This change promotes load instructions which directly read from stores by
replacing them with mov instructions. If the store is wider than the load,
the load will be replaced with a bitfield extract.
For example :
STRWui %W1, %X0, 1
%W0 = LDRHHui %X0, 3
becomes
STRWui %W1, %X0, 1
%W0 = UBFMWri %W1, 16, 31
llvm-svn: 256004
Use the 3-byte (4 with REX prefix) push-pop sequence for materializing
small constants. This is smaller than using a mov (5, 6 or 7 bytes
depending on size and REX prefix), but it's likely to be slower, so
only used for 'minsize'.
This is a follow-up to r255656.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15549
llvm-svn: 255936
Summary:
The method insertNOPs expected the number of wait states to be passed as
parameter, while eliminateFrameIndex passed the immediate argument for the
S_NOP, leading to an off-by-one error. Rename the method to make the
meaning of its parameter clearer. The number of 4 / 5 wait states (which
is what the method has always _tried_ to do according to the comment) is
correct according to the hardware docs.
I stumbled upon this while trying to track down the cause of
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93264. While clearly needed,
this patch unfortunately does not fix that bug...
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15542
llvm-svn: 255906
These days relocations are created and stored in a deterministic way.
The order they are created is also suitable for the .o file, so we don't
need an explicit sort.
The last remaining exception is MIPS.
llvm-svn: 255902
This patch enables PostRAScheduler specifically for AArch64 generic build,
which is beneficial from the performance perspective.
Speedups up to 2 to 7% for some benchmarks on A57 and A53 are observed.
Also benchmarks from LLVM test-suite did not regress.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15557
llvm-svn: 255896
This patch adds a DAG combine for (any_extend (extract_vector_elt v, i)) ->
(extract_vector_elt v, i). The combine enables us to better match some SMOV
patterns.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15515
llvm-svn: 255895
Add option to enable/disable LEA optimization pass. By default the pass is disabled.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15573
llvm-svn: 255881
This creates the initial infrastructure for writing ELF output files. It
doesn't yet have any implementation for encoding instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15555
llvm-svn: 255869
Summary:
Implement eliminateCallFramePsuedo to handle ADJCALLSTACKUP/DOWN
pseudo-instructions. Add a test calling a vararg function which causes non-0
adjustments. This revealed an issue with RegisterCoalescer wherein it
eliminates a COPY from SP32 to a vreg but failes to update the live ranges
of EXPR_STACK, causing a machineinstr verifier failure (so this test
is commented out).
Also add a dynamic alloca test, which causes a callseq_end dag node with
a 0 (instead of undef) second argument to be generated. We currently fail to
select that, so adjust the ADJCALLSTACKUP tablegen code to handle it.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15587
llvm-svn: 255844
This matches the other MIB methods, none of which modify the builder.
Without this, we can't chain copyImplicitOps.
Also reformat the few users, in PPCEarlyReturn.
llvm-svn: 255828
The access function has a short entry and a short exit, the initialization
block is only run the first time. To improve the performance, we want to
have a short frame at the entry and exit.
We explicitly handle most of the CSRs via copies. Only the CSRs that are not
handled via copies will be in CSR_SaveList.
Frame lowering and prologue/epilogue insertion will generate a short frame
in the entry and exit according to CSR_SaveList. The majority of the CSRs will
be handled by register allcoator. Register allocator will try to spill and
reload them in the initialization block.
We add CSRsViaCopy, it will be explicitly handled during lowering.
1> we first set FunctionLoweringInfo->SplitCSR if conditions are met (the target
supports it for the given machine function and the function has only return
exits). We also call TLI->initializeSplitCSR to perform initialization.
2> we call TLI->insertCopiesSplitCSR to insert copies from CSRsViaCopy to
virtual registers at beginning of the entry block and copies from virtual
registers to CSRsViaCopy at beginning of the exit blocks.
3> we also need to make sure the explicit copies will not be eliminated.
The target independent portion was committed as r255353.
rdar://problem/23557469
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15341
llvm-svn: 255821
The SystemZ linkers provide an optimization to transform a general-
or local-dynamic TLS sequence into an initial-exec sequence if possible.
Do do that, the compiler generates a function call to __tls_get_offset,
which is a brasl instruction annotated with *two* relocations:
- a R_390_PLT32DBL to install __tls_get_offset as branch target
- a R_390_TLS_GDCALL / R_390_TLS_LDCALL to inform the linker that
the TLS optimization should be performed if possible
If the optimization is performed, the brasl is replaced by an ld load
instruction.
However, *both* relocs are processed independently by the linker.
Therefore it is crucial that the R_390_PLT32DBL is processed *first*
(installing the branch target for the brasl) and the R_390_TLS_GDCALL
is processed *second* (replacing the whole brasl with an ld).
If the relocs are swapped, the linker will first replace the brasl
with an ld, and *then* install the __tls_get_offset branch target
offset. Since ld has a different layout than brasl, this may even
result in a completely different (or invalid) instruction; in any
case, the resulting code is corrupted.
Unfortunately, the way the MC common code sorts relocations causes
these two to *always* end up the wrong way around, resulting in
wrong code generation by the linker and crashes.
This patch overrides the sortRelocs routine to detect this particular
pair of relocs and enforce the required order.
llvm-svn: 255787
When comparing a zero-extended value against a constant small enough to
be in range of the inner type, it doesn't matter whether a signed or
unsigned compare operation (for the outer type) is being used. This is
why the code in adjustSubwordCmp had this assertion:
assert(C.ICmpType == SystemZICMP::Any &&
"Signedness shouldn't matter here.");
assuming the the caller had already detected that fact. However, it
turns out that there cases, in particular with always-true or always-
false conditions that have not been eliminated when compiling at -O0,
where this is not true.
Instead of failing an assertion if C.ICmpType is not SystemZICMP::Any
here, we can simply *set* it safely to SystemZICMP::Any, however.
llvm-svn: 255786
This removes an unpleasant hack involving a global variable for special
lowering of certain memcpy calls. These are now lowered as intended in
EmitTargetCodeForMemcpy in the same way that other targets do it.
llvm-svn: 255785
ARMv8.2-A adds 16-bit floating point versions of all existing SIMD
floating-point instructions. This is an optional extension, so all of
these instructions require the FeatureFullFP16 subtarget feature.
Note that VFP without SIMD is not a valid combination for any version of
ARMv8-A, but I have ensured that these instructions all depend on both
FeatureNEON and FeatureFullFP16 for consistency.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15039
llvm-svn: 255764
ARMv8.2-A adds 16-bit floating point versions of all existing VFP
floating-point instructions. This is an optional extension, so all of
these instructions require the FeatureFullFP16 subtarget feature.
The assembly for these instructions uses S registers (AArch32 does not
have H registers), but the instructions have ".f16" type specifiers
rather than ".f32" or ".f64". The top 16 bits of each source register
are ignored, and the top 16 bits of the destination register are set to
zero.
These instructions are mostly the same as the 32- and 64-bit versions,
but they use coprocessor 9 rather than 10 and 11.
Two new instructions, VMOVX and VINS, have been added to allow packing
and extracting two 16-bit floats stored in the top and bottom halves of
an S register.
New fixup kinds have been added for the PC-relative load and store
instructions, but no ELF relocations have been added as they have a
range of 512 bytes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15038
llvm-svn: 255762
This folds (ashr (shl a, [56,48,32,24,16]), SarConst)
into (shl, (sext (a), [56,48,32,24,16] - SarConst))
or into (lshr, (sext (a), SarConst - [56,48,32,24,16]))
depending on sign of (SarConst - [56,48,32,24,16])
sexts in X86 are MOVs.
The MOVs have the same code size as above SHIFTs (only SHIFT by 1 has lower code size).
However the MOVs have 2 advantages to SHIFTs on x86:
1. MOVs can write to a register that differs from source.
2. MOVs accept memory operands.
This fixes PR24373.
Patch by: evgeny.v.stupachenko@intel.com
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13161
llvm-svn: 255761
It adjusts from RSP-after-prologue to RBP, which is what SEH filters
need to do before they can use llvm.localrecover.
Fixes SEH filter captures, which were broken in r250088.
Issue reported by Alex Crichton.
llvm-svn: 255707
This patch improves on the suggested codegen from PR24475:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24475
but only for the fmaxf() case to start, so we can sort out any bugs before
extending to fmin, f64, and vectors.
The fmax / maxnum definitions provide us flexibility for signed zeros, so the
only thing we have to worry about in this replacement sequence is NaN handling.
Note 1: It may be better to implement this as lowerFMAXNUM(), but that exposes
a problem: SelectionDAGBuilder::visitSelect() transforms compare/select
instructions into FMAXNUM nodes if we declare FMAXNUM legal or custom. Perhaps
that should be checking for NaN inputs or global unsafe-math before transforming?
As it stands, that bypasses a big set of optimizations that the x86 backend
already has in PerformSELECTCombine().
Note 2: The v2f32 test reveals another bug; the vector is extended to v4f32, so
we have completely unnecessary operations happening on undef elements of the
vector.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15294
llvm-svn: 255700
Krzysztof Parzyszek