This clarifies that this is an LLVM specific variable and avoids
potential conflicts with other projects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119918
This is useful when building a complete toolchain to ensure that CRT
is built after builtins but before the rest of the compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120682
Pass LIBCXX_HAS_PTHREAD_LIB, LIBCXX_HAS_RT_LIB and LIBCXXABI_HAS_PTHREAD_LIB
through to the custom lib++ builds so that libfuzzer doesn't end up with a .deplibs section that
links against those libraries when the variables are set to false.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120946
Let `archive-aix-libatomic` accept additional argument to customize name of output atomic library.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120534
clang-cl doesn't support -target <target>, instead it only supports
--target=<target> so building a RUNTIME configuration for clang-cl
ended up in never building builtins. Which in turn lead to clang-cl
not being able to find the runtime libraries because we depend
on the compiler_rt.builtins.lib being in the runtime dir for the
Driver to add it as a candidate.
I don't think this should have any downsides since most the code
these days are using --target=<target> instead of the old syntax.
Reviewed By: mstorsjo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120308
This patch extends compiler-rt's cmake config to build macOS builtins with both macOS and Mac Catalyst support.
This is done by telling the compiler to emit macho files with two build version load commands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118875
This reverts commit 910a642c0a.
There are serious correctness issues with the current approach: __sync_*
routines which are not actually atomic should not be enabled by default.
I'll continue discussion on the review.
ARMv5 and older architectures don’t support SMP and do not have atomic instructions. Still they’re in use in IoT world, where one has to stick to libgcc.
Reviewed By: mstorsjo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116088
Note: the term "libgcc" refers to the all of `libgcc.a`, `libgcc_eh.a`,
and `libgcc_s.so`.
Enabling libunwind as a replacement for libgcc on Linux has proven to be
challenging since libgcc_s.so is a required dependency in the [Linux
standard base][5]. Some software is transitively dependent on libgcc
because glibc makes hardcoded calls to functions in libgcc_s. For example,
the function `__GI___backtrace` eventually makes its way to a [hardcoded
dlopen to libgcc_s' _Unwind_Backtrace][1]. Since libgcc_{eh.a,s.so} and
libunwind have the same ABI, but different implementations, the two
libraries end up [cross-talking, which ultimately results in a
segfault][2].
To solve this problem, libunwind needs to build a “libgcc”. That is, link
the necessary functions from compiler-rt and libunwind into an archive
and shared object that advertise themselves as `libgcc.a`, `libgcc_eh.a`,
and `libgcc_s.so`, so that glibc’s baked calls are diverted to the
correct objects in memory. Fortunately for us, compiler-rt and libunwind
use the same ABI as the libgcc family, so the problem is solvable at the
llvm-project configuration level: no program source needs to be edited.
Thus, the end result is for a user to configure their LLVM build with a
flag that indicates they want to archive compiler-rt/unwind as libgcc.
We achieve this by compiling libunwind with all the symbols necessary
for compiler-rt to emulate the libgcc family, and then generate symlinks
named for our "libgcc" that point to their corresponding libunwind
counterparts.
We alternatively considered patching glibc so that the source doesn't
directly refer to libgcc, but rather _defaults_ to libgcc, so that a
system preferring compiler-rt/libunwind can point to these libraries
at the config stage instead. Even if we modified the Linux standard
base, this alternative won't work because binaries that are built using
libgcc will still end up having crosstalk between the differing
implementations.
This problem has been solved in this manner for [FreeBSD][3], and this
CL has been tested against [Chrome OS][4].
[1]: https://github.com/bminor/glibc/blob/master/sysdeps/arm/backtrace.c#L68
[2]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1162190#c16
[3]: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/tree/main/lib/libgcc_s
[4]: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/overlays/chromiumos-overlay/+/2945947
[5]: https://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_5.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/libgcc-s.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108416
Follow-up to 458ead66dc, which replaced the bespoke CMakeLists.txt
file for building a custom instrumented libc++ with an invocation of the
runtimes build.
In the the bespoke CMakeLists.txt, the LIBCXX_CXX_ABI setting was forced
to libcxxabi, but this was not done for the CMake invocation for the
runtimes build. This would cause CMake configuration issues on platforms
where the default LIBCXX_CXX_ABI setting is not libcxxabi, such as
FreeBSD.
Add `-DLIBCXX_CXX_ABI=libcxxabi` to that invocation, to make sure the
custom instrumented libc++ always uses the expected ABI.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119554
This reverts commit 640beb38e7.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ibf8e397df94001f248fba609f072088a46abae08
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115960
Change-Id: Id169459ce4dfffa857d5645a0af50b0063ce1105
Adds x-ray support for hexagon to llvm codegen, clang driver,
compiler-rt libs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113638
Reapplying this after 543a9ad7c4,
which fixes the leak introduced there.
Some of the compiler-rt runtimes use custom instrumented libc++ build.
Use the runtimes build for building this custom libc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114922
We don't run tests or benchmarks from this build anyway.
Benchmarks in custom libc++ break my local build.
Reviewed By: ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115375
Some of the compiler-rt runtimes use custom instrumented libc++ build.
Use the runtimes build for building this custom libc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114922
We need libfuzzer libraries on Arm32 so that we can fuzz
Arm32 binaries on Linux (Chrome OS). Android already
allows Arm32 for libfuzzer.
Reviewed By: morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112091
Applying the same rules as for LLVM_BUILD_INSTRUMENTED build in the cmake files.
By having this patch, we are able to disable/enable instrument+coverage build
of the compiler-rt project when building instrumented LLVM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108127
D98452 introduced a mismatch between clang expectations for
builtin name for baremetal targets on arm. Fix it by
adding a case for baremetal. This now matches the output of
"clang -target armv7m-none-eabi -print-libgcc-file-name \
-rtlib=compiler-rt"
Reviewed By: mstorsjo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113357
There's a lot of duplicated calls to find various compiler-rt libraries
from build of runtime libraries like libunwind, libc++, libc++abi and
compiler-rt. The compiler-rt helper module already implemented caching
for results avoid repeated Clang invocations.
This change moves the compiler-rt implementation into a shared location
and reuses it from other runtimes to reduce duplication and speed up
the build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88458
Reapply 5692ed0cce, but with the ORC runtime disabled explicitly on
CrossWinToARMLinux to match the other compiler-rt runtime libraries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112229
---
Enable building the ORC runtime for 64-bit and 32-bit ARM architectures,
and for all Darwin embedded platforms (iOS, tvOS, and watchOS). This
covers building the cross-platform code, but does not add TLV runtime
support for the new architectures, which can be added independently.
Incidentally, stop building the Mach-O TLS support file unnecessarily on
other platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112111
Enable building the ORC runtime for 64-bit and 32-bit ARM architectures,
and for all Darwin embedded platforms (iOS, tvOS, and watchOS). This
covers building the cross-platform code, but does not add TLV runtime
support for the new architectures, which can be added independently.
Incidentally, stop building the Mach-O TLS support file unnecessarily on
other platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112111
There's a lot of duplicated calls to find various compiler-rt libraries
from build of runtime libraries like libunwind, libc++, libc++abi and
compiler-rt. The compiler-rt helper module already implemented caching
for results avoid repeated Clang invocations.
This change moves the compiler-rt implementation into a shared location
and reuses it from other runtimes to reduce duplication and speed up
the build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88458
This way, we do not need to set LLVM_CMAKE_PATH to LLVM_CMAKE_DIR when (NOT LLVM_CONFIG_FOUND)
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107717
Before, COMPILER_RT_TEST_COMPILER was used which pointed to a C compiler. While
it is incorrect to assume either of these is the default compiler, using the
C++ one allows for linking cpp tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109207
This change adds tests to make sure that SCUDO is being properly
included with llvm libc. This change also adds the toggles to properly
use SCUDO, as GWP-ASan is enabled by default and must be included for
SCUDO to function.
Reviewed By: sivachandra, hctim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106919
As code diverge from Google style we need
to add more and more exceptions to suppress
conflicts with clang-format and clang-tidy.
As this point it does not provide a additional value.
Reviewed By: morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107197
Petr Hosek