Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd8493847 with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This was originally committed in 277623f4d5
Reverted in f9ad1d1c77 due to breakages
outside of clang - lldb seems to have some strange/strong dependence on
"char [N]" versus "char[N]" when printing strings (not due to that name
appearing in DWARF, but probably due to using clang to stringify type
names) that'll need to be addressed, plus a few other odds and ends in
other subprojects (clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt, etc).
Looks like lldb has some issues with this - somehow it causes lldb to
treat a "char[N]" type as an array of chars (prints them out
individually) but a "char [N]" is printed as a string. (even though the
DWARF doesn't have this string in it - it's something to do with the
string lldb generates for itself using clang)
This reverts commit 277623f4d5.
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd8493847 with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
The outputs between the direct ast-dump test and the ast-dump test after
deserialization should match modulo a few differences.
For hand-written tests, strip the "<undeserialized declarations>"s and
the "imported"s with sed.
For tests generated with "make-ast-dump-check.sh", regenerate the
output.
Part 2/n.
not be a pack expansion type.
Using a pack expansion type for a pack declaration makes sense, but
general expressions should never have pack expansion types. If we have a
pack `T *...V`, then the type of `V` is the type `T *`, which contains
an unexpanded pack, and is a pointer type.
This allows us to better diagnose issues where a template is invalid due
to some non-dependent portion of a dependent type of a non-type template
parameter pack.
and returned to the context in which 'this' should be captured.
This means we now always mark 'this' referenced from the context in
which it's actually referenced, rather than potentially from some
context nested within that.
llvm-svn: 362182
capturing expression or statement.
No functionality change yet. The intent is that we will also delay
building the initialization expression until the enclosing context, so
that:
a) we build the initialization expression in the right context, and
b) we can elide captures that are not odr-used, as suggested by P0588R1.
This also consolidates some duplicated code building capture fields into
a single place.
llvm-svn: 361893
There is currently no way to distinguish implicit from explicit
CXXThisExpr in the AST dump output.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57649
Reviewed By: steveire
llvm-svn: 353003
Summary:
Currently the Clang AST doesn't store information about how the callee of a CallExpr was found. Specifically if it was found using ADL.
However, this information is invaluable to tooling. Consider a tool which renames usages of a function. If the originally CallExpr was formed using ADL, then the tooling may need to additionally qualify the replacement.
Without information about how the callee was found, the tooling is left scratching it's head. Additionally, we want to be able to match ADL calls as quickly as possible, which means avoiding computing the answer on the fly.
This patch changes `CallExpr` to store whether it's callee was found using ADL. It does not change the size of any AST nodes.
Reviewers: fowles, rsmith, klimek, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, riccibruno, calabrese, titus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55534
llvm-svn: 348977
David Blaikie