Tests that need ASTs have to deal with the awkward control flow of
FrontendAction in some way. There are a few idioms used:
- don't bother with unit tests, use clang -dump-ast
- create an ASTConsumer by hand, which is bulky
- use ASTMatchFinder - works pretty well if matchers are actually
needed, very strange if they are not
- use ASTUnit - this yields nice straight-line code, but ASTUnit is a
terrifically complicated library not designed for this purpose
TestAST provides a very simple way to write straight-line tests: specify
the code/flags and it provides an AST that is kept alive until the
object is destroyed.
It's loosely modeled after TestTU in clangd, which we've successfully
used for a variety of tests.
I've updated a couple of clang tests to use this helper, IMO they're clearer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123668
Summary:
The unittest for AST matchers has its own way to specify language
standards. I unified it with the shared infrastructure from
libClangTesting.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, hlopko
Reviewed By: hlopko
Subscribers: mgorny, sstefan1, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81150
Summary:
I think we would be better off with tests explicitly specifying the
language mode. Right now Lang_C means C99, but reads as "any C version",
or as "unspecified C version".
I also changed '-std=c++98' to '-std=c++03' because they are aliases (so
there is no difference in practice), because Clang implements C++03
rules in practice, and because 03 makes a nice sortable progression
between 03, 11, 14, 17, 20.
Reviewers: shafik, hlopko
Reviewed By: hlopko
Subscribers: jfb, martong, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81000
Summary:
unittests/AST/Language.h defines some helpers that we would like to
reuse in other tests, for example, in tests for syntax trees.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgorny, martong, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80792
Volodymyr Sapsai