Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Philip Reames 8906a0fe64 [SCEVExpander] Drop poison generating flags when reusing instructions
The basic problem we have is that we're trying to reuse an instruction which is mapped to some SCEV. Since we can have multiple such instructions (potentially with different flags), this is analogous to our need to drop flags when performing CSE. A trivial implementation would simply drop flags on any instruction we decided to reuse, and that would be correct.

This patch is almost that trivial patch except that we preserve flags on the reused instruction when existing users would imply UB on overflow already. Adding new users can, at most, refine this program to one which doesn't execute UB which is valid.

In practice, this fixes two conceptual problems with the previous code: 1) a binop could have been canonicalized into a form with different opcode or operands, or 2) the inbounds GEP case which was simply unhandled.

On the test changes, most are pretty straight forward. We loose some flags (in some cases, they'd have been dropped on the next CSE pass anyways). The one that took me the longest to understand was the ashr-expansion test. What's happening there is that we're considering reuse of the mul, previously we disallowed it entirely, now we allow it with no flags. The surrounding diffs are all effects of generating the same mul with a different operand order, and then doing simple DCE.

The loss of the inbounds is unfortunate, but even there, we can recover most of those once we actually treat branch-on-poison as immediate UB.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112734
2021-11-29 15:23:34 -08:00
Philip Reames 6caff716da Regen some autogen tests to account for format change 2021-10-28 09:22:20 -07:00
Roman Lebedev b46c085d2b
[NFCI] SCEVExpander: emit intrinsics for integral {u,s}{min,max} SCEV expressions
These intrinsics, not the icmp+select are the canonical form nowadays,
so we might as well directly emit them.

This should not cause any regressions, but if it does,
then then they would needed to be fixed regardless.

Note that this doesn't deal with `SCEVExpander::isHighCostExpansion()`,
but that is a pessimization, not a correctness issue.

Additionally, the non-intrinsic form has issues with undef,
see https://reviews.llvm.org/D88287#2587863
2021-03-06 21:52:46 +03:00
Arthur Eubanks 9c56e94a9f [NPM] Bail out when -foo and --passes=foo are both specified
Summary:
Currently when --passes is used, any passes specified via -foo are
ignored. Explicitly bail out when that happens.

This requires changing some tests. Most were straightforward, but
codegenprepare-produced-address-math.ll is tricky. One of its RUNs runs
CodeGenPrepare. I tried porting CodeGenPrepare to the NPM, but ended up
getting stuck when I needed a TargetMachine. NPM doesn't have support
for MachineFunctions yet. So I just deleted that RUN line, since it was
mass-added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D54848 and is likely not that
useful.

Reviewers: echristo, hans

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82271
2020-06-22 08:27:13 -07:00
Denis Antrushin 99a6e405ed [IRCE] Use SCEVExpander to modify loop bound
IRCE pass checks that it can calculate loop bounds by checking
SCEV availability at loop entry. However it is possible that loop
bound SCEV is loop invariant, but instruction used to compute it
resides within loop. In such case adjusting loop bound in preheader
using IRBuilder leads to malformed SSA.
Use SCEVExpander instead to generate proper instructions.

Reviewed-by: mkazantsev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73496
2020-02-06 12:44:43 +03:00