Commit Graph

4539 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Arthur Eubanks 326da4adcb [FuncAttrs] Always preserve FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy
FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy should not be preserved if any of its
keys may be invalid. Since we are not removing/adding functions in
FuncAttrs, it's fine to preserve it.

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100893
2021-04-20 16:37:45 -07:00
Joseph Huber b2ad63d3cf [OpenMP] Add OpenMPOpt as a Module pass
Summary:
This patch registers OpenMPOpt as a Module pass in addition to a CGSCC
pass. This is so certain optimzations that are sensitive to intact
call-sites can happen before inlining. The old `openmpopt` pass name is
changed to `openmp-opt-cgscc` and `openmp-opt` calls the Module pass.
The current module pass only runs a single check but will be expanded in
the future.

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99202
2021-04-20 12:28:58 -04:00
Arthur Eubanks 5e71b9fa93 Explicitly pass type to cast load constant folding result
Previously we would use the type of the pointee to determine what to
cast the result of constant folding a load. To aid with opaque pointer
types, we should explicitly pass the type of the load rather than
looking at pointee types.

ConstantFoldLoadThroughBitcast() converts the const prop'd value to the
proper load type (e.g. [1 x i32] -> i32). Instead of calling this in
every intermediate step like bitcasts, we only call this when we
actually see the global initializer value.

In some existing uses of this API, we don't know the exact type we're
loading from immediately (e.g. first we visit a bitcast, then we visit
the load using the bitcast). In those cases we have to manually call
ConstantFoldLoadThroughBitcast() when simplifying the load to make sure
that we cast to the proper type.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100718
2021-04-20 00:53:21 -07:00
Zequan Wu e28435caf6 [ThinLTO] Copy UnnamedAddr when spliting module.
The unnamedaddr property of a function is lost when using
`-fwhole-program-vtables` and thinlto which causes size increase under linker's
safe icf mode.

The size increase of chrome on Linux when switching from all icf to safe icf
drops from 5 MB to 3 MB after this change, and from 6 MB to 4 MB on Windows.

There is a repro:
```
# a.h
struct A {
  virtual int f();
  virtual int g();
};

# a.cpp
#include "a.h"
int A::f() { return 10; }
int A::g() { return 10; }

# main.cpp
#include "a.h"

int g(A* a) {
  return a->f();
}

int main(int argv, char** args) {
  A a;
  return g(&a);
}

$ clang++ -O2 -ffunction-sections -flto=thin -fwhole-program-vtables -fsplit-lto-unit -c main.cpp -o main.o  && clang++ -Wl,--icf=safe -fuse-ld=lld  -flto=thin main.o -o a.out && llvm-readobj -t a.out | grep -A 1 -e _ZN1A1fEv -e _ZN1A1gEv
    Name: _ZN1A1fEv (480)
    Value: 0x201830
--
    Name: _ZN1A1gEv (490)
    Value: 0x201840
```

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100498
2021-04-19 14:04:58 -07:00
Philip Reames 3c54762226 [funcattrs] Consistently check call site attributes
This is mostly stylistic cleanup after D100226, but not entirely. When skimming the code, I found one case where we weren't accounting for attributes on the callsite at all. I'm also suspicious we had some latent bugs related to operand bundles (which are supposed to be able to *override* attributes on declarations), but I don't have concrete test cases for those, just suspicions.

Aside: The only case left in the file which directly checks attributes on the declaration is the norecurse logic. I left that because I didn't understand it; it looks obviously wrong, so I suspect I'm misinterpreting the intended semantics of the attribute.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100689
2021-04-19 13:20:50 -07:00
Philip Reames 11707435cc [inferattrs] Don't infer lib func attributes for nobuiltin functions
If we have a nobuiltin function, we can't assume we know anything about the implementation.

I noticed this when tracing through a log from an in the wild miscompile (https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/9443) triggered after 8666463.  We were incorrectly assuming that a custom allocator could not free.  (It's not clear yet this is the only problem in said issue.)

I also noticed something similiar mentioned in the commit message of ab243e when scrolling back through history.  Through, from what I can tell, that commit fixed symptom not root cause.

The interface we have for library function detection is extremely error prone, but given the interaction between ``nobuiltin`` decls and ``builtin`` callsites, it's really hard to imagine something much cleaner.  I may iterate on that, but it'll be invasive enough I didn't want to hold an obvious functional fix on it.
2021-04-16 15:36:15 -07:00
Philip Reames f549176ad9 [funcattrs] Add the maximal set of implied attributes to definitions
Have funcattrs expand all implied attributes into the IR. This expands the infrastructure from D100400, but for definitions not declarations this time.

Somewhat subtly, this mostly isn't semantic. Because the accessors did the inference, any client which used the accessor was already getting the stronger result. Clients that directly checked presence of attributes (there are some), will see a stronger result now.

The old behavior can end up quite confusing for two reasons:
* Without this change, we have situations where function-attrs appears to fail when inferring an attribute (as seen by a human reading IR), but that consuming code will see that it should have been implied. As a human trying to sanity check test results and study IR for optimization possibilities, this is exceeding error prone and confusing. (I'll note that I wasted several hours recently because of this.)
* We can have transforms which trigger without the IR appearing (on inspection) to meet the preconditions. This change doesn't prevent this from happening (as the accessors still involve multiple checks), but it should make it less frequent.

I'd argue in favor of deleting the extra checks out of the accessors after this lands, but I want that in it's own review as a) it's purely stylistic, and b) I already know there's some disagreement.

Once this lands, I'm also going to do a cleanup change which will delete some now redundant duplicate predicates in the inference code, but again, that deserves to be a change of it's own.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100226
2021-04-16 14:22:19 -07:00
Philip Reames dd985551c2 Reapply "[InferAttributes] Materialize all infered attributes for declaration"" and follow on patches.
This reverts commit ab98f2c712 and 98eea392cd.

It includes a fix for the clang test which triggered the revert.  I failed to notice this one because there was another AMDGPU llvm test with a similiar name and the exact same text in the error message.  Odd.  Since only one build bot reported the clang test, I didn't notice that one.
2021-04-14 16:38:07 -07:00
Nico Weber ab98f2c712 Revert "[InferAttributes] Materialize all infered attributes for declaration"
Breaks check-clang, see comments on D100400

Also revert follow-up "[NFC] Move a recently added utility into a location to enable reuse"

This reverts commit 3ce61fb6d6.
This reverts commit 61a85da882.
2021-04-14 18:41:20 -04:00
Philip Reames 3ce61fb6d6 [NFC] Move a recently added utility into a location to enable reuse
About to refresh a patch that uses this in FunctionAtrrs, doing the move seperately to control build times.
2021-04-14 15:05:16 -07:00
Philip Reames 61a85da882 [InferAttributes] Materialize all infered attributes for declaration
We have some cases today where attributes can be inferred from another on access, but the result is not explicitly materialized in IR. This change is a step towards changing that.

Why? Two main reasons:

* Human clarity. It's really confusing trying to figure out why a transform is triggering when the IR doesn't appear to have the required attributes.
* This avoids the need to special case declarations in e.g. functionattrs. Since we can assume the attribute is present, we can work directly from attributes (and only attributes) without also needing to query accessors on Function to avoid missing cases due to unannotated (but infered on use) declarations. (This piece will appear must easier to follow once D100226 also lands.)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100400
2021-04-14 14:45:24 -07:00
Sterling Augustine 32e264921b Revert "[GlobalOpt] Revert valgrind hacks"
This reverts commit dbc16ed199.
2021-04-13 17:47:07 -07:00
Evgeny Leviant dbc16ed199 [GlobalOpt] Revert valgrind hacks
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69428
2021-04-13 19:11:10 +03:00
Sanjay Patel 661cc71a1c [PassManager][PhaseOrdering] lower expects before running simplifyCFG
Retry of 330619a3a6 that includes a clang test update.

Original commit message:

If we run passes before lowering llvm.expect intrinsics to metadata,
then those passes have no way to act on the hints provided by llvm.expect.
SimplifyCFG is the known offender, and we made it smarter about profile
metadata in D98898 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D98898>.

In the motivating example from https://llvm.org/PR49336 , this means we
were ignoring the recommended method for a programmer to tell the compiler
that a compare+branch is expensive. This change appears to solve that case -
the metadata survives to the backend, the compare order is as expected in IR,
and the backend does not do anything to reverse it.

We make the same change to the old pass manager to keep things synchronized.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100213
2021-04-12 15:07:53 -04:00
Sanjay Patel 23ac9d1e6e Revert "[PassManager][PhaseOrdering] lower expects before running simplifyCFG"
This reverts commit 330619a3a6.
There are clang tests that also need to be updated.
2021-04-12 13:58:54 -04:00
Sanjay Patel 330619a3a6 [PassManager][PhaseOrdering] lower expects before running simplifyCFG
If we run passes before lowering llvm.expect intrinsics to metadata,
then those passes have no way to act on the hints provided by llvm.expect.
SimplifyCFG is the known offender, and we made it smarter about profile
metadata in D98898.

In the motivating example from https://llvm.org/PR49336 , this means we
were ignoring the recommended method for a programmer to tell the compiler
that a compare+branch is expensive. This change appears to solve that case -
the metadata survives to the backend, the compare order is as expected in IR,
and the backend does not do anything to reverse it.

We make the same change to the old pass manager to keep things synchronized.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100213
2021-04-12 12:23:31 -04:00
Roman Lebedev e8c7f43e2c
[NFC][ConstantRange] Add 'icmp' helper method
"Does the predicate hold between two ranges?"

Not very surprisingly, some places were already doing this check,
without explicitly naming the algorithm, cleanup them all.
2021-04-10 19:38:55 +03:00
Roman Lebedev 7b12c8c59d
Revert "[NFC][ConstantRange] Add 'icmp' helper method"
This reverts commit 17cf2c9423.
2021-04-10 19:37:53 +03:00
Roman Lebedev 17cf2c9423
[NFC][ConstantRange] Add 'icmp' helper method
"Does the predicate hold between two ranges?"

Not very surprisingly, some places were already doing this check,
without explicitly naming the algorithm, cleanup them all.
2021-04-10 19:09:52 +03:00
Philip Reames 35393c865c [funcattrs] Infer nosync from instruction walk
Pretty straightforward use of existing infrastructure and port of the attributor inference rules for nosync.

A couple points of interest:
* I deliberately switched from "monotonic or better" to "unordered or better". This is simply me being conservative and is better in line with the rest of the optimizer. We treat monotonic conservatively pretty much everywhere.
* The operand bundle test change is suspicious. It looks like we might have missed something here, but if so, it's an issue with the existing nofree inference as well. I'm going to take a closer look at that separately.
* I needed to keep the previous inference from readnone. This surprised me, but made sense once I realized readonly inference goes to lengths to reason about local vs non-local memory and that writes to local memory are okay. This is fine for the purpose of nosync, but would e.g. prevent us from inferring nofree from readnone - which is slightly surprising.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99769
2021-04-08 14:05:00 -07:00
wlei 6d5132b426 [CSSPGO] Fix incorrect probe distribution factor computation in top-down inliner
We see a regression related to low probe factor(0.01) which prevents some callsites being promoted in ICPPass and later cause the missing inline in CGSCC inliner. The root cause is due to redundant(the second) multiplication of the probe factor and this change try to fix it.

`Sum` does multiply a factor right after findCallSamples but later when using as the parameter in setProbeDistributionFactor, it multiplies one again.

This change could get ~2% perf back on mcf benchmark. In mcf, previously the corresponding factor is 1 and it's the recent feature introducing the <1 factor then trigger this bug.

Reviewed By: hoy, wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99787
2021-04-07 08:48:59 -07:00
Philip Reames 908215b346 Use AssumeInst in a few more places [nfc]
Follow up to a6d2a8d6f5.  These were found by simply grepping for "::assume", and are the subset of that result which looked cleaner to me using the isa/dyn_cast patterns.
2021-04-06 13:18:53 -07:00
Philip Reames 9ef6aa020b Plumb AssumeInst through operand bundle apis [nfc]
Follow up to a6d2a8d6f5.  This covers all the public interfaces of the bundle related code.  I tried to cleanup the internals where the changes were obvious, but there's definitely more room for improvement.
2021-04-06 12:53:53 -07:00
Jan Svoboda fb6a5237aa Revert "[IR] Ignore bitcasts of function pointers which are only used as callees in callbase instruction"
This reverts commit 167ea67d

This causes a bunch of build failures:
* http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/121/builds/6287
* http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage1-RA/19915
2021-04-06 16:33:28 +02:00
Abhina Sreeskantharajan 82b3e28e83 [SystemZ][z/OS][Windows] Add new OF_TextWithCRLF flag and use this flag instead of OF_Text
Problem:
On SystemZ we need to open text files in text mode. On Windows, files opened in text mode adds a CRLF '\r\n' which may not be desirable.

Solution:
This patch adds two new flags

  - OF_CRLF which indicates that CRLF translation is used.
  - OF_TextWithCRLF = OF_Text | OF_CRLF indicates that the file is text and uses CRLF translation.

Developers should now use either the OF_Text or OF_TextWithCRLF for text files and OF_None for binary files. If the developer doesn't want carriage returns on Windows, they should use OF_Text, if they do want carriage returns on Windows, they should use OF_TextWithCRLF.

So this is the behaviour per platform with my patch:

z/OS:
OF_None: open in binary mode
OF_Text : open in text mode
OF_TextWithCRLF: open in text mode

Windows:
OF_None: open file with no carriage return
OF_Text: open file with no carriage return
OF_TextWithCRLF: open file with carriage return

The Major change is in llvm/lib/Support/Windows/Path.inc to only set text mode if the OF_CRLF is set.
```
  if (Flags & OF_CRLF)
    CrtOpenFlags |= _O_TEXT;
```

These following files are the ones that still use OF_Text which I left unchanged. I modified all these except raw_ostream.cpp in recent patches so I know these were previously in Binary mode on Windows.
./llvm/lib/Support/raw_ostream.cpp
./llvm/lib/TableGen/Main.cpp
./llvm/tools/dsymutil/DwarfLinkerForBinary.cpp
./llvm/unittests/Support/Path.cpp
./clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/HTMLDiagnostics.cpp
./clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp
./clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp
./clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp

Reviewed By: MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99426
2021-04-06 07:23:31 -04:00
madhur13490 167ea67d76 [IR] Ignore bitcasts of function pointers which are only used as callees in callbase instruction
This patch enhances hasAddressTaken() to ignore bitcasts as a
callee in callbase instruction. Such bitcast usage doesn't really take
the address in a useful meaningful way.

Reviewed By: rampitec

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98884
2021-04-06 09:23:46 +00:00
Roman Lebedev a26f1bf67e
[PassManager] Run additional LICM before LoopRotate
Loop rotation often has to perform code duplication
from header into preheader, which introduces PHI nodes.

>>! In D99204, @thopre wrote:
>
> With loop peeling, it is important that unnecessary PHIs be avoided or
> it will leads to spurious peeling. One source of such PHIs is loop
> rotation which creates PHIs for invariant loads. Those PHIs are
> particularly problematic since loop peeling is now run as part of simple
> loop unrolling before GVN is run, and are thus a source of spurious
> peeling.
>
> Note that while some of the load can be hoisted and eventually
> eliminated by instruction combine, this is not always possible due to
> alignment issue. In particular, the motivating example [1] was a load
> inside a class instance which cannot be hoisted because the `this'
> pointer has an alignment of 1.
>
> [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20210312/4ce73c47/attachment.cpp

Now, we could enhance LoopRotate to avoid duplicating code when not needed,
but instead hoist loop-invariant code, but isn't that a code duplication? (*sic*)
We have LICM, and in fact we already run it right after LoopRotation.

We could try to move it to before LoopRotation,
that is basically free from compile-time perspective:
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=6c93eb4477d88af046b915bc955c03693b2cbb58&to=a4bee6d07732b1184c436da489040b912f0dc271&stat=instructions
But, looking at stats, i think it isn't great that we would no longer do LICM after LoopRotation, in particular:
| statistic name                                   | LoopRotate-LICM | LICM-LoopRotate |     Δ |       % | abs(%) |
| asm-printer.EmittedInsts                         | 9015930         | 9015799         |  -131 |   0.00% |  0.00% |
| indvars.NumElimCmp                               | 3536            | 3544            |     8 |   0.23% |  0.23% |
| indvars.NumElimExt                               | 36725           | 36580           |  -145 |  -0.39% |  0.39% |
| indvars.NumElimIV                                | 1197            | 1187            |   -10 |  -0.84% |  0.84% |
| indvars.NumElimIdentity                          | 143             | 136             |    -7 |  -4.90% |  4.90% |
| indvars.NumElimRem                               | 4               | 5               |     1 |  25.00% | 25.00% |
| indvars.NumLFTR                                  | 29842           | 29890           |    48 |   0.16% |  0.16% |
| indvars.NumReplaced                              | 2293            | 2227            |   -66 |  -2.88% |  2.88% |
| indvars.NumSimplifiedSDiv                        | 6               | 8               |     2 |  33.33% | 33.33% |
| indvars.NumWidened                               | 26438           | 26329           |  -109 |  -0.41% |  0.41% |
| instcount.TotalBlocks                            | 1178338         | 1173840         | -4498 |  -0.38% |  0.38% |
| instcount.TotalFuncs                             | 111825          | 111829          |     4 |   0.00% |  0.00% |
| instcount.TotalInsts                             | 9905442         | 9896139         | -9303 |  -0.09% |  0.09% |
| lcssa.NumLCSSA                                   | 425871          | 423961          | -1910 |  -0.45% |  0.45% |
| licm.NumHoisted                                  | 378357          | 378753          |   396 |   0.10% |  0.10% |
| licm.NumMovedCalls                               | 2193            | 2208            |    15 |   0.68% |  0.68% |
| licm.NumMovedLoads                               | 35899           | 31821           | -4078 | -11.36% | 11.36% |
| licm.NumPromoted                                 | 11178           | 11154           |   -24 |  -0.21% |  0.21% |
| licm.NumSunk                                     | 13359           | 13587           |   228 |   1.71% |  1.71% |
| loop-delete.NumDeleted                           | 8547            | 8402            |  -145 |  -1.70% |  1.70% |
| loop-instsimplify.NumSimplified                  | 12876           | 11890           |  -986 |  -7.66% |  7.66% |
| loop-peel.NumPeeled                              | 1008            | 925             |   -83 |  -8.23% |  8.23% |
| loop-rotate.NumNotRotatedDueToHeaderSize         | 368             | 365             |    -3 |  -0.82% |  0.82% |
| loop-rotate.NumRotated                           | 42015           | 42003           |   -12 |  -0.03% |  0.03% |
| loop-simplifycfg.NumLoopBlocksDeleted            | 240             | 242             |     2 |   0.83% |  0.83% |
| loop-simplifycfg.NumLoopExitsDeleted             | 497             | 20              |  -477 | -95.98% | 95.98% |
| loop-simplifycfg.NumTerminatorsFolded            | 618             | 336             |  -282 | -45.63% | 45.63% |
| loop-unroll.NumCompletelyUnrolled                | 11028           | 11032           |     4 |   0.04% |  0.04% |
| loop-unroll.NumUnrolled                          | 12608           | 12529           |   -79 |  -0.63% |  0.63% |
| mem2reg.NumDeadAlloca                            | 10222           | 10221           |    -1 |  -0.01% |  0.01% |
| mem2reg.NumPHIInsert                             | 192110          | 192106          |    -4 |   0.00% |  0.00% |
| mem2reg.NumSingleStore                           | 637650          | 637643          |    -7 |   0.00% |  0.00% |
| scalar-evolution.NumBruteForceTripCountsComputed | 814             | 812             |    -2 |  -0.25% |  0.25% |
| scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsComputed           | 283108          | 282934          |  -174 |  -0.06% |  0.06% |
| scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsNotComputed        | 106712          | 106718          |     6 |   0.01% |  0.01% |
| simple-loop-unswitch.NumBranches                 | 5178            | 4752            |  -426 |  -8.23% |  8.23% |
| simple-loop-unswitch.NumCostMultiplierSkipped    | 914             | 503             |  -411 | -44.97% | 44.97% |
| simple-loop-unswitch.NumSwitches                 | 20              | 18              |    -2 | -10.00% | 10.00% |
| simple-loop-unswitch.NumTrivial                  | 183             | 95              |   -88 | -48.09% | 48.09% |

... but that actually regresses LICM (-12% `licm.NumMovedLoads`),
loop-simplifycfg (`NumLoopExitsDeleted`, `NumTerminatorsFolded`),
simple-loop-unswitch (`NumTrivial`).

What if we instead have LICM both before and after LoopRotate?
| statistic name                                | LoopRotate-LICM | LICM-LoopRotate-LICM |     Δ |       % | abs(%) |
| asm-printer.EmittedInsts                      | 9015930         | 9014474              | -1456 |  -0.02% |  0.02% |
| indvars.NumElimCmp                            | 3536            | 3546                 |    10 |   0.28% |  0.28% |
| indvars.NumElimExt                            | 36725           | 36681                |   -44 |  -0.12% |  0.12% |
| indvars.NumElimIV                             | 1197            | 1185                 |   -12 |  -1.00% |  1.00% |
| indvars.NumElimIdentity                       | 143             | 146                  |     3 |   2.10% |  2.10% |
| indvars.NumElimRem                            | 4               | 5                    |     1 |  25.00% | 25.00% |
| indvars.NumLFTR                               | 29842           | 29899                |    57 |   0.19% |  0.19% |
| indvars.NumReplaced                           | 2293            | 2299                 |     6 |   0.26% |  0.26% |
| indvars.NumSimplifiedSDiv                     | 6               | 8                    |     2 |  33.33% | 33.33% |
| indvars.NumWidened                            | 26438           | 26404                |   -34 |  -0.13% |  0.13% |
| instcount.TotalBlocks                         | 1178338         | 1173652              | -4686 |  -0.40% |  0.40% |
| instcount.TotalFuncs                          | 111825          | 111829               |     4 |   0.00% |  0.00% |
| instcount.TotalInsts                          | 9905442         | 9895452              | -9990 |  -0.10% |  0.10% |
| lcssa.NumLCSSA                                | 425871          | 425373               |  -498 |  -0.12% |  0.12% |
| licm.NumHoisted                               | 378357          | 383352               |  4995 |   1.32% |  1.32% |
| licm.NumMovedCalls                            | 2193            | 2204                 |    11 |   0.50% |  0.50% |
| licm.NumMovedLoads                            | 35899           | 35755                |  -144 |  -0.40% |  0.40% |
| licm.NumPromoted                              | 11178           | 11163                |   -15 |  -0.13% |  0.13% |
| licm.NumSunk                                  | 13359           | 14321                |   962 |   7.20% |  7.20% |
| loop-delete.NumDeleted                        | 8547            | 8538                 |    -9 |  -0.11% |  0.11% |
| loop-instsimplify.NumSimplified               | 12876           | 12041                |  -835 |  -6.48% |  6.48% |
| loop-peel.NumPeeled                           | 1008            | 924                  |   -84 |  -8.33% |  8.33% |
| loop-rotate.NumNotRotatedDueToHeaderSize      | 368             | 365                  |    -3 |  -0.82% |  0.82% |
| loop-rotate.NumRotated                        | 42015           | 42005                |   -10 |  -0.02% |  0.02% |
| loop-simplifycfg.NumLoopBlocksDeleted         | 240             | 241                  |     1 |   0.42% |  0.42% |
| loop-simplifycfg.NumTerminatorsFolded         | 618             | 619                  |     1 |   0.16% |  0.16% |
| loop-unroll.NumCompletelyUnrolled             | 11028           | 11029                |     1 |   0.01% |  0.01% |
| loop-unroll.NumUnrolled                       | 12608           | 12525                |   -83 |  -0.66% |  0.66% |
| mem2reg.NumPHIInsert                          | 192110          | 192073               |   -37 |  -0.02% |  0.02% |
| mem2reg.NumSingleStore                        | 637650          | 637652               |     2 |   0.00% |  0.00% |
| scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsComputed        | 283108          | 282998               |  -110 |  -0.04% |  0.04% |
| scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsNotComputed     | 106712          | 106691               |   -21 |  -0.02% |  0.02% |
| simple-loop-unswitch.NumBranches              | 5178            | 5185                 |     7 |   0.14% |  0.14% |
| simple-loop-unswitch.NumCostMultiplierSkipped | 914             | 925                  |    11 |   1.20% |  1.20% |
| simple-loop-unswitch.NumTrivial               | 183             | 179                  |    -4 |  -2.19% |  2.19% |
| simple-loop-unswitch.NumBranches              | 5178            | 4752                 |  -426 |  -8.23% |  8.23% |
| simple-loop-unswitch.NumCostMultiplierSkipped | 914             | 503                  |  -411 | -44.97% | 44.97% |
| simple-loop-unswitch.NumSwitches              | 20              | 18                   |    -2 | -10.00% | 10.00% |
| simple-loop-unswitch.NumTrivial               | 183             | 95                   |   -88 | -48.09% | 48.09% |

I.e. we end up with less instructions, less peeling, more LICM activity,
also note how none of those 4 regressions are here. Namely:

| statistic name                                   | LICM-LoopRotate | LICM-LoopRotate-LICM |     Δ |        % |   abs(%) |
| asm-printer.EmittedInsts                         | 9015799         | 9014474              | -1325 |   -0.01% |    0.01% |
| indvars.NumElimCmp                               | 3544            | 3546                 |     2 |    0.06% |    0.06% |
| indvars.NumElimExt                               | 36580           | 36681                |   101 |    0.28% |    0.28% |
| indvars.NumElimIV                                | 1187            | 1185                 |    -2 |   -0.17% |    0.17% |
| indvars.NumElimIdentity                          | 136             | 146                  |    10 |    7.35% |    7.35% |
| indvars.NumLFTR                                  | 29890           | 29899                |     9 |    0.03% |    0.03% |
| indvars.NumReplaced                              | 2227            | 2299                 |    72 |    3.23% |    3.23% |
| indvars.NumWidened                               | 26329           | 26404                |    75 |    0.28% |    0.28% |
| instcount.TotalBlocks                            | 1173840         | 1173652              |  -188 |   -0.02% |    0.02% |
| instcount.TotalInsts                             | 9896139         | 9895452              |  -687 |   -0.01% |    0.01% |
| lcssa.NumLCSSA                                   | 423961          | 425373               |  1412 |    0.33% |    0.33% |
| licm.NumHoisted                                  | 378753          | 383352               |  4599 |    1.21% |    1.21% |
| licm.NumMovedCalls                               | 2208            | 2204                 |    -4 |   -0.18% |    0.18% |
| licm.NumMovedLoads                               | 31821           | 35755                |  3934 |   12.36% |   12.36% |
| licm.NumPromoted                                 | 11154           | 11163                |     9 |    0.08% |    0.08% |
| licm.NumSunk                                     | 13587           | 14321                |   734 |    5.40% |    5.40% |
| loop-delete.NumDeleted                           | 8402            | 8538                 |   136 |    1.62% |    1.62% |
| loop-instsimplify.NumSimplified                  | 11890           | 12041                |   151 |    1.27% |    1.27% |
| loop-peel.NumPeeled                              | 925             | 924                  |    -1 |   -0.11% |    0.11% |
| loop-rotate.NumRotated                           | 42003           | 42005                |     2 |    0.00% |    0.00% |
| loop-simplifycfg.NumLoopBlocksDeleted            | 242             | 241                  |    -1 |   -0.41% |    0.41% |
| loop-simplifycfg.NumLoopExitsDeleted             | 20              | 497                  |   477 | 2385.00% | 2385.00% |
| loop-simplifycfg.NumTerminatorsFolded            | 336             | 619                  |   283 |   84.23% |   84.23% |
| loop-unroll.NumCompletelyUnrolled                | 11032           | 11029                |    -3 |   -0.03% |    0.03% |
| loop-unroll.NumUnrolled                          | 12529           | 12525                |    -4 |   -0.03% |    0.03% |
| mem2reg.NumDeadAlloca                            | 10221           | 10222                |     1 |    0.01% |    0.01% |
| mem2reg.NumPHIInsert                             | 192106          | 192073               |   -33 |   -0.02% |    0.02% |
| mem2reg.NumSingleStore                           | 637643          | 637652               |     9 |    0.00% |    0.00% |
| scalar-evolution.NumBruteForceTripCountsComputed | 812             | 814                  |     2 |    0.25% |    0.25% |
| scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsComputed           | 282934          | 282998               |    64 |    0.02% |    0.02% |
| scalar-evolution.NumTripCountsNotComputed        | 106718          | 106691               |   -27 |   -0.03% |    0.03% |
| simple-loop-unswitch.NumBranches                 | 4752            | 5185                 |   433 |    9.11% |    9.11% |
| simple-loop-unswitch.NumCostMultiplierSkipped    | 503             | 925                  |   422 |   83.90% |   83.90% |
| simple-loop-unswitch.NumSwitches                 | 18              | 20                   |     2 |   11.11% |   11.11% |
| simple-loop-unswitch.NumTrivial                  | 95              | 179                  |    84 |   88.42% |   88.42% |

{F15983613} {F15983615} {F15983616}
(this is vanilla llvm testsuite + rawspeed + darktable)

As an example of the code where early LICM only is bad, see:
https://godbolt.org/z/GzEbacs4K

This does have an observable compile-time regression of +~0.5% geomean
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7c5222e4d1a3a14f029e5f614c9aefd0fa505f1e&to=5d81826c3411982ca26e46b9d0aff34c80577664&stat=instructions
but i think that's basically nothing, and there's potential that it might
be avoidable in the future by fixing clang to produce alignment information
on function arguments, thus making the second run unneeded.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99249
2021-04-02 11:11:42 +03:00
Philip Reames b23a314146 [funcattrs] Respect nofree attribute on callsites (not just callee) 2021-04-01 14:45:49 -07:00
Philip Reames 1e69a5af92 [Attributor] Cleanup detection of non-relaxed atomics in nosync inference
The code was checking for cases which are disallowed by the verifier.  Delete dead code and adjust style.
2021-04-01 12:01:29 -07:00
Philip Reames 8e596f7e27 [Attributor] Cleanup intrinsic handling in nosync inference [mostly NFC]
Mostly stylistic adjustment, but the old code didn't handle the memcpy.inline intrinsic.  By using the matcher class, we now do.
2021-04-01 11:49:59 -07:00
Philip Reames 6ef4505298 [funcattrs] Infer nosync from readnone and non-convergent
This implements the most basic possible nosync inference. The choice of inference rule is taken from the comments in attributor and the discussion on the review of the change which introduced the nosync attribute (0626367202).

This is deliberately minimal. As noted in code comments, I do plan to add a more robust inference which actually scans the function IR directly, but a) I need to do some refactoring of the attributor code to use common interfaces, and b) I wanted to get something in. I also wanted to minimize the "interesting" analysis discussion since that's time intensive.

Context: This combines with existing nofree attribute inference to help prove dereferenceability in the ongoing deref-at-point semantics work.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99749
2021-04-01 11:37:34 -07:00
Philip Reames ffa15e9463 Extract isVolatile helper on Instruction [NFCI]
We have this logic duplicated in several cases, none of which were exhaustive.  Consolidate it in one place.

I don't believe this actually impacts behavior of the callers.  I think they all filter their inputs such that their partial implementations were correct.  If not, this might be fixing a cornercase bug.
2021-04-01 11:24:02 -07:00
Philip Reames 6b05d753e0 Mark unordered memset/memmove/memcpy as nosync
Mostly a means to remove a bit of code from attributor in advance of implementing a FuncAttr inference for nosync.
2021-04-01 10:38:54 -07:00
spupyrev 22998738e8 [SamplePGO] Keeping prof metadata for IndirectBrInst
Currently prof metadata with branch counts is added only for BranchInst and SwitchInst, but not for IndirectBrInst. As a result, BPI/BFI make incorrect inferences for indirect branches, which can be very hot.
This diff adds metadata for IndirectBrInst, in addition to BranchInst and SwitchInst.

Reviewed By: wmi, wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99550
2021-03-30 10:44:48 -07:00
Hongtao Yu 3e3fc431df [CSSPGO] Top-down processing order based on full profile.
Use profiled call edges to augment the top-down order. There are cases that the top-down order computed based on the static call graph doesn't reflect real execution order. For example:

1. Incomplete static call graph due to unknown indirect call targets. Adjusting the order by considering indirect call edges from the profile can enable the inlining of indirect call targets by allowing the caller processed before them.

2. Mutual call edges in an SCC. The static processing order computed for an SCC may not reflect the call contexts in the context-sensitive profile, thus may cause potential inlining to be overlooked. The function order in one SCC is being adjusted to a top-down order based on the profile to favor more inlining.

3. Transitive indirect call edges due to inlining. When a callee function is inlined into into a caller function in LTO prelink, every call edge originated from the callee will be transferred to the caller. If any of the transferred edges is indirect, the original profiled indirect edge, even if considered, would not enforce a top-down order from the caller to the potential indirect call target in LTO postlink since the inlined callee is gone from the static call graph.

4. #3 can happen even for direct call targets, due to functions defined in header files. Header functions, when included into source files, are defined multiple times but only one definition survives due to ODR. Therefore, the LTO prelink inlining done on those dropped definitions can be useless based on a local file scope. More importantly, the inlinee, once fully inlined to a to-be-dropped inliner, will have no profile to consume when its outlined version is compiled. This can lead to a profile-less prelink compilation for the outlined version of the inlinee function which may be called from external modules. while this isn't easy to fix, we rely on the postlink AutoFDO pipeline to optimize the inlinee. Since the survived copy of the inliner (defined in headers) can be inlined in its local scope in prelink, it may not exist in the merged IR in postlink, and we'll need the profiled call edges to enforce a top-down order for the rest of the functions.

Considering those cases, a profiled call graph completely independent of the static call graph is constructed based on profile data, where function objects are not even needed to handle case #3 and case 4.

I'm seeing an average 0.4% perf win out of SPEC2017. For certain benchmark such as Xalanbmk and GCC, the win is bigger, above 2%.

The change is an enhancement to https://reviews.llvm.org/D95988.

Reviewed By: wmi, wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99351
2021-03-30 10:42:22 -07:00
Krasimir Georgiev c51e91e046 Revert "[Passes] Add relative lookup table converter pass"
This reverts commit 5178ffc7cf.

Compiling `llvm-profdata` with a compiler build from this produces a
crashing binary.
2021-03-30 14:13:37 +02:00
Sander de Smalen f71ed5dfe2 NFC: Migrate PartialInlining to work on InstructionCost
This patch migrates cost values and arithmetic to work on InstructionCost.
When the interfaces to TargetTransformInfo are changed, any InstructionCost
state will propagate naturally.

See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91174
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146408.html

Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97382
2021-03-30 11:59:45 +01:00
Huihui Zhang ca721042f1 [IPO][SampleContextTracker] Use SmallVector to track context profiles to prevent non-determinism.
Use SmallVector instead of SmallSet to track the context profiles mapped. Doing this
can help avoid non-determinism caused by iterating over unordered containers.

This bug was found with reverse iteration turning on,
--extra-llvm-cmake-variables="-DLLVM_REVERSE_ITERATION=ON".
Failing LLVM test profile-context-tracker-debug.ll .

Reviewed By: MaskRay, wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99547
2021-03-29 16:37:10 -07:00
Gulfem Savrun Yeniceri 5178ffc7cf [Passes] Add relative lookup table converter pass
Lookup tables generate non PIC-friendly code, which requires dynamic relocation as described in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45244

This patch adds a new pass that converts lookup tables to relative lookup tables to make them PIC-friendly.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94355
2021-03-29 21:53:32 +00:00
Wenlei He 30b0232336 [CSSPGO][llvm-profgen] Context-sensitive global pre-inliner
This change sets up a framework in llvm-profgen to estimate inline decision and adjust context-sensitive profile based on that. We call it a global pre-inliner in llvm-profgen.

It will serve two purposes:
  1) Since context profile for not inlined context will be merged into base profile, if we estimate a context will not be inlined, we can merge the context profile in the output to save profile size.
  2) For thinLTO, when a context involving functions from different modules is not inined, we can't merge functions profiles across modules, leading to suboptimal post-inline count quality. By estimating some inline decisions, we would be able to adjust/merge context profiles beforehand as a mitigation.

Compiler inline heuristic uses inline cost which is not available in llvm-profgen. But since inline cost is closely related to size, we could get an estimate through function size from debug info. Because the size we have in llvm-profgen is the final size, it could also be more accurate than the inline cost estimation in the compiler.

This change only has the framework, with a few TODOs left for follow up patches for a complete implementation:
  1) We need to retrieve size for funciton//inlinee from debug info for inlining estimation. Currently we use number of samples in a profile as place holder for size estimation.
  2) Currently the thresholds are using the values used by sample loader inliner. But they need to be tuned since the size here is fully optimized machine code size, instead of inline cost based on not yet fully optimized IR.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99146
2021-03-29 09:46:14 -07:00
Hans Wennborg c6e5c4654b Don't use $ as suffix for symbol names in ThinLTOBitcodeWriter and other places
Using $ breaks demangling of the symbols. For example,

$ c++filt _Z3foov\$123
_Z3foov$123

This causes problems for developers who would like to see nice stack traces
etc., but also for automatic crash tracking systems which try to organize
crashes based on the stack traces.

Instead, use the period as suffix separator, since Itanium demanglers normally
ignore such suffixes:

$ c++filt _Z3foov.123
foo() [clone .123]

This is already done in some places; try to do it everywhere.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97484
2021-03-29 13:03:52 +02:00
Hongtao Yu 12ac0403b1 [CSSPGO][NFC] Fix a debug dump issue.
During context promotion, intermediate nodes that are on a call path but do not come with a profile can be promoted together with their parent nodes. Do not print sample context string for such nodes since they do not have profile.

Reviewed By: wenlei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99441
2021-03-26 16:06:56 -07:00
Chris Lattner 62c41cfba1 Add a missing file header comment, NFC. 2021-03-26 15:34:04 -07:00
Nikita Popov 4622648a06 Revert "[ArgPromotion] Copy additional metadata for loads."
This reverts commit 166620a4f0.

A miscompile has been reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D93927#2653480
and following.
2021-03-26 21:34:54 +01:00
Wenlei He 5f59f407f5 [CSSPGO] Minor tweak for inline candidate priority tie breaker
When prioritize call site to consider for inlining in sample loader, use number of samples as a first tier breaker before using name/guid comparison. This would favor smaller functions when hotness is the same (from the same block). We could try to retrieve accurate function size if this turns out to be more important.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99370
2021-03-25 21:15:36 -07:00
Guozhi Wei 3240910f00 [DAE] Adjust param/arg attributes when changing parameter to undef
In DeadArgumentElimination pass, if a function's argument is never used, corresponding caller's parameter can be changed to undef. If the param/arg has attribute noundef or other related attributes, LLVM LangRef(https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#parameter-attributes) says its behavior is undefined. SimplifyCFG(D97244) takes advantage of this behavior and does bad transformation on valid code.

To avoid this undefined behavior when change caller's parameter to undef, this patch removes noundef attribute and other attributes imply noundef on param/arg.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98899
2021-03-25 14:53:22 -07:00
Gulfem Savrun Yeniceri 5fbe1fdf17 Revert "[Passes] Add relative lookup table converter pass"
This reverts commit 5fd001a5ff
because it broke clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu bot.
2021-03-24 18:59:33 +00:00
Gulfem Savrun Yeniceri 5fd001a5ff [Passes] Add relative lookup table converter pass
Lookup tables generate non PIC-friendly code, which requires dynamic relocation as described in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45244

This patch adds a new pass that converts lookup tables to relative lookup tables to make them PIC-friendly.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94355
2021-03-24 17:31:18 +00:00
Gulfem Savrun Yeniceri e3a6d70c68 Revert "[Passes] Add relative lookup table converter pass"
This reverts commit 78a65cd945 which
caused buildbot failures.
2021-03-23 00:43:16 +00:00
Gulfem Savrun Yeniceri 78a65cd945 [Passes] Add relative lookup table converter pass
Lookup tables generate non PIC-friendly code, which requires dynamic relocation as described in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45244

This patch adds a new pass that converts lookup tables to relative lookup tables to make them PIC-friendly.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94355
2021-03-22 22:09:02 +00:00