This patch add the ISD::LROUND and ISD::LLROUND along with new
intrinsics. The changes are straightforward as for other
floating-point rounding functions, with just some adjustments
required to handle the return value being an interger.
The idea is to optimize lround/llround generation for AArch64
in a subsequent patch. Current semantic is just route it to libm
symbol.
llvm-svn: 360889
Summary:
The complex DOT instructions perform a dot-product on quadtuplets from
two source vectors and the resuling wide real or wide imaginary is
accumulated into the destination register. The instructions come in two
forms:
Vector form, e.g.
cdot z0.s, z1.b, z2.b, #90 - complex dot product on four 8-bit quad-tuplets,
accumulating results in 32-bit elements. The
complex numbers in the second source vector are
rotated by 90 degrees.
cdot z0.d, z1.h, z2.h, #180 - complex dot product on four 16-bit quad-tuplets,
accumulating results in 64-bit elements.
The complex numbers in the second source
vector are rotated by 180 degrees.
Indexed form, e.g.
cdot z0.s, z1.b, z2.b[3], #0 - complex dot product on four 8-bit quad-tuplets,
with specified quadtuplet from second source vector,
accumulating results in 32-bit elements.
cdot z0.d, z1.h, z2.h[1], #0 - complex dot product on four 16-bit quad-tuplets,
with specified quadtuplet from second source vector,
accumulating results in 64-bit elements.
The specification can be found here:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0602/latest
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer, rovka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61903
llvm-svn: 360870
Summary:
Add support for the following instructions:
* MUL (indexed and unpredicated vectors forms)
* SQDMULH (indexed and unpredicated vectors forms)
* SQRDMULH (indexed and unpredicated vectors forms)
* SMULH (unpredicated, predicated form added in SVE)
* UMULH (unpredicated, predicated form added in SVE)
* PMUL (unpredicated)
The specification can be found here:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0602/latest
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer, rovka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61902
llvm-svn: 360867
If we're trying to match an LEA, its possible the LEA match will be deemed unprofitable. In which case the negation we created in matchAddress would be left dangling in the SelectionDAG. This could artificially increase use counts for other nodes in the DAG. Though I don't have an example of that. But it just seems like bad form to have dangling nodes in isel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61047
llvm-svn: 360823
Summary:
Otherwise, we emit directives for CFI without any actual CFI opcodes to
go with them, which causes tools to malfunction. The technique is
similar to what the x86 backend already does.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40876
Patch by: froydnj (Nathan Froyd)
Reviewers: mstorsjo, eli.friedman, rnk, mgrang, ssijaric
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, dmajor
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61960
llvm-svn: 360816
These particular instructions only operate on 128-bit vectors and have no wider equivalents. And the
element size is always known.
One could argue that MOVSS/MOVSD could be merged, but that's probably disruptive to code in
X86ISelLowering and probably low value.
llvm-svn: 360815
Summary:
SGPR in CC can be either hw initialized or set by other chained shaders
and so this increases the SGPR count availalbe to CC to 105.
Change-Id: I3dfadc750fe4a3e2bd07117a2899fd13f3e2fef3
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61261
llvm-svn: 360778
The new cortex-m schedule in rL360768 helps performance, but can increase the
amount of high-registers used. This, on average, ends up increasing the
codesize by a fair amount (because less instructions are converted from T2 to
T1). On cortex-m at -Oz, where we are quite size-paranoid, it is better to use
the existing DAG scheduler with the RegPressure scheduling preference (at least
until the issues around T2 vs T1 instructions can be improved).
I have also made sure that the Sched::RegPressure dag scheduler is always
chosen for MinSize.
The test shows one case where we increase the number of registers used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61882
llvm-svn: 360769
This patch adds a simple Cortex-M4 schedule, renaming the existing M3
schedule to M4 and filling in the latencies as-per the Cortex-M4 TRM:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0439/latest
Most of these are 1, with the important exception being loads taking 2
cycles. A few others are also higher, but I don't believe they make a
large difference. I've repurposed the M3 schedule as the latencies are
mostly the same between the two cores, with the M4 having more FP and
DSP instructions. We also turn on MISched and UseAA for the cores that
now use this.
It also adds some schedule Write's to various instruction to make things
simpler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54142
llvm-svn: 360768
LLVM previously used `DW_CFA_def_cfa` instruction in .eh_frame to set
the register and offset for current CFA rule. We change it to
`DW_CFA_def_cfa_register` which is the same one used by GAS that only
changes the register but keeping the old offset.
Patch by Mirko Brkusanin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61899
llvm-svn: 360765
They encode the same way, but OR32mi8Locked sets hasUnmodeledSideEffects set
which should be stronger than the mayLoad/mayStore on LOCK_OR32mi8. I think
this makes sense since we are using it as a fence.
This also seems to hide the operation from the speculative load hardening pass
so I've reverted r360511.
llvm-svn: 360747
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360738
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360736
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360735
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360734
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360733
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360732
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360731
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360729
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360728
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360727
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360726
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360724
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360722
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360721
This was the portion split off D58632 so that it could follow the redzone API cleanup. Note that I changed the offset preferred from -8 to -64. The difference should be very minor, but I thought it might help address one concern which had been previously raised.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61862
llvm-svn: 360719
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360718
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360716
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360713
Move the declarations of getThe<Name>Target() functions into a new header in
TargetInfo and make users of these functions include this new header.
This fixes a layering problem.
llvm-svn: 360709
The +DumpCode attribute is a horrible hack in AMDGPU to embed the
disassembly of the generated code into the elf file. It is used by LLPC
to implement an extension that allows the application to read back the
disassembly of the code. Longer term, we should re-implement that by
using the LLVM disassembler from the Vulkan driver.
Recent LLVM changes broke +DumpCode. With -filetype=asm it crashed, and
with -filetype=obj I think it did not include any instructions, only the
labels. Fixed with this commit: now it has no effect with -filetype=asm,
and works as intended with -filetype=obj.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60682
Change-Id: I6436d86fe2ea220d74a643a85e64753747c9366b
llvm-svn: 360688
D61068 handled vector shifts, this patch does the same for scalars where there are similar number of pipes for shifts as bit ops - this is true almost entirely for AMD targets where the scalar ALUs are well balanced.
This combine avoids AND immediate mask which usually means we reduce encoding size.
Some tests show use of (slow, scaled) LEA instead of SHL in some cases, but thats due to particular shift immediates - shift+mask generate these just as easily.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61830
llvm-svn: 360684
Summary:
This patch adds support for the following instructions:
MLA mul-add, writing addend (Zda = Zda + Zn * Zm[idx])
MLS mul-sub, writing addend (Zda = Zda + -Zn * Zm[idx])
Predicated forms of these instructions were added in SVE.
The specification can be found here:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0602/latest
Reviewed By: rovka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61514
llvm-svn: 360682
For known CRBit spills, CRSET/CRUNSET, it is more efficient to load and spill
the known value instead of extracting the bit.
eg. This sequence is currently used to spill a CRUNSET:
crclr 4*cr5+lt
mfocrf r3,4
rlwinm r3,r3,20,0,0
stw r3,132(r1)
This patch custom lower it to:
li r3,0
stw r3,132(r1)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61754
llvm-svn: 360677
This adds support for the arm64_32 watchOS ABI to LLVM's low level tools,
teaching them about the specific MachO choices and constants needed to
disassemble things.
llvm-svn: 360663
This is a follow on to D58632, with the same logic. Given a memory operation which needs ordering, but doesn't need to modify any particular address, prefer to use a locked stack op over an mfence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61863
llvm-svn: 360649
Returning SDValue() makes the caller think that nothing happened and it will
end up executing the Expand path. This generates extra nodes that will need to
be pruned as dead code.
Returning an ISD::MERGE_VALUES will tell the caller that we'd like to make a
change and it will take care of replacing uses. This will prevent falling into
the Expand path.
llvm-svn: 360627
These are updates to match how isel table would emit a LOCK_OR32mi8 node.
-Use i32 for the immediate zero even though only 8 bits are encoded.
-Use i16 for segment register.
-Use LOCK_OR32mi8 for idempotent atomic operations in 32-bit mode to match
64-bit mode. I'm not sure why OR32mi8Locked and LOCK_OR32mi8 both exist. The
only difference seems to be that OR32mi8Locked is marked as UnmodeledSideEffects=1.
-Emit an extra i32 result for the flags output.
I don't know if the types here really matter just noticed it was inconsistent
with normal behavior.
llvm-svn: 360619
Usually this will abort fast-isel at the instruction using the
non-legal result, but if the only use is in a different basic block,
we'll incorrectly assume that the zext/sext is to i32 (rather than
i128 in this case).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61823
llvm-svn: 360616
Summary:
X86TargetLowering::LowerAsmOperandForConstraint had better support than
TargetLowering::LowerAsmOperandForConstraint for arbitrary depth
getelementpointers for "i", "n", and "s" extended inline assembly
constraints. Hoist its support from the derived class into the base
class.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/469
Reviewers: echristo, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: t.p.northover, E5ten, kees, jyknight, nemanjai, javed.absar, eraman, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits, void, craig.topper, nathanchance, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61560
llvm-svn: 360604
Fixes the regression noted in D61782 where a VZEXT_MOVL was being inserted because we weren't discriminating between 'zeroable' and 'all undef' for the upper elts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61782
llvm-svn: 360596
Now that we can use HADD/SUB for scalar additions from any pair of extracted elements (D61263), we can relax the one use limit as we will be able to merge multiple uses into using the same HADD/SUB op.
This exposes a couple of missed opportunities in LowerBuildVectorv4x32 which will be committed separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61782
llvm-svn: 360594
Summary:
This patch adds the following features defined by Arm SVE2 architecture
extension:
sve2, sve2-aes, sve2-sm4, sve2-sha3, bitperm
For existing CPUs these features are declared as unsupported to prevent
scheduler errors.
The specification can be found here:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0602/latest
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, sdesmalen, ostannard, rovka
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer, rovka
Subscribers: rovka, javed.absar, tschuett, kristof.beyls, kristina, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61513
llvm-svn: 360573
This adds the FPC (floating-point control register) as a reserved
physical register and models its use by SystemZ instructions.
Note that only the current rounding modes and the IEEE exception
masks are modeled. *Changes* of the FPC due to exceptions (in
particular the IEEE exception flags and the DXC) are not modeled.
At this point, this patch is mostly NFC, but it will prevent
scheduling of floating-point instructions across SPFC/LFPC etc.
llvm-svn: 360570
When deciding the safety of generating smlad, we checked for any
writes within the block that may alias with any of the loads that
need to be widened. This is overly conservative because it only
matters when there's a potential aliasing write to a location
accessed by a pair of loads.
Now we check for aliasing writes only once, during setup. If two
loads are found to have an aliasing write between them, we don't add
these loads to LoadPairs. This means that later during the transform,
we can safely widened a pair without worrying about aliasing.
However, to maintain correctness, we also need to change the way that
wide loads are inserted because the order is now important.
The MatchSMLAD method has also been changed, absorbing
MatchReductions and AddMACCandidate to hopefully improve readability.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D6102
llvm-svn: 360567
This fixes the link error
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: llvm::WebAssembly::anyTypeToString(unsigned int)
>>> referenced by WebAssemblyDisassembler.cpp
llvm-svn: 360558
Currently, without -g, BTF sections may still be emitted with
data sections, e.g., for linux kernel bpf selftest
test_tcp_check_syncookie_kern.c issue discovered by Martin
as shown below.
-bash-4.4$ bpftool btf dump file test_tcp_check_syncookie_kern.o
[1] VAR 'results' type_id=0, linkage=global-alloc
[2] VAR '_license' type_id=0, linkage=global-alloc
[3] DATASEC 'license' size=0 vlen=1
type_id=2 offset=0 size=4
[4] DATASEC 'maps' size=0 vlen=1
type_id=1 offset=0 size=28
Let disable BTF generation if no debuginfo, which is
the original design.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61826
llvm-svn: 360556
I've included a new fix in X86RegisterInfo to prevent PR41619 without
reintroducing r359392. We might be able to improve that in the base class
implementation of shouldRewriteCopySrc somehow. But this hopefully enables
forward progress on SimplifyDemandedBits improvements for now.
Original commit message:
This patch adds support for BigBitWidth -> SmallBitWidth bitcasts, splitting the DemandedBits/Elts accordingly.
The AMDGPU backend needed an extra (srl (and x, c1 << c2), c2) -> (and (srl(x, c2), c1) combine to encourage BFE creation, I investigated putting this in DAGComb
but it caused a lot of noise on other targets - some improvements, some regressions.
The X86 changes are all definite wins.
llvm-svn: 360552
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360550
See if we can simplify the demanded vector elts from the extraction before trying to simplify the demanded bits.
This helps us with target shuffles and hops in particular.
llvm-svn: 360535
The original costs stopped at SSE42, I've added conservative estimates for everything down to SSE1/SSE2 and moved some of the SSE42 costs to SSE41 (really only the addition of PCMPGT makes any difference).
I've also added missing vXi8 costs (we use PHMINPOSUW for i8/i16 for scarily quick results) and 256-bit vector costs for AVX1.
llvm-svn: 360528
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360510
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360506
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure
llvm-svn: 360505
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360502
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360500
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360498
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360497
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360496
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360494
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360493
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360490
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360488
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360487
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360486
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360485
For some targets, there is a circular dependency between InstPrinter and
MCTargetDesc. Merging them together will fix this. For the other targets,
the merging is to maintain consistency so all targets will have the same
structure.
llvm-svn: 360484
As requested in D58632, cleanup our red zone detection logic in the X86 backend. The existing X86MachineFunctionInfo flag is used to track whether we *use* the redzone (via a particularly optimization?), but there's no common way to check whether the function *has* a red zone.
I'd appreciate careful review of the uses being updated. I think they are NFC, but a careful eye from someone else would be appreciated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61799
llvm-svn: 360479
After D58632, we can create idempotent atomic operations to the top of stack.
This confused speculative load hardening because it thinks accesses should have
virtual register base except for the cases it already excluded.
This commit adds a new exclusion for this case. I'll try to reduce a test case
for this, but this fix was verified to work by the reporter. This should avoid
needing to revert D58632.
llvm-svn: 360475
Summary: Skip over prefetches when assigning debug info to instructions with memory operands. This way, the debug info is stable after instrumenting a binary with prefetches, allowing for iterative profiling and instrumentation.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: aprantl, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61789
llvm-svn: 360471
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40969
The functions findPotentiallyBlockedCopies and buildCopy are currently not
accounting for the presence of debug instructions. In the former this results
in the optimization not being trigerred, and in the latter results in
inconsistent codegen.
This patch enables the optimization to be performed in a debug build and
ensures the codegen is consistent with non-debug builds.
Patch by Chris Dawson.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61680
llvm-svn: 360436
If we only use the lower xmm of a ymm hop, then extract the xmm's (for free), perform the xmm hop and then insert back into a ymm (for free).
Fixes some of the regressions noted in D61782
llvm-svn: 360435
The current PIC model for WebAssembly is more like ELF in that it
allows symbol interposition.
This means that more functions end up being addressed via the GOT
and fewer directly added to the wasm table.
One effect is a reduction in the number of wasm table entries similar
to the previous attempt in https://reviews.llvm.org/D61539 which was
reverted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61772
llvm-svn: 360402
Adhemerval Zanella