Currently it rejects "// FOO_BAR_H" as an endif comment due to the extra space.
A user complained that this is too picky, which seems fair enough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124955
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48613.
llvm-header-guard is suggesting header guards with leading underscores
if the header file path begins with a '/' or similar special character.
Only reserved identifiers should begin with an underscore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114149
Fixes pr40372 (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40372).
The llvm-header-guard check does not take into account that the path
separator on Windows is `\`, not `/`.
This means that instead of suggesting a header guard in the form of:
LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_CLANG_TIDY_FOO_H
it incorrectly suggests:
C:\LLVM_PROJECT\CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA\CLANG_TIDY\FOO_H
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113450
Summary:
Change the namespace for llvm checkers from 'llvm' to
'llvm_check', and modify add_new_check.py and rename_check.py to
support the new namespace. Checker, file, and directory names remain
unchanged.
Used new version of rename_check.py to make the change in existing
llvm checkers, but had to fix LLVMTidyModule.cpp and
LLVMModuleTest.cpp by hand.
The changes made by rename_check.py are idempotent, so if accidentally
run multiple times, it won't do anything.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60629
llvm-svn: 360450
The check doesn't really know if the code it is warning about came before
or after the header guard, so phrase it more neutral instead of complaining
about code before the header guard. The location for the warning is still
not optimal, but I don't think fixing that is worth the effort, the
preprocessor doesn't give us a better location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30191
llvm-svn: 295715
clang-tidy checks are organized into modules. This refactoring moves the llvm
module checks to clang::tidy::llvm
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7995
Patch by Richard Thomson!
llvm-svn: 230952
Summary:
This patch makes the check work better for LLVM code:
* always fix existing #endif comments
* use one space before the comment (+allow customization for other styles)
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5795
llvm-svn: 219789
A precondition of that was to run both the preprocessor checks and AST
checks from the same FrontendAction, otherwise we'd have needed to
duplicate all involved objects in order to not have any references to a
deleted source manager.
llvm-svn: 219212
Summary:
This uses a bit hacky way to set the defaults for the spaces before
comments, but it's also one of the simplest ways. Fixed a bug with how the
SpacesBeforeComments option was used.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5410
llvm-svn: 218240
Summary:
Each check can implement readOptions and storeOptions methods to read
and store custom options. Each check's options are stored in a local namespace
to avoid name collisions and provide some sort of context to the user.
Reviewers: bkramer, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5296
llvm-svn: 217661
we can also fix the original header guard.
We still allow an _ at the end of a header guard since it's so common, but
remove it now when the #endif comment is changed.
llvm-svn: 216462
The implementation is split into a generic part and a LLVM-specific part.
Other codebases can implement it with their own style. The specific features
supported are:
- Verification (and fixing) of header guards against a style based on the file path
- Automatic insertion of header guards for headers that are missing them
- A warning when the header guard doesn't enable our fancy header guard optimization
(e.g. when there's an include preceeding the guard)
- Automatic insertion of a comment with the guard name after #endif.
For the LLVM style we disable #endif comments for now, they're not very common
in the codebase. We also only flag headers in the include directories, there
doesn't seem to be a common style outside.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4867
llvm-svn: 215548
Summary:
Handle various forms of existing namespace closing comments, fix
existing comments with wrong namespace name, ignore short namespaces.
The state of this check now seems to be enough to enable it by default to gather
user feedback ;)
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3825
llvm-svn: 209141
always produce as pretty of results as it does in LLVM and Clang, but
I don't mind and the value of having a single canonical ordering is very
high IMO.
Let me know if you spot really serious problems here.
llvm-svn: 198703
This is the first version of a possible clang-tidy architecture. The
purpose of clang-tidy is to detect errors in adhering to common coding
patterns, e.g. described in the LLVM Coding Standards.
This is still heavily in flux.
Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D884
llvm-svn: 187345
Kazu Hirata