Reassociation's NegateValue moved instructions to the beginning of
blocks (after PHIs) without checking for exception handling pads.
It's possible for reassociation to move something into an exception
handling block so we need to make sure we don't move things too early
in the block. This change advances the insertion point past any
exception handling pads.
If the block we want to move into contains a catchswitch, we cannot
move into it. In that case just create a new neg as if we had not
found an existing neg to move.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61089
llvm-svn: 360262
If we fold a branch/switch to an unconditional branch to another dead block we
replace the branch with unreachable, to avoid attempting to fold the
unconditional branch.
Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mssimpso, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61300
llvm-svn: 360232
(X | C1) + C2 --> (X | C1) ^ C1 iff (C1 == -C2)
I verified the correctness using Alive:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/YNV
This transform enables the following transform that already exists in
instcombine:
(X | Y) ^ Y --> X & ~Y
As a result, the full expected transform is:
(X | C1) + C2 --> X & ~C1 iff (C1 == -C2)
There already exists the transform in the sub case:
(X | Y) - Y --> X & ~Y
However this does not trigger in the case where Y is constant due to an earlier
transform:
X - (-C) --> X + C
With this new add fold, both the add and sub constant cases are handled.
Patch by Chris Dawson.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61517
llvm-svn: 360185
Fundamentally/generally, we should not have to rely on bailouts/crippling of
folds. In this particular case, I think we always recognize the inverted
predicate min/max pattern, so there should not be any loss of optimization.
Codegen looks better because we are eliminating an fneg.
llvm-svn: 360180
Summary:
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39024
The bug reports that a vectorized loop is stepped through 4 times and each step through the loop seemed to show a different path. I found two problems here:
A) An incorrect line number on a preheader block (for.body.preheader) instruction causes a step into the loop before it begins.
B) Instructions in the middle block have different line numbers which give the impression of another iteration.
In this patch I give all of the middle block instructions the line number of the scalar loop latch terminator branch. This seems to provide the smoothest debugging experience because the vectorized loops will always end on this line before dropping into the scalar loop. To solve problem A I have altered llvm::SplitBlockPredecessors to accommodate loop header blocks.
Reviewers: samsonov, vsk, aprantl, probinson, anemet, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: bjope, jmellorcrummey, hfinkel, gbedwell, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60831
llvm-svn: 360162
Fixes the main issue in PR41693
When both modes are used, two functions are created:
`sancov.module_ctor`, `sancov.module_ctor.$LastUnique`, where
$LastUnique is the current LastUnique counter that may be different in
another module.
`sancov.module_ctor.$LastUnique` belongs to the comdat group of the same
name (due to the non-null third field of the ctor in llvm.global_ctors).
COMDAT group section [ 9] `.group' [sancov.module_ctor] contains 6 sections:
[Index] Name
[ 10] .text.sancov.module_ctor
[ 11] .rela.text.sancov.module_ctor
[ 12] .text.sancov.module_ctor.6
[ 13] .rela.text.sancov.module_ctor.6
[ 23] .init_array.2
[ 24] .rela.init_array.2
# 2 problems:
# 1) If sancov.module_ctor in this module is discarded, this group
# has a relocation to a discarded section. ld.bfd and gold will
# error. (Another issue: it is silently accepted by lld)
# 2) The comdat group has an unstable name that may be different in
# another translation unit. Even if the linker allows the dangling relocation
# (with --noinhibit-exec), there will be many undesired .init_array entries
COMDAT group section [ 25] `.group' [sancov.module_ctor.6] contains 2 sections:
[Index] Name
[ 26] .init_array.2
[ 27] .rela.init_array.2
By using different module ctor names, the associated comdat group names
will also be different and thus stable across modules.
Reviewed By: morehouse, phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61510
llvm-svn: 360107
This reverts r357452 (git commit 21eb771dcb).
This was causing strange optimization-related test failures on an internal test. Will followup with more details offline.
llvm-svn: 360086
We don't always get this:
Cond ? -X : -Y --> -(Cond ? X : Y)
...even with the legacy IR form of fneg in the case with extra uses,
and we miss matching with the newer 'fneg' instruction because we
are expecting binops through the rest of the path.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61604
llvm-svn: 360075
Properly initialize store type to null then ensure we find a real store type in the chain.
Fixes scan-build null dereference warning and makes the code clearer.
llvm-svn: 360031
Optimization pass lib/Transforms/IPO/GlobalOpt.cpp needs to insert
DW_OP_deref_size instead of DW_OP_deref to be compatible with big-endian
targets for same reasons as in D59687.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60611
llvm-svn: 360013
Summary:
It is a common thing to loop over every `PHINode` in some `BasicBlock`
and change old `BasicBlock` incoming block to a new `BasicBlock` incoming block.
`replaceSuccessorsPhiUsesWith()` already had code to do that,
it just wasn't a function.
So outline it into a new function, and use it.
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper, spatel, danielcdh
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61013
llvm-svn: 359996
Summary:
There is `PHINode::getBasicBlockIndex()`, `PHINode::setIncomingBlock()`
and `PHINode::getNumOperands()`, but no function to replace every
specified `BasicBlock*` predecessor with some other specified `BasicBlock*`.
Clearly, there are a lot of places that could use that functionality.
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper, spatel, danielcdh
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61011
llvm-svn: 359995
Summary:
There is `Instruction::getNumSuccessors()`, `Instruction::getSuccessor()`
and `Instruction::setSuccessor()`, but no function to replace every
specified `BasicBlock*` successor with some other specified `BasicBlock*`.
I've found one place where it should clearly be used.
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper, spatel, danielcdh
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61010
llvm-svn: 359994
Summary:
If `deleteDeadLoop()` is called on such a loop, that has "bad" exit block,
one that e.g. has no terminator instruction, the `DIBuilder::insertDbgValueIntrinsic()`
will be told to insert the Dbg Value Intrinsic after `nullptr`
(since there is no first non-PHI instruction), which will cause it to not insert
those instructions into any basic block. The instructions will be parent-less,
and IR verifier will complain. It is rather obvious to track down the root cause
when that happens, so let's just assert it never happens.
Reviewers: sanjoy, davide, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61008
llvm-svn: 359993
Summary:
Inalloca parameters require special handling in some optimizations.
This change causes globalopt to strip the inalloca attribute from
function parameters when it is safe to do so, removes the special
handling for inallocas from argpromotion, and replaces it with a
simple check that causes argpromotion to skip functions that receive
inallocas (for when the pass is invoked on code that didn't run
through globalopt first). This also avoids a case where argpromotion
would incorrectly try to pass an inalloca in a register.
Fixes PR41658.
Reviewers: rnk, efriedma
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61286
llvm-svn: 359743
Summary: Fix a transformation bug where two scopes share a common instrution to hoist.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61405
llvm-svn: 359736
The demanded elts rules introduced for GEPs in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL356293 replaced vector constants with undefs (by design). It turns out that the LangRef disallows such cases when indexing structs. The right fix is probably to relax the langref requirement, and update other passes to expect the result, but for the moment, limit the transform to avoid compiler crashes.
This should fix https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41624.
llvm-svn: 359633
Summary:
Match NewPassManager behavior: add option for interleaved loops in the
old pass manager, and use that instead of the flag used to disable loop unroll.
No changes in the defaults.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, jlebar, dmgreen, hsaito, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61030
llvm-svn: 359615
Summary:
When a variable goes into scope several times within a single function
or when two variables from different scopes share a stack slot it may
be incorrect to poison such scoped locals at the beginning of the
function.
In the former case it may lead to false negatives (see
https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/590), in the latter - to
incorrect reports (because only one origin remains on the stack).
If Clang emits lifetime intrinsics for such scoped variables we insert
code poisoning them after each call to llvm.lifetime.start().
If for a certain intrinsic we fail to find a corresponding alloca, we
fall back to poisoning allocas for the whole function, as it's now
impossible to tell which alloca was missed.
The new instrumentation may slow down hot loops containing local
variables with lifetime intrinsics, so we allow disabling it with
-mllvm -msan-handle-lifetime-intrinsics=false.
Reviewers: eugenis, pcc
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60617
llvm-svn: 359536
Follow-up to:
rL359482
Avoid this potential problem throughout by giving the type a name
and verifying the assumption that both operands are the same type.
llvm-svn: 359485
PVS Studio's copy+paste recognizer was seeing this as a typo, technically Op0/Op1 in a fcmp should always be the same type, but we might as well avoid the issue.
Reported in https://www.viva64.com/en/b/0629/
llvm-svn: 359482
This change aims at making the file format be compatible with the
way LLVM handles command line options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60970
llvm-svn: 359462
This enables the pass to be used in the absence of
TargetTransformInfo. When the argument isn't passed, the factory
defaults to UninitializedAddressSpace and the flat address space is
obtained from the TargetTransformInfo as before this change. Existing
users won't have to change.
Patch by Kevin Petit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60602
llvm-svn: 359290
isValidCandidateForColdCC is much more expensive than
TTI.useColdCCForColdCall, which by default just returns false. Avoid
doing this work if we're not going to look at the answer anyway.
This change is NFC, but I see significant compile time improvements on
some code with pathologically many functions.
llvm-svn: 359253
I added a diagnostic along the lines of `-Wpessimizing-move` to detect `return x = y` suppressing copy elision, but I don't know if the diagnostic is really worth it. Anyway, here are the places where my diagnostic reported that copy elision would have been possible if not for the assignment.
P1155R1 in the post-San-Diego WG21 (C++ committee) mailing discusses whether WG21 should fix this pitfall by just changing the core language to permit copy elision in cases like these.
(Kona update: The bulk of P1155 is proceeding to CWG review, but specifically *not* the parts that explored the notion of permitting copy-elision in these specific cases.)
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Author: Arthur O'Dwyer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54885
llvm-svn: 359236
it keeps track of becomes too large
ARC optimizer does a top-down and a bottom-up traversal of the whole
function to pair up retain and release instructions and remove them.
This can be expensive if the number of instructions in the function and
pointer states it tracks are large since it has to look at each pointer
state and determine whether the instruction being visited can
potentially use the pointer.
This patch adds a command line option that sets a limit to the number of
pointers it tracks.
rdar://problem/49477063
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61100
llvm-svn: 359226
When evaluating a store through a bitcast, the evaluator tries to move the
bitcast from the pointer onto the stored value. If the cast is invalid, it
tries to "introspect" the type to get a valid cast by obtaining a pointer to
the initial element (if the type is nested, this may require walking several
initial elements).
In some situations it is possible to get a bitcast on a load (e.g. with
unions, where the bitcast may not be the same type as the store). However,
equivalent logic to the store to introspect the type is missing. This patch
add this logic.
Note, when developing the patch I was unhappy with adding similar logic
directly to the load case as it could get out of step. Instead, I have
abstracted the "introspection" into a helper function, with the specifics
being handled by a passed-in lambda function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60793
llvm-svn: 359205
Summary:
When refactoring vectorization flags, vectorization was disabled by default in the new pass manager.
This patch re-enables is for both managers, and changes the assumptions opt makes, based on the new defaults.
Comments in opt.cpp should clarify the intended use of all flags to enable/disable vectorization.
Reviewers: chandlerc, jgorbe
Subscribers: jlebar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61091
llvm-svn: 359167
Do not wrap the contents of printFusionCandidates in the LLVM_DEBUG macro. This
fixes an unused variable warning generated when compiling without asserts but
with -DENABLE_LLVM_DUMP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61035
llvm-svn: 359161
Summary: The code did not check if operand was undef before casting it to Instruction.
Reviewers: RKSimon, ABataev, dtemirbulatov
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: uabelho
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61024
llvm-svn: 359136
This patch rewrites the existing PACKSS/PACKUS constant folding code to expand as a generic expansion.
This is a first NFCI step toward expanding PACKSS/PACKUS intrinsics which are acting as non-saturating truncations (although technically the expansion could be used in all cases - but we'll probably want to be conservative).
llvm-svn: 359111
Summary:
Both the input Value pointer and the returned Value
pointers in GetUnderlyingObjects are now declared as
const.
It turned out that all current (in-tree) uses of
GetUnderlyingObjects were trivial to update, being
satisfied with have those Value pointers declared
as const. Actually, in the past several of the users
had to use const_cast, just because of ValueTracking
not providing a version of GetUnderlyingObjects with
"const" Value pointers. With this patch we get rid
of those const casts.
Reviewers: hfinkel, materi, jkorous
Reviewed By: jkorous
Subscribers: dexonsmith, jkorous, jholewinski, sdardis, eraman, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61038
llvm-svn: 359072
Summary:
Enabling MemorySSA in the old pass manager leads to MemorySSA being run
twice due to the fact that LCSSA and LoopSimplify do not preserve
MemorySSA. This is the first step to address that: target LCSSA.
LCSSA does not make any changes that invalidate MemorySSA, so it
preserves it by design. It must preserve AA as well, for this to hold.
After this patch, MemorySSA is still run twice in the old pass manager.
Step two follows: target LoopSimplify.
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits, george.burgess.iv, chandlerc
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60832
llvm-svn: 359032
DominatorTree::dominate.
ARC contract pass has an optimization that replaces the uses of the
argument of an ObjC runtime function call with the call result.
For example:
; Before optimization
%1 = tail call i8* @foo1()
%2 = tail call i8* @llvm.objc.retainAutoreleasedReturnValue(i8* %1)
store i8* %1, i8** @g0, align 8
; After optimization
%1 = tail call i8* @foo1()
%2 = tail call i8* @llvm.objc.retainAutoreleasedReturnValue(i8* %1)
store i8* %2, i8** @g0, align 8 // %1 is replaced with %2
Before replacing the argument use, DominatorTree::dominate is called to
determine whether the user instruction is dominated by the ObjC runtime
function call instruction. The call to DominatorTree::dominate can be
expensive if the two instructions belong to the same basic block and the
size of the basic block is large. This patch checks the basic block size
and just bails out if the size exceeds the limit set by command line
option "arc-contract-max-bb-size".
rdar://problem/49477063
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60900
llvm-svn: 359027
If we have a masked.load from a location we know to be dereferenceable, we can simply issue a speculative unconditional load against that address. The key advantage is that it produces IR which is well understood by the optimizer. The select (cnd, load, passthrough) form produced should be pattern matchable back to hardware predication if profitable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59703
llvm-svn: 359000
Converting InlineCost interface and its internals into CallBase usage.
Inliners themselves are still not converted.
Reviewed By: reames
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60636
llvm-svn: 358982
In some circumstances we can end up with setup costs that are very complex to
compute, even though the scevs are not very complex to create. This can also
lead to setupcosts that are calculated to be exactly -1, which LSR treats as an
invalid cost. This patch puts a limit on the recursion depth for setup cost to
prevent them taking too long.
Thanks to @reames for the report and test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60944
llvm-svn: 358958
If we have a store to a piece of memory which is known constant, then we know the store must be storing back the same value. As a result, the store (or memset, or memmove) must either be down a dead path, or a noop. In either case, it is valid to simply remove the store.
The motivating case for this involves a memmove to a buffer which is constant down a path which is dynamically dead.
Note that I'm choosing to implement the less aggressive of two possible semantics here. We could simply say that the store *is undefined*, and prune the path. Consensus in the review was that the more aggressive form might be a good follow on change at a later date.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60659
llvm-svn: 358919
In the process, use the existing masked.load combine which is slightly stronger, and handles a mix of zero and undef elements in the mask.
llvm-svn: 358913
Back in August, r340525 introduced a dependency on the assumption
cache tracker in the ipsccp pass, but that commit missed a call to
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY, which leaves the assumption cache
improperly registered if SCCP is the only thing that pulls it in.
llvm-svn: 358903
Currently, we do not expose BPI to loop passes at all. In the old pass manager, we appear to have been ignoring the fact that LCSSA and/or LoopSimplify didn't preserve BPI, and making it available to the following loop passes anyways. In the new one, it's invalidated before running any loop pass if either LCSSA or LoopSimplify actually make changes. If they don't make changes, then BPI is valid and available. So, we go ahead and teach LCSSA and LoopSimplify how to preserve BPI for consistency between old and new pass managers.
This patch avoids an invalidation between the two requires in the following trivial pass pipeline:
opt -passes="requires<branch-prob>,loop(no-op-loop),requires<branch-prob>"
(when the input file is one which requires either LCSSA or LoopSimplify to canonicalize the loops)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60790
llvm-svn: 358901
This reverts commit 7bf4d7c07f2fac862ef34c82ad0fef6513452445.
After thinking about this more, this isn't right, the range is not exact
in the same sense as makeExactICmpRegion(). This needs a separate
function.
llvm-svn: 358876
Following D60632 makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion() always returns an
exact nowrap region. Rename the function accordingly. This is in
line with the naming of makeExactICmpRegion().
llvm-svn: 358875
Summary:
Teach CorrelatedValuePropagation to also handle sub instructions in addition to add. Relatively simple since makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion already understood sub instructions. Only subtle change is which range is passed as "Other" to that function, since sub isn't commutative.
Note that CorrelatedValuePropagation::processAddSub is still hidden behind a default-off flag as IndVarSimplify hasn't yet been fixed to strip the added nsw/nuw flags and causes a miscompile. (PR31181)
Reviewers: sanjoy, apilipenko, nikic
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60036
llvm-svn: 358816
This is a follow-up to r291037+r291258, which used null debug locations
to prevent jumpy line tables.
Using line 0 locations achieves the same effect, but works better for
crash attribution because it preserves the right inline scope.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60913
llvm-svn: 358791
Summary:
Make the flags in LICM + MemorySSA tuning options in the old and new
pass managers.
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60490
llvm-svn: 358772
Summary:
Trying to add the plumbing necessary to add tuning options to the new pass manager.
Testing with the flags for loop vectorize.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, mehdi_amini, jlebar, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59723
llvm-svn: 358763
removeUsers uses a work list to collect indirect users and call remove()
on those functions. However it has a bug (`if (!Visited.insert(UU).second)`).
Actually, we don't have to collect indirect users.
After the merge of F and G, G's callers will be considered (added to
Deferred). If G's callers can be merged, G's callers' callers will be
considered.
Update the test unnamed-addr-reprocessing.ll to make it clear we can
still merge indirect callers.
llvm-svn: 358741
code to `CallBase`.
This patch focuses on the legacy PM, call graph, and some of inliner and legacy
passes interacting with those APIs from `CallSite` to the new `CallBase` class.
No interesting changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60412
llvm-svn: 358739
We would previously drop the COMDAT on the thunk we generated when replacing a
function body with the forwarding thunk. This would result in a function that
may have been multiply emitted and multiply merged to be emitted with the same
name without the COMDAT. This is a hard error with PE/COFF where the COMDAT is
used for the deduplication of Value Witness functions for Swift.
llvm-svn: 358728
Prior to this patch, each basic block listed in the extrack-blocks-file
would be extracted to a different function.
This patch adds the support for comma separated list of basic blocks
to form group.
When the region formed by a group is not extractable, e.g., not single
entry, all the blocks of that group are left untouched.
Let us see this new format in action (comments are not part of the
file format):
;; funcName bbName[,bbName...]
foo bb1 ;; Extract bb1 in its own function
foo bb2,bb3 ;; Extract bb2,bb3 in their own function
bar bb1,bb4 ;; Extract bb1,bb4 in their own function
bar bb2 ;; Extract bb2 in its own function
Assuming all regions are extractable, this will create one function and
thus one call per region.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60746
llvm-svn: 358701
The bug is that I didn't check whether the operand of the invariant_loads were themselves invariant. I don't know how this got missed in the patch and review. I even had an unreduced test case locally, and I remember handling this case, but I must have lost it in one of the rebases. Oops.
llvm-svn: 358688
The purpose of this patch is to eliminate a pass ordering dependence between LoopPredication and LICM. To understand the purpose, consider the following snippet of code inside some loop 'L' with IV 'i'
A = _a.length;
guard (i < A)
a = _a[i]
B = _b.length;
guard (i < B);
b = _b[i];
...
Z = _z.length;
guard (i < Z)
z = _z[i]
accum += a + b + ... + z;
Today, we need LICM to hoist the length loads, LoopPredication to make the guards loop invariant, and TrivialUnswitch to eliminate the loop invariant guard to establish must execute for the next length load. Today, if we can't prove speculation safety, we'd have to iterate these three passes 26 times to reduce this example down to the minimal form.
Using the fact that the array lengths are known to be invariant, we can short circuit this iteration. By forming the loop invariant form of all the guards at once, we remove the need for LoopPredication from the iterative cycle. At the moment, we'd still have to iterate LICM and TrivialUnswitch; we'll leave that part for later.
As a secondary benefit, this allows LoopPred to expose peeling oppurtunities in a much more obvious manner. See the udiv test changes as an example. If the udiv was not hoistable (i.e. we couldn't prove speculation safety) this would be an example where peeling becomes obviously profitable whereas it wasn't before.
A couple of subtleties in the implementation:
- SCEV's isSafeToExpand guarantees speculation safety (i.e. let's us expand at a new point). It is not a precondition for expansion if we know the SCEV corresponds to a Value which dominates the requested expansion point.
- SCEV's isLoopInvariant returns true for expressions which compute the same value across all iterations executed, regardless of where the original Value is located. (i.e. it can be in the loop) This implies we have a speculation burden to prove before expanding them outside loops.
- invariant_loads and AA->pointsToConstantMemory are two cases that SCEV currently does not handle, but meets the SCEV definition of invariance. I plan to sink this part into SCEV once this has baked for a bit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60093
llvm-svn: 358684
Reverse the checking of the domiance order so that when a self compare happens,
it returns false. This makes compare function have strict weak ordering.
llvm-svn: 358636
This patch adds a basic loop fusion pass. It will fuse loops that conform to the
following 4 conditions:
1. Adjacent (no code between them)
2. Control flow equivalent (if one loop executes, the other loop executes)
3. Identical bounds (both loops iterate the same number of iterations)
4. No negative distance dependencies between the loop bodies.
The pass does not make any changes to the IR to create opportunities for fusion.
Instead, it checks if the necessary conditions are met and if so it fuses two
loops together.
The pass has not been added to the pass pipeline yet, and thus is not enabled by
default. It can be run stand alone using the -loop-fusion option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55851
llvm-svn: 358607
In InstCombine, we use an idiom of "store i1 true, i1 undef" to indicate we've found a path which we've proven unreachable. We can't actually insert the unreachable instruction since that would require changing the CFG. We leave that to simplifycfg later.
This just factors out that idiom creation so we don't duplicate the same mostly undocument idiom creation in multiple places.
llvm-svn: 358600
Summary:
In the following cases, unrolling can be beneficial, even when
optimizing for code size:
1) very low trip counts
2) potential to constant fold most instructions after fully unrolling.
We can unroll in those cases, by setting the unrolling threshold to the
loop size. This might highlight some cost modeling issues and fixing
them will have a positive impact in general.
Reviewers: vsk, efriedma, dmgreen, paquette
Reviewed By: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60265
llvm-svn: 358586
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
This patch adds a basic loop fusion pass. It will fuse loops that conform to the
following 4 conditions:
1. Adjacent (no code between them)
2. Control flow equivalent (if one loop executes, the other loop executes)
3. Identical bounds (both loops iterate the same number of iterations)
4. No negative distance dependencies between the loop bodies.
The pass does not make any changes to the IR to create opportunities for fusion.
Instead, it checks if the necessary conditions are met and if so it fuses two
loops together.
The pass has not been added to the pass pipeline yet, and thus is not enabled by
default. It can be run stand alone using the -loop-fusion option.
Phabricator: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55851
llvm-svn: 358543
This is 1 of the problems discussed in the post-commit thread for:
rL355741 / http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190311/635516.html
and filed as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41101
Instcombine tries to canonicalize some of these cases (and there's room for improvement
there independently of this patch), but it can't always do that because of extra uses.
So we need to recognize these commuted operand patterns here in EarlyCSE. This is similar
to how we detect commuted compares and commuted min/max/abs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60723
llvm-svn: 358523
If a umul.with.overflow or smul.with.overflow operation cannot
overflow, simplify it to a simple mul nuw / mul nsw. After the
refactoring in D60668 this is just a matter of removing an
explicit check against multiplications.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60791
llvm-svn: 358521
This is a refactoring patch which should have all the functionality of the current code. Its goal is twofold:
i. Cleanup and simplify the reordering code, and
ii. Generalize reordering so that it will work for an arbitrary number of operands, not just 2.
This is the second patch in a series of patches that will enable operand reordering across chains of operations. An example of this was presented in EuroLLVM'18 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIEn34LvyNo .
Committed on behalf of @vporpo (Vasileios Porpodas)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59973
llvm-svn: 358519
If a constant shift amount is used, then only some of the LHS/RHS
operand bits are demanded and we may be able to simplify based on
that. InstCombineSimplifyDemanded already had the necessary support
for that, we just weren't calling it with fshl/fshr as root.
In particular, this allows us to relax some masked funnel shifts
into simple shifts, as shown in the tests.
Patch by Shawn Landden.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60660
llvm-svn: 358515
This adds a WithOverflowInst class with a few helper methods to get
the underlying binop, signedness and nowrap type and makes use of it
where sensible. There will be two more uses in D60650/D60656.
The refactorings are all NFC, though I left some TODOs where things
could be improved. In particular we have two places where add/sub are
handled but mul isn't.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60668
llvm-svn: 358512
The original commit caused false positives from AddressSanitizer's
use-after-scope checks, which have now been fixed in r358478.
> The code was previously checking that candidates for sinking had exactly
> one use or were a store instruction (which can't have uses). This meant
> we could sink call instructions only if they had a use.
>
> That limitation seemed a bit arbitrary, so this patch changes it to
> "instruction has zero or one use" which seems more natural and removes
> the need to special-case stores.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59936
llvm-svn: 358483
If there are any intrinsics that cannot be traced back to an alloca, we
might have missed the start of a variable's scope, leading to false
error reports if the variable is poisoned at function entry. Instead, if
there are some intrinsics that can't be traced, fail safe and don't
poison the variables in that function.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60686
llvm-svn: 358478
The CodeExtractor is not smart enough to compute which basic block is
the entry of a region. Instead it relies on the order of the list
of basic blocks that is handed to it and assumes that the entry
is the first block in the list.
Without the additional debug information, it is hard to understand
why a valid region does not get extracted, because we would miss
that the order of in the list just doesn't match what the CodeExtractor
wants.
NFC
llvm-svn: 358471
David Greene