Before this patch the DebugifyLevel option was used for
the synthetic mode, so after this, it will be used in
the original mode as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115623
Before we start addressing the issue with having
a lot of false positives when using debugify in
the original mode, we have made a few patches that
should speed up the execution of the testing
utility Passes.
For example, when testing a large project
(let's say LLVM project itself), we can face
a lot of potential DI issues. Usually, we use
-verify-each-debuginfo-preserve (that is very
similar to -debugify-each) -- it collects
DI metadata before each Pass, and after the Pass
it checks if the Pass preserved the DI metadata.
However, we can speed up this process, since we
don't need to collect DI metadata before each
Pass -- we could use the DI metadata that are
collected after the previous Pass from
the pipeline as an input for the next Pass.
This patch speeds up the utility for ~2x.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115622
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
For MachO, lower `@llvm.global_dtors` into `@llvm_global_ctors` with
`__cxa_atexit` calls to avoid emitting the deprecated `__mod_term_func`.
Reuse the existing `WebAssemblyLowerGlobalDtors.cpp` to accomplish this.
Enable fallback to the old behavior via Clang driver flag
(`-fregister-global-dtors-with-atexit`) or llc / code generation flag
(`-lower-global-dtors-via-cxa-atexit`). This escape hatch will be
removed in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121736
This code queries TTI on a single function, which is considered to
be representative. This is a bit odd, but probably fine in practice.
However, I think we should at least avoid querying declarations,
which e.g. will generally lack target attributes, and for which
we don't seem to ever query TTI in other places.
For MachO, lower `@llvm.global_dtors` into `@llvm_global_ctors` with
`__cxa_atexit` calls to avoid emitting the deprecated `__mod_term_func`.
Reuse the existing `WebAssemblyLowerGlobalDtors.cpp` to accomplish this.
Enable fallback to the old behavior via Clang driver flag
(`-fregister-global-dtors-with-atexit`) or llc / code generation flag
(`-lower-global-dtors-via-cxa-atexit`). This escape hatch will be
removed in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121327
Extend -wholeprogramdevirt-check to support both the existing
trapping mode on an incorrect devirtualization, as well as a new
mode to fallback to an indirect call on a mismatch. The new mode is
The new mode is useful in cases where we want to enable
devirtualization but cannot fully guarantee whole program visibility
(e.g in the case where LTO has been disabled for a small set of objects
that could potentially override virtual methods without having a symbol
reference to anything in the base class including the vtable).
Remove !prof and !callees metadata (which are used by indirect call
promotion) from both the new direct call and the fallback indirect call
(so that we don't perform another round of promotion on the latter).
Also remove it from the direct call in the non-fallback cases, which
was an oversight, although it didn't seem to cause any issues. Add tests
for the metadata removal covering the various cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121419
If there are no ctors, then this can have an arbirary zero-sized
value. The current code checks for null, but it could also be
undef or poison.
Replacing the specific null check with a check for
non-ConstantArray.
MinBaseDistance may be odr-used by std::max, leading to an undefined symbol linker error:
```
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: (anonymous namespace)::MinCostMaxFlow::MinBaseDistance
>>> referenced by SampleProfileInference.cpp:744 (/home/ray/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SampleProfileInference.cpp:744)
>>> lib/Transforms/Utils/CMakeFiles/LLVMTransformUtils.dir/SampleProfileInference.cpp.o:((anonymous namespace)::FlowAdjuster::jumpDistance(llvm::FlowJump*) const)
```
Since llvm-project is still using C++ 14, workaround it with a cast.
The OpenMPIRBuilder has a bug. Specifically, suppose you have two nested openmp parallel regions (writing with MLIR for ease)
```
omp.parallel {
%a = ...
omp.parallel {
use(%a)
}
}
```
As OpenMP only permits pointer-like inputs, the builder will wrap all of the inputs into a stack allocation, and then pass this
allocation to the inner parallel. For example, we would want to get something like the following:
```
omp.parallel {
%a = ...
%tmp = alloc
store %tmp[] = %a
kmpc_fork(outlined, %tmp)
}
```
However, in practice, this is not what currently occurs in the context of nested parallel regions. Specifically to the OpenMPIRBuilder,
the entirety of the function (at the LLVM level) is currently inlined with blocks marking the corresponding start and end of each
region.
```
entry:
...
parallel1:
%a = ...
...
parallel2:
use(%a)
...
endparallel2:
...
endparallel1:
...
```
When the allocation is inserted, it presently inserted into the parent of the entire function (e.g. entry) rather than the parent
allocation scope to the function being outlined. If we were outlining parallel2, the corresponding alloca location would be parallel1.
This causes a variety of bugs, including https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54165 as one example.
This PR allows the stack allocation to be created at the correct allocation block, and thus remedies such issues.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121061
This will let us start moving away from hard-coded attributes in
MemoryBuiltins.cpp and put the knowledge about various attribute
functions in the compilers that emit those calls where it probably
belongs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117921
`ArgInfo` is reduced to only contain a pair of {formal,actual} values.
The specialized function `Fn` and the `Partial` flag are redundant in
this structure. The `Gain` is moved to a new struct `SpecializationInfo`.
The value mappings created by cloneCandidateFunction() are being used
by rewriteCallSites() for matching the formal arguments of recursive
functions.
The list of specializations is passed by reference to calculateGains()
instead of being returned by value.
The `IsPartial` flag is removed from isArgumentInteresting() and
getPossibleConstants() as it's no longer used anywhere in the code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120753
The verify call was taking 50% of the compile time in our internal LLVM
fork when trying to unroll many loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113028
Currently adding attribute no_sanitize("bounds") isn't disabling
-fsanitize=local-bounds (also enabled in -fsanitize=bounds). The Clang
frontend handles fsanitize=array-bounds which can already be disabled by
no_sanitize("bounds"). However, instrumentation added by the
BoundsChecking pass in the middle-end cannot be disabled by the
attribute.
The fix is very similar to D102772 that added the ability to selectively
disable sanitizer pass on certain functions.
In this patch, if no_sanitize("bounds") is provided, an additional
function attribute (NoSanitizeBounds) is attached to IR to let the
BoundsChecking pass know we want to disable local-bounds checking. In
order to support this feature, the IR is extended (similar to D102772)
to make Clang able to preserve the information and let BoundsChecking
pass know bounds checking is disabled for certain function.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119816
SCEVs ExprValueMap currently tracks not only which IR Values
correspond to a given SCEV expression, but additionally stores that
it may be expanded in the form X+Offset. In theory, this allows
reusing existing IR Values in more cases.
In practice, this doesn't seem to be particularly useful (the test
changes are rather underwhelming) and adds a good bit of complexity.
Per https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53905, we have an
invalidation issue with these offseted expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120311
Summary:
We use a section to embed offloading code into the host for later
linking. This is normally unique to the translation unit as it is thrown
away during linking. However, if the user performs a relocatable link
the sections will be merged and we won't be able to access the files
stored inside. This patch changes the section variables to have external
linkage and a name defined by the section name, so if two sections are
combined during linking we get an error.
The `SplitIndirectBrCriticalEdges` function was originally designed for
`CodeGenPrepare` and skipped splitting of edges when the destination
block didn't contain any `PHI` instructions. This only makes sense when
reducing COPYs like `CodeGenPrepare`. In the case of
`PGOInstrumentation` or `GCOVProfiling` it would result in missed
counters and wrong result in functions with computed goto.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120096
Constants cannot be cyclic, but they can be tree-like. Keep a
visited set to ensure we do not degenerate to exponential run-time.
This fixes the problem reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D117223#3335482,
though I haven't been able to construct a concise test case for
the issue. This requires a combination of dead constants and the
kind of constant expression tree that textual IR cannot represent
(because the textual representation, unlike the in-memory
representation, is also exponential in size).
This code could be generalized to be type-independent, but for now
just ensure that the same type constraints are enforced with opaque
pointers as with typed pointers.
By convention, memcpy/memmove intrinsics are always used with i8
pointers (though this is not enforced), so in practice this code
was always using an i8 type. Make that explicit.
Of course, i8 is not a very profitable choice, and this code could
be more performant by picking an appropriate larger type. But that
would require additional test coverage and correctness review, and
certainly shouldn't be a decision based on the pointer element type.
Djordje Todorovic