We currently always store absolute filenames in coverage mapping. This
is problematic for several reasons. It poses a problem for distributed
compilation as source location might vary across machines. We are also
duplicating the path prefix potentially wasting space.
This change modifies how we store filenames in coverage mapping. Rather
than absolute paths, it stores the compilation directory and file paths
as given to the compiler, either relative or absolute. Later when
reading the coverage mapping information, we recombine relative paths
with the working directory. This approach is similar to handling
ofDW_AT_comp_dir in DWARF.
Finally, we also provide a new option, -fprofile-compilation-dir akin
to -fdebug-compilation-dir which can be used to manually override the
compilation directory which is useful in distributed compilation cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95753
We currently always store absolute filenames in coverage mapping. This
is problematic for several reasons. It poses a problem for distributed
compilation as source location might vary across machines. We are also
duplicating the path prefix potentially wasting space.
This change modifies how we store filenames in coverage mapping. Rather
than absolute paths, it stores the compilation directory and file paths
as given to the compiler, either relative or absolute. Later when
reading the coverage mapping information, we recombine relative paths
with the working directory. This approach is similar to handling
ofDW_AT_comp_dir in DWARF.
Finally, we also provide a new option, -fprofile-compilation-dir akin
to -fdebug-compilation-dir which can be used to manually override the
compilation directory which is useful in distributed compilation cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95753
This is an enhancement to LLVM Source-Based Code Coverage in clang to track how
many times individual branch-generating conditions are taken (evaluate to TRUE)
and not taken (evaluate to FALSE). Individual conditions may comprise larger
boolean expressions using boolean logical operators. This functionality is
very similar to what is supported by GCOV except that it is very closely
anchored to the ASTs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84467
llvm-cov.test and many Inputs/test* files contain wrong tests.
This patch rewrites a large portion of these files.
The pre-canned .gcno & .gcda are replaced by binaries produced by
clang --coverage (compatible with gcov 4.8~7)
(after some GCDAProfiling.c bugs were fixed by my previous commits).
Also make llvm-cov gcov on a little-endian host capable to parse big-endian .gcno and .gcda,
and make llvm-cov gcov on big-endian host capable to parse little-endian .gcno and .gcda
gcov 9 (r264462) started to use GCOV_TAG_OBJECT_SUMMARY. Before,
GCOV_TAG_PROGRAM_SUMMARY was used.
libclang_rt.profile should emit just one tag according to the version.
Another bug introduced by rL194499 is that the wrong runcount field was
selected.
Fix the two bugs so that gcov can correctly decode "Runs:" from
libclang_rt.profile produced .gcda files, and llvm-cov gcov can
correctly decode "Runs:" from libgcov produced .gcda files.
GCDAProfiling.c unnecessarily writes function names to .gcda files.
GCC 4.2 gcc/libgcov.c (now renamed to libgcc/libgcov*) did not write function
names. gcov-7 (compatible) crashes on .gcda produced by libclang_rt.profile
rL176173 realized the problem and introduced a mode to remove function
names.
llvm-cov code apparently takes GCDAProfiling.c output format as truth
and tries to decode function names. Additionally, llvm-cov tries to
decode tags in certain order which does not match libgcov emitted .gcda
files.
This patch fixes the .gcda decoder and makes it work with GCC 8 and 9
(10 is compatible with 9). Note, line statistics are broken and not
fixed by this patch.
Add test/tools/llvm-cov/gcov-{4.7,8,9}.c to test compatibility.
Try again with an up-to-date version of D69471 (99317124 was a stale
revision).
---
Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:
1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.
This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).
Rationale for changes to the format:
- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.
- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.
- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).
See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.
Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471
Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:
1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.
This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).
Rationale for changes to the format:
- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.
- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.
- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).
See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.
Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471
Revise the coverage mapping format to reduce binary size by:
1. Naming function records and marking them `linkonce_odr`, and
2. Compressing filenames.
This shrinks the size of llc's coverage segment by 82% (334MB -> 62MB)
and speeds up end-to-end single-threaded report generation by 10%. For
reference the compressed name data in llc is 81MB (__llvm_prf_names).
Rationale for changes to the format:
- With the current format, most coverage function records are discarded.
E.g., more than 97% of the records in llc are *duplicate* placeholders
for functions visible-but-not-used in TUs. Placeholders *are* used to
show under-covered functions, but duplicate placeholders waste space.
- We reached general consensus about giving (1) a try at the 2017 code
coverage BoF [1]. The thinking was that using `linkonce_odr` to merge
duplicates is simpler than alternatives like teaching build systems
about a coverage-aware database/module/etc on the side.
- Revising the format is expensive due to the backwards compatibility
requirement, so we might as well compress filenames while we're at it.
This shrinks the encoded filenames in llc by 86% (12MB -> 1.6MB).
See CoverageMappingFormat.rst for the details on what exactly has
changed.
Fixes PR34533 [2], hopefully.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118428.html
[2] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34533
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69471
Before this change, if multiple binary files were presented, all of them must have been instrumented or the load would fail with coverage_map_error::no_data_found.
Patch by Dean Sturtevant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66763
llvm-svn: 370257
Support loading code coverage data from regular archives, thin archives,
and from MachO universal binaries which contain archives.
Testing: check-llvm, check-profile (with {A,UB}San enabled)
rdar://51538999
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63232
llvm-svn: 363325
The patch adds support for --hash-filenames to llvm-cov. This option adds md5
hash of the source path to the name of the generated .gcov file. The option is
crucial for cases where you have multiple files with the same name but can't
use --preserve-paths as resulting filenames exceed the limit.
from gcov(1):
```
-x
--hash-filenames
By default, gcov uses the full pathname of the source files to to
create an output filename. This can lead to long filenames that
can overflow filesystem limits. This option creates names of the
form source-file##md5.gcov, where the source-file component is
the final filename part and the md5 component is calculated from
the full mangled name that would have been used otherwise.
```
Patch by Igor Ignatev!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58370
llvm-svn: 354379
Summary:
The goal of this patch is to have the same behaviour than gcc-gcov.
Currently the hit counts for a line is the sum of the counts for each block on that line.
The idea is to detect the cycles in the graph of blocks in using the algorithm by Hawick & James.
The count for a cycle is the min of the counts for each edge in the cycle.
Once we've the count for each cycle, we can sum them and add the transition counts of those cycles.
Fix both https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38065 and https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38066
Reviewers: marco-c, davidxl
Reviewed By: marco-c
Subscribers: vsk, lebedev.ri, sylvestre.ledru, dblaikie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49659
llvm-svn: 342657
Summary:
Local testing has demonstrated a great speed improvement, compare the following:
1) Existing version:
```
$ time llvm-cov show -format=html -output-dir=report -instr-profile=... ...
The tool has been launched: 00:00:00
Loading coverage data: 00:00:00
Get unique source files: 00:00:33
Creating an index out of the source files: 00:00:34
Going into prepareFileReports: 00:00:34
Going to emit summary information for each file: 00:28:55 <-- 28:21 min!
Going to emit links to files with no function: 00:28:55
Launching 32 threads for generating HTML files: 00:28:55
real 37m43.651s
user 112m5.540s
sys 7m39.872s
```
2) Multi-threaded version with 32 CPUs:
```
$ time llvm-cov show -format=html -output-dir=report -instr-profile=... ...
The tool has been launched: 00:00:00
Loading coverage data: 00:00:00
Get unique source files: 00:00:38
Creating an index out of the source files: 00:00:40
Going into prepareFileReports: 00:00:40
Preparing file reports using 32 threads: 00:00:40
# Creating thread tasks for the following number of files: 16422
Going to emit summary information for each file: 00:01:57 <-- 1:17 min!
Going to emit links to files with no function: 00:01:58
Launching 32 threads for generating HTML files: 00:01:58
real 11m2.044s
user 134m48.124s
sys 7m53.388s
```
Reviewers: vsk, morehouse
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: Dor1s, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41206
llvm-svn: 321871
We've worked around bugs in the frontend by ignoring the count from
wrapped segments when a line has at least one region entry segment.
Those frontend bugs are now fixed, so it's time to regenerate the
checked-in covmapping files and remove the workaround.
llvm-svn: 317761
Gap areas make it possible to correctly determine when to use counts
from deferred regions. Before gap areas were introduced, llvm-cov needed
to use a heuristic to do this: it ignored counts from segments that
start, but do not end, on a line. This heuristic breaks down on a simple
example (see PR34962).
This patch removes the heuristic and picks counts from any region entry
segment which isn't a gap area.
llvm-svn: 315960
Summary: This version of tests should be working properly.
Reviewers: vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38889
llvm-svn: 315714
Summary:
Documentation says that user can specify sources for both "show" and
"report" commands. "Show" command respects specified sources, but "report" does
not. It is useful to have both "show" and "report" generated for specified
sources. Also added tests to for both commands with sources specified.
Reviewers: vsk, kcc
Reviewed By: vsk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38860
llvm-svn: 315685
Before this change using any of the -name*= command line options with an output
directory would result in a single file (functions.txt/functions.html)
containing the coverage for those specific functions. Now you get the same
directory structure as when not using any -name*= options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38280
llvm-svn: 314396
Before this change using any of the -name*= command line options with an output
directory would result in a single file (functions.txt/functions.html)
containing the coverage for those specific functions. Now you get the same
directory structure as when not using any -name*= options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38280
llvm-svn: 314310
After clang started emitting deferred regions (r312818), llvm-cov has
had a hard time picking reasonable line execuction counts. There have
been one or two generic improvements in this area (e.g r310012), but
line counts can still report coverage for whitespace instead of code
(llvm.org/PR34612).
To fix the problem:
* Introduce a new region kind so that frontends can explicitly label
gap areas.
This is done by changing the encoding of the columnEnd field of
MappingRegion. This doesn't substantially increase binary size, and
makes it easy to maintain backwards-compatibility.
* Don't set the line count to a count from a gap area, unless the count
comes from a wrapped segment.
* Don't highlight gap areas as uncovered.
Fixes llvm.org/PR34612.
llvm-svn: 313597
* Fix an unsigned integer overflow in the logic that computes the
number of uncovered lines in a function.
* When aggregating region and line coverage summaries, take into account
that different instantiations may have a different number of regions.
The new test case provides test coverage for both bugs. I also verified
this change by preparing a coverage report for a stage2 build of llc --
the new assertions should detect any outstanding over-counting bugs.
Fixes PR34613.
llvm-svn: 313417
Each source region has a start and end location. Report an error when
the end location does not precede the begin location.
The old lineExecutionCounts.covmapping test actually had a buggy source
region in it. This commit introduces a regenerated copy of the coverage
and moves the old copy to malformedRegions.covmapping, for a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37387
llvm-svn: 312814
Summary: Add a -name-whitelist option, which behaves in the same way as -name, but it reads in multiple function names from the given input file(s).
Reviewers: vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37111
llvm-svn: 312227
Summary:
This patch adds the -path-equivalence option (example: llvm-cov show -path-equivalence=/origin/path,/local/path) which maps the source code path from one machine to another when using `llvm-cov show`. This is similar to the -filename-equivalence option, but doesn't require you to specify all the source files on the command line.
This allows you to generate the coverage data on one machine (e.g. in a CI system), and then use llvm-cov on another machine where you have the same code base on a different path.
Reviewers: vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36391
llvm-svn: 310827
This patch makes a slight change to the way llvm-cov determines line
execution counts. If there are multiple line segments on a line, the
line count is the max count among the regions which start *and* end on
the line. This avoids an issue posed by deferred regions which start on
the same line as a terminated region, e.g:
if (false)
return; //< The line count should be 0, even though a new region
//< starts at the semi-colon.
foo();
Another change is that counts from line segments which don't correspond
to region entries are considered. This enables the first change, and
corrects an outstanding issue (see the showLineExecutionCounts.cpp test
change).
This is related to D35925.
Testing: check-profile, llvm-cov lit tests
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36014
llvm-svn: 310012
The order in which GCOV file info is printed depends on the string hash
function. This makes some GCOV tests brittle, because the tests must be
updated whenever the hash function changes.
Sort the filenames before printing out the file info to solve the
problem. This should be relatively cheap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32512
llvm-svn: 301371
Instead of stripping the longest common prefix off of the filenames in a
report, strip out the longest chain of redundant path components. This
fixes the case in PR31982, where there are two files with the same
prefix, and stripping out the LCP makes things less intelligible.
llvm-svn: 296029
This commit makes llvm-cov avoid showing 0% (0/0) coverage for things
like file function coverage, etc. in reports and HTML output. This can happen
for files like headers that have macros but no functions. This commit makes
llvm-cov report - (0/0) instead.
rdar://29246480
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26615
llvm-svn: 287539
When we load coverage data from multiple objects, we don't have a way to
attribute a source object to a function record. Printing out the object
filename next to the source filename is already not very useful: soon,
it'll actually become misleading. Stop printing out the filename now.
llvm-svn: 285043
These are distinct statistics which are useful to look at separately.
Example: say you have a template function "foo" with 5 instantiations
and only 3 of them are covered. Then this contributes (1/1) to the total
function coverage and (3/5) to the total instantiation coverage. I.e,
the old "Function Coverage" column has been renamed to "Instantiation
Coverage", and the new "Function Coverage" aggregates information from
the various instantiations of a function.
One benefit of making this switch is that the Line and Region coverage
columns will start making sense. Let's continue the example and assume
that the 5 instantiations of "foo" cover {2, 4, 6, 8, 10} out of 10
lines respectively. The new line coverage for "foo" is (10/10), not
(30/50). The old scenario got confusing because we'd report that there
were more lines in a file than what was actually possible.
llvm-svn: 281875
Zequan Wu