This patch adds a lightweight assertion handler mechanism that can be
overriden at link-time in a fashion similar to `operator new`.
This is a third take on https://llvm.org/D121123 (which allowed customizing
the assertion handler at compile-time), and https://llvm.org/D119969
(which allowed customizing the assertion handler at runtime only).
This approach is, I think, the best of all three explored approaches.
Indeed, replacing the assertion handler in user code is ergonomic,
yet we retain the ability to provide a custom assertion handler when
deploying to older platforms that don't have a default handler in
the dylib.
As-is, this patch provides a pretty good amount of backwards compatibility
with the previous debug mode:
- Code that used to set _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 in order to get basic assertions
in their code will still get basic assertions out of the box, but
those assertions will be using the new assertion handler support.
- Code that was previously compiled with references to __libcpp_debug_function
and friends will work out-of-the-box, no changes required. This is
because we provide the same symbols in the dylib as we used to.
- Code that used to set a custom __libcpp_debug_function will stop
compiling, because we don't provide that declaration anymore. Users
will have to migrate to the new way of setting a custom assertion
handler, which is extremely easy. I suspect that pool of users is
very limited, so breaking them at compile-time is probably acceptable.
The main downside of this approach is that code being compiled with
assertions enabled but deploying to an older platform where the assertion
handler didn't exist yet will fail to compile. However users can easily
fix the problem by providing a custom assertion handler and defining
the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_ASSERTION_HANDLER_PROVIDED macro to
let the library know about the custom handler. In a way, this is
actually a feature because it avoids a load-time error that one would
otherwise get when trying to run the code on the older target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121478
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D121626 for details -- this re-enables the
CTAD we removed, since it does break some stuff as well (even though it's
not nearly as bad as the removed constructors fixed by D121626).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122184
The test fails on AIX due to it expecting an error as on Linux. However, as on
other non-Linux systems symlinks permissions are supported so expect an empty
error code.
Reviewed By: daltenty, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121140
These are the last™ changes to the tests for constexpr preparation.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, #libc, Mordante
Spies: Mordante, EricWF, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120951
Before it only accepted one output iterator type. Now it accepts all
output iterator types as required by BasicFormatter.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120916
Addresses LWG 3548 which mandates that when shared_ptr is being constructed from a unique_ptr, the unique_ptr's deleter should be moved and not copied.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119159
Changes in [P0896](https://wg21.link/p0896):
- add `disable_sized_sentinel_for`;
- add `iter_move` and `iter_swap`;
- add a `requires` clause to the `operator->`;
- add `iterator_concept`;
- check that the `Iterator` template parameter is a bidirectional
iterator;
- add constraints to all comparison operators;
- change the definitions of `iterator_category`, `value_type`,
`difference_type` and `reference` (changes to `iterator_category` were
already implemented).
Also add a few forgotten things to the `reverse_iterator` synopsis
(notably the spaceship operator).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120180
This tests the same QoI issue as the existing STL Classic test,
but for the Ranges algorithms. Also, do the same thing for all
the algorithms that take projections.
I found a few missing algorithms and added them to the existing test, too. `std::find_first_of` currently fails; I should look at why that is (and in particular, what is it doing weird that //makes// it inconsistent with the entire rest of libc++?).
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121265
In the new-style testing configurations, we were hardcoding paths to the
`include` and `lib` directories, which was incorrect but always went
unnoticed because the hardcoded values always happened to match the
actual value.
When using new-style configs with the bootstrapping build, this falls
appart -- and we never noticed this because the bootstrapping build was
still using old style configs.
This patch removes the %{install} substitution, which makes it too
tempting to hardcode installation paths, and it also switches the
bootstrapping build to actually using new-style configs like we
always intended to do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121700
This should make CI consistent on all the compilers we support. Most of
this patch is working around various warnings emitted by GCC in our code
base, which are now being shown when we compile the tests.
After this patch, the whole test suite should be warning free on all
compilers we support and test, except for a few warnings on GCC that
we silence explicitly until we figure out the proper fix for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120684
Back in 3a208c6894, we implemented the range-based constructor for <span>.
However, in doing so, we removed a previous non-standard constructor that
we provided before shipping <ranges>. Unfortunately, that breaks code that
was relying on a range-based constructor until we ship all of <ranges>.
This patch reintroduces the old non-conforming constructors and tests
that were removed in 3a208c6894 and uses them whenever <ranges> is
not provided (e.g. in LLVM 14). This is only a temporary workaround
until we enable <ranges> by default in C++20, which should hopefully
happen by LLVM 15.
The goal is to cherry-pick this workaround back to the LLVM 14 release
branch, since I suspect the constructor removal may otherwise cause
breakage out there, like the breakage I saw internally.
We could have avoided this situation by waiting for C++20 to be finalized
before shipping std::span. For example, we could have guarded it with
something like _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES to prevent users from
accidentally starting to depend on it before it is stable. We did not
have these mechanisms when std::span was first implemented, though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121626
Prior to this patch, there was no distinction between tests that check
basic assertions and tests that check full-fledged iterator debugging
assertions. Both were disabled when support for the debug mode is not
provided in the dylib, which is stronger than it needs to be.
Furthermore, all of the tests using "debug_macros.h" that contain more
than one assertion in them were broken -- any code after the first
assertion would never be executed.
This patch refactors all of our assertion-related tests to:
1. Be enabled whenever they can, i.e. basic assertions tests are run
even when the debug mode is disabled.
2. Use the superior `check_assertion.h` (previously `debug_mode_helper.h`)
instead of `debug_macros.h`, which allows multiple assertions in the
same program.
3. Coalesce some tests into the same file to make them more readable.
4. Use consistent naming for test files -- no more db{1,2,3,...,10} tests.
This is a large but mostly mechanical patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121462
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
operator-> is not a requirement for most iterators, so remove it. To
account for this change, the `common_iterator.operator->` test needs to
be refactored quite a bit -- improve test coverage while we're at it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118400
Now that we've branched for the LLVM 14 release, our support window
moves to clang-13 and clang-14. Similarly, AppleClang 13 has been
released for some time now, so that should be the oldest compiler
we support, per our policy.
A possible follow-up would be to remove _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS, since
I don't think we support any compiler that doesn't support concepts
anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118831
This reverts commit 276ca873. That commit has quite a history at this
point. It was first landed in dbc647643577, which broke std::shared_ptr<T const>
and was reverted in 9138666f5. It was then re-applied in 276ca873, with
the std::shared_ptr issue fixed, but it caused widespread breakage at
Google (which suggests it would cause similar breakage in the wild too),
so now I'm reverting again.
Instead, I will add a escape hatch that vendors can turn on to enable
the extension and perform a phased transition over one or two releases
like we sometimes do when things become non-trivial.
These tests don't seem specific to the debug mode, so it makes sense to
run them even when the debug mode is disabled. When we run with the debug
mode enabled, we'll get the out-of-bounds checking that this test seems
to be concerned with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121241
Those older versions used a different monetary decimal separator.
To avoid unnecessary churn to support that, just XFAIL the test
on those older versions. (Up until
df1e43c496, the whole test was XFAILed
on all versions of glibc.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120979
On Windows, constants like F::alpha and F::print are bitmasks
consisting of multiple bits (e.g. F::alpha consisting of both the
bits F::upper and F::lower). In such a case, we can't check that
all the bits from all the expected constants are set. Instead,
check that (p[i] & mask) != 0 returns the expected value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120802
This extension is a portability trap for users, since no other standard
library supports it. Furthermore, the Standard explicitly allows
implementations to reject std::allocator<cv T>, so allowing it is
really going against the current.
This was discovered in D120684: this extension required `const_cast`ing
in `__construct_range_forward`, a fishy bit of code that can be removed
if we don't support the extension anymore.
This is a re-application of dbc647643577, which was reverted in 9138666f5
because it broke std::shared_ptr<T const>. Tests have now been added and
we've made sure that std::shared_ptr<T const> wouldn't be broken in this
version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120996
As a fly-by fix, enable the complexity-changing assertions in __debug_less
only when the full debug mode is enabled, since debugging level 0 is usually
understood to only contain basic assertions that do not change the complexity
of algorithms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121129
This extension is a portability trap for users, since no other standard
library supports it. Furthermore, the Standard explicitly allows
implementations to reject std::allocator<cv T>, so allowing it is
really going against the current.
This was discovered in D120684: this extension required `const_cast`ing
in `__construct_range_forward`, a fishy bit of code that can be removed
if we don't support the extension anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120996
AIX print -0.0 , inf, nan differently, which are causing the test
failures. We are OK for most other tests.
This patch remove the tests related these limitations conditionally on AIX,
so that we can enable the other tests to avoid losing test coverage.
The general direction is:
```
if strings don't differ between environments, keep the string literal "INF" and the padding, instead of folding them into variables.
```
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120448
Move `__quoted_output_proxy` into the one file that uses it.
A `const char*` has no associated traits class, so `std::quoted("literal")`
should be printable into any basic_ostream regardless of traits.
Use hidden-friend `operator<<` and `operator>>`, since we're permitted to.
(The exact signature is unspecified because the class itself is unspecified.)
We shouldn't support `std::quoted("literal")` in C++03 or C++11 mode.
(We do need `std::__quoted(s)` and `std::__quoted(cs)` in C++11 mode,
because they're used by `std::__fs::filesystem::path`.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120135
Zero-sized types are a GCC extension, also supported by Clang.
In theory it's already invalid to `delete` a void pointer or a
pointer-to-incomplete, so we shouldn't need any special code
to catch those cases; but in practice Clang accepts both
constructs with just a warning, and GCC even accepts `sizeof(void)`
with just a warning! So we must keep the static_asserts.
The hard errors are tested in `unique_ptr_dltr_dflt/*.compile.fail.cpp`.
In ranges::begin/end, check `sizeof >= 0` instead of `sizeof != 0`,
so as to permit zero-sized types while still disallowing incomplete
types.
Fixes#54100.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120633
I believe the origin issue in PR31864 has been addressed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D59566.
As discussed in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53840, `ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE == 2` sometimes is not consistent with `std::atomic<long long>::is_always_lock_free`, since the macro takes `long long`'s ABI alignment into account. https://reviews.llvm.org/D28213 proposed we should not rely on ABI alignment of types, thus we have consistent `ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE` and `std::atomic<long long>::is_always_lock_free` on x86's old cpu. Currently, I plan to move on to remove the workaround which should have been addressed and don't want to break current tests.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119931
Previously, this test snippet would report incorrect information:
F::mask m;
std::wstring in(L"\u00DA"); // LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH ACUTE
f.is(in.data(), in.data() + 1, &m);
// m & F::lower would be set
The single-character version of the `is` function wasn't
affected by this issue though.
Define `_LIBCPP_CTYPE_MASK_IS_COMPOSITE_ALPHA` for Windows,
as the `alpha` / `_ALPHA` constant is a mask consisting of
multiple bits set, which avoids setting `alpha` whenver any
of the bits is set, in the `do_is` implementation.
On Windows, with the "C" locale, wchars are classified according
to their Unicode interpretation, just as in the en_US.UTF-8 locale on
all platforms.
Due to the differing classification of some characters, the
`scan_is` and `scan_not` tests are quite annoying to fix, thus just
ifdef out some of the tests for the "C" locale there - the code gets
tested with the more standard en_US.UTF-8 locale anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120796
Fixes LWG3656, "Inconsistent bit operations returning a count".
https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3656
The fix has been approved for C++23 and left to vendors' discretion
in C++20 (but it sounds like everyone's on the same page that
of course it should be DR'ed back to C++20 too).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120444
Louis Dionne