We currently have all those fields in AnnotatingParser::Context. They
are not inherited from the Context object for the parent scope. They
are exclusive. Now they are replaced with an enum.
`InCpp11AttributeSpecifier` and `InCSharpAttributeSpecifier` are not
handled like the rest in ContextType because they are not exclusive.
Reviewed By: curdeius, MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121907
in TokenAnnotator::parseBrace. Left is misleading, because we have a
loop and Left does not move.
Also return early.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121558
in TokenAnnotator::parseParens(). Left is misleading since we have a
loop and Left is not adjusted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121557
I have lost count of the number of times this has been reported, but it fundamentally comes down to the fact that the "AlignArrayLeft/Right" function is fundamentally broken for non-square arrays.
As a result, a pointer can end up running off the end of the array structure, I've spent the last 2 weekends trying to rewrite this algorithm but I've struggled to get it aligned correctly.
This is an interim fix, that ignores all array that are non-square and leaves them alone. I think this can allow us to close out most of the crashes (if not all).
I think this can help reduce the number of bugs coming in that are duplicates.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53748https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51767https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51277
Reviewed By: curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks, feg208
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121069
Before, the code:
```
int Value { get; } = 0;
int Value { init; } = 0;
```
was formatted incoherently:
```
int Value { get; } = 0;
int Value { init; }
= 0;
```
because `init` was not recognised as an accessor specifier.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121132
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54147.
When handling `AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine`, we were searching for the last line with a smaller level than the current line. The search was incorrect when the first line had the same level as the current one. This led to an unsatisfied assumption about the existence of a brace (non-comment token).
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120902
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53981
Reorder the qualifiers inside the template argument. This should handle the simple cases of
```
<const T>
<T const>
```
But only by relaxing that single letter capital variables are not possible macros
Fixes: #53981
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120710
Originally filed at crbug.com/1184570.
When the name of a namespace is a macro that takes arguments,
- It fixed the indentation.
- It fixed the namepsace end comments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120931
We have a little problem. TokenAnnotator::resetTokenMetadata() resets
the type, except for a (growing) whitelist. This is because the
TokenAnnotator visits some tokens multiple times. E.g. trying to
identify if a < is an operator less or a template opener. And in some
runs, which are bascially "reverted" the types are reset.
On the other hand, if the parser does already know the type, it should
be able to set it, without it being reset. So we introduce the ability
to set a type and make that final.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120511
This change can be seen as code cleanup but motivation is more performance related.
While browsing perf reports captured during Linux build we can notice unusual portion of instructions executed in std::vector<std::string> copy constructor like:
0.59% 0.58% clang-14 clang-14 [.] std::vector<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >,
std::allocator<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >::vector
or even:
1.42% 0.26% clang clang-14 [.] clang::LangOptions::LangOptions
|
--1.16%--clang::LangOptions::LangOptions
|
--0.74%--std::vector<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >,
std::allocator<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >::vector
After more digging we can see that relevant LangOptions std::vector members (*Files, ModuleFeatures and NoBuiltinFuncs)
are constructed when Lexer::LangOpts field is initialized on list:
Lexer::Lexer(..., const LangOptions &langOpts, ...)
: ..., LangOpts(langOpts),
Since LangOptions copy constructor is called by Lexer(..., const LangOptions &LangOpts,...) and local Lexer objects are created thousands times
(in Lexer::getRawToken, Preprocessor::EnterSourceFile and more) during single module processing in frontend it makes std::vector copy constructors surprisingly hot.
Unfortunately even though in current Lexer implementation mentioned std::vector members are unused and most of time empty,
no compiler is smart enough to optimize their std::vector copy constructors out (take a look at test assembly): https://godbolt.org/z/hdoxPfMYY even with LTO enabled.
However there is simple way to fix this. Since Lexer doesn't access *Files, ModuleFeatures, NoBuiltinFuncs and any other LangOptions fields (but only LangOptionsBase)
we can simply get rid of redundant copy constructor assembly by changing LangOpts type to more appropriate const LangOptions reference: https://godbolt.org/z/fP7de9176
Additionally we need to store LineComment outside LangOpts because it's written in SkipLineComment function.
Also FormatTokenLexer need to be adjusted a bit to avoid lifetime issues related to passing local LangOpts reference to Lexer.
After this change I can see more than 1% speedup in some of my microbenchmarks when using Clang release binary built with LTO.
For Linux build gains are not so significant but still nice at the level of -0.4%/-0.5% instructions drop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120334
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53876.
This is a solution for standard C++ casts: const_cast, dynamic_cast, reinterpret_cast, static_cast.
A general approach handling all possible casts is not possible without semantic information.
Consider the code:
```
static_cast<T>(*function_pointer_variable)(arguments);
```
vs.
```
some_return_type<T> (*function_pointer_variable)(parameters);
// Later used as:
function_pointer_variable = &some_function;
return function_pointer_variable(args);
```
In the latter case, it's not a cast but a variable declaration of a pointer to function.
Without knowing what `some_return_type<T>` is (and clang-format does not know it), it's hard to distinguish between the two cases. Theoretically, one could check whether "parameters" are types (not a cast) and "arguments" are value/expressions (a cast), but that might be inefficient (needs lots of lookahead).
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120140
Marek Kurdej