This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
Check llvm::Optional before dereferencing it.
Compute VirtualEndLoc differently to avoid an assertion failure
in clang::SourceManager::getFileIDLoaded:
Assertion `0 && "Invalid SLocOffset or bad function choice"' failed
The `cppcoreguidelines-virtual-class-destructor` supposed to enforce
http://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#c35-a-base-class-destructor-should-be-either-public-and-virtual-or-protected-and-non-virtual
Quote:
> A **base** class destructor should be either public and virtual, or
> protected and non-virtual
[emphasis mine]
However, this check still rules the following case:
class MostDerived final : public Base {
public:
MostDerived() = default;
~MostDerived() = default;
void func() final;
};
Even though `MostDerived` class is marked `final`, thus it should not be
considered as a **base** class. Consequently, the rule is satisfied, yet
the check still flags this code.
In this patch, I'm proposing to ignore `final` classes since they cannot
be //base// classes.
Reviewed By: whisperity
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126891
The `cppcoreguidelines-virtual-base-class-destructor` checker crashed on
this example:
#define DECLARE(CLASS) \
class CLASS { \
protected: \
virtual ~CLASS(); \
}
DECLARE(Foo); // no-crash
The checker will hit the following assertion:
clang-tidy: llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h:196: T &llvm::optional_detail::OptionalStorage<clang::Token, true>::getValue() & [T = clang::Token]: Assertion `hasVal' failed."
It turns out, `Lexer::findNextToken()` returned `llvm::None` within the
`getVirtualKeywordRange()` function when the `VirtualEndLoc`
SourceLocation represents a macro expansion.
To prevent this from happening, I decided to propagate the `llvm::None`
further up and only create the removal of `virtual` if the
`getVirtualKeywordRange()` succeeds.
I considered an alternative fix for this issue:
I could have checked the `Destructor.getLocation().isMacroID()` before
doing any Fixit calculation inside the `check()` function.
In contrast to this approach my patch will preserve the diagnostics and
drop the fixits only if it would have crashed.
Reviewed By: whisperity
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113558
Incorrectly triggers for template classes that inherit
from a base class that has virtual destructor.
Any class inheriting from a base that has a virtual destructor
will have their destructor also virtual, as per the Standard:
https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n4140/class.dtor#9
> If a class has a base class with a virtual destructor,
> its destructor (whether user- or implicitly-declared) is virtual.
Added unit tests to prevent regression.
Fixes bug https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51912
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110614
Finds base classes and structs whose destructor is neither public and
virtual nor protected and non-virtual.
A base class's destructor should be specified in one of these ways to
prevent undefined behaviour.
Fixes are available for user-declared and implicit destructors that are
either public and non-virtual or protected and virtual.
This check implements C.35 [1] from the CppCoreGuidelines.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, njames93
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D102325
[1]: http://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Rc-dtor-virtual
Kazu Hirata