Summary:
scan-build flagged a potential use-after-move in debug builds. It's not
safe that a moved from value contains anything but garbage. Manually
DRY up these repeated expressions.
Reviewers: lhames
Reviewed By: lhames
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62112
llvm-svn: 361203
Unfortunately the way SIInsertSkips works is backwards, and is
required for correctness. r338235 added handling of some special cases
where skipping is mandatory to avoid side effects if no lanes are
active. It conservatively handled asm correctly, but the same logic
needs to apply to calls.
Usually the call sequence code is larger than the skip threshold,
although the way the count is computed is really broken, so I'm not
sure if anything was likely to really hit this.
llvm-svn: 361202
Rename member 'Size' to 'AllocatedSize' in order to provide a hint that the
allocated size may be different than the requested size. Comments are added to
clarify this point. Updated the InMemoryBuffer in FileOutputBuffer.cpp to track
the requested buffer size.
Patch by Machiel van Hooren. Thanks Machiel!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61599
llvm-svn: 361195
Also, break out a helper function, namely foldFNegIntoConstant(...), which performs transforms common between visitFNeg(...) and visitFSub(...).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61693
llvm-svn: 361188
Since INLINEASM_BR is a terminator we need to flush the pending exports before
emitting it. If we don't do this, a TokenFactor can be inserted between it and
the BR instruction emitted to finish the callbr lowering.
It looks like nodes are glued to the INLINEASM_BR so I had to make sure we emit
the TokenFactor before that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59981
llvm-svn: 361177
Summary:
This was flagged in https://www.viva64.com/en/b/0629/ under "Snippet No.
15" (see under #13). It looks like PVS studio flags nullptr checks where
the ptr is used inbetween creation and checking against nullptr.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, probinson
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: RKSimon, hiraditya, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62118
llvm-svn: 361176
Summary:
It was supposed that Ref LazyCallGraph::Edge's were being inserted by
inlining, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Instead, it seems that
there was no test for a blockaddress Constant in an instruction that
referenced the function that contained the instruction. Ex:
```
define void @f() {
%1 = alloca i8*, align 8
2:
store i8* blockaddress(@f, %2), i8** %1, align 8
ret void
}
```
When iterating blockaddresses, do not add the function they refer to
back to the worklist if the blockaddress is referring to the contained
function (as opposed to an external function).
Because blockaddress has sligtly different semantics than GNU C's
address of labels, there are 3 cases that can occur with blockaddress,
where only 1 can happen in GNU C due to C's scoping rules:
* blockaddress is within the function it refers to (possible in GNU C).
* blockaddress is within a different function than the one it refers to
(not possible in GNU C).
* blockaddress is used in to declare a global (not possible in GNU C).
The second case is tested in:
```
$ ./llvm/build/unittests/Analysis/AnalysisTests \
--gtest_filter=LazyCallGraphTest.HandleBlockAddress
```
This patch adjusts the iteration of blockaddresses in
LazyCallGraph::visitReferences to not revisit the blockaddresses
function in the first case.
The Linux kernel contains code that's not semantically valid at -O0;
specifically code passed to asm goto. It requires that asm goto be
inline-able. This patch conservatively does not attempt to handle the
more general case of inlining blockaddresses that have non-callbr users
(pr/39560).
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39560https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40722https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/6https://reviews.llvm.org/rL212077
Reviewers: jyknight, eli.friedman, chandlerc
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: george.burgess.iv, nathanchance, mgorny, craig.topper, mengxu.gatech, void, mehdi_amini, E5ten, chandlerc, efriedma, eraman, hiraditya, haicheng, pirama, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58260
llvm-svn: 361173
A std::array is implemented as a template with an array
inside a struct. Older versions of clang, like 3.6,
require an extra set of curly braces around std::array
initializations to avoid warnings.
The C++ language was changed regarding this by CWG 1270.
So more modern tool chains does not complaing even if
leaving out one level of braces.
llvm-svn: 361171
We shouldn't really make assumptions about possible sizes for long and long long. And longer term we should probably support vectorizing these intrinsics. By making the result types not fixed we can support vectors as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62026
llvm-svn: 361169
This changes the isShift variable to include the constant operand
check that was previously in the if statement.
While there fix an 80 column violation and an unnecessary use of
getNode. Also fix variable name capitalization.
llvm-svn: 361168
Fixes issue reported by aemerson on D57348. Vector op legalization
support is added for uaddo, usubo, saddo and ssubo (umulo and smulo
were already supported). As usual, by extracting TargetLowering methods
and calling them from vector op legalization.
Vector op legalization doesn't really deal with multiple result nodes,
so I'm explicitly performing a recursive legalization call on the
result value that is not being legalized.
There are some existing test changes because expansion happens
earlier, so we don't get a DAG combiner run in between anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61692
llvm-svn: 361166
The code did not match the example in the comment, and was checking
the undef flag on the copy dest instead of source. The existing tests
were only hitting the > 2 operands case.
llvm-svn: 361156
Summary:
This patch adds support for the integer pairwise add and accumulate long
instructions SADALP/UADALP. These instructions are predicated.
The specification can be found here:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0602/latest
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62001
llvm-svn: 361154
This reverts commit 95805bc425.
I've squashed the test fix into this commit.
[DebugInfo] Update loop metadata for inlined loops
Currently, when a loop is cloned while inlining function (A) into function (B)
the loop metadata is copied and then not modified at all. The loop metadata can
encode the loop's start and end DILocations. Therefore, the new inlined loop in
function (B) may have loop metadata which shows start and end locations residing
in function (A).
This patch ensures loop metadata is updated while inlining so that the start and
end DILocations are given the "inlinedAt" operand. I've also added a regression
test for this.
This fix is required for D60831 because that patch uses loop metadata to
determine the DILocation for the branches of new loop preheaders.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, anemet
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61933
llvm-svn: 361149
Refactor DIExpression::With* into a flag enum in order to be less
error-prone to use (as discussed on D60866).
Patch by Djordje Todorovic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61943
llvm-svn: 361137
Summary:
This patch adds support for the predicated integer halving add/sub
instructions:
* SHADD, UHADD, SRHADD, URHADD
* SHSUB, UHSUB, SHSUBR, UHSUBR
The specification can be found here:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0602/latest
Reviewed By: rovka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62000
llvm-svn: 361136
The scalar start/accumulator value of the fadd- and fmul reduction
should match the result type of the reduction, as well as the vector
element-type of the input vector. Although this was not explicitly
specified in the LangRef, it was taken for granted in code implementing
the reductions. The patch also fixes the LangRef by adding this
constraint.
Reviewed By: aemerson, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60260
llvm-svn: 361133
Summary:
Currently, when a loop is cloned while inlining function (A) into function (B) the loop metadata is copied and then not modified at all. The loop metadata can encode the loop's start and end DILocations. Therefore, the new inlined loop in function (B) may have loop metadata which shows start and end locations residing in function (A).
This patch ensures loop metadata is updated while inlining so that the start and end DILocations are given the "inlinedAt" operand. I've also added a regression test for this.
This fix is required for D60831 because that patch uses loop metadata to determine the DILocation for the branches of new loop preheaders.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, anemet
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61933
llvm-svn: 361132
Summary:
Avoid introducing hazard mitigation when lgkmcnt is reduced to 0.
Clarify code comments to explain assumptions made for this hazard
mitigation. Expand and correct test cases to cover variants of
s_waitcnt.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, rampitec
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62058
llvm-svn: 361124
This is the sibling transform for rL360899 (D61691):
maxnum(X, GreaterC) == C --> false
maxnum(X, GreaterC) <= C --> false
maxnum(X, GreaterC) < C --> false
maxnum(X, GreaterC) >= C --> true
maxnum(X, GreaterC) > C --> true
maxnum(X, GreaterC) != C --> true
llvm-svn: 361118
This is a follow-up refactoring patch after the introduction of usable TreeEntry pointers in D61706.
The EdgeInfo struct can now use a TreeEntry pointer instead of an index in VectorizableTree.
Committed on behalf of @vporpo (Vasileios Porpodas)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61795
llvm-svn: 361110
This is ported from the custom AMDGPU DAG implementation. I think this
is a better default expansion than what the DAG currently uses, at
least if the target has CTLZ.
This implements the signed version in terms of the unsigned
conversion, which is implemented with bit operations. SelectionDAG has
several other implementations that should eventually be ported
depending on what instructions are legal.
llvm-svn: 361081
Same as what we do for vector reductions in combineHorizontalPredicateResult, use movmsk+cmp for scalar (and(extract(x,0),extract(x,1)) reduction patterns.
llvm-svn: 361052
Summary:
That check claims that the transform is illegal otherwise.
That isn't true:
1. For `ISD::ADD`, we only process `ISD::SHL` outer shift => sign bit does not matter
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/K4A
2. For `ISD::AND`, there is no restriction on constants:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Wy3
3. For `ISD::OR`, there is no restriction on constants:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/GOH
3. For `ISD::XOR`, there is no restriction on constants:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ml6
So, why is it there then?
This changes the testcase that was touched by @spatel in rL347478,
but i'm not sure that test tests anything particular?
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, craig.topper, jojo, rengolin
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits, spatel
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61918
llvm-svn: 361044
Summary:
In D61918 i was looking at dropping it in DAGCombiner `visitShiftByConstant()`,
but as @craig.topper pointed out, it was copied from here.
That check claims that the transform is illegal otherwise.
That isn't true:
1. For `ISD::ADD`, we only process `ISD::SHL` outer shift => sign bit does not matter
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/K4A
2. For `ISD::AND`, there is no restriction on constants:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Wy3
3. For `ISD::OR`, there is no restriction on constants:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/GOH
3. For `ISD::XOR`, there is no restriction on constants:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ml6
So, why is it there then?
As far as i can tell, it dates all the way back to original check-in rL7793.
I think we should just drop it.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, efriedma, majnemer
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits, craig.topper
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61938
llvm-svn: 361043
Chen Zheng