Quote from the LLVM Language Reference
If ptr is a stack-allocated object and it points to the first byte of the
object, the object is initially marked as dead. ptr is conservatively
considered as a non-stack-allocated object if the stack coloring algorithm
that is used in the optimization pipeline cannot conclude that ptr is a
stack-allocated object.
By replacing the alloca pointer with the tagged address before this change,
we confused the stack coloring algorithm.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121835
Failed on buildbot:
/home/buildbot/buildbot-root/llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast/build/bin/llc: error: : error: unable to get target for 'aarch64-unknown-linux-android29', see --version and --triple.
FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty.
FileCheck command line: /home/buildbot/buildbot-root/llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-ubuntu-fast/build/bin/FileCheck /home/buildbot/buildbot-root/llvm-project/llvm/test/Instrumentation/HWAddressSanitizer/stack-coloring.ll --check-prefix=COLOR
This reverts commit 208b923e74.
Quote from the LLVM Language Reference
If ptr is a stack-allocated object and it points to the first byte of the
object, the object is initially marked as dead. ptr is conservatively
considered as a non-stack-allocated object if the stack coloring algorithm
that is used in the optimization pipeline cannot conclude that ptr is a
stack-allocated object.
By replacing the alloca pointer with the tagged address before this change,
we confused the stack coloring algorithm.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121835
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
An analysis may just be interested in checking if an instruction is
atomic but system scoped or single-thread scoped, like ThreadSanitizer's
isAtomic(). Unfortunately Instruction::isAtomic() can only answer the
"atomic" part of the question, but to also check scope becomes rather
verbose.
To simplify and reduce redundancy, introduce a common helper
getAtomicSyncScopeID() which returns the scope of an atomic operation.
Start using it in ThreadSanitizer.
NFCI.
Reviewed By: dvyukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121910
Currently, when instrumenting indirect calls, this uses
CallBase::getCalledFunction to determine whether a given callsite is
eligible.
However, that returns null if:
this is an indirect function invocation or the function signature
does not match the call signature.
So, we end up instrumenting direct calls where the callee is a bitcast
ConstantExpr, even though we presumably don't need to.
Use isIndirectCall to ignore those funky direct calls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119594
Currently adding attribute no_sanitize("bounds") isn't disabling
-fsanitize=local-bounds (also enabled in -fsanitize=bounds). The Clang
frontend handles fsanitize=array-bounds which can already be disabled by
no_sanitize("bounds"). However, instrumentation added by the
BoundsChecking pass in the middle-end cannot be disabled by the
attribute.
The fix is very similar to D102772 that added the ability to selectively
disable sanitizer pass on certain functions.
In this patch, if no_sanitize("bounds") is provided, an additional
function attribute (NoSanitizeBounds) is attached to IR to let the
BoundsChecking pass know we want to disable local-bounds checking. In
order to support this feature, the IR is extended (similar to D102772)
to make Clang able to preserve the information and let BoundsChecking
pass know bounds checking is disabled for certain function.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119816
This is a clean-up patch. The functional pass was rolled into the module pass in D112732.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120674
The `SplitIndirectBrCriticalEdges` function was originally designed for
`CodeGenPrepare` and skipped splitting of edges when the destination
block didn't contain any `PHI` instructions. This only makes sense when
reducing COPYs like `CodeGenPrepare`. In the case of
`PGOInstrumentation` or `GCOVProfiling` it would result in missed
counters and wrong result in functions with computed goto.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120096
This patch is the first in a series of patches to upstream the support for Apple's DriverKit. Once complete, it will allow targeting DriverKit platform with Clang similarly to AppleClang.
This code was originally authored by JF Bastien.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118046
For ASan this will effectively serve as a synonym for
__attribute__((no_sanitize("address"))).
Adding the disable_sanitizer_instrumentation to functions will drop the
sanitize_XXX attributes on the IR level.
This is the third reland of https://reviews.llvm.org/D114421.
Now that TSan test is fixed (https://reviews.llvm.org/D120050) there
should be no deadlocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120055
this is the first step in unifying some of the logic between hwasan and
mte stack tagging. this only moves around code, changes to converge
different implementations of the same logic follow later.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118947
The last use of this file was removed in late 2013 in ea56494625.
The last use was in PathProfiling.cpp, which had an overview comment
of the overall approach.
Similar functionality lives in the slight more cryptically named
CFGMST.h in this same directory. A similar overview comment is
in PGOInstrumentation.cpp.
No behavior change.
This header is very large (3M Lines once expended) and was included in location
where dwarf-specific information were not needed.
More specifically, this commit suppresses the dependencies on
llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h in two headers: llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h and
llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h. As these headers (esp. the former) are widely used,
this has a decent impact on number of preprocessed lines generated during
compilation of LLVM, as showcased below.
This is achieved by moving some definitions back to the .cpp file, no
performance impact implied[0].
As a consequence of that patch, downstream user may need to manually some extra
files:
llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h
llvm/IR/DebugInfoMetadata.h no longer includes llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h
In some situations, codes maybe relying on the fact that
llvm/BinaryFormat/Dwarf.h was including llvm/ADT/Triple.h, this hidden
dependency now needs to be explicit.
$ clang++ -E -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l
after: 10978519
before: 11245451
Related Discourse thread: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
[0] https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=fa7145dfbf94cb93b1c3e610582c495cb806569b&to=995d3e326ee1d9489145e20762c65465a9caeab4&stat=instructions
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118781
Based on the output of include-what-you-use.
This is a big chunk of changes. It is very likely to break downstream code
unless they took a lot of care in avoiding hidden ehader dependencies, something
the LLVM codebase doesn't do that well :-/
I've tried to summarize the biggest change below:
- llvm/include/llvm-c/Core.h: no longer includes llvm-c/ErrorHandling.h
- llvm/IR/DIBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/DebugInfo.h
- llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h
- llvm/IR/LLVMRemarkStreamer.h no longer includes llvm/Support/ToolOutputFile.h
- llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h no longer include llvm/Pass.h
- llvm/IR/Type.h no longer includes llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h
- llvm/IR/PassManager.h no longer includes llvm/Pass.h nor llvm/Support/Debug.h
And the usual count of preprocessed lines:
$ clang++ -E -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/lib/IR/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l
before: 6400831
after: 6189948
200k lines less to process is no that bad ;-)
Discourse thread on the topic: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118652
setjmp can return twice, but PostDominatorTree is unaware of this. as
such, it overestimates postdominance, leaving some cases (see attached
compiler-rt) where memory does not get untagged on return. this causes
false positives later in the program execution.
this is a crude workaround to unblock use-after-scope for now, in the
longer term PostDominatorTree should bemade aware of returns_twice
function, as this may cause problems elsewhere.
Reviewed By: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118647
Nikita Popov