Link to the GitHub Issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53745
Added config_path variable within the python script which makes the
required call to the clang-tidy binary with --config-file option.
If the config_path is None then config will be used. No error is raised
if both are given but silently chooses config_path over config
This changes the clang-tidy script to discover binaries you've built
locally without having to pass them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100692
D90110 modified the behavior of `run-clang-tidy` to always pass the
`--use-color` option to clang-tidy, which enabled colored diagnostics
output regardless of TTY status or .clang-tidy settings. This left the
user with no option to disable the colored output.
This presents an issue when trying to parse the output of run-clang-tidy
programmaticall, as the output is polluted with ANSI escape characters.
This PR fixes this issue in two ways:
1. It restores the default behavior of `run-clang-tidy` to let
`clang-tidy` decide whether to color output. This allows the user to
configure color via the `UseColor` option in a .clang-tidy file.
2. It adds mutually exclusive, optional `-use-color` and `-no-use-color`
argument flags that let the user explicitly set the color option via
the invocation.
After this change the default behavior of `run-clang-tidy` when no
.clang-tidy file is available is now to show no color, presumably
because `clang-tidy` detects that the output is being piped and defaults
to not showing colored output. This seems like an acceptable tradeoff
to respect .clang-tidy configurations, as users can still use the
`-use-color` option to explicitly enable color.
Fixes#49441 (50097 in Bugzilla)
Reviewed By: njames93
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119562
The test invocation at the start of run-clang-tidy.py (line 257) prints
all enabled checks - meaning either the default set or anything
configured via the -checks option. If any checks were (un-)configured
via the -config option, these are not printed. This is confusing to the
user, since the list of checks that are printed may be different from
the list of checks that are used by the non-testing calls to clang-tidy,
where the -config option is passed correctly.
This patch adds the -config option to the test invocation of clang-tidy
at the start of the script. This means that checks (un-)configured via
the -config option (rather than the -checks option) are applied
correctly, when printing the list of enabled checks.
This reverts commit 36892727e4 which
breaks the build when LLVM_INSTALL_TOOLCHAIN_ONLY is enabled with:
CMake Error at cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake:683 (add_dependencies):
The dependency target "clang-tidy-headers" of target "CTTestTidyModule"
does not exist.
This is the original patch in my GNUInstallDirs series, now last to merge as the final piece!
It arose as a new draft of D28234. I initially did the unorthodox thing of pushing to that when I wasn't the original author, but since I ended up
- Using `GNUInstallDirs`, rather than mimicking it, as the original author was hesitant to do but others requested.
- Converting all the packages, not just LLVM, effecting many more projects than LLVM itself.
I figured it was time to make a new revision.
I have used this patch series (and many back-ports) as the basis of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/111487 for my distro (NixOS), which was merged last spring (2021). It looked like people were generally on board in D28234, but I make note of this here in case extra motivation is useful.
---
As pointed out in the original issue, a central tension is that LLVM already has some partial support for these sorts of things. Variables like `COMPILER_RT_INSTALL_PATH` have already been dealt with. Variables like `LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX` however, will require further work, so that we may use `CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR`.
These remaining items will be addressed in further patches. What is here is now rote and so we should get it out of the way before dealing more intricately with the remainder.
Reviewed By: #libunwind, #libc, #libc_abi, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99484
This is the original patch in my GNUInstallDirs series, now last to merge as the final piece!
It arose as a new draft of D28234. I initially did the unorthodox thing of pushing to that when I wasn't the original author, but since I ended up
- Using `GNUInstallDirs`, rather than mimicking it, as the original author was hesitant to do but others requested.
- Converting all the packages, not just LLVM, effecting many more projects than LLVM itself.
I figured it was time to make a new revision.
I have used this patch series (and many back-ports) as the basis of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/111487 for my distro (NixOS), which was merged last spring (2021). It looked like people were generally on board in D28234, but I make note of this here in case extra motivation is useful.
---
As pointed out in the original issue, a central tension is that LLVM already has some partial support for these sorts of things. Variables like `COMPILER_RT_INSTALL_PATH` have already been dealt with. Variables like `LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX` however, will require further work, so that we may use `CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR`.
These remaining items will be addressed in further patches. What is here is now rote and so we should get it out of the way before dealing more intricately with the remainder.
Reviewed By: #libunwind, #libc, #libc_abi, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99484
This is the original patch in my GNUInstallDirs series, now last to merge as the final piece!
It arose as a new draft of D28234. I initially did the unorthodox thing of pushing to that when I wasn't the original author, but since I ended up
- Using `GNUInstallDirs`, rather than mimicking it, as the original author was hesitant to do but others requested.
- Converting all the packages, not just LLVM, effecting many more projects than LLVM itself.
I figured it was time to make a new revision.
I have used this patch series (and many back-ports) as the basis of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/111487 for my distro (NixOS), which was merged last spring (2021). It looked like people were generally on board in D28234, but I make note of this here in case extra motivation is useful.
---
As pointed out in the original issue, a central tension is that LLVM already has some partial support for these sorts of things. Variables like `COMPILER_RT_INSTALL_PATH` have already been dealt with. Variables like `LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX` however, will require further work, so that we may use `CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR`.
These remaining items will be addressed in further patches. What is here is now rote and so we should get it out of the way before dealing more intricately with the remainder.
Reviewed By: #libunwind, #libc, #libc_abi, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99484
The files in compile-commands.json can potentially include duplicates.
Change run-clang-tidy.py so that it does not run on the duplicate entries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112926
If a clang-tidy child process exits with a signal then run-clang-tidy will exit
with an error but there is no hint why in the output, since the clang-tidy
doesn't log anything and may not even have had the opportunity to do so
depending on the signal used.
`subprocess.CompletedProcess.returncode` is the negative signal number in this
case.
I hit this in a CI system where the parallelism used exceeded the RAM assigned
to the container causing the OOM killer to SIGKILL clang-tidy processes.
Reviewed By: sylvestre.ledru
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99081
Added an option to control whether to apply the fixes found in notes attached to clang tidy errors or not.
Diagnostics may contain multiple notes each offering different ways to fix the issue, for that reason the default behaviour should be to not look at fixes found in notes.
Instead offer up all the available fix-its in the output but don't try to apply the first one unless `-fix-notes` is supplied.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84924
The run-clang-tidy.py helper script is supposed to be used by the
user, hence it should be placed in the user's PATH. Some
distributions, like Gentoo [1], won't have it in PATH unless it is
installed in bin/.
Furthermore, installed scripts in PATH usually do not carry a filename
extension, since there is no need to know that this is a Python
script. For example Debian and Ubuntu already install this script as
'run-clang-tidy' [2] and hence build systems like Meson also look for
this name first [3]. Hence we install run-clang-tidy.py as
run-clang-tidy, as suggested by Sylvestre Ledru [4].
1: https://bugs.gentoo.org/753380
2: 60aefb1417/debian/clang-tidy-X.Y.links.in (L2)
3: b6dc4d5e5c/mesonbuild/scripts/clangtidy.py (L44)
4: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90972#2380640
Reviewed By: sylvestre.ledru, JonasToth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90972
Clang-tidy seems to output color only when printing directly to
terminal, but an option to force color-output has been added in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D7947
Using a MemoryBufferRef, If there is an error parsing, we can point the user to the location of the file.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93024
Changed `ClangTidyOptions::mergeWith` to operate on the instance instead of returning a copy. The old mergeWith method has been renamed to merge and marked as nodiscard, to aid in disambiguating which one is which.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91184
Let clang-tidy to read config from specified file.
Example:
$ clang-tidy --config-file=/some/path/myTidyConfig --list-checks --
...this will read config from '/some/path/myTidyConfig'.
ClangTidyMain.cpp reads ConfigFile into string and then assigned read data to 'Config' i.e. makes like '--config' code flow internally.
May speed-up tidy runtime since now it will just look-up <file-path>
instead of searching ".clang-tidy" in parent-dir(s).
Directly specifying config path helps setting build dependencies.
Thanks to @DmitryPolukhin for valuable suggestion. This patch now propose
change only in ClangTidyMain.cpp.
Reviewed By: DmitryPolukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89936
Now that clang-tidy supports the --use-color command line option, it's
a better user experience to use --use-color in run-clang-tidy.py and
preserving the colored output.
The action='store_true' option of argparse.add_argument implicitly
generates a default value of False if the argument is not specified.
Thus, the allow_enabling_alpha_checkers argument of
get_tidy_invocation is never None.
Extend the `InheritParentConfig` support introduced in D75184 for the command line option `--config`.
The current behaviour of `--config` is to when set, disable looking for `.clang-tidy` configuration files.
This new behaviour lets you set `InheritParentConfig` to true in the command line to then look for `.clang-tidy` configuration files to be merged with what's been specified on the command line.
Reviewed By: DmitryPolukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81949
This patch adds `--use-color` command line option and `UseColor` option to clang-tidy to control colors in diagnostics. With these options, users can force colorful output. This is useful when using clang-tidy with parallelization command line tools (like ninja and GNU parallel), as they often pipe clang-tidy's standard output and make the colors disappear.
Reviewed By: njames93
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79477
Fix various tool libraries not to link to clang's .a libraries and dylib
simultaneously. This may cause breakage, in particular through
duplicate command-line option declarations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81967
When using `-warnings-as-errors`, If there are any warnings promoted to errors, clang-tidy exits with the number of warnings. This really isn't needed and can cause issues when the number of warnings doesn't fit into 8 bits as POSIX terminals aren't designed to handle more than that.
This addresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46305.
Bug originally added in D15528
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81953
Summary:
Without this patch clang-tidy stops finding file configs on the nearest
.clang-tidy file. In some cases it is not very convenient because it
results in common parts duplication into every child .clang-tidy file.
This diff adds optional config inheritance from the parent directories
config files.
Test Plan:
Added test cases in existing config test.
Reviewers: alexfh, gribozavr2, klimek, hokein
Subscribers: njames93, arphaman, xazax.hun, aheejin, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75184
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
This library allows to create clang-tidy tools with custom checks outside of llvm repo
using prebuilt clang release tarball.
Test Plan:
Checked that clang-tidy works as before. New library exists in istall dir.
Reviewers: smeenai, gribozavr, stephanemoore
Subscribers: mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73300
Update clang-tidy to use InitLLVM, like several other llvm tools that
were previously updated. On Windows, this allows clang-tidy to operate
on arguments containing characters which cannot be represented in the
system's ANSI code page such as filenames with Unicode characters.
Fixes bugzilla bug 43751.
Patch by Tristan Labelle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70694
This reverts commit 3f76260dc0.
Breaks at least these tests on Windows:
Clang :: Driver/clang-offload-bundler.c
Clang :: Driver/clang-offload-wrapper.c
Use clang_target_link_libraries() in order to support linking against
libclang-cpp instead of static libraries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68448
llvm-svn: 373786
Instead, put all checks in a cmake variable and reference this.
Also, make clangd use the the ClangTidyForceLinker.h header instead
of duplicating the list of modules -- the duplicate copy was missing
the new "darwin" checker added in r373065.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68132
llvm-svn: 373082
Summary:
Creates a new darwin ClangTidy module and adds the darwin-dispatch-once-nonstatic check that warns about dispatch_once_t variables not in static or global storage. This catches a missing static for local variables in e.g. singleton initialization behavior, and also warns on storing dispatch_once_t values in Objective-C instance variables. C/C++ struct/class instances may potentially live in static/global storage, and are ignored for this check.
The osx.API static analysis checker can find the non-static storage use of dispatch_once_t; I thought it useful to also catch this issue in clang-tidy when possible.
This is a re-land of https://reviews.llvm.org/D67567
Reviewers: thakis, gribozavr, stephanemoore
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68109
llvm-svn: 373065
Summary:
Creates a new darwin ClangTidy module and adds the darwin-dispatch-once-nonstatic check that warns about dispatch_once_t variables not in static or global storage. This catches a missing static for local variables in e.g. singleton initialization behavior, and also warns on storing dispatch_once_t values in Objective-C instance variables. C/C++ struct/class instances may potentially live in static/global storage, and are ignored for this check.
The osx.API static analysis checker can find the non-static storage use of dispatch_once_t; I thought it useful to also catch this issue in clang-tidy when possible.
Contributed By: mwyman
Reviewers: benhamilton, hokein, stephanemoore, aaron.ballman, gribozavr
Reviewed By: stephanemoore, gribozavr
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, NoQ, xazax.hun, lebedev.ri, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67567
llvm-svn: 373028
Shreyas Atre