Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikita Popov bb939ebfd7 [BasicAA] Handle known non-zero variable index
BasicAA currently handles cases like Scale*V0 + (-Scale)*V1 where
V0 != V1, but does not handle the simpler case of Scale*V with
V != 0. Add it based on an isKnownNonZero() call.

I'm not passing a context instruction for now, because the existing
approach of always using GEP1 for context could result in symmetry
issues.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93162
2020-12-13 13:20:05 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks feeed16a5f [NewPM][BasicAA] basicaa -> basic-aa in Analysis/BasicAA
Following https://reviews.llvm.org/D82607.

Reviewed By: ychen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82683
2020-06-26 14:58:01 -07:00
Florian Hahn 9a7d80a32c Revert "[BasicAA] Use known lower bounds for index values for size based check."
This potentially related to https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46335
and causes a slight compile-time regression. Revert while investigating.

This reverts commit d99a1848c4.
2020-06-20 10:06:05 +01:00
Florian Hahn d99a1848c4 [BasicAA] Use known lower bounds for index values for size based check.
Currently, BasicAA does not exploit information about value ranges of
indexes. For example, consider the 2 pointers %a = %base and
%b = %base + %stride below, assuming they are used to access 4 elements.

If we know that %stride >= 4, we know the accesses do not alias. If
%stride is a constant, BasicAA currently gets that. But if the >= 4
constraint is encoded using an assume, it misses the NoAlias.

This patch extends DecomposedGEP to include an additional MinOtherOffset
field, which tracks the constant offset similar to the existing
OtherOffset, which the difference that it also includes non-negative
lower bounds on the range of the index value. When checking if the
distance between 2 accesses exceeds the access size, we can use this
improved bound.

For now this is limited to using non-negative lower bounds for indices,
as this conveniently skips cases where we do not have a useful lower
bound (because it is not constrained). We potential miss out in cases
where the lower bound is constrained but negative, but that can be
exploited in the future.

Reviewers: sanjoy, hfinkel, reames, asbirlea

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76194
2020-05-30 16:20:42 +01:00
Michael Kruse 47f856095a [BasicAA] Use MayAlias instead of PartialAlias for fallback.
Using various methods, BasicAA tries to determine whether two
GetElementPtr memory locations alias when its base pointers are known
to be equal. When none of its heuristics are applicable, it falls back
to PartialAlias to, according to a comment, protect TBAA making a wrong
decision in case of unions and malloc. PartialAlias is not correct,
because a PartialAlias result implies that some, but not all, bytes
overlap which is not necessarily the case here.

AAResults returns the first analysis result that is not MayAlias.
BasicAA is always the first alias analysis. When it returns
PartialAlias, no other analysis is queried to give a more exact result
(which was the intention of returning PartialAlias instead of MayAlias).
For instance, ScopedAA could return a more accurate result.

The PartialAlias hack was introduced in r131781 (and re-applied in
r132632 after some reverts) to fix llvm.org/PR9971 where TBAA returns a
wrong NoAlias result due to a union. A test case for the malloc case
mentioned in the comment was not provided and I don't think it is
affected since it returns an omnipotent char anyway.

Since r303851 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D33328) clang does emit specific
TBAA for unions anymore (but "omnipotent char" instead). Hence, the
PartialAlias workaround is not required anymore.

This patch passes the test-suite and check-llvm/check-clang of a
self-hoisted build on x64.

Reviewed By: hfinkel

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34318

llvm-svn: 305938
2017-06-21 18:25:37 +00:00
Quentin Colombet 5989bc6f41 [BasicAA] Fix the handling of sext and zext in the analysis of GEPs.
Hopefully this will end the GEPs saga!

This commit reverts r245394, i.e., it reapplies r221876 while incorporating the
fixes from D11847.
r221876 was not reapplied alone because it was not safe and D11847 was not
applied alone because it needs r221876 to produce correct results.

This should fix PR24596.

Original commit message for r221876:
Let's try this again...

This reverts r219432, plus a bug fix.

Description of the bug in r219432 (by Nick):

The bug was using AllPositive to break out of the loop; if the loop break
condition i != e is changed to i != e && AllPositive then the
test_modulo_analysis_with_global test I've added will fail as the Modulo will
be calculated incorrectly (as the last loop iteration is skipped, so Modulo
isn't updated with its Scale).

Nick also adds this comment:

ComputeSignBit is safe to use in loops as it takes into account phi nodes, and
the  == EK_ZeroEx check is safe in loops as, no matter how the variable changes
between iterations, zero-extensions will always guarantee a zero sign bit. The
isValueEqualInPotentialCycles check is therefore definitely not needed as all
the variable analysis holds no matter how the variables change between loop
iterations.

And this patch also adds another enhancement to GetLinearExpression - basically
to convert ConstantInts to Offsets (see test_const_eval and
test_const_eval_scaled for the situations this improves).

Original commit message:

This reverts r218944, which reverted r218714, plus a bug fix.

Description of the bug in r218714 (by Nick):

The original patch forgot to check if the Scale in VariableGEPIndex flipped the
sign of the variable. The BasicAA pass iterates over the instructions in the
order they appear in the function, and so BasicAliasAnalysis::aliasGEP is
called with the variable it first comes across as parameter GEP1. Adding a
%reorder label puts the definition of %a after %b so aliasGEP is called with %b
as the first parameter and %a as the second. aliasGEP later calculates that %a
== %b + 1 - %idxprom where %idxprom >= 0 (if %a was passed as the first
parameter it would calculate %b == %a - 1 + %idxprom where %idxprom >= 0) -
ignoring that %idxprom is scaled by -1 here lead the patch to incorrectly
conclude that %a > %b.

Revised patch by Nick White, thanks! Thanks to Lang to isolating the bug.
Slightly modified by me to add an early exit from the loop and avoid
unnecessary, but expensive, function calls.

Original commit message:

Two related things:

1. Fixes a bug when calculating the offset in GetLinearExpression. The code
   previously used zext to extend the offset, so negative offsets were converted
   to large positive ones.

2. Enhance aliasGEP to deduce that, if the difference between two GEP
   allocations is positive and all the variables that govern the offset are also
   positive (i.e. the offset is strictly after the higher base pointer), then
   locations that fit in the gap between the two base pointers are NoAlias.

Patch by Nick White!

Message from D11847:
Un-revert of r241981 and fix for PR23626. The 'Or' case of GetLinearExpression
delegates to 'Add' if possible, and if not it returns an Opaque value.
Unfortunately the Scale and Offsets weren't being set (and so defaulted to 0) -
and a scale of zero effectively removes the variable from the GEP instruction.
This meant that BasicAA would return MustAliases when it should have been
returning PartialAliases (and PR23626 was an example of the GVN pass using an
incorrect MustAlias to merge loads from what should have been different
pointers).

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11847
Patch by Nick White <n.j.white@gmail.com>!

llvm-svn: 246502
2015-08-31 22:32:47 +00:00