It appears that this regressed the formatting of initializer lists in some
cases, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D114583. I'll follow-up
by adding regression tests for these.
This reverts commit c41b3b0fa0.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116000
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/49804
Interaction between IndentExternBlock and AfterExternBlock means you cannot have AfterExternBlock = true and IndentExternBlock = NoIndent/Indent
This patch resolves that
```
BraceWrapping:
AfterExternBlock: true
IndentExternBlock: AfterExternBlock
```
Fixes: #49804
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115879
The alignment fix introduced by https://reviews.llvm.org/D104388 caused a regression whereby formatting of code that follows the lambda block is incorrect i.e. separate expressions are put on the same line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115738
Responding to a Discord call to help {D113977} and heavily inspired by the unlanded {D34225} add some support to help coroutinues from not being formatted from
```for co_await(auto elt : seq)```
to
```
for
co_await(auto elt : seq)
```
Because of the dominance of clang-format in the C++ community, I don't think we should make it the blocker that prevents users from embracing the newer parts of the standard because we butcher the layout of some of the new constucts.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, Quuxplusone, ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114859
Previously, clang-format would not correctly identify preprocessor
directives directly following a conflict marker, which would result in
violating the formatter's invariants.
The provided test fails in assert mode before this change.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52517
clang-format is butchering modules, this could easily become a barrier to entry for modules given clang-formats wide spread use.
Prevent the following from adding spaces around the `:` (cf was considering the ':' as an InheritanceColon)
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan, ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114151
Make all code go through FormatTokenSource instead of going around it, which
makes changes to TokenSource brittle.
Add LLVM_DEBUG in FormatTokenSource to be able to follow the token stream.
1. IndexTokenSource::getNextToken cannot return nullptr; some code was
still written assuming it can; make getNextToken more resilient against
incorrect input and fix its call-sites.
2. Change various asserts that can happen due to user provided input to
conditionals in the code.
Currently constructor initializer lists sometimes format incorrectly
when there is a preprocessor directive in the middle of the list.
This patch fixes the issue when parsing the initilizer list by
ignoring the preprocessor directive when checking if a block is
part of an initializer list.
rdar://82554274
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109951
TypeScript 4.3 added a new "override" keyword for class members. This
lets clang-format know about it, so it can format code using it
properly.
Reviewed By: krasimir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108692
Clean up the detection of parameter declarations in K&R C function
definitions. Also make it more precise by requiring the second
token after the r_paren to be either a star or keyword/identifier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108094
After
9da70ab3d4
we saw a few regressions around trailing attribute definitions and in
typedefs (examples in the added test cases). There's some tension
distinguishing K&R definitions from attributes at the parser level,
where we have to decide if we need to put the type of the K&R definition
on a new unwrapped line before we have access to the rest of the line,
so we're scanning backwards and looking for a pattern like f(a, b). But
this type of pattern could also be an attribute macro, or the whole
declaration could be a typedef itself. I updated the code to check for a
typedef at the beginning of the line and to not consider raw identifiers
as possible first K&R declaration (but treated as an attribute macro
instead). This is not 100% correct heuristic, but I think it should be
reasonably good in practice, where we'll:
* likely be in some very C-ish code when using K&R style (e.g., stuff
that uses `struct name a;` instead of `name a;`
* likely be in some very C++-ish code when using attributes
* unlikely mix up the two in the same declaration.
Ideally, we should only decide to add the unwrapped line before the K&R
declaration after we've scanned the rest of the line an noticed the
variable declarations and the semicolon, but the way the parser is
organized I don't see a good way to do this in the current parser, which
only has good context for the previously visited tokens. I also tried
not emitting an unwrapped line there and trying to resolve the situation
later in the token annotator and the continuation indenter, and that
approach seems promising, but I couldn't make it to work without
messing up a bunch of other cases in unit tests.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107950
Previously, with AllowShortEnumsOnASingleLine disabled, enums that would have otherwise fit on a single line would always put the opening brace on its own line.
This patch ensures that these enums will only put the brace on its own line if the existing attachment rules indicate that it should.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99840
Break an unwrapped line before the first parameter declaration in a
K&R C function definition.
This fixes PR51074.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106112
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50727
When processing C# Lambda expression in the indentation can goes a little wrong,
resulting the the closing } being at the wrong indentation level and meaning the remaining part of the file is
incorrectly indented.
This can be a fairly common pattern for when C# wants to peform a UI action from a thread,
and it wants to invoke that action on the main thread
Reviewed By: exv, jbcoe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104388
WG14 adopted N2645 and WG21 EWG has accepted P2334 in principle (still
subject to full EWG vote + CWG review + plenary vote), which add
support for #elifdef as shorthand for #elif defined and #elifndef as
shorthand for #elif !defined. This patch adds support for the new
preprocessor directives.
This fixes two errors:
Previously, clang-format was splitting up type identifiers from the
nullable ?. This changes this behavior so that the type name sticks with
the operator.
Additionally, nullable operators attached to return types in interface
functions were not parsed correctly. Digging deeper, it looks like
interface bodies were being parsed differently than classes and structs,
causing MustBeDeclaration to be incorrect for interface members. They
now share the same logic.
One other change is reintroducing the CSharpNullable type independent of
JsTypeOptionalQuestion. Despite having a similar semantic purpose, their
actual syntax differs quite a bit.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101860
Commit
f7f9f94b2e
changed the indent of ObjC method arguments from +4 to +2, if the method
occurs after a block statement. I believe this was unintentional and there
was insufficient ObjC test coverage to catch this.
Example: `clang-format -style=google test.mm`
before:
```
void aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(int c) {
if (c) {
f();
}
[dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee:^(fffffffffffffff gggggggg) {
f(SSSSS, c);
}];
}
```
after:
```
void aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(int c) {
if (c) {
f();
}
[dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee:^(fffffffffffffff gggggggg) {
f(SSSSS, c);
}];
}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99063
This commit removes the old way of handling Whitesmiths mode in favor of just setting the
levels during parsing and letting the formatter handle it from there. It requires a bit of
special-casing during the parsing, but ends up a bit cleaner than before. It also removes
some of switch/case unit tests that don't really make much sense when dealing with
Whitesmiths.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94500
Adds support for coding styles that make a separate indentation level for access modifiers, such as Code::Blocks or QtCreator.
The new option, `IndentAccessModifiers`, if enabled, forces the content inside classes, structs and unions (“records”) to be indented twice while removing a level for access modifiers. The value of `AccessModifierOffset` is disregarded in this case, aiming towards an ease of use.
======
The PR (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19056) had an implementation attempt by @MyDeveloperDay already (https://reviews.llvm.org/D60225) but I've decided to start from scratch. They differ in functionality, chosen approaches, and even the option name. The code tries to re-use the existing functionality to achieve this behavior, limiting possibility of breaking something else.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94661
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48569
This is a tentative fix which addresses a PR raise regarding Case indentation when working with Whitesmiths Indentation
I could not find online any reference sources as to what the case indentation for Whitesmith's should be (or be allowed to be)
But according to the documentation, we don't obey the rules for Whitesmith's
```
In particular, the documentation states that this option is to "indent case labels one level from the switch statement. When false, use the same indentation level as for the switch statement."
```
The behaviour we add here is actually as the TODO in the tests used to state in {D67627}, but when {D82016} was added and I brought these tests out from being TODO I realized I changed the indentation.
Reviewed By: curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93806
A quick search of github.com, shows one common scenario for excessive use of //clang-format off/on is the indentation of #pragma's, especially around the areas of loop optimization or OpenMP
This revision aims to help that by introducing an `IndentPragmas` style, the aim of which is to keep the pragma at the current level of scope
```
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
// clang-format off
#pragma HLS UNROLL
// clang-format on
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) {
// clang-format off
#pragma HLS UNROLL
// clang-format on
....
```
can become
```
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
#pragma HLS UNROLL
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) {
#pragma HLS UNROLL
....
```
This revision also support working alongside the `IndentPPDirective` of `BeforeHash` and `AfterHash` (see unit tests for examples)
Reviewed By: curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92753
This is a starting point to improve the handling of concepts in clang-format. There is currently no real formatting of concepts and this can lead to some odd formatting, e.g.
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar, miscco, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79773
ClangFormat does not correctly handle an Objective-C interface declaration
with both lightweight generics and a protocol conformance.
This simple example:
```
@interface Foo : Bar <Baz> <Blech>
@end
```
means `Foo` extends `Bar` (a lightweight generic class whose type
parameter is `Baz`) and also conforms to the protocol `Blech`.
ClangFormat should not apply any changes to the above example, but
instead it currently formats it quite poorly:
```
@interface Foo : Bar <Baz>
<Blech>
@end
```
The bug is that `UnwrappedLineParser` assumes an open-angle bracket
after a base class name is a protocol list, but it can also be a
lightweight generic specification.
This diff fixes the bug by factoring out the logic to parse
lightweight generics so it can apply both to the declared class
as well as the base class.
Test Plan: New tests added. Ran tests with:
% ninja FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Confirmed tests failed before diff and passed after diff.
Reviewed By: sammccall, MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89496
This improves the debugging experience since LLDB will print the enumerator
name instead of a decimal number. This changes TokenType to have uint8_t
as the underlying type and moves it after the remaining bitfields to avoid
increasing the size of FormatToken.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87006
The underlying ABI forces FormatToken to have a lot of padding.
Currently (on x86-64 linux) `sizeof(FormatToken) == 288`. After this patch
`sizeof(FormatToken) == 232`.
No functional changes.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84306
Summary:
There should be no line break before the opening brace for Microsoft style property accessors when the accessor is a simple `{ get; set }`.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/properties
Reviewers: krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81467
Summary:
{D80144} introduce an ObjC regression
Only parse the `[]` if what follows is really an attribute
Reviewers: krasimir, JakeMerdichAMD
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: rdwampler, aaron.ballman, curdeius, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80547
Summary:
Its currently not possible to recreate the GNU style using the `BreakBeforeBraces: Custom` style due to a lack of missing `BeforeWhile` in the `BraceWrappingFlags`
The following request was raised to add `BeforeWhile` in a `do..while` context like `BeforeElse` and `BeforeCatch` to give greater control over the positioning of the `while`
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42164
Reviewers: krasimir, mitchell-stellar, sammccall
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79325
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45614
`[[nodiscard]]` after a macro doesn't behave the same as an __attribute__ resulting in incorrect indentation
This revision corrects that behavior
See original Mozilla bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1629756
Before:
```
class FooWidget : public nsBaseWidget {
public:
FooWidget();
NS_DECL_ISUPPORTS_INHERITED
[[nodiscard]] nsresult
FunctionOne();
[[nodiscard]] nsresult FunctionTwo();
};
```
After:
```
class FooWidget : public nsBaseWidget {
public:
FooWidget();
NS_DECL_ISUPPORTS_INHERITED
[[nodiscard]] nsresult FunctionOne();
[[nodiscard]] nsresult FunctionTwo();
};
```
Reviewed By: Abpostelnicu
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79990
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
With Chromium style (although that is not important) its just it defines PointerAligmment: Left
The following arguments `S&&` are formatted differently depending on if the class has an attribute between it and the class identifier
```
class S {
S(S&&) = default;
};
class [[nodiscard]] S {
S(S &&) = default;
};
```
The prescense of [[nodiscard]] between the `class/struct` and the `{` causes the `{` to be incorrectly seen as a `TT_FunctionLBrace` which in turn transforms all the && to be `TT_BinaryOperators` rather than `TT_PointerOrReference`, as binary operators other spacing rules come into play causing a miss format
This revision resolves this by allowing the parseRecord to consider the [[nodisscard]]
Reviewed By: Abpostelnicu
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80008
Summary:
Allow brace wrapping in C# property accessors to be controlled by configuration options.
Add new tests and revert old test results for Microsoft style to their previous state (as intended).
`FormatStyle.BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true;` will change automatic property formatting from
```
Type MyType { get; set }
```
to
```
Type MyType
{ get; set }
```
Reviewers: krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79000
Summary:
Currently the 'AlignConsecutive*' options incorrectly align across
elif and else statements, even if they are very far away and across
unrelated preprocessor macros.
This failed since on preprocessor run 2+, there is not enough context
about the #ifdefs to actually differentiate one block from another,
causing them to align across different blocks or even large sections of
the file.
Eg, with AlignConsecutiveAssignments:
```
\#if FOO // Run 1
\#else // Run 1
int a = 1; // Run 2, wrong
\#endif // Run 1
\#if FOO // Run 1
\#else // Run 1
int bar = 1; // Run 2
\#endif // Run 1
```
is read as
```
int a = 1; // Run 2, wrong
int bar = 1; // Run 2
```
The approach taken to fix this was to add a new flag to Token that
forces breaking alignment across groups of lines (MustBreakAlignBefore)
in a similar manner to the existing flag that forces a line break
(MustBreakBefore). This flag is set for the first Token after a
preprocessor statement or diff conflict marker.
Fixes #25167,#31281
Patch By: JakeMerdichAMD
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79388
This enables us to intercept changes to the token type via setType(), which
is a precondition for being able to use multi-pass formatting for macro
arguments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67405
Summary:
BTW my actual code that hit this issue is like
```
[a, b = std::move(b)](auto &&... c) mutable -> std::invoke_result_t<decltype(b), decltype(c)...> { /* omitted */ }
```
where this explicit return type is required for SFINAE.
Reviewed By: krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Patch By: johnchen902
Subscribers: krasimir, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78694
Summary:
Allow brace wrapping in C# property accessors to be controlled by configuration options.
Add new tests and revert old test results for MS style to their old state (as intended).
`FormatStyle.BraceWrapping.AfterFunction = true;` will change automatic property formatting from
```
Type MyType { get; set }
```
to
```
Type MyType
{ get; set }
```
Reviewers: krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79000
Summary:
Added some examples of properties from Microsoft documentation as test cases.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/programming-guide/classes-and-structs/properties
Configuration support will be added in a follow up patch to address whether automatic properties are formatted as
```
Type MyType { get; set }
```
or
```
Type MyType
{ get; set }
```
Reviewers: krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78915
Summary: In recent patches the clang-format code has become un-formatted, correct this before making additional changes
Reviewers: mitchell-stellar, sylvestre.ledru, Abpostelnicu, Wawha, jbcoe
Reviewed By: sylvestre.ledru, Abpostelnicu, jbcoe
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78909
Summary:
Improve C# `{ get; set; } = default;` formatting by handling it in the UnwrappedLineParser rather than trying to merge lines later.
Remove old logic to merge lines.
Update tests as formatting output has changed (as intended).
Reviewers: krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78642
Summary:
Treat each C# generic type constraint, `where T: ...`, as a line.
Add C# keyword: where
Add Token Types: CSharpGenericTypeConstraint, CSharpGenericTypeConstraintColon, CSharpGenericTypeConstraintComma.
This patch does not wrap generic type constraints well, that will be addressed in a follow up patch.
Reviewers: krasimir
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits, MyDeveloperDay
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76367
Summary:
C# attributes can appear on classes and methods, in which case they should go on their own line, or on method parameters in which case
they should be left inline.
Reviewers: krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: klimek
Tags: #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74265
Summary:
The documentation for IndentCaseLabels claimed that the "Switch
statement body is always indented one level more than case labels". This
is technically false for the code block immediately following the label.
Its closing bracket aligns with the start of the label.
If the case label are not indented, it leads to a style where the
closing bracket of the block aligns with the closing bracket of the
switch statement, which can be hard to parse.
This change introduces a new option, IndentCaseBlocks, which when true
treats the block as a scope block (which it technically is).
(Note: regenerated ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst using tools/dump_style.py)
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Patch By: capn
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72276
Summary:
Including `do`, `for`, and `while`, `if`, `else`, `try`, `catch`, in
addition to the previously handled fields. The unit test explicitly uses
methods, but this code path handles both fields and methods.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72827
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44340
The rule that prevents `... {} [[....]]` being treated as a braced initializer for C++ causes problems for C# with attributes, causing it to be incorrectly classified and then messing up the subsequent formatting. (see bug for details of formatting)
Reviewers: mitchell-stellar, klimek, sammccall
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71769
The const-correctness of match() was fixed in rL372764, which allows
uses of Regex objects to be const in cases they couldn't be before. This
patch tightens up the const-ness of Regex in various such cases.
Reviewers: thopre
Reviewed By: thopre
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68155
Summary:
Change the BraceWrappingFlags' AfterControlStatement from a bool to an enum with three values:
* "Never": This is the default, and does not do any brace wrapping after control statements.
* "MultiLine": This only wraps braces after multi-line control statements (this really only happens when a ColumnLimit is specified).
* "Always": This always wraps braces after control statements.
The first and last options are backwards-compatible with "false" and "true", respectively.
The new "MultiLine" option is useful for when a wrapped control statement's indentation matches the subsequent block's indentation. It makes it easier to see at a glance where the control statement ends and where the block's code begins. For example:
```
if (
foo
&& bar )
{
baz();
}
```
vs.
```
if (
foo
&& bar ) {
baz();
}
```
Short control statements (1 line) do not wrap the brace to the next line, e.g.
```
if (foo) {
bar();
} else {
baz();
}
```
Reviewers: sammccall, owenpan, reuk, MyDeveloperDay, klimek
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Patch By: mitchell-stellar
Tags: #clang-format, #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68296
llvm-svn: 373647
This patch makes cases work where the lambda's template list doesn't
contain any of + - ! ~ / % << | || && ^ == != >= <= ? : true false
(see added FIXME).
Ports r359967 to clang-format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67246
llvm-svn: 371854
Summary:
This option determines whether goto labels are indented according to scope. Setting this option to false causes goto labels to be flushed to the left.
This is mostly copied from [[ http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-September/045014.html | this patch ]] submitted by Christian Neukirchen that didn't make its way into trunk.
```
true: false:
int f() { vs. int f() {
if (foo()) { if (foo()) {
label1: label1:
bar(); bar();
} }
label2: label2:
return 1; return 1;
} }
```
Reviewers: klimek, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Patch by: tetsuo-cpp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67037
llvm-svn: 371719
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
This is like r305666 (which added support for `if constexpr`) except
that it allows a macro name after the if.
This is slightly tricky for two reasons:
1. r305666 didn't add test coverage for all cases where it added a
kw_constexpr, so I had to figure out what all the added cases were
for. I now added tests for all `if constexpr` bits that didn't have
tests. (This took a while, see e.g. https://reviews.llvm.org/D65223)
2. Parsing `if <ident> (` as an if means that `#if defined(` and
`#if __has_include(` parse as ifs too. Add some special-case code
to prevent this from happening where it's incorrect.
Fixes PR39248.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65227
llvm-svn: 367167
Summary:
Other macros are used to declare namespaces, and should thus be handled
similarly. This is the case for crpcut's TESTSUITE macro, or for
unittest-cpp's SUITE macro:
TESTSUITE(Foo) {
TEST(MyFirstTest) {
assert(0);
}
} // TESTSUITE(Foo)
This patch deals with this cases by introducing a new option to specify
lists of namespace macros. Internally, it re-uses the system already in
place for foreach and statement macros, to ensure there is no impact on
performance.
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: acoomans, cfe-commits, klimek
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37813
llvm-svn: 362740
Summary:
This option `AllowShortLambdasOnASingleLine` similar to the other `AllowShort*` options, but applied to C++ lambdas.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57687
llvm-svn: 357027
Summary:
This revision adds basic support for formatting C# files with clang-format, I know the barrier to entry is high here so I'm sending this revision in to test the water as to whether this might be something we'd consider landing.
Tracking in Bugzilla as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40850
Justification:
C# code just looks ugly in comparison to the C++ code in our source tree which is clang-formatted.
I've struggled with Visual Studio reformatting to get a clean and consistent style, I want to format our C# code on saving like I do now for C++ and i want it to have the same style as defined in our .clang-format file, so it consistent as it can be with C++. (Braces/Breaking/Spaces/Indent etc..)
Using clang format without this patch leaves the code in a bad state, sometimes when the BreakStringLiterals is set, it fails to compile.
Mostly the C# is similar to Java, except instead of JavaAnnotations I try to reuse the TT_AttributeSquare.
Almost the most valuable portion is to have a new Language in order to partition the configuration for C# within a common .clang-format file, with the auto detection on the .cs extension. But there are other C# specific styles that could be added later if this is accepted. in particular how `{ set;get }` is formatted.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, krasimir, benhamilton, JonasToth
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58404
llvm-svn: 356662
Summary:
The revision r355434 had the unfortunate side-effect that it started to
recognize certain ObjC expressions with a call subexpression followed by a
`a->b` subexpression as C++ lambda expressions.
This patch adds a bit of logic to handle these cases and documents them in
tests.
The commented-out test cases in the new test suite are ones that were
problematic before r355434.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, gribozavr
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, gribozavr
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59210
llvm-svn: 355831
Summary:
A Lamdba with a return type template with a boolean literal (true,false) behaves differently to an integer literal
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40910
Reviewers: klimek, djasper, JonasToth, alexfh, krasimir, jkorous
Reviewed By: jkorous
Subscribers: jkorous, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58922
llvm-svn: 355450
A template specialization of a template foo<int N> can contain integer constants and a whole bunch of operators - e. g. foo< 1 ? !0 : (3+1)%4 >
Inspired by https://reviews.llvm.org/D58922
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58934
llvm-svn: 355434
Previously revisions commited non-clang-formatted changes to the Format library, this means submitting any revision e.g. {D55170} can cause additional whitespace changes to potentially be included in a revision.
Commit a non functional change using latest build Windows clang-format r351376 with no other changes, to remove these differences
All FormatTests
pass [==========] 652 tests from 20 test cases ran.
llvm-svn: 355182
Summary:
Currently, `UnwrappedLineParser` thinks an arrow token after
an ObjC method expression is a C++ lambda arrow, so it formats:
```
[foo bar]->baz
```
as:
```
[foo bar] -> baz
```
Because `UnwrappedLineParser` runs before `TokenAnnotator`, it can't
know if the arrow token is after an ObjC method expression or not.
This diff makes `TokenAnnotator` remove the TT_LambdaArrow on
the arrow token if it follows an ObjC method expression.
Test Plan: New test added. Ran test with:
% ninja FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Confirmed test failed before diff and passed after diff.
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57923
llvm-svn: 353531
mydeveloperday