Summary:
This patch adds checks that were missing in clang for Armv8.5/6/7-A. These include:
* ACLE macro defines for AArch32.
* Handling of crypto and SM4, SHA and AES feature flags on clang's driver.
Reviewers: dmgreen, SjoerdMeijer, tmatheson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116153
Branch protection in M-class is supported by
- Armv8.1-M.Main
- Armv8-M.Main
- Armv7-M
Attempting to enable this for other architectures, either by
command-line (e.g -mbranch-protection=bti) or by target attribute
in source code (e.g. __attribute__((target("branch-protection=..."))) )
will generate a warning.
In both cases function attributes related to branch protection will not
be emitted. Regardless of the warning, module level attributes related to
branch protection will be emitted when it is enabled via the command-line.
The following people also contributed to this patch:
- Victor Campos
Reviewed By: chill
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115501
This patch introduces support for targetting the Armv9.3-A architecture,
which should map to the existing Armv8.8-A extensions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116159
This is the first commit in a series that implements support for
"armv8.8-a" architecture. This should contain all the necessary
boilerplate to make the 8.8-A architecture exist from LLVM and Clang's
point of view: it adds the new arch as a subtarget feature, a definition
in TargetParser, a name on the command line, an appropriate set of
predefined macros, and adds appropriate tests. The new architecture name
is supported in both AArch32 and AArch64.
However, in this commit, no actual _functionality_ is added as part of
the new architecture. If you specify -march=armv8.8a, the compiler
will accept it and set the right predefines, but generate no code any
differently.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115694
Handle branch protection option on the commandline as well as a function
attribute. One patch for both mechanisms, as they use the same underlying
parsing mechanism.
These are recorded in a set of LLVM IR module-level attributes like we do for
AArch64 PAC/BTI (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D85649):
- command-line options are "translated" to module-level LLVM IR
attributes (metadata).
- functions have PAC/BTI specific attributes iff the
__attribute__((target("branch-protection=...))) was used in the function
declaration.
- command-line option -mbranch-protection to armclang targeting Arm,
following this grammar:
branch-protection ::= "-mbranch-protection=" <protection>
protection ::= "none" | "standard" | "bti" [ "+" <pac-ret-clause> ]
| <pac-ret-clause> [ "+" "bti"]
pac-ret-clause ::= "pac-ret" [ "+" <pac-ret-option> ]
pac-ret-option ::= "leaf" ["+" "b-key"] | "b-key" ["+" "leaf"]
b-key is simply a placeholder to make it consistent with AArch64's
version. In Arm, however, it triggers a warning informing that b-key is
unsupported and a-key will be selected instead.
- Handle _attribute_((target(("branch-protection=..."))) for AArch32 with the
same grammer as the commandline options.
This patch is part of a series that adds support for the PACBTI-M extension of
the Armv8.1-M architecture, as detailed here:
https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/armv8-1-m-pointer-authentication-and-branch-target-identification-extension
The PACBTI-M specification can be found in the Armv8-M Architecture Reference
Manual:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0553/latest
The following people contributed to this patch:
- Momchil Velikov
- Victor Campos
- Ties Stuij
Reviewed By: vhscampos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112421
armv9-a, armv9.1-a and armv9.2-a can be targeted using the -march option
both in ARM and AArch64.
- Armv9-A maps to Armv8.5-A.
- Armv9.1-A maps to Armv8.6-A.
- Armv9.2-A maps to Armv8.7-A.
- The SVE2 extension is enabled by default on these architectures.
- The cryptographic extensions are disabled by default on these
architectures.
The Armv9-A architecture is described in the Arm® Architecture Reference
Manual Supplement Armv9, for Armv9-A architecture profile
(https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0608/latest).
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109517
This change is intended as initial setup. The plan is to add
more semantic checks later. I plan to update the documentation
as more semantic checks are added (instead of documenting the
details up front). Most of the code closely mirrors that for
the Swift calling convention. Three places are marked as
[FIXME: swiftasynccc]; those will be addressed once the
corresponding convention is introduced in LLVM.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95561
This patch contains a couple of minor corrections to my previous
crypto patch:
Since both AArch32 and AArch64 are now correctly setting the aes and
sha2 features individually, it is not necessary to continue to check
the crypto feature when defining feature macros.
In the AArch32 driver, the feature vector is only modified when the
crypto feature is actually in the vector. If crypto is not present,
there is no need to split it and explicitly define crypto/sha2/aes.
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102406
This patch changes the AArch32 crypto instructions (sha2 and aes) to
require the specific sha2 or aes features. These features have
already been implemented and can be controlled through the command
line, but do not have the expected result (i.e. `+noaes` will not
disable aes instructions). The crypto feature retains its existing
meaning of both sha2 and aes.
Several small changes are included due to the knock-on effect this has:
- The AArch32 driver has been modified to ensure sha2/aes is correctly
set based on arch/cpu/fpu selection and feature ordering.
- Crypto extensions are permitted for AArch32 v8-R profile, but not
enabled by default.
- ACLE feature macros have been updated with the fine grained crypto
algorithms. These are also used by AArch64.
- Various tests updated due to the change in feature lists and macros.
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99079
Reverts parts of https://reviews.llvm.org/D17183, but keeps the
resetDataLayout() API and adds an assert that checks that datalayout string and
user label prefix are in sync.
Approach 1 in https://reviews.llvm.org/D17183#2653279
Reduces number of TUs build for 'clang-format' from 689 to 575.
I also implemented approach 2 in D100764. If someone feels motivated
to make us use DataLayout more, it's easy to revert this change here
and go with D100764 instead. I don't plan on doing more work in this
area though, so I prefer going with the smaller, more self-consistent change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100776
Clang only defines __VFP_FP__ when the FPU is enabled. However, gcc
defines it unconditionally.
This patch aligns Clang with gcc.
Reviewed By: peter.smith, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100372
This extends the command-line support for the 'armv8.7-a' architecture
name to the ARM target.
Based on a patch written by Momchil Velikov.
Reviewed By: ostannard
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93231
Summary:
This patch upstreams support for a new storage only bfloat16 C type.
This type is used to implement primitive support for bfloat16 data, in
line with the Bfloat16 extension of the Armv8.6-a architecture, as
detailed here:
https://community.arm.com/developer/ip-products/processors/b/processors-ip-blog/posts/arm-architecture-developments-armv8-6-a
The bfloat type, and its properties are specified in the Arm Architecture
Reference Manual:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0487/latest/arm-architecture-reference-manual-armv8-for-armv8-a-architecture-profile
In detail this patch:
- introduces an opaque, storage-only C-type __bf16, which introduces a new bfloat IR type.
This is part of a patch series, starting with command-line and Bfloat16
assembly support. The subsequent patches will upstream intrinsics
support for BFloat16, followed by Matrix Multiplication and the
remaining Virtualization features of the armv8.6-a architecture.
The following people contributed to this patch:
- Luke Cheeseman
- Momchil Velikov
- Alexandros Lamprineas
- Luke Geeson
- Simon Tatham
- Ties Stuij
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, rjmccall, rsmith, liutianle, RKSimon, craig.topper, jfb, LukeGeeson, fpetrogalli
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: labrinea, majnemer, asmith, dexonsmith, kristof.beyls, arphaman, danielkiss, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76077
Summary:
An upgrade of LLVM for CrOS [0] containing [1] triggered a bunch of
errors related to writing to reserved registers for a Linux kernel's
arm64 compat vdso (which is a aarch32 image).
After a discussion on LKML [2], it was determined that
-f{no-}omit-frame-pointer was not being specified. Comparing GCC and
Clang [3], it becomes apparent that GCC defaults to omitting the frame
pointer implicitly when optimizations are enabled, and Clang does not.
ie. setting -O1 (or above) implies -fomit-frame-pointer. Clang was
defaulting to -fno-omit-frame-pointer implicitly unless -fomit-frame-pointer
was set explicitly.
Why this becomes a problem is that the Linux kernel's arm64 compat vdso
contains code that uses r7. r7 is used sometimes for the frame pointer
(for example, when targeting thumb (-mthumb)). See useR7AsFramePointer()
in llvm/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMSubtarget.h. This is mostly
for legacy/compatibility reasons, and the 2019 Q4 revision of the ARM
AAPCS looks to standardize r11 as the frame pointer for aarch32, though
this is not yet implemented in LLVM.
Users that are reliant on the implicit value if unspecified when
optimizations are enabled should explicitly choose -fomit-frame-pointer
(new behavior) or -fno-omit-frame-pointer (old behavior).
[0] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1084372
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D76848
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200526173117.155339-1-ndesaulniers@google.com/
[3] https://godbolt.org/z/0oY39t
Reviewers: kristof.beyls, psmith, danalbert, srhines, MaskRay, ostannard, efriedma
Reviewed By: psmith, danalbert, srhines, MaskRay, efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, olista01, MaskRay, vhscampos, cfe-commits, llvm-commits, manojgupta, llozano, glider, hctim, eugenis, pcc, peter.smith, srhines
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80828
This patch upstreams support for the Armv8.6-a Matrix Multiplication
Extension. A summary of the features can be found here:
https://community.arm.com/developer/ip-products/processors/b/processors-ip-blog/posts/arm-architecture-developments-armv8-6-a
This patch includes:
- Assembly support for AArch32
- Intrinsics Support for AArch32 Neon Intrinsics for Matrix
Multiplication
Note: these extensions are optional in the 8.6a architecture and so have
to be enabled by default
No additional IR types or C Types are needed for this extension.
This is part of a patch series, starting with BFloat16 support and
the other components in the armv8.6a extension (in previous patches
linked in phabricator)
Based on work by:
- Luke Geeson
- Oliver Stannard
- Luke Cheeseman
Reviewers: t.p.northover, miyuki
Reviewed By: miyuki
Subscribers: miyuki, ostannard, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss,
cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77872
Summary:
This patch introduces command-line support for the Armv8.6-a architecture and assembly support for BFloat16. Details can be found
https://community.arm.com/developer/ip-products/processors/b/processors-ip-blog/posts/arm-architecture-developments-armv8-6-a
in addition to the GCC patch for the 8..6-a CLI:
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2019-11/msg02647.html
In detail this patch
- march options for armv8.6-a
- BFloat16 assembly
This is part of a patch series, starting with command-line and Bfloat16
assembly support. The subsequent patches will upstream intrinsics
support for BFloat16, followed by Matrix Multiplication and the
remaining Virtualization features of the armv8.6-a architecture.
Based on work by:
- labrinea
- MarkMurrayARM
- Luke Cheeseman
- Javed Asbar
- Mikhail Maltsev
- Luke Geeson
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, craig.topper, rjmccall, jfb, LukeGeeson
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: stuij, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, dexonsmith, danielkiss, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76062
Summary:
This patch implements feature test macros for the CDE extension
according to the upcoming ACLE specification.
The following 2 macros are being added:
- __ARM_FEATURE_CDE - defined as '1' when any coprocessor is
configured as a CDE coprocessor
- __ARM_FEATURE_CDE_COPROC - defined as an 8-bit mask, each bit of the
mask corresponds to a coprocessor and is set when the corresponding
coprocessor is configured as CDE (and cleared otherwise).
The patch also exposes the value of __ARM_FEATURE_CDE_COPROC in the
target-independent method TargetInfo::getARMCDECorpocMask, the method
will be used in follow-up patches implementing semantic checks of CDE
intrinsics (we want to diagnose the cases when CDE intrinsics are used
with coprocessors that are not configured as CDE).
Reviewers: simon_tatham, dmgreen, ostannard, MarkMurrayARM
Reviewed By: simon_tatham
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, danielkiss, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75843
Summary:
This patch changes the underlying type of the ARM::ArchExtKind
enumeration to uint64_t and adjusts the related code.
The goal of the patch is to prepare the code base for a new
architecture extension.
Reviewers: simon_tatham, eli.friedman, ostannard, dmgreen
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits, pbarrio
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73906
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
Add support for vcadd_* family of intrinsics. This set of intrinsics is
available in Armv8.3-A.
The fp16 versions require the FP16 extension, which has been available
(opt-in) since Armv8.2-A.
Reviewers: t.p.northover
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: t.p.northover, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70862
Provides support for using r6-r11 as globally scoped
register variables. This requires a -ffixed-rN flag
in order to reserve rN against general allocation.
If for a given GRV declaration the corresponding flag
is not found, or the the register in question is the
target's FP, we fail with a diagnostic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68862
A number of inline assembly constraints are currently supported by LLVM, but rejected as invalid by Clang:
Target independent constraints:
s: An integer constant, but allowing only relocatable values
ARM specific constraints:
j: An immediate integer between 0 and 65535 (valid for MOVW)
x: A 32, 64, or 128-bit floating-point/SIMD register: s0-s15, d0-d7, or q0-q3
N: An immediate integer between 0 and 31 (Thumb1 only)
O: An immediate integer which is a multiple of 4 between -508 and 508. (Thumb1 only)
This patch adds support to Clang for the missing constraints along with some checks to ensure that the constraints are used with the correct target and Thumb mode, and that immediates are within valid ranges (at least where possible). The constraints are already implemented in LLVM, but just a couple of minor corrections to checks (V8M Baseline includes MOVW so should work with 'j', 'N' and 'O' shouldn't be valid in Thumb2) so that Clang and LLVM are in line with each other and the documentation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65863
Change-Id: I18076619e319bac35fbb60f590c069145c9d9a0a
llvm-svn: 371079
Push LR register before calling __gnu_mcount_nc as it expects the value of LR register to be the top value of
the stack on ARM32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65019
llvm-svn: 369147
Summary:
The maximum alignment used by ARM arch
is 64bits, not 128.
This could cause overaligned memory
access for 128 bit neon vector that
have unpredictable behaviour.
This fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42668
Reviewers: ostannard, dmgreen, srhines, danalbert, pirama, peter.smith
Reviewed By: pirama, peter.smith
Subscribers: phosek, thegameg, thakis, llvm-commits, carwil, peter.smith, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65000
llvm-svn: 368288
The maximum alignment used by ARM arch
is 64bits, not 128.
This could cause overaligned memory
access for 128 bit neon vector that
have unpredictable behaviour.
This fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42668
Patch by: Diogo Sampaio(diogo.sampaio@arm.com)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65000
Change-Id: I5a62b766491f15dd51e4cfe6625929db897f67e3
llvm-svn: 367119
These macro definitions don't depend on the template parameter, so they
don't need to be part of the template. Move them to a .cpp file.
llvm-svn: 365556
"To" selects an odd-numbered GPR, and "Te" an even one. There are some
8.1-M instructions that have one too few bits in their register fields
and require registers of particular parity, without necessarily using
a consecutive even/odd pair.
Also, the constraint letter "t" should select an MVE q-register, when
MVE is present. This didn't need any source changes, but some extra
tests have been added.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60709
llvm-svn: 364331
ARM has a special target feature called soft-float-abi. This feature is
special, since we get it passed to us explicitly in the frontend, but
filter it out before it can land in any target feature strings in LLVM
IR.
__attribute__((target(""))) doesn't quite filter these features out
properly, so today, we get warnings about soft-float-abi being an
unknown feature from the backend.
This CL has us filter soft-float-abi out at a slightly different point,
so we don't end up passing these invalid features to the backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61750
llvm-svn: 363346
If MVE is present at all, then the macro __ARM_FEATURE_MVE is defined
to a value which has bit 0 set for integer MVE, and bit 1 set for
floating-point MVE.
(Floating-point MVE implies integer MVE, so if this macro is defined
at all then it will be set to 1 or 3, never 2.)
Patch mostly by Simon Tatham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60710
llvm-svn: 362806
Change D60691 caused some knock-on failures that weren't caught by the
existing tests. Firstly, selecting a CPU that should have had a
restricted FPU (e.g. `-mcpu=cortex-m4`, which should have 16 d-regs
and no double precision) could give the unrestricted version, because
`ARM::getFPUFeatures` returned a list of features including subtracted
ones (here `-fp64`,`-d32`), but `ARMTargetInfo::initFeatureMap` threw
away all the ones that didn't start with `+`. Secondly, the
preprocessor macros didn't reliably match the actual compilation
settings: for example, `-mfpu=softvfp` could still set `__ARM_FP` as
if hardware FP was available, because the list of features on the cc1
command line would include things like `+vfp4`,`-vfp4d16` and clang
didn't realise that one of those cancelled out the other.
I've fixed both of these issues by rewriting `ARM::getFPUFeatures` so
that it returns a list that enables every FP-related feature
compatible with the selected FPU and disables every feature not
compatible, which is more verbose but means clang doesn't have to
understand the dependency relationships between the backend features.
Meanwhile, `ARMTargetInfo::handleTargetFeatures` is testing for all
the various forms of the FP feature names, so that it won't miss cases
where it should have set `HW_FP` to feed into feature test macros.
That in turn caused an ordering problem when handling `-mcpu=foo+bar`
together with `-mfpu=something_that_turns_off_bar`. To fix that, I've
arranged that the `+bar` suffixes on the end of `-mcpu` and `-march`
cause feature names to be put into a separate vector which is
concatenated after the output of `getFPUFeatures`.
Another side effect of all this is to fix a bug where `clang -target
armv8-eabi` by itself would fail to set `__ARM_FEATURE_FMA`, even
though `armv8` (aka Arm v8-A) implies FP-Armv8 which has FMA. That was
because `HW_FP` was being set to a value including only the `FPARMV8`
bit, but that feature test macro was testing only the `VFP4FPU` bit.
Now `HW_FP` ends up with all the bits set, so it gives the right
answer.
Changes to tests included in this patch:
* `arm-target-features.c`: I had to change basically all the expected
results. (The Cortex-M4 test in there should function as a
regression test for the accidental double-precision bug.)
* `arm-mfpu.c`, `armv8.1m.main.c`: switched to using `CHECK-DAG`
everywhere so that those tests are no longer sensitive to the order
of cc1 feature options on the command line.
* `arm-acle-6.5.c`: been updated to expect the right answer to that
FMA test.
* `Preprocessor/arm-target-features.c`: added a regression test for
the `mfpu=softvfp` issue.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, dmgreen, ostannard, samparker, JamesNagurne
Reviewed By: ostannard
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62998
llvm-svn: 362791
Given the existing infrastructure in LLVM side for +fp and +fp.dp,
this is more or less trivial, needing only one tiny source change and
a couple of tests.
Patch by Simon Tatham.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60699
llvm-svn: 362096
Those two subtarget features were awkward because their semantics are
reversed: each one indicates the _lack_ of support for something in
the architecture, rather than the presence. As a consequence, you
don't get the behavior you want if you combine two sets of feature
bits.
Each SubtargetFeature for an FP architecture version now comes in four
versions, one for each combination of those options. So you can still
say (for example) '+vfp2' in a feature string and it will mean what
it's always meant, but there's a new string '+vfp2d16sp' meaning the
version without those extra options.
A lot of this change is just mechanically replacing positive checks
for the old features with negative checks for the new ones. But one
more interesting change is that I've rearranged getFPUFeatures() so
that the main FPU feature is appended to the output list *before*
rather than after the features derived from the Restriction field, so
that -fp64 and -d32 can override defaults added by the main feature.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, zzheng, Petar.Avramovic, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60691
llvm-svn: 361845
Defines macro ARM_FEATURE_CMSE to 1 for v8-M targets and introduces
-mcmse option which for v8-M targets sets ARM_FEATURE_CMSE to 3.
A diagnostic is produced when the option is given on architectures
without support for Security Extensions.
Reviewed By: dmgreen, snidertm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59879
llvm-svn: 361261
Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is
incorrectly assumed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335
llvm-svn: 355685
Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is
incorrectly assumed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335
llvm-svn: 355585
tyb0807