Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikita Popov 9bc7e543b4 [BasicAA] Make range check more precise
Make the range check more precise by calculating the range of
potentially accessed bytes for both accesses and checking whether
their intersection is empty. In that case there can be no overlap
between the accesses and the result is NoAlias.

This is more powerful than the previous approach, because it can
deal with sign-wrapped ranges. In the test case the original range
is [-1, INT_MAX] but becomes [0, INT_MIN] after applying the offset.
This is a wrapping range, so getSignedMin/getSignedMax will treat
it as a full range. However, the range excludes the elements
[INT_MIN+1, -1], which is enough to prove NoAlias with an access
at offset -1.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112486
2021-10-27 12:40:58 +02:00
Nikita Popov 721569cc36 [BasicAA] Add test for benign range overflow (NFC) 2021-10-25 22:09:39 +02:00
Nikita Popov 0d20ebf686 [BasicAA] Use ranges for more than one index
D109746 made BasicAA use range information to determine the
minimum/maximum GEP offset. However, it was limited to the case of
a single variable index. This patch extends support to multiple
indices by adding all the ranges together.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112378
2021-10-25 15:30:50 +02:00
Nikita Popov 2ae67c9684 [BasicAA] Add range test with multiple indices (NFC) 2021-10-24 16:13:03 +02:00
Clement Courbet 83ded5d323 re-land "[AA] Teach BasicAA to recognize basic GEP range information."
Now that PR52104 is fixed.
2021-10-11 10:04:22 +02:00
Clement Courbet ff41fc07b1 Revert "[AA] Teach BasicAA to recognize basic GEP range information."
We have found a miscompile with this change, reverting while working on a
reproducer.

This reverts commit 455b60ccfb.
2021-10-06 16:49:10 +02:00
Clement Courbet 455b60ccfb [AA] Teach BasicAA to recognize basic GEP range information.
The information can be implicit (from `ValueTracking`) or explicit.

This implements the backend part of the following RFC
https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/T9o51zB1JY.

We still need to settle on how to best represent the information in the
IR, but this is a separate discussion.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109746
2021-09-30 08:29:32 +02:00