Previously, an attempt to declare an overload of a multiversion function
in C was not properly diagnosed. In some cases, diagnostics were simply
missing. In other cases the following assertion failure occured...
```
Assertion `(Previous.empty() || llvm::any_of(Previous, [](const NamedDecl *ND) { return ND->hasAttr(); })) && "Non-redecls shouldn't happen without overloadable present"' failed.
```
... or the following diagnostic was spuriously issued.
```
error: at most one overload for a given name may lack the 'overloadable' attribute
```
The diagnostics issued in some cases could be improved. When the function
type of a redeclaration does not match the prior declaration, it would be
preferable to diagnose the type mismatch before diagnosing mismatched
attributes. Diagnostics are also missing for some cases.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121959
Checking of multiversion function declarations performed by various functions
in clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp previously forced the valus of a passed in
'MergeTypeWithPrevious' reference argument in several scenarios. This was
unnecessary and possibly incorrect in the one case that the value
was forced to 'true' (though seemingly unobservably so).
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121958
This change removes redundant code in the definition of
CheckTargetCausesMultiVersioning() in SemaDecl.cpp. The removed code checked
for multiversion function support. The code immediately following the removed
code is a call to CheckMultiVersionAdditionalRules(); that function performs
the same check on entry. In both cases, the consequences of missing multiversion
function support results in the same diagnostic message being issued and the
applicable function declaration being marked as invalid.
Reviewed By: erichkeane, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121957
This change removes dead code in the definition of CheckMultiVersionFunction()
in clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp. The removed code was made dead by commit
fc53eb69c26cdd7efa6b629c187d04326f0448ca: "Reapply 'Implement target_clones multiversioning'".
See the added code just above the code being deleted; it contains the same
return statement with the previous condition now distributed across an if
statement and a switch statement.
Reviewed By: erichkeane, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121955
Regresses:
typedef struct {
static void f() {
}
} a_t;
Causing this to error instead of warn, because the linkage is computed
earlier/too early perhaps. I'll send out a review to see if there's some
other path forward or if this is an acceptable regression, etc.
This reverts commit 275c56226d.
The `objc_precise_lifetime` attribute is applied to Objective-C pointers to ensure the optimizer does not prematurely release an object under Automatic Reference Counting (ARC). It is a common enough pattern to assign values to these variables but not reference them otherwise, and annotating them with `__unused` is not really correct as they are being used to ensure an object's lifetime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120372
This implements the parsing and recognition of module partition CMIs
and removes the FIXMEs in the parser.
Module partitions are recognised in the base computation of visibility,
however additional amendments to visibility follow in subsequent patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118586
The above change assumed that malloc (and friends) would always
allocate memory to getNewAlign(), even for allocations which have a
smaller size. This is not actually required by spec (a 1-byte
allocation may validly have 1-byte alignment).
Some real-world malloc implementations do not provide this guarantee,
and thus this optimization is breaking programs.
Fixes#53540
This reverts commit c2297544c0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118804
Some functions can end up non-externally visible despite not being
declared "static" or in an unnamed namespace in C++ - such as by having
parameters that are of non-external types.
Such functions aren't mistakenly intended to be defining some function
that needs a declaration. They could be maybe more legible (except for
the `operator new` example) with an explicit static, but that's a
stylistic thing outside what should be addressed by a warning.
Do not warn on reserved identifiers resulting from expansion of system macros.
Also properly test -Wreserved-identifier wrt. system headers.
Should fix#49592
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118532
This commit checks if a function is marked with the naked attribute
and, if it is, will silence the emission of any unused-parameter
warning.
Inside a naked function only the usage of basic ASM instructions is
expected. In this context the parameters can actually be used by
fetching them according to the underlying ABI. Since parameters might
be used through ASM instructions, the linter and the compiler will have
a hard time understanding if one of those is unused or not, therefore
no unused-parameter warning should ever be triggered whenever a
function is marked naked.
Since only the decls inhabit in a namespace scope could be exported, it
is not meaningful to check it in CheckRedeclarationExported, which
implements [module.interface]/p6.
Reviewed By: urnathan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118120
Special classes such as accessor, sampler, and stream need additional
implementation when they are passed from host to device.
This patch is adding a new attribute “sycl_special_class” used to mark
SYCL classes/struct that need the additional compiler handling.
There is a comment contains a FIXME for the Module TS. And now the
Module TS is merged so we should update the comment. I've checked the
implementation.
This fixes bug 47716.
According to [module.interface]p2, it is meaningless to export an entity
which is not in namespace scope.
The reason why the compiler crashes is that the compiler missed
ExportDecl when the compiler traverse the subclass of DeclContext. So
here is the crash.
Also, the patch implements [module.interface]p6 in
Sema::CheckRedeclaration* functions.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, urnathan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112903
Often we run into situations where we want to ignore
warnings from system headers, but Clang will still
give warnings about the contents of a macro defined
in a system header used in user-code.
Introduce a ShowInSystemMacro option to be able to
specify which warnings we do want to keep raising
warnings for. The current behavior is kept in this patch
(i.e. warnings from system macros are enabled by default).
The decision as to whether this should be an opt-in or opt-out
feature can be made in a separate patch.
To put the feature to test, replace duplicated code for
Wshadow and Wold-style-cast with the SuppressInSystemMacro tag.
Also disable the warning for C++20 designators, fixing #52944.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116833
A function call `unresolved()` in C will generate an implicit declaration
of the missing function and warn `ext_implicit_function_decl` or so.
(Compared to in C++ where we get `err_undeclared_var_use`).
We want to try to resolve these names.
Unfortunately typo correction is disabled in sema for performance
reasons unless this warning is promoted to error.
(We need typo correction for include-fixer.)
It's not clear to me where a switch to force this correction on should
go, include-fixer is kind of a hack. So hack more by telling sema we're
promoting them to error.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/937
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115490
This reverts commit cc56c66f27.
Fixed a bad assertion, the target of a UsingShadowDecl must not have
*local* qualifiers, but it can be a typedef whose underlying type is qualified.
Currently there's no way to find the UsingDecl that a typeloc found its
underlying type through. Compare to DeclRefExpr::getFoundDecl().
Design decisions:
- a sugar type, as there are many contexts this type of use may appear in
- UsingType is a leaf like TypedefType, the underlying type has no TypeLoc
- not unified with UnresolvedUsingType: a single name is appealing,
but being sometimes-sugar is often fiddly.
- not unified with TypedefType: the UsingShadowDecl is not a TypedefNameDecl or
even a TypeDecl, and users think of these differently.
- does not cover other rarer aliases like objc @compatibility_alias,
in order to be have a concrete API that's easy to understand.
- implicitly desugared by the hasDeclaration ASTMatcher, to avoid
breaking existing patterns and following the precedent of ElaboratedType.
Scope:
- This does not cover types associated with template names introduced by
using declarations. A future patch should introduce a sugar TemplateName
variant for this. (CTAD deduced types fall under this)
- There are enough AST matchers to fix the in-tree clang-tidy tests and
probably any other matchers, though more may be useful later.
Caveats:
- This changes a fairly common pattern in the AST people may depend on matching.
Previously, typeLoc(loc(recordType())) matched whether a struct was
referred to by its original scope or introduced via using-decl.
Now, the using-decl case is not matched, and needs a separate matcher.
This is similar to the case of typedefs but nevertheless both adds
complexity and breaks existing code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251
Down the path, if there is a implicit instantiation, this may trigger
the assertion "Member specialization must be an explicit specialization"
in `clang::FunctionDecl::setFunctionTemplateSpecialization`.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113245
Down the path, if there is a implicit instantiation, this may trigger
the assertion "Member specialization must be an explicit specialization"
in `clang::FunctionDecl::setFunctionTemplateSpecialization`.
WG14 adopted the _ExtInt feature from Clang for C23, but renamed the
type to be _BitInt. This patch does the vast majority of the work to
rename _ExtInt to _BitInt, which accounts for most of its size. The new
type is exposed in older C modes and all C++ modes as a conforming
extension. However, there are functional changes worth calling out:
* Deprecates _ExtInt with a fix-it to help users migrate to _BitInt.
* Updates the mangling for the type.
* Updates the documentation and adds a release note to warn users what
is going on.
* Adds new diagnostics for use of _BitInt to call out when it's used as
a Clang extension or as a pre-C23 compatibility concern.
* Adds new tests for the new diagnostic behaviors.
I want to call out the ABI break specifically. We do not believe that
this break will cause a significant imposition for early adopters of
the feature, and so this is being done as a full break. If it turns out
there are critical uses where recompilation is not an option for some
reason, we can consider using ABI tags to ease the transition.
See discussion in D51650, this change was a little aggressive in an
error while doing a 'while we were here', so this removes that error
condition, as it is apparently useful.
This reverts commit bb4934601d.
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
As discussed here: https://lwn.net/Articles/691932/
GCC6.0 adds target_clones multiversioning. This functionality is
an odd cross between the cpu_dispatch and 'target' MV, but is compatible
with neither.
This attribute allows you to list all options, then emits a separately
optimized version of each function per-option (similar to the
cpu_specific attribute). It automatically generates a resolver, just
like the other two.
The mangling however, is... ODD to say the least. The mangling format
is:
<normal_mangling>.<option string>.<option ordinal>.
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D51650
Currently, this is only diagnosed but the decl is not marked invalid. This may hit assertions down the path.
This also reverts the fix for PR49534 since it is not needed anymore.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113145
The __block Objective-C pointers can be set but not used due to a commonly used lifetime extension pattern in Objective-C.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112850
This patch attempts to fix a compiler crash that occurs when long
double type is used with -mno-x87 compiler option.
The option disables x87 target feature, which in turn disables x87
registers, so CG cannot select them for x86_fp80 LLVM IR type. Long
double is lowered as x86_fp80 for some targets, so it leads to a
crash.
The option seems to contradict the SystemV ABI, which requires long
double to be represented as a 80-bit floating point, and it also
requires to use x87 registers.
To avoid that, `long double` type is disabled when -mno-x87 option is
set. In addition to that, `float` and `double` also use x87 registers
for return values on 32-bit x86, so they are disabled as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98895
Tom Honermann