Clang doesn't offer these fixes I guess for a couple of reasons:
- where to insert includes is a formatting concern, and clang shouldn't
depend on clang-format
- the way clang prints diagnostics, we'd show a bunch of basically irrelevant
context of "this is where we'd want to insert the include"
Maybe it's possible to hack around 1, but 2 is still a concern.
Meanwhile, bolting this onto include-fixer gets the job done.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/355
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/937
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114667
The overload shouldSuppressDiagnostic seems unnecessary, and it is only
used in clangd.
This patch removes it and use the real one (suppression diagnostics are
discarded in clangd at the moment).
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/929
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113999
Headers without include guards might have side effects or can be the files we
don't want to consider (e.g. tablegen ".inc" files). Skip them when translating
headers to the HeaderIDs that we will consider as unused.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112695
This is a temporary hack to disable diagnostics for system headers. As of right
now, IncludeCleaner does not handle the Standard Library correctly and will
report most system headers as unused because very few symbols are defined in
top-level system headers. This will eventually be fixed, but for now we are
aiming for the most conservative approach with as little false-positive
warnings as possible. After the initial prototype and core functionality is
polished, I will turn back to handling the Standard Library as it requires
custom logic.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112571
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd8493847 with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This was originally committed in 277623f4d5
Reverted in f9ad1d1c77 due to breakages
outside of clang - lldb seems to have some strange/strong dependence on
"char [N]" versus "char[N]" when printing strings (not due to that name
appearing in DWARF, but probably due to using clang to stringify type
names) that'll need to be addressed, plus a few other odds and ends in
other subprojects (clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt, etc).
It is not great to list diag ids by hand, but I don't see any other
solution unless diagnostics are annotated with these explicitly, which is a
bigger change in clang and I am not sure if would be worth it.
Diagnostics handled by this patch is by no means exhaustive, there might be
other checks that don't mention "unused"/"deprecated" in their names. But it
feels like this should be enough to catch common diagnostics and can be extended
over time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107040
This reduces the size of the dependency graph and makes incremental
development a little more pleasant (less rebuilding).
This introduces a bit of complexity/fragility as some tests verify
clang-tidy behavior. I attempted to isolate these and build/run as much
of the tests as possible in both configs to prevent rot.
Expectation is that (some) developers will use this locally, but
buildbots etc will keep testing clang-tidy.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/233
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105679
Given `int foo, bar;`, TraverseAST reveals this tree:
TranslationUnitDecl
- foo
- bar
Before this patch, with the TraversalScope set to {foo}, TraverseAST yields:
foo
After this patch it yields:
TranslationUnitDecl
- foo
Also, TraverseDecl(TranslationUnitDecl) now respects the traversal scope.
---
The main effect of this today is that clang-tidy checks that match the
translationUnitDecl(), either in order to traverse it or check
parentage, should work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104071
When building preamble, clangd truncates file contents. This yielded
errnous warnings in some cases.
This patch fixes the issue by turning off no-newline-at-eof warnings whenever
the file has more contents than the preamble.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/744.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100501
These can be invoked at different stages while building an AST to let
FeatureModules implement features on top of it. The patch also
introduces a sawDiagnostic hook, which can mutate the final clangd::Diag
while reading a clang::Diagnostic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98499
Implement initial support for pull-based diagnostics in ClangdServer.
This is planned for LSP 3.17, and initial proposal is in
d15eb0671e/protocol/src/common/proposed.diagnostic.ts (L111).
We chose to serve the requests only when clangd has a fresh preamble
available. In case of a stale preamble we just drop the request on the
floor.
This patch doesn't plumb this to LSP layer yet, as pullDiags is still a
proposal with only an implementation in vscode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98623
Added some new ClangTidyOptionsProvider like classes designed for clangd work flow.
These providers are designed to source the options on the worker thread but in a thread safe manner.
This is done through making the options getter take a pointer to the filesystem used by the worker thread which natuarally is from a ThreadsafeFS.
Internal caching in the providers is also guarded.
The providers don't inherit from `ClangTidyOptionsProvider` instead they share a base class which is able to create a provider for the `ClangTidyContext` using a specific FileSystem.
This approach means one provider can be used for multiple contexts even though `ClangTidyContext` owns its provider.
Depends on D90531
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91029
If there is a "-verify" flag in the compile command, clangd will crash
(hit the assertion) inside the `~VerifyDiagnosticConsumer` (Looks like our
compiler invocation doesn't setup correctly?).
This patch disables the verify mode as it is rarely useful in clangd.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91777
Summary:
Some clang-tidy checkers, e.g. llvm-include-order can emit diagnostics
at this callback (as mentioned in the comments).
Clangd was resetting diag consumer to IgnoreDiags before sending EOF, hence we
were unable to emit diagnostics for such checkers.
This patch changes the order of that reset and preprocosser event to make sure
we emit that diag.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/314.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83178
Inside clangd, clang-tidy checks don't see preprocessor events in the preamble.
This leads to `Token::PtrData == nullptr` for tokens that the macro is defined to.
E.g. `#define SIGTERM 15`:
- Token::Kind == tok::numeric_constant (Token::isLiteral() == true)
- Token::UintData == 2
- Token::PtrData == nullptr
As the result of this, bugprone-bad-signal-to-kill-thread check crashes at null-dereference inside clangd.
Reviewed By: hokein
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85417
This reverts commit 658af94350.
Breaks tests on windows: http://45.33.8.238/win/17229/step_9.txt
I think this is uncovering a latent bug when a late-parsed preamble is
used with an eagerly-parsed file.
Summary:
Parsing std::make_unique is an exception to the usual non-parsing of function
bodies in the preamble. (A hook is added to PreambleCallbacks to allow this).
This allows us to diagnose make_unique<Foo>(wrong arg list), and opens the door
to providing signature help (by detecting where the arg list is forwarded to).
This function is trivial (checked libc++ and libstdc++) and doesn't result in
any extra templates being instantiated, so this should be cheap.
This uncovered a second issue (already visible with class templates)...
Errors produced by template instantiation have primary locations within the
template, with instantiation stack reported as notes.
For templates defined in headers, these end up reported at the #include
directive, which isn't terribly helpful as the header itself is probably fine.
This patch reports them at the instantiation site (the first location in the
instantiation stack that's in the main file). This in turn required a bit of
refactoring in Diagnostics so we can delay relocating the diagnostic until all
notes are available.
https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/412
Reviewers: hokein, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81351
Summary:
This would avoid adding too much noise when there is a "-Wall" in the
compile command.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79923
Summary:
this maybe not ideal, but it is trivial and does fix the crash.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/156.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78715
Summary: This seems like a pretty safe case, and common enough to be useful.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78338
Summary:
This is guaranteed to be a no-op without the preamble, so should be a
no-op with it too.
Partially fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/337
This doesn't yet work for #ifndef guards, which are not recognized in preambles.
see D78038
I can't for the life of me work out how to test this outside clangd.
The original reentrant preamble diagnostic was untested, I added a test
to clangd for that too.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78366
Summary:
Not handling this was a side-effect of being overly cautious when trying
to avoid reading files for which clangd doesn't have the source mapped.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/266
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet,
usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75286
Summary: Previously, we dropped the AST node for nonexistent member exprs.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76764
This has the same behavior as converting std::string_view to
std::string. This is an expensive conversion, so explicit conversions
are helpful for avoiding unneccessary string copies.
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
The historic behavior of TestTU is to gather diagnostics and otherwise ignore
them. So if a test has a syntax error, and doesn't assert diagnostics, it
silently misbehaves.
This can be annoying when developing tests, as evidenced by various tests
gaining "assert no diagnostics" where that's not really the point of the test.
This patch aims to make that default behavior. For the first error
(not warning), TestTU will call ADD_FAILURE().
This can be suppressed with a comment containing "error-ok". For now that will
suppress any errors in the TU. We can make this stricter later -verify style.
(-verify itself is hard to reuse because of DiagnosticConsumer interfaces...)
A magic-comment was chosen over a TestTU option because of table-driven tests.
In addition to the behavior change, this patch:
- adds //error-ok where we're knowingly testing invalid code
(e.g. for diagnostics, crash-resilience, or token-level tests)
- fixes a bunch of errors in the checked-in tests, mostly trivial (missing ;)
- removes a bunch of now-redundant instances of "assert no diagnostics"
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73199
Summary:
LSP requires diagnostics to lay inside main file. In clangd we keep
diagnostics in three different cases:
- already in main file
- adjusted to a header included in main file
- has a note covering some range in main file
In the last case, we were not adjusting the diagnostics range to be in main
file, therefore these diagnostics ended up pointing some arbitrary locations.
This patch fixes that issue by adjusting the range of diagnostics to be the
first note inside main file when converting to LSP.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72458
Sam McCall