Compared to the legacy PM, the new PM passes are lacking descriptions.
We'll need to figure out a way to add descriptions if we think this is
important.
Also, this only works for passes specified in PassRegistry.def. If we
want to print other custom registered passes, we'll need a different
mechanism.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96101
Sample re-annotation is required in LTO time to achieve a reasonable post-inline profile quality. However, we have seen that such LTO-time re-annotation degrades profile quality. This is mainly caused by preLTO code duplication that is done by passes such as loop unrolling, jump threading, indirect call promotion etc, where samples corresponding to a source location are aggregated multiple times due to the duplicates. In this change we are introducing a concept of distribution factor for pseudo probes so that samples can be distributed for duplicated probes scaled by a factor. We hope that optimizations duplicating code well-maintain the branch frequency information (BFI) based on which probe distribution factors are calculated. Distribution factors are updated at the end of preLTO pipeline to reflect an estimated portion of the real execution count.
This change also introduces a pseudo probe verifier that can be run after each IR passes to detect duplicated pseudo probes.
A saturated distribution factor stands for 1.0. A pesudo probe will carry a factor with the value ranged from 0.0 to 1.0. A 64-bit integral distribution factor field that represents [0.0, 1.0] is associated to each block probe. Unfortunately this cannot be done for callsite probes due to the size limitation of a 32-bit Dwarf discriminator. A 7-bit distribution factor is used instead.
Changes are also needed to the sample profile inliner to deal with prorated callsite counts. Call sites duplicated by PreLTO passes, when later on inlined in LTO time, should have the callees’s probe prorated based on the Prelink-computed distribution factors. The distribution factors should also be taken into account when computing hotness for inline candidates. Also, Indirect call promotion results in multiple callisites. The original samples should be distributed across them. This is fixed by adjusting the callisites' distribution factors.
Reviewed By: wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93264
Some benchmarks regress with non-trivial unswitching, so add an option
to opt-out of performing non-trivial unswitching while investigating.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95796
As it looks like NewPM generally is using SimpleLoopUnswitch
instead of LoopUnswitch, this patch also use SimpleLoopUnswitch
in the ExtraVectorizerPasses sequence (compared with LegacyPM
which use the LoopUnswitch pass).
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95457
D84108 exposed a bad interaction between inlining and loop-rotation
during regular LTO, which is causing notable regressions in at least
CINT2006/473.astar.
The problem boils down to: we now rotate a loop just before the vectorizer
which requires duplicating a function call in the preheader when compiling
the individual files ('prepare for LTO'). But this then prevents further
inlining of the function during LTO.
This patch tries to resolve this issue by making LoopRotate more
conservative with respect to rotating loops that have inline-able calls
during the 'prepare for LTO' stage.
I think this change intuitively improves the current situation in
general. Loop-rotate tries hard to avoid creating headers that are 'too
big'. At the moment, it assumes all inlining already happened and the
cost of duplicating a call is equal to just doing the call. But with LTO,
inlining also happens during full LTO and it is possible that a previously
duplicated call is actually a huge function which gets inlined
during LTO.
From the perspective of LV, not much should change overall. Most loops
calling user-provided functions won't get vectorized to start with
(unless we can infer that the function does not touch memory, has no
other side effects). If we do not inline the 'inline-able' call during
the LTO stage, we merely delayed loop-rotation & vectorization. If we
inline during LTO, chances should be very high that the inlined code is
itself vectorizable or the user call was not vectorizable to start with.
There could of course be scenarios where we inline a sufficiently large
function with code not profitable to vectorize, which would have be
vectorized earlier (by scalarzing the call). But even in that case,
there probably is no big performance impact, because it should be mostly
down to the cost-model to reject vectorization in that case. And then
the version with scalarized calls should also not be beneficial. In a way,
LV should have strictly more information after inlining and make more
accurate decisions (barring cost-model issues).
There is of course plenty of room for things to go wrong unexpectedly,
so we need to keep a close look at actual performance and address any
follow-up issues.
I took a look at the impact on statistics for
MultiSource/SPEC2000/SPEC2006. There are a few benchmarks with fewer
loops rotated, but no change to the number of loops vectorized.
Reviewed By: sanwou01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94232
Expanding from D94808 - we ensure the same InlineAdvisor is used by both
InlinerPass instances. The notion of mandatory inlining is moved into
the core InlineAdvisor: advisors anyway have to handle that case, so
this change also factors out that a bit better.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94825
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90402 was inconsistent with where it put
LoopFlatten between the two pass managers. It also missed adding it to
the non-O1 function simplification pipeline.
PR48738
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94650
to Pass.h.
In some compiler passes like SampleProfileLoaderPass, we want to know which
LTO/ThinLTO phase the pass is in. Currently the phase is represented in enum
class PassBuilder::ThinLTOPhase, so it is only available in PassBuilder and
it also cannot represent phase in full LTO. The patch extends it to include
full LTO phases and move it from PassBuilder.h to Pass.h, then it is much
easier for PassBuilder to communiate with each pass about current LTO phase.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94613
This currently blocks --print-before/after with a legacy PM pass, for
example when we use the new PM for the optimization pipeline but the
legacy PM for the codegen pipeline. Also in the future when the codegen
pipeline works with the new PM there will be multiple places to specify
passes, so even when everything is using the new PM, there will still be
multiple places that can accept different pass names.
Reviewed By: hoy, ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94283
bb7d3af113 disabled hoisting in SimplifyCFG by default, but enabled it
late in the pipeline. But it appears as if the LTO pipelines got missed.
This patch adjusts the LTO pipelines to also enable hoisting in the
later stages.
Unfortunately there's no easy way to add a test for the change I think.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93684
`UniqueInternalLinkageNamesPass` is useful to CSSPGO, especially when pseudo probe is used. It solves naming conflict for static functions which otherwise will share a merged profile and likely have a profile quality issue with mismatched CFG checksums. Since the pseudo probe instrumentation happens very early in the pipeline, I'm moving `UniqueInternalLinkageNamesPass` right before it. This is being done only to the new pass manager.
Reviewed By: dblaikie, aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93656
CGSCCOptimizerLateEPCallbacks are supposed to be run before the function
simplification pipeline, like in the legacy PM and as specified in the
comments for registerCGSCCOptimizerLateEPCallback().
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93871
AMDGPUTargetMachine::adjustPassManager() adds some alias analyses to the
legacy PM. We need a way to do the same for the new PM in order to port
AMDGPUTargetMachine::adjustPassManager() to the new PM.
Currently the new PM adds alias analyses by creating an AAManager via
PassBuilder and overriding the AAManager a PassManager uses via
FunctionAnalysisManager::registerPass().
We will continue to respect a custom AA pipeline that specifies an exact
AA pipeline to use, but for "default" we will now add alias analyses
that backends specify. Most uses of PassManager use the "default"
AAManager created by PassBuilder::buildDefaultAAPipeline(). Backends can
override the newly added TargetMachine::registerAliasAnalyses() to add custom
alias analyses.
Reviewed By: ychen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93261
Extracting the similar regions is the first step in the IROutliner.
Using the IRSimilarityIdentifier, we collect the SimilarityGroups and
sort them by how many instructions will be removed. Each
IRSimilarityCandidate is used to define an OutlinableRegion. Each
region is ordered by their occurrence in the Module and the regions that
are not compatible with previously outlined regions are discarded.
Each region is then extracted with the CodeExtractor into its own
function.
We test that correctly extract in:
test/Transforms/IROutliner/extraction.ll
test/Transforms/IROutliner/address-taken.ll
test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-same-globals.ll
test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-same-constants.ll
test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-different-structure.ll
Recommit of bf899e8913 fixing memory
leaks.
Reviewers: paquette, jroelofs, yroux
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86975
This is being recommitted to try and address the MSVC complaint.
This patch implements a DDG printer pass that generates a graph in
the DOT description language, providing a more visually appealing
representation of the DDG. Similar to the CFG DOT printer, this
functionality is provided under an option called -dot-ddg and can
be generated in a less verbose mode under -dot-ddg-only option.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90159
This patch implements a DDG printer pass that generates a graph in
the DOT description language, providing a more visually appealing
representation of the DDG. Similar to the CFG DOT printer, this
functionality is provided under an option called -dot-ddg and can
be generated in a less verbose mode under -dot-ddg-only option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90159
Joseph Huber