This change breaks no existing tests but does fix the linked issue.
Declarations of operator overloads are annotated with
`TT_FunctionDeclarationName` on the `operator` keyword, which is already
being checked for when aligning, so the extra `kw_operator` doesn't seem
to be necessary. (just for reference, it was added in
rG92b397fb9d55ccdf4632c2b1b15b4a0ee417cf74 / 92b397fb9d)
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55733
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137223
Ran into an issue where function declarations inside function
scopes or uses of sizeof inside a function would treat the && in
'sizeof(Type &&)' as a binary operator.
Attempt to fix this by assuming reference when followed by ',' or
')'. Also adds tests for these.
Also hit an edge case in another test that treated "and" the same
as "&&" since it parses as C++. Changed the "and" to "also" so it
is no longer a keyword.
Fixes#58923.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137755
Before this patch code like this:
```
if (Class* obj{getObject()}) { }
```
would be mis-formated since the * would be annotated as a
binaryoperator.
This patch changes the * to become a PointerOrReference instead
and fixes the formatting issues.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137327
They were annotated with TrailingAnnotation, which they are not. And
that resulted in some quirky formatting in some cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136635
In our code-base we auto-generate pragma regions the regions
look like method signatures like:
`#pragma region MYREGION(Foo: bar)`
The problem here was that the rest of the line after region
was not marked as stringliteral as in the case of pragma mark
so clang-format tried to change the formatting based on the
method signature.
Added test and mark it similar as pragma mark.
Reviewed By: owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136336
Inside the arguments part of a function pointer declaration,
`determineStarAmpUsage` results in a binary operator rather than
pointers, because said parens are assumed to be an expression.
This patch correctly marks the argument parens of a function
pointer type as not an expression. Note that this fix already
existed for Objective-C blocks as part of f1f267b447.
As Objective-C blocks and C/C++ function pointers share a lot
of the same logic, that fix also makes sense here.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/31659
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135707
The comment handling the bool case says:
"bool is only allowed if it is directly followed by a paren for a cast"
This change more closely follows this directive by looking ahead for
the paren before consuming the bool keyword itself. Without a following
paren, the bool would be part of something else, such as a return type
for a function declaration
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57538
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan, MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134325
`P1169` "static operator()" (https://wg21.link/P1169) is accepted to
C++23 and while clang itself doesn't exactly support it yet,
clang-format could quite easily.
This simply allows the keyword `static` to be a part of lambdas as
specified by the addition to [expr.prim.lambda.general]
While adding this, I noticed `consteval` lambdas also aren't handled,
so that keyword is now allowed to be a part of lambdas as well
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan, MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134587
There already exists logic to disallow requires *expressions* to be
treated as function declarations, but this expands it to include
requires *clauses*, when they happen to also be parenthesized.
Previously, in the following case:
```
template <typename T>
requires(Foo<T>)
T foo();
```
The line with the requires clause was actually being considered as the
line with the function declaration due to the parentheses, and the
*real* function declaration on the next line became a trailing
annotation
(Together with https://reviews.llvm.org/D134049) Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56213
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134052
In the following construction:
`template <typename T> requires Foo<T> || Bar<T> auto func() -> int;`
The `->` of the trailing return type was actually considered as an
operator as part of the binary operation in the requires clause, with
the precedence level of `PrecedenceArrowAndPeriod`, leading to fake
parens being inserted in strange locations, that would never be closed.
Fixes one part of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56213
(the rest will probably be in a separate patch)
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134049
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57738
old
```
#define FOO(typeName, realClass) \
{ \
#typeName, foo < FooType>(new foo <realClass>(#typeName)) \
}
```
new
```
#define FOO(typeName, realClass) \
{ #typeName, foo<FooType>(new foo<realClass>(#typeName)) }
```
Previously, when an UnwrappedLine began with a hash in a macro
definition, the program incorrectly assumed the line was a preprocessor
directive. It should be stringification.
The rule in spaceRequiredBefore was added in 8b5297117b. Its purpose is
to add a space in an include directive. It also added a space to a
template opener when the line began with a stringification hash. So we
changed it.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133954
Previously, the heuristic was simply to look for template argument-
specific keywords, such as typename, class, template and auto
that are preceded by a left angle bracket <.
This changes the heuristic to instead look for a left angle bracket <
preceded by a right square bracket ], since according to the C++
grammar, the template arguments must *directly* follow the introducer.
(This sort of check might just end up being *too* aggressive)
This patch also adds a bunch more token annotator tests for lambdas,
specifically for some of the stranger forms of lambdas now allowed as
of C++20 or soon-to-be-allowed as part of C++23.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57093
This does NOT resolve the FIXME regarding explicit template lists, but
perhaps it gets closer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132295
Previously, the formatter would refuse to treat identifiers within a
compound concept definition as actually part of the definition, if
they were after the negation operator !. It is now made consistent
with the likes of && and ||.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55898
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131978
With the AlwaysBreakTemplateDeclarations option, having a constructor
template for a type consisting of all-uppercase letters with a
noexcept specifier would put said noexcept specifier on its own blank
line.
This is because the all-uppercase type is understood as a macro-like
attribute (such as DEPRECATED()), and noexcept is seen as the
declaration. However, noexcept is a keyword and cannot be an
identifier on its own.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56216
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132189
These statements are like switch statements in C, but without the 'case'
keyword in labels.
How labels are parsed. In UnwrappedLineParser, the program tries to
parse a statement every time it sees a colon. In TokenAnnotator, a
colon that isn't part of an expression is annotated as a label.
The token type `TT_GotoLabelColon` is added. We did not include Verilog
in the name because we thought we would eventually have to fix the
problem that case labels in C can't contain ternary conditional
expressions and we would use that token type.
The style is like below. Labels are on separate lines and indented by
default. The linked style guide also has examples where labels and the
corresponding statements are on the same lines. They are not supported
for now.
https://github.com/lowRISC/style-guides/blob/master/VerilogCodingStyle.md
```
case (state_q)
StIdle:
state_d = StA;
StA: begin
state_d = StB;
end
endcase
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128714
Now things inside hierarchies like modules and interfaces are
indented. When the module header spans multiple lines, all except the
first line are indented as continuations. We added the property
`IsContinuation` to mark lines that should be indented this way.
In order that the colons inside square brackets don't get labeled as
`TT_ObjCMethodExpr`, we added a check to only use this type when the
language is not Verilog.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128712
Now stuff inside begin-end blocks get indented.
Some tests are moved into FormatTestVerilog.Block from
FormatTestVerilog.If because they have nothing to do with if statements.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128711
Lambdas with trailing return type 'auto' are annotated incorrectly. It causes a misformatting. The simpliest code to reproduce is:
```
auto list = {[]() -> auto { return 0; }};
```
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54798
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130299
Otherwise the brace was detected as a function brace, not wrong per se,
but when directly calling the lambda the calling parens were put on the
next line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129946
After b646f09555,
the added regression test started being formatted as-if the
multiplication `*` was a pointer. This adapts the heuristic to
distinguish between these two cases.
Reviewed By: jackhong12, curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129771
This patch is the result of running clang-format version 753fe33 in
clang/unittests/Format/:
clang-format -style="{InsertBraces: true, RemoveBracesLLVM: true}" -i *.cpp *.h
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125510
Due to how parseBracedList always stopped on the first closing angle
bracket and was used in parsing angle bracketed expression inside concept
definition, nested brackets inside concepts were parsed incorrectly.
nextToken() call before calling parseBracedList is required because
we were processing opening angle bracket inside parseBracedList second
time leading to incorrect logic after my fix.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54943
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54837
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123896
There was some duplicate code in determineStarAmpUsage and
determinePlusMinusCaretUsage
Now a `-` or `+` following `;`, `sizeof`, `co_await`, or `delete` is
regarded as a unary operator.
Now a `*` or `&` following `case` is also a unary operator.
Reviewed By: curdeius, MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121754
We have a little problem. TokenAnnotator::resetTokenMetadata() resets
the type, except for a (growing) whitelist. This is because the
TokenAnnotator visits some tokens multiple times. E.g. trying to
identify if a < is an operator less or a template opener. And in some
runs, which are bascially "reverted" the types are reset.
On the other hand, if the parser does already know the type, it should
be able to set it, without it being reset. So we introduce the ability
to set a type and make that final.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120511
Why put "InMacros" in the name? We test other things to, and I will add
more, withut macros.
Also all our tests are regression tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120401
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/24781.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/38160.
This patch splits `TT_RecordLBrace` for classes/enums/structs/unions (and other records, e.g. interfaces) and uses the brace type to avoid the error-prone scanning for record token.
The mentioned bugs were provoked by the scanning being too limited (and so not considering `const` or `constexpr`, or other qualifiers, on an anonymous struct variable declaration).
Moreover, the proposed solution is more efficient as we parse tokens once only (scanning being parsing too).
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119785
Emilia Dreamer