This adds support for multiple attributes in `#pragma clang attribute push`, for example:
```
```
or
```
```
Related attributes can now be applied with a single pragma, which makes it harder for developers to make an accidental error later when editing the code.
rdar://78269653
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121283
GCC supports:
- `namespace <gnu attributes> identifier`
- `namespace identifier <gnu attributes>`
But clang supports only `namespace identifier <gnu attributes>` and diagnostics for `namespace <gnu attributes> identifier` case looks unclear:
Code:
```
namespace __attribute__((visibility("hidden"))) A
{
}
```
Diags:
```
test.cpp:1:49: error: expected identifier or '{'
namespace __attribute__((visibility("hidden"))) A
^
test.cpp:1:49: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations
test.cpp:3:2: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
}
```
This patch adds support for `namespace <gnu attributes> identifier` and also forbids gnu attributes for nested namespaces (this already done for C++ attributes).
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121245
We were not creating an evaluation context for the TU scope, so we
never popped an evaluation context for it. Popping the evaluation
context triggers a number of diagnostics, including warnings about
immediate invocations that we were previously missing.
Note: I think we have an additional issue that we should solve, but not
as part of this patch. I don't think Clang is properly modeling static
initialization as happening before constant expression evaluation. I
think structure members members are zero initialized per
http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.start.static#1,
https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.start.static#2.sentence-2, and
http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.init#general-6.2 and the new test case
actually should be accepted. However, it's also worth noting that other
compilers behave the way this patch makes Clang behave:
https://godbolt.org/z/T7noqhdPr
It's almost always entirely unused and if it is used, the end of the
attribute range can be used instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120888
This implements the parsing and recognition of module partition CMIs
and removes the FIXMEs in the parser.
Module partitions are recognised in the base computation of visibility,
however additional amendments to visibility follow in subsequent patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118586
In C++20 modules imports must be together and at the start of the module.
Rather than growing more ad-hoc flags to test state, this keeps track of the
phase of of a valid module TU (first decl, global module frag, module,
private module frag). If the phasing is broken (with some diagnostic) the
pattern does not conform to a valid C++20 module, and we set the state
accordingly.
We can thus issue diagnostics when imports appear in the wrong places and
decouple the C++20 modules state from other module variants (modules-ts and
clang modules). Additionally, we attempt to diagnose wrong imports before
trying to find the module where possible (the latter will generally emit an
unhelpful diagnostic about the module not being available).
Although this generally simplifies the handling of C++20 module import
diagnostics, the motivation was that, in particular, it allows detecting
invalid imports like:
import module A;
int some_decl();
import module B;
where being in a module purview is insufficient to identify them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118893
In C++20 modules imports must be together and at the start of the module.
Rather than growing more ad-hoc flags to test state, this keeps track of the
phase of of a valid module TU (first decl, global module frag, module,
private module frag). If the phasing is broken (with some diagnostic) the
pattern does not conform to a valid C++20 module, and we set the state
accordingly.
We can thus issue diagnostics when imports appear in the wrong places and
decouple the C++20 modules state from other module variants (modules-ts and
clang modules). Additionally, we attempt to diagnose wrong imports before
trying to find the module where possible (the latter will generally emit an
unhelpful diagnostic about the module not being available).
Although this generally simplifies the handling of C++20 module import
diagnostics, the motivation was that, in particular, it allows detecting
invalid imports like:
import module A;
int some_decl();
import module B;
where being in a module purview is insufficient to identify them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118893
These changes make the Clang parser recognize expression parameter pack
expansion and initializer lists in attribute arguments. Because
expression parameter pack expansion requires additional handling while
creating and instantiating templates, the support for them must be
explicitly supported through the AcceptsExprPack flag.
Handling expression pack expansions may require a delay to when the
arguments of an attribute are correctly populated. To this end,
attributes that are set to accept these - through setting the
AcceptsExprPack flag - will automatically have an additional variadic
expression argument member named DelayedArgs. This member is not
exposed the same way other arguments are but is set through the new
CreateWithDelayedArgs creator function generated for applicable
attributes.
To illustrate how to implement support for expression pack expansion
support, clang::annotate is made to support pack expansions. This is
done by making handleAnnotationAttr delay setting the actual attribute
arguments until after template instantiation if it was unable to
populate the arguments due to dependencies in the parsed expressions.
Implement P2128R6 in C++23 mode.
Unlike GCC's implementation, this doesn't try to recover when a user
meant to use a comma expression.
Because the syntax changes meaning in C++23, the patch is *NOT*
implemented as an extension. Instead, declaring an array with not
exactly 1 parameter is an error in older languages modes. There is an
off-by-default extension warning in C++23 mode.
Unlike the standard, we supports default arguments;
Ie, we assume, based on conversations in WG21, that the proposed
resolution to CWG2507 will be accepted.
We allow arrays OpenMP sections and C++23 multidimensional array to
coexist:
[a , b] multi dimensional array
[a : b] open mp section
[a, b: c] // error
The rest of the patch is relatively straight forward: we take care to
support an arbitrary number of arguments everywhere.
Done in manner similar to mutexinoutset
(see https://reviews.llvm.org/D57576)
Runtime support already exists in LLVM OpenMP runtime (see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D97085).
The value used to identify an inoutset dependency type in the LLVM
OpenMP runtime is 8.
Some tests updated due to change in dependency type error messages that
now include new dependency type. Also updated
test/OpenMP/task_codegen.cpp to verify we emit the right code.
This reverts commit ef82063207.
- It conflicts with the existing llvm::size in STLExtras, which will now
never be called.
- Calling it without llvm:: breaks C++17 compat
E.g. `Concept auto Func();`
The nameLoc for the constained auto type loc pointed to the concept name
loc, it should be the auto token loc. This patch fixes it, and remove
a relevant hack in clang-tidy check.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117009
The parsing code for a typename requirement currently asserts when
given something which is not a valid type-requirement
(http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.prim.req.type#nt:type-requirement). This
removes the assertion to continue on to the proper diagnostic.
This resolves PR53057.
Note that in that PR, it is using _BitInt(N) as a dependent type name.
This patch does not attempt to support that as it is not clear that is
a valid type requirement (it does not match the grammar production for
one). The workaround in the PR, however, is definitely valid and works
as expected.
The patch was reverted because it caused a crash during PCH build -- we
missed to update the RParenLoc in TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformAutoType.
This relands 55d96ac and 37ec65e with a test and fix.
C++ member function bodies (including ctor initializers) are first captured
into a buffer and then parsed after the class is complete. (This allows
members to be referenced even if declared later).
When the boundary of the function body cannot be established, its buffer is
discarded and late-parsing never happens (it would surely fail).
For code completion this is the wrong tradeoff: the point of the parse is to
generate completions as a side-effect.
Today, when the ctor body wasn't typed yet there are no init list completions.
With this patch we parse such an init-list if it contains the completion point.
There's one caveat: the parser has to decide where to resume parsing members
after a broken init list. Often the first clear recovery point is *after* the
next member, so that member is missing from completion/signature help etc. e.g.
struct S {
S() m //<- completion here
int maaa;
int mbbb;
}
Here "int maaa;" is treated as part of the init list, so "maaa" is not available
as a completion. Maybe in future indentation can be used to recognize that
this is a separate member, not part of the init list.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116294
Passing any feature in the device-isa trait which is not supported by the host
was causing a compilation failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116549
This allows the body to be parsed.
An special-case that would replace a missing if condition with OpaqueValueExpr
was removed as it's now redundant (unless recovery-expr is disabled).
For loops are not handled at this point, as the parsing is more complicated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113752
Implementation is based on the "expected type" as used for
designated-initializers in braced init lists. This means it can deduce the type
in some cases where it's not written:
void foo(Widget);
foo({ /*help here*/ });
Only basic constructor calls are in scope of this patch, excluded are:
- aggregate initialization (no help is offered for aggregates)
- initializer_list initialization (no help is offered for these constructors)
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/306
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116317
Provide signature while typing template arguments: Foo< ^here >
Here the parameters are e.g. "typename x", and the result type is e.g.
"struct" (class template) or "int" (variable template) or "bool (std::string)"
(function template).
Multiple overloads are possible when a template name is used for several
overloaded function templates.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/299
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116352
This patch adds the support for `atomic compare` in parser. The support
in Sema and CodeGen will come soon. For now, it simply eimits an error when it
is encountered.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115561
When parsing the following construct, we parse it as an erroneous
deduction guide declaration and correctly diagnose the issues with it.
template<class> struct B;
struct A { B() noexcept(false); };
However, we then go on to finish late parsing the declaration and this
expects that what we've parsed is a CXXMethodDecl. A
CXXDeductionGuideDecl is not a CXXMethodDecl (it's a FunctionDecl), and
so we assert on the cast.
This fixes the crash by switching from cast<> to dyn_cast<> and not
setting up a "this" scope when the declaration is not a CXXMethodDecl.
This fixes PR49735.
WG14 adopted the _ExtInt feature from Clang for C23, but renamed the
type to be _BitInt. This patch does the vast majority of the work to
rename _ExtInt to _BitInt, which accounts for most of its size. The new
type is exposed in older C modes and all C++ modes as a conforming
extension. However, there are functional changes worth calling out:
* Deprecates _ExtInt with a fix-it to help users migrate to _BitInt.
* Updates the mangling for the type.
* Updates the documentation and adds a release note to warn users what
is going on.
* Adds new diagnostics for use of _BitInt to call out when it's used as
a Clang extension or as a pre-C23 compatibility concern.
* Adds new tests for the new diagnostic behaviors.
I want to call out the ABI break specifically. We do not believe that
this break will cause a significant imposition for early adopters of
the feature, and so this is being done as a full break. If it turns out
there are critical uses where recompilation is not an option for some
reason, we can consider using ABI tags to ease the transition.
The form 'for co_await' is part of CoroutineTS instead of C++20.
So if we detected the use of 'for co_await' in C++20, we should emit
a warning at least.
Mike Rice