Previous we used sra (X, size(X)-1); xor (add (X, Y), Y).
By placing sub at the end, we allow RISCV to combine sign_extend_inreg
with it to form subw.
Some X86 tests for Z - abs(X) seem to have improved as well.
Other targets look to be a wash.
I had to modify ARM's abs matching code to match from sub instead of
xor. Maybe instead ISD::ABS should be made legal. I'll try that in
parallel to this patch.
This is an alternative to D119099 which was focused on RISCV only.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119171
This code was detecting whether the value returned by getShiftAmountTy
can represent all shift amounts. If not, it would use MVT::i32 as a
placeholder. getShiftAmountTy was updated last year to return i32
if the type returned by the target couldn't represent all values.
This means the MVT::i32 case here is dead and can the logic can
be simplified.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120164
The code was considering shifts by an about larger than the number of
bits in the original VT to be out of range. Shifts exactly equal to
the original bit width are also out of range.
I don't know how to test this. DAGCombiner should usually fold this
away. I just noticed while looking for something else in this code. The
llvm-cov report shows that we don't have coverage for out of range shifts here.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120170
getShiftAmountTy will return MVT::i32 if the shift amount
coming from the target's getScalarShiftAmountTy can't reprsent
all possible values. That should eliminate the need to use the
pointer type which is what we do when LegalTypes is false.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120165
This fold is done in IR:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/jWyFrP
There is an x86 test that shows an improvement
from the added flexibility of using add (commutative).
The other diffs are presumed neutral.
Note that this could also be folded to an 'xor',
but I'm not sure if that would be universally better
(eg, x86 can convert adds more easily into LEA).
This helps prevent regressions from a potential fold for
issue #53829.
The current ABD combine doesn't quite work for SVE because only a
single scalable vector per scalar integer type is legal (e.g. for
i32, <vscale x 4 x i32> is the only legal scalable vector type).
This patch extends the combine to also trigger for the cases when
operand extension must be retained.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115739
When doing SelectionDAG::ReplaceAllUsesOfValuesWith a worklist is
prepared containing all users that should be updated. Then we use
the RemoveNodeFromCSEMaps/AddModifiedNodeToCSEMaps helpers to handle
recursive CSE updates while doing the replacements.
This patch aims at solving a problem that could arise if the recursive
CSE updates would result in an SDNode present in the worklist is being
removed as a side-effect of morphing a prio user in the worklist.
To examplify such a scenario, imagine that we have these nodes in
the DAG
t12: i64 = add t8, t11
t13: i64 = add t12, t8
t14: i64 = add t11, t11
t15: i64 = add t14, t8
t16: i64 = sub t13, t15
and that the t8 uses should be replaced by t11. An initial worklist
(listing the users that should be morphed) could be [t12, t13, t15].
When updating t12 we get
t12: i64 = add t11, t11
which results in a CSE update that replaces t14 by t12, so we get
t15: i64 = add t12, t8
which results in a CSE update that replaces t13 by t12, so we get
t16: i64 = sub t12, t15
and then t13 is removed given that it was the last use of t13.
So when being done with the updates triggered by rewriting the use
of t8 in t12 the t13 node no longer exist. And we used to end up
hitting an assertion when continuing with the worklist aiming at
replacing the t8 uses in t13.
The solution is based on using a DAGUpdateListener, making sure that
we prune a user from the worklist if it is removed during the
recursive CSE updates.
The bug was found using an OOT target. I think the problem is quite
old, even if the particular intree target reproducer added in this
patch seem to pass when using LLVM 13.0.0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119088
This moves the matching of AVGFloor and AVGCeil into a place where
demand bit are available, so that it can detect more cases for more
folds. It changes the transform to start from a shift, not from a
truncate. We match the pattern shr(add(ext(A), ext(B)), 1), transforming
to ext(hadd(A, B)).
For signed values, because only the bottom bits are demanded llvm will
transform the above to use a lshr too, as opposed to ashr. In order to
correctly detect the hadd we need to know the demanded bits to turn it
back. Depending on whether the shift is signed (ashr) or logical (lshr),
and the extensions are signed or unsigned we can create different nodes.
If the shift is signed:
Needs >= 2 sign bits. https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/h4gQAW generating signed rhadd.
Needs >= 2 zero bits. https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/B64DUA generating unsigned rhadd.
If the shift is unsigned:
Needs >= 1 zero bits. https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/ByD8sj generating unsigned rhadd.
Needs 1 demanded bit zero and >= 2 sign bits https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/hvPGxX and
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/32P5n1 generating signed rhadd.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119072
This adds very basic combines for AVG nodes, mostly for constant folding
and handling degenerate (zero) cases. The code performs mostly the same
transforms as visitMULHS, adjusted for AVG nodes.
Constant folding extends to a higher bitwidth and drops the lowest bit.
For undef nodes, `avg undef, x` is transformed to x. There is also a
transform for `avgfloor x, 0` transforming to `shr x, 1`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119559
The current FastISel code reuses the register for a bitcast that
doesn't change the IR type, but uses a reg-to-reg copy if it
changes the IR type without changing the MVT. However, we can
simply reuse the register in that case as well.
In particular, this avoids unnecessary reg-to-reg copies for pointer
bitcasts. This was found while inspecting O0 codegen differences
between typed and opaque pointers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119432
This enables fshl to be matched earlier on X86
%6 = lshr i32 %3, 1
%7 = select i1 %4, i32 -2147483648, i32 0
%8 = or i32 %6, %7
X86 uses i8 for shift amounts. SelectionDAGBuilder creates the
ISD::SRL with an i8 shift type. DAGCombiner turns the select into
an ISD::SHL. Prior to this patch it would use i32 for the shift
amount. fshl matching failed because the shift amounts have different
types. LegalizeDAG fixes the ISD::SHL shift amount to i8. This
allowed fshl matching to succeed.
With this patch, the ISD::SHL will be created with an i8 shift
amount. This allows the fshl to match immediately.
No test case beause we still end up with a fshl either way.
I have not found a way to expose a difference for this patch in a test
because it only triggers for a one-use load, but this is the code that
was adapted into D118376 and caused miscompiles. The new code pattern
is the same as what we do in narrowExtractedVectorLoad() (reduces load
width for a subvector extract).
This removes seemingly unnecessary manual worklist management and fixes
the chain updating via "SelectionDAG::makeEquivalentMemoryOrdering()".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119549
This ports the aarch64 combines for HADD and RHADD over to DAG combine,
so that they can be used in more architectures (notably MVE in a
followup patch). They are renamed to AVGFLOOR and AVGCEIL in the
process, to avoid confusion with instructions such as X86 hadd. The code
was also rewritten slightly to remove the AArch64 idiosyncrasies.
The general pattern for a AVGFLOORS is
%xe = sext i8 %x to i32
%ye = sext i8 %y to i32
%a = add i32 %xe, %ye
%r = lshr i32 %a, 1
%t = trunc i32 %r to i8
An AVGFLOORU is equivalent with zext. Because of the truncate
lshr==ashr, as the top bits are not demanded. An AVGCEIL also includes
an extra rounding, so includes an extra add of 1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106237
Add a new llvm.fptrunc.round intrinsic to precisely control
the rounding mode when converting from f32 to f16.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110579
We're hitting a pathological compile-time case, profiled to be in
DagCombiner::visitTokenFactor and many inserts into a SmallPtrSet.
It looks like one of the paths around findBetterNeighborChains is not
capped and leads to this.
This patch resolves the issue. Looking for feedback if this solution
looks reasonable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118877
The test diffs are identical to D119111.
This only affects x86 currently because no other target
has an override for the TLI hook that controls this transform.
This is no-functional-change-intended because only the
x86 target enables the TLI hook currently.
We can add fmul/fdiv opcodes to the switch similar to the
proposal D119111, but we don't need to make other changes
like enabling target-specific combines.
We can also add integer opcodes (add, or, shl, etc.) to
the switch because this function is called from all of the
generic binary opcodes.
The goal is to incrementally enable the profitable diffs
from D90113 while avoiding regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119150
In many cases, calls to isShiftedMask are immediately followed with checks to determine the size and position of the bitmask.
This patch adds variants of APInt::isShiftedMask, isShiftedMask_32 and isShiftedMask_64 that return these values as additional arguments.
I've updated a number of cases that were either performing seperate size/position calculations or had created their own local wrapper versions of these.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119019
rv64izbb has a RORW/ROLW instructions that operate on the lower
32-bits of a 64-bit value and sign extend bit 31 of the result.
DAGCombiner won't match rotate idioms because the i32 type isn't Legal
on riscv64.
This patch teaches DAGCombiner to allow it if the type is going to
be promoted and the target has Custom type legalization for ISD::ROTL
or ISD::ROTR. I've restricted this to scalar types. It doesn't appear
any in tree targets other than riscv64 have custom type legalization
for rotates.
If this patch isn't acceptable, I guess I can match SRLW, SLLW, and OR
after type legalization, but I'd like to avoid that if possible.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119062
When the shift amount is known and a known sign bit analysis of
the shiftee indicates that no saturation will occur, then we can
replace SSHLSAT/USHLSAT by SHL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118765
These operations are scalarized but the result type v1i1 isn't which
needs special handling (the same as is done for the non-strict
versions of these operations).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118258
This header is very large (3M Lines once expended) and was included in location
where dwarf-specific information were not needed.
More specifically, this commit suppresses the dependencies on
llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h in two headers: llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h and
llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h. As these headers (esp. the former) are widely used,
this has a decent impact on number of preprocessed lines generated during
compilation of LLVM, as showcased below.
This is achieved by moving some definitions back to the .cpp file, no
performance impact implied[0].
As a consequence of that patch, downstream user may need to manually some extra
files:
llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h
llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h no longer includes llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h
In some situations, codes maybe relying on the fact that
llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h was including llvm/ADT/Triple.h, this hidden
dependency now needs to be explicit.
$ clang++ -E -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l
after: 10978519
before: 11245451
Related Discourse thread: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
[0] https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=fa7145dfbf94cb93b1c3e610582c495cb806569b&to=995d3e326ee1d9489145e20762c65465a9caeab4&stat=instructions
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118781
In the aftermath of D116895 a problem was found in the analysis of
dependencies between store merge candidates in
checkMergeStoreCandidatesForDependencies, that is needed to avoid
the cycles are introduced in the DAG.
In the past it has been enough (or assumed to be enough) to start
scanning from non-chain operands when analysing the store merge
candidates for dependencies, assuming that the analysis of chain
dependencies performed when finding the candidates would cover
up for potential dependencies that exist involving the chain operands.
It was however discovered that one could end up with scenarios such
as descibed in the aarch64-checkMergeStoreCandidatesForDependencies.ll
test case, when the dependency between two stores is given by a mix
of chain operand dependencies and non-chain operand dependencies.
The fix in this patch make sure that we also account for chain operand
dependencies when doing the more elaborate analysis in
checkMergeStoreCandidatesForDependencies, no longer relying on that
the earlier check involving chain operands is enough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118943
This helps recognise patterns where we're trying to match STEP_VECTOR
patterns to INDEX instructions that take a GPR for the Start/Step.
The reason for canonicalising this operation to the LHS is
because it will already be canonicalised to the LHS if the RHS
is a constant splat vector.
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118459
None of the external users actual touch these (they're purely used internally down the recursive call) - its trivial to add another wrapper if anything ever does want to track known elements.
The new LEGALAVL node annotates that the AVL refers to packs of 64bit.
We use a two-stage lowering approach with LEGALAVL:
First, standard SDNodes are translated into illegal VVP layer nodes.
Regardless of source (VP or standard), all VVP nodes have a mask and AVL
parameter. The AVL parameter refers to the element position (just as in
VP intrinsics).
Second, we legalize the AVL usage in VVP layer nodes. If the element
size is < 64bit, the EVL parameter has to be adjusted to refer to packs
of 64bits. We wrap the legalized AVL in a LEGALAVL node to track this.
Reviewed By: kaz7
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118321
Do "simplifyShift" and "FoldConstantArithmetic" folds for the SSHLSAT
and USHLSAT DAG nodes.
This includes folds such as:
(shlsat undef/poison, x) -> 0
(shlsat x, undef/poison) -> undef
(shlsat x, too_large_shamt) -> undef
(shlsat 0, x) -> 0
(shlsat x, 0) -> x
(shlsat c1, c2) -> c3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118603
I have updated TargetLowering::isConstTrueVal to also consider
SPLAT_VECTOR nodes with constant integer operands. This allows the
optimisation to also work for targets that support scalable vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117210
For the cross block gc.result projection case, we only care about the return type if there is a cross block gc.result, and if there is one, we can take the type from the gc.result.
At the moment, this makes little difference, but for opaque pointers we need a means to get result typing without relying on pointee types.
When lowering a gc.result, we can assume that the result type of the gc.result matches the type of the underlying call. This is explicitly required in LangRef.
At the moment, this makes little difference, but for opaque pointers we need a means to get result typing without relying on pointee types.
Fixes a crash ('Invalid size request on a scalable vector') in visitAlloca()
when we call this function for a scalable alloca instruction, caused
by the implicit conversion of TySize to uint64_t.
This patch changes TySize to a TypeSize as returned by getTypeAllocSize()
and ensures the allocation size is multiplied by vscale for scalable vectors.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen, david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118372
We already call SimplifyDemandedVectorElts using whether each vector mask element is zero/nonzero, this just extends this to also try SimplifyDemandedBits using the demanded bits mask generated from the nonzero elements.
This also requires an additional TargetLowering::SimplifyDemandedBits DemandedBits/DemandedElts wrapper.
If we have a vector FP division with a splatted divisor, use
getVectorMinNumElements when scaling the num of uses by splat factor.
For AArch64 the combine kicks in for the <vscale x 4 x float> case since it's
above the fdiv threshold (3) when scaling num uses by splat factor, but the
codegen is worse (splat + vector fdiv + vector fmul) than the <vscale x 2 x
double> case (splat + vector fdiv).
If the combine could be converted into a scalar FP division by
scalarizeBinOpOfSplats it may be cheaper, but it looks like this is predicated
on the isExtractVecEltCheap TLI function which is implemented for x86 but not
AArch64. Perhaps for now combineRepeatedFPDivisors should only scale num uses
by splat if the division can be converted into scalar op.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118343
Use the llvm flag `-pgo-function-entry-coverage` to create single byte "counters" to track functions coverage. This mode has significantly less size overhead in both code and data because
* We mark a function as "covered" with a store instead of an increment which generally requires fewer assembly instructions
* We use a single byte per function rather than 8 bytes per block
The trade off of course is that this mode only tells you if a function has been covered. This is useful, for example, to detect dead code.
When combined with debug info correlation [0] we are able to create an instrumented Clang binary that is only 150M (the vanilla Clang binary is 143M). That is an overhead of 7M (4.9%) compared to the default instrumentation (without value profiling) which has an overhead of 31M (21.7%).
[0] https://groups.google.com/g/llvm-dev/c/r03Z6JoN7d4
Reviewed By: kyulee
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116180
We already perform some basic folds (add/sub with zero etc.) on scalar types, this patch adds some basic support for constant splats as well in a few cases (we can add more with future test coverage).
In the cases I've enabled, we can handle buildvector implicit truncation as we're not creating new constant nodes from the vector types - we're just returning existing nodes. This allows us to get a number of extra cases in the aarch64 tests.
I haven't enabled support for undefs in buildvector splats, as we're often checking for zero/allones patterns that return the original constant and we shouldn't be returning undef elements in some of these cases - we can enable this later if we're OK with creating new constants.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118264
This patch adds support for expanding VP_MERGE through a sequence of
vector operations producing a full-length mask setting up the elements
past EVL/pivot to be false, combining this with the original mask, and
culminating in a full-length vector select.
This expansion should work for any data type, though the only use for
RVV is for boolean vectors, which themselves rely on an expansion for
the VSELECT.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118058
This reverts commit ef82063207.
- It conflicts with the existing llvm::size in STLExtras, which will now
never be called.
- Calling it without llvm:: breaks C++17 compat
The loop below the changed line assumes that the element
width of the target constant is the same as the element
width of the loaded value, but that is not always true.
We could try harder to do some kind of min/max calc even
if the sizes don't match, but that can be another patch
if needed. This fixes#53401 (miscompile) and does not
change the motivating cases added when this analysis
was introduced:
ad298f86b7
Currently not (xor_one_use) pattern is always selected to S_XNOR irrelative od the node divergence.
This relies on further custom selection pass which converts to VALU if necessary and replaces with V_NOT_B32 ( V_XOR_B32)
on those targets which have no V_XNOR.
Current change enables the patterns which explicitly select the not (xor_one_use) to appropriate form.
We assume that xor (not) is already turned into the not (xor) by the combiner.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116270
This is the unsigned variant of D111976, where we convert a clamped
fptoui to a fptoui.sat. Because we are unsigned, the condition this time
is only UMIN of UINT_MAX. Similarly to D111976 it handles ISD::UMIN,
ISD::SETCC/ISD::SELECT, ISD::VSELECT or ISD::SELECT_CC nodes.
This especially helps on ARM/AArch64 where the vcvt instructions
naturally saturate the result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114964
An sra is basically sign-extending a narrower value. Fold away the
shift by doing a sextload of a narrower value, when it is legal to
reduce the load width accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116930
This patch adds widening support for ISD::VP_MERGE, which widens
identically to VP_SELECT and similarly to other select-like nodes.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118030
This patch adds splitting support for ISD::VP_MERGE, which splits
identically to VP_SELECT and similarly to other select-like nodes.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118032
Split these nodes in a similar way as their masked versions.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117760
Given that step_vector is practically a constant, doing this early
helps with DAGCombine folds that happen before type legalization.
There is currently no way to test this happens earlier, although existing
tests for step_vector folds continue protect the folds happening at all.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117863
If the bitreverse gets expanded, it will introduce a new bswap. By
putting a bswap before the bitreverse, we can ensure it gets cancelled
out when this happens.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118012
This can show up during when bitreverse is expanded to bswap and
swap of bits within a byte. If the input is already a bswap, we
should cancel them out before we further transform them in a way
that makes it harder to see the redundancy.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118007
In code review for D117104 two slightly weird checks were found
in DAGCombiner::reduceLoadWidth. They were typically checking
if BitsA was a mulitple of BitsB by looking at (BitsA & (BitsB - 1)),
but such a comparison actually only make sense if BitsB is a power
of two.
The checks were related to the code that attempted to shrink a load
based on the fact that the loaded value would be right shifted.
Afaict the legality of the value types is checked later (typically in
isLegalNarrowLdSt), so the existing checks were both overly
conservative as well as being wrong whenever ExtVTBits wasn't a
power of two. The latter was a situation triggered by a number of
lit tests so we could not just assert on ExtVTBIts being a power of
two).
When attempting to simply remove the checks I found some problems,
that seems to have been guarded by the checks (maybe just out of
luck). A typical example would be a pattern like this:
t1 = load i96* ptr
t2 = srl t1, 64
t3 = truncate t2 to i64
When DAGCombine is visiting the truncate reduceLoadWidth is called
attempting to narrow the load to 64 bits (ExtVT := MVT::i64). Then
the SRL is detected and we set ShAmt to 64.
In the past we've bailed out due to i96 not being a multiple of 64.
If we simply remove that check then we would end up replacing the
load with a new load that would read 64 bits but with a base pointer
adjusted by 64 bits. So we would read 32 bits the wasn't accessed by
the original load.
This patch will instead utilize the fact that the logical left shift
can be folded away by using a zextload. Thus, the pattern above will
now be combined into
t3 = load i32* ptr+offset, zext to i64
Another case is shown in the X86/shift-folding.ll test case:
t1 = load i32* ptr
t2 = srl i32 t1, 8
t3 = truncate t2 to i16
In the past we bailed out due to the shift count (8) not being a
multiple of 16. Now the narrowing kicks in and we get
t3 = load i16* ptr+offset
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117406
EmitSchedule() shouldn't be touching instructions after the provided
insertion point. The change introduced in D83561 performs a scan to
the end of the block, and thus may move unrelated instructions. In
particular, this ends up moving instructions that have been produced
by FastISel and will later be deleted. Moving them means that more
instructions than intended are removed.
Fix this by stopping the iteration when the insertion point is
reached.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53243.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117489
SelectionDAG::getNode() canonicalises constants to the RHS if the
operation is commutative, but it doesn't do so for constant splat
vectors. Doing this early helps making certain folds on vector types,
simplifying the code required for target DAGCombines that are enabled
before Type legalization.
Somewhat to my surprise, DAGCombine doesn't seem to traverse the
DAG in a post-order DFS, so at the time of doing some custom fold where
the input is a MUL, DAGCombiner::visitMUL hasn't yet reordered the
constant splat to the RHS.
This patch leads to a few improvements, but also a few minor regressions,
which I traced down to D46492. When I tried reverting this change to see
if the changes were still necessary, I ran into some segfaults. Not sure
if there is some latent bug there.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117794
Fixes parity codegen issue where we know all but the lowest bit is zero, we can replace the ICMPNE with 0 comparison with a ext/trunc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117983
Fixes parity codegen issue where we know all but the lowest bit is zero, we can replace the ICMPNE with 0 comparison with a ext/trunc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117983
Pulled out of D106237, this folds truncstore(extend(x)) back to store(x)
if the original store was legal. This can come up due to the order we
fold nodes. A fold from X86 needs to be adjusted to prevent infinite
loops, to have it pick the operand of a trunc more directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117901
This extends the code in SearchForAndLoads to be able to look through
ANY_EXTEND nodes, which can be created from mismatching IR types where
the AND node we begin from only demands the low parts of the register.
That turns zext and sext into any_extends as only the low bits are
demanded. To be able to look through ANY_EXTEND nodes we need to handle
mismatching types in a few places, potentially truncating the mask to
the size of the final load.
Recommitted with a more conservative check for the type of the extend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117457
This patch fixes a case where the 'align' parameter attribute on the
pointer operands to llvm.vp.gather and llvm.vp.scatter was being dropped
during the conversion to the SelectionDAG. The default alignment equal
to the ABI type alignment of the vector type was kept. It also updates
the documentation to reflect the fact that the parameter attribute is
now properly supported.
The default alignment of these intrinsics was previously documented as
being equal to the ABI alignment of the *scalar* type, when in fact that
wasn't the case: the ABI alignment of the vector type was used instead.
This has also been fixed in this patch.
Reviewed By: simoll, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114423
This was noted as a potential cleanup in D117508.
getShiftAmountTy() has checks for vector, phase, etc. so it should
handle anything that the caller was trying to account for.
When widening these intrinsics, we do not have to insert neutral
elements at the end of the vector as when widening vector.reduce.*
intrinsics, thanks to vector predication semantics.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117467
This caused builds to fail with
llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp:5638:
bool (anonymous namespace)::DAGCombiner::BackwardsPropagateMask(llvm::SDNode *):
Assertion `NewLoad && "Shouldn't be masking the load if it can't be narrowed"' failed.
See the code review for a link to a reproducer.
> This extends the code in SearchForAndLoads to be able to look through
> ANY_EXTEND nodes, which can be created from mismatching IR types where
> the AND node we begin from only demands the low parts of the register.
> That turns zext and sext into any_extends as only the low bits are
> demanded. To be able to look through ANY_EXTEND nodes we need to handle
> mismatching types in a few places, potentially truncating the mask to
> the size of the final load.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117457
This reverts commit 578008789f.
Split vp.reduction.* intrinsics by splitting the vector to reduce in
two halves, perform the reduction operation in each one of them and
accumulate the results of both operations.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117469
A possible codegen regression for PowerPC is noted in D117406
because we don't recognize a pattern that demands only 1 byte
from a bswap.
This fold has existed in IR since close to the beginning of LLVM:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blame/main/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSimplifyDemanded.cpp#L794
...so this patch copies that code as much as possible and adapts
it for SDAG.
The test for PowerPC that would change in D117406 is over-reduced
with undefs, so I recreated it for AArch64 and x86 by passing in
pointer args and renamed the values to make the logic clearer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117508
This extends the code in SearchForAndLoads to be able to look through
ANY_EXTEND nodes, which can be created from mismatching IR types where
the AND node we begin from only demands the low parts of the register.
That turns zext and sext into any_extends as only the low bits are
demanded. To be able to look through ANY_EXTEND nodes we need to handle
mismatching types in a few places, potentially truncating the mask to
the size of the final load.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117457
When we know the value we're extending is a negative constant then it
makes sense to use SIGN_EXTEND because this may improve code quality in
some cases, particularly when doing a constant splat of an unpacked vector
type. For example, for SVE when splatting the value -1 into all elements
of a vector of type <vscale x 2 x i32> the element type will get promoted
from i32 -> i64. In this case we want the splat value to sign-extend from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 -1), whereas currently it zero-extends from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 0xFFFFFFFF). Sign-extending the constant means we can use
a single mov immediate instruction.
New tests added here:
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-vector-splat.ll
I believe we see some code quality improvements in these existing
tests too:
CodeGen/AArch64/reduce-and.ll
CodeGen/AArch64/unfold-masked-merge-vector-variablemask.ll
The apparent regressions in CodeGen/AArch64/fast-isel-cmp-vec.ll only
occur because the test disables codegen prepare and branch folding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114357
Update code comments in DAGCombiner::ReduceLoadWidth and refactor
the handling of SRL a bit. The refactoring is done with the intent
of adding support for folding away SRA by using SEXTLOAD in a
follow-up patch.
The function is also renamed as DAGCombiner::reduceLoadWidth.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117104
Use the AttributeSet constructor instead. There's no good reason
why AttrBuilder itself should exact the AttributeSet from the
AttributeList. Moving this out of the AttrBuilder generally results
in cleaner code.
Original patch by @hussainjk.
This patch was split off from D109377 to keep vector legalization
(widening/splitting) separate from vector element legalization
(promoting).
While the original patch added a third overload of
SelectionDAG::getVPStore, this patch takes the liberty of collapsing
those all down to 1, as three overloads seems excessive for a
little-used node.
The original patch also used ModifyToType in places, but that method
still crashes on scalable vector types. Seeing as the other VP
legalization methods only work when all operands need identical
widening, this patch follows in that vein.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117235
Simon Pilgrim