This patch renames the "Initial" member of WasmLimits to the name used
in the spec, "Minimum".
In the core WebAssembly specification, the Limits data type has one
required "min" member and one optional "max" member, indicating the
minimum required size of the corresponding table or memory, and the
maximum size, if any.
Although the WebAssembly spec does instantiate locally-defined tables
and memories with the initial size being equal to the minimum size, it
can't impose such a requirement for imports. It doesn't make sense to
require an initial size for a memory import, for example. The compiler
can only sensibly express the minimum and maximum sizes.
See
https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-types/blob/master/proposals/js-types/Overview.md#naming-of-size-limits
for a related discussion that agrees that the right name of "initial" is
"minimum" when querying the type of a table or memory from JavaScript.
(Of course it still makes sense for JS to speak in terms of an initial
size when it explicitly instantiates memories and tables.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99186
The WebAssembly text and binary formats have different operand orders
for the "type" and "table" fields of call_indirect (and
return_call_indirect). In LLVM we use the binary order for the MCInstr,
but when we produce or consume the text format we should use the text
order. For compilation units targetting WebAssembly 1.0 (without the
reference types feature), we omit the table operand entirely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97761
If the reference-types feature is enabled, call_indirect will explicitly
reference its corresponding function table via TABLE_NUMBER
relocations against a table symbol.
Also, as before, address-taken functions can also cause the function
table to be created, only with reference-types they additionally cause a
symbol table entry to be emitted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90948
If the reference-types feature is enabled, call_indirect will explicitly
reference its corresponding function table via `TABLE_NUMBER`
relocations against a table symbol.
Also, as before, address-taken functions can also cause the function
table to be created, only with reference-types they additionally cause a
symbol table entry to be emitted.
We abuse the used-in-reloc flag on symbols to indicate which tables
should end up in the symbol table. We do this because unfortunately
older wasm-ld will carp if it see a table symbol.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90948
This reverts commit 418df4a6ab.
This change broke emscripten tests, I believe because it started
generating 5-byte a wide table index in the call_indirect instruction.
Neither v8 nor wabt seem to be able to handle that. The spec
currently says that this is single 0x0 byte and:
"In future versions of WebAssembly, the zero byte occurring in the
encoding of the call_indirectcall_indirect instruction may be used to
index additional tables."
So we need to revisit this change. For backwards compat I guess
we need to guarantee that __indirect_function_table is always at
address zero. We could also consider making this a single-byte
relocation with and assert if have more than 127 tables (for now).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95005
This patch changes to make call_indirect explicitly refer to the
corresponding function table, residualizing TABLE_NUMBER relocs against
it.
With this change, wasm-ld now sees all references to tables, and can
link multiple tables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90948
When we produce an YAML output, we also print leading zeroes currently.
An output might look like this:
```
- Name: .dynsym
Type: SHT_DYNSYM
Address: 0x0000000000001000
EntSize: 0x0000000000000018
```
There are probably no reason to print leading zeroes.
It just makes harder to read values. This patch stops printing them.
The output becomes like:
```
- Name: .dynsym
Type: SHT_DYNSYM
Address: 0x1000
EntSize: 0x18
```
This affects obj2yaml mostly, but also dsymutil and llvm-xray tools output.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90930
Accounting for the fact that Wasm function indices are 32-bit, but in wasm64 we want uniform 64-bit pointers.
Includes reloc types for 64-bit table indices.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83729
Andy Wingo