Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Roman Lebedev 4be8707e64
[SimplifyCFG] Teach FoldTwoEntryPHINode() to preserve DomTree
Still boring, simply drop all edges to successors of DomBlock,
and add an edge to to BB instead.
2020-12-20 00:18:33 +03:00
Roman Lebedev b43b77ff9b
[NFCI][SimlifyCFG] simplifyOnce(): also perform DomTree validation
And that exposes that a number of tests don't *actually* manage to
maintain DomTree validity, which is inline with my observations.

Once again, SimlifyCFG pass currently does not require/preserve DomTree
by default, so this is effectively NFC.
2020-12-20 00:18:32 +03:00
Roman Lebedev 164e0847a5
[SimplifyCFG] DeleteDeadBlock() already knows how to preserve DomTree
... so just ensure that we pass DomTreeUpdater it into it.

Fixes DomTree preservation for a large number of tests,
all of which are marked as such so that they do not regress.
2020-12-18 00:37:21 +03:00
Sanjay Patel 7fe0e70ecc [SimplifyCFG] regenerate test checks; NFC 2020-03-13 14:12:28 -04:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 25475bcc0c [Constant] remove fdiv and frem from canTrap()
Assuming the default FP env, we should not treat fdiv and frem any differently in terms of
trapping behavior than any other FP op. Ie, FP ops do not trap with the default FP env.

This matches how we treat the fdiv/frem in IR with isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute() and in 
the backend after:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL279970

llvm-svn: 279973
2016-08-29 15:27:17 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 20f02b271b [SimplifyCFG] rename test file, regenerate checks, and add test
The fdiv test shows a problem similar to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL279970

llvm-svn: 279972
2016-08-29 14:57:53 +00:00