Commit Graph

3842 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kito Cheng 7a5cb15ea6 [RISCV] Lazily add RVV C intrinsics.
Leverage the method OpenCL uses that adds C intrinsics when the lookup
failed. There is no need to define C intrinsics in the header file any
more. It could help to avoid the large header file to speed up the
compilation of RVV source code. Besides that, only the C intrinsics used
by the users will be added into the declaration table.

This patch is based on https://reviews.llvm.org/D103228 and inspired by
OpenCL implementation.

### Experimental Results

#### TL;DR:

- Binary size of clang increase ~200k, which is +0.07%  for debug build and +0.13% for release build.
- Single file compilation speed up ~33x for debug build and ~8.5x for release build
- Regression time reduce ~10% (`ninja check-all`, enable all targets)

#### Header size change
```
       |      size |     LoC |
------------------------------
Before | 4,434,725 |  69,749 |
After  |     6,140 |     162 |
```

#### Single File Compilation Time
Testcase:
```
#include <riscv_vector.h>

vint32m1_t test_vadd_vv_vfloat32m1_t(vint32m1_t op1, vint32m1_t op2, size_t vl) {
  return vadd(op1, op2, vl);
}
```
##### Debug build:
Before:
```
real    0m19.352s
user    0m19.252s
sys     0m0.092s
```

After:
```
real    0m0.576s
user    0m0.552s
sys     0m0.024s
```

~33x speed up for debug build

##### Release build:
Before:
```
real    0m0.773s
user    0m0.741s
sys     0m0.032s
```

After:
```
real    0m0.092s
user    0m0.080s
sys     0m0.012s
```

~8.5x speed up for release build

#### Regression time
Note: the failed case is `tools/llvm-debuginfod-find/debuginfod.test` which is unrelated to this patch.

##### Debug build
Before:
```
Testing Time: 1358.38s
  Skipped          :    11
  Unsupported      :   446
  Passed           : 75767
  Expectedly Failed:   190
  Failed           :     1
```
After
```
Testing Time: 1220.29s
  Skipped          :    11
  Unsupported      :   446
  Passed           : 75767
  Expectedly Failed:   190
  Failed           :     1
```
##### Release build
Before:
```
Testing Time: 381.98s
  Skipped          :    12
  Unsupported      :  1407
  Passed           : 74765
  Expectedly Failed:   176
  Failed           :     1
```
After:
```
Testing Time: 346.25s
  Skipped          :    12
  Unsupported      :  1407
  Passed           : 74765
  Expectedly Failed:   176
  Failed           :     1
```

#### Binary size of clang

##### Debug build
Before
```
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
335261851       12726004         552812 348540667       14c64efb        bin/clang
```
After
```
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
335442803       12798708         552940 348794451       14ca2e53        bin/clang
```
+253K, +0.07% code size

##### Release build
Before
```
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
144123975       8374648  483140 152981763       91e5103 bin/clang
```
After
```
   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
144255762       8447296  483268 153186326       9217016 bin/clang
```
+204K, +0.13%

Authored-by: Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>

Reviewed By: khchen, aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111617
2022-07-26 15:47:47 +08:00
Muhammad Usman Shahid 76476efd68 Rewording "static_assert" diagnostics
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
2022-07-25 07:22:54 -04:00
inclyc edaae251cc
[clang] better error message for while loops outside of control flow
report an error when encountering 'while' token parsing declarator

```
clang/test/Parser/while-loop-outside-function.c:3:1: error: while loop outside of a function
while // expected-error {{while loop outside of a function}}
^
clang/test/Parser/while-loop-outside-function.c:7:1: error: while loop outside of a function
while // expected-error {{while loop outside of a function}}
^
```

Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/34462

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129573
2022-07-25 11:48:24 +08:00
Iain Sandoe afda39a566 re-land [C++20][Modules] Build module static initializers per P1874R1.
The re-land fixes module map module dependencies seen on Greendragon, but
not in the clang test suite.

---

Currently we only implement this for the Itanium ABI since the correct
mangling for the initializers in other ABIs is not yet known.

Intended result:

For a module interface [which includes partition interface and implementation
units] (instead of the generic CXX initializer) we emit a module init that:

 - wraps the contained initializations in a control variable to ensure that
   the inits only happen once, even if a module is imported many times by
   imports of the main unit.

 - calls module initializers for imported modules first.  Note that the
   order of module import is not significant, and therefore neither is the
   order of imported module initializers.

 - We then call initializers for the Global Module Fragment (if present)
 - We then call initializers for the current module.
 - We then call initializers for the Private Module Fragment (if present)

For a module implementation unit, or a non-module TU that imports at least one
module we emit a regular CXX init that:

 - Calls the initializers for any imported modules first.
 - Then proceeds as normal with remaining inits.

For all module unit kinds we include a global constructor entry, this allows
for the (in most cases unusual) possibility that a module object could be
included in a final binary without a specific call to its initializer.

Implementation:

 - We provide the module pointer in the AST Context so that CodeGen can act
   on it and its sub-modules.

 - We need to account for module build lines like this:
  ` clang -cc1 -std=c++20 Foo.pcm -emit-obj -o Foo.o` or
  ` clang -cc1 -std=c++20 -xc++-module Foo.cpp -emit-obj -o Foo.o`

 - in order to do this, we add to ParseAST to set the module pointer in
   the ASTContext, once we establish that this is a module build and we
   know the module pointer. To be able to do this, we make the query for
   current module public in Sema.

 - In CodeGen, we determine if the current build requires a CXX20-style module
   init and, if so, we defer any module initializers during the "Eagerly
   Emitted" phase.

 - We then walk the module initializers at the end of the TU but before
   emitting deferred inits (which adds any hidden and static ones, fixing
   https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51873 ).

 - We then proceed to emit the deferred inits and continue to emit the CXX
   init function.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126189
2022-07-22 08:38:07 +01:00
Erich Keane 1da3119025 Revert "Rewording the "static_assert" to static assertion"
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.

This reverts commit 6542cb55a3.
2022-07-21 06:40:14 -07:00
Muhammad Usman Shahid 6542cb55a3 Rewording the "static_assert" to static assertion
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.

consider a c file having code

_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");

In clang the output is like:

<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^              ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1

Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:

<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
    1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
          | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
          Compiler returned: 1

The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
2022-07-21 06:34:14 -07:00
Mitch Phillips 041d4012e4 Revert "Rewording "static_assert" diagnostics"
This reverts commit b7e77ff25f.

Reason: Broke sanitizer builds bots + libcxx. 'static assertion
expression is not an integral constant expression'. More details
available in the Phabricator review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
2022-07-14 10:59:20 -07:00
Muhammad Usman Shahid b7e77ff25f Rewording "static_assert" diagnostics
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
2022-07-14 07:47:37 -04:00
Kazu Hirata cb2c8f694d [clang] Use value instead of getValue (NFC) 2022-07-13 23:39:33 -07:00
Iain Sandoe b19d3ee712 Revert "[C++20][Modules] Build module static initializers per P1874R1."
This reverts commit ac507102d2.

reverting while we figuere out why one of the green dragon lldb test fails.
2022-07-11 19:50:31 +01:00
Iain Sandoe af2d11b1d5 [C++20][Modules] Implement include translation.
This addresses [cpp.include]/7

(when encountering #include header-name)

If the header identified by the header-name denotes an importable header, it
is implementation-defined whether the #include preprocessing directive is
instead replaced by an import directive.

In this implementation, include translation is performed _only_ for headers
in the Global Module fragment, so:
```
module;
 #include "will-be-translated.h" // IFF the header unit is available.

export module M;
 #include "will-not-be-translated.h" // even if the header unit is available
```
The reasoning is that, in general, includes in the module purview would not
be validly translatable (they would have to immediately follow the module
decl and without any other intervening decls).  Otherwise that would violate
the rules on contiguous import directives.

This would be quite complex to track in the preprocessor, and for relatively
little gain (the user can 'import "will-not-be-translated.h";' instead.)

TODO: This is one area where it becomes increasingly difficult to disambiguate
clang modules in C++ from C++ standard modules.  That needs to be addressed in
both the driver and the FE.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128981
2022-07-10 11:06:51 +01:00
Iain Sandoe ac507102d2 [C++20][Modules] Build module static initializers per P1874R1.
Currently we only implement this for the Itanium ABI since the correct
mangling for the initializers in other ABIs is not yet known.

Intended result:

For a module interface [which includes partition interface and implementation
units] (instead of the generic CXX initializer) we emit a module init that:

 - wraps the contained initializations in a control variable to ensure that
   the inits only happen once, even if a module is imported many times by
   imports of the main unit.

 - calls module initializers for imported modules first.  Note that the
   order of module import is not significant, and therefore neither is the
   order of imported module initializers.

 - We then call initializers for the Global Module Fragment (if present)
 - We then call initializers for the current module.
 - We then call initializers for the Private Module Fragment (if present)

For a module implementation unit, or a non-module TU that imports at least one
module we emit a regular CXX init that:

 - Calls the initializers for any imported modules first.
 - Then proceeds as normal with remaining inits.

For all module unit kinds we include a global constructor entry, this allows
for the (in most cases unusual) possibility that a module object could be
included in a final binary without a specific call to its initializer.

Implementation:

 - We provide the module pointer in the AST Context so that CodeGen can act
   on it and its sub-modules.

 - We need to account for module build lines like this:
  ` clang -cc1 -std=c++20 Foo.pcm -emit-obj -o Foo.o` or
  ` clang -cc1 -std=c++20 -xc++-module Foo.cpp -emit-obj -o Foo.o`

 - in order to do this, we add to ParseAST to set the module pointer in
   the ASTContext, once we establish that this is a module build and we
   know the module pointer. To be able to do this, we make the query for
   current module public in Sema.

 - In CodeGen, we determine if the current build requires a CXX20-style module
   init and, if so, we defer any module initializers during the "Eagerly
   Emitted" phase.

 - We then walk the module initializers at the end of the TU but before
   emitting deferred inits (which adds any hidden and static ones, fixing
   https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51873 ).

 - We then proceed to emit the deferred inits and continue to emit the CXX
   init function.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126189
2022-07-09 09:09:09 +01:00
Fazlay Rabbi 38bcd483dd [OpenMP] Initial parsing and semantic support for 'parallel masked taskloop simd' construct
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for
"parallel masked taskloop simd" construct introduced in
OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.10)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128946
2022-07-01 08:57:15 -07:00
Fazlay Rabbi d64ba896d3 [OpenMP] Initial parsing and sema support for 'parallel masked taskloop' construct
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for
"parallel masked taskloop" construct introduced in
OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.9)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128834
2022-06-30 11:44:17 -07:00
Joseph Huber f892ddb3be [OpenMP] Add variant extension that applies to declarations
This patch adds a new extension to the `omp begin / end declare variant`
support that causes it to apply to function declarations as well. This
is explicitly not done in the standard, but can be useful in some
situations so we should provide it as an extension. This will allow us
to uniquely bind and overload existing definitions with a simple
declaration using variants.

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124624
2022-06-29 15:04:26 -04:00
Corentin Jabot a9a60f20e6 [Clang] Rename StringLiteral::isAscii() => isOrdinary() [NFC]
"Ascii" StringLiteral instances are actually narrow strings
that are UTF-8 encoded and do not have an encoding prefix.
(UTF8 StringLiteral are also UTF-8 encoded strings, but with
the u8 prefix.

To avoid possible confusion both with actuall ASCII strings,
and with future works extending the set of literal encodings
supported by clang, this rename StringLiteral::isAscii() to
isOrdinary(), matching C++ standard terminology.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128762
2022-06-29 18:28:51 +02:00
Fazlay Rabbi 73e5d7bdff [OpenMP] Initial parsing and sema support for 'masked taskloop simd' construct
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for
"masked taskloop simd" construct introduced in OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.8)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128693
2022-06-28 15:27:49 -07:00
Martin Boehme 86866107b8 [Clang] Fix: Restore warning inadvertently removed by D126061.
Before D126061, Clang would warn about this code

```
struct X {
    [[deprecated]] struct Y {};
};
```

with the warning

    attribute 'deprecated' is ignored, place it after "struct" to apply attribute to type declaration

D126061 inadvertently caused this warning to no longer be emitted. This patch
restores the previous behavior.

The reason for the bug is that after D126061, C++11 attributes applied to a
member declaration are no longer placed in `DS.getAttributes()` but are instead
tracked in a separate list (`DeclAttrs`). In the case of a free-standing
decl-specifier-seq, we would simply ignore the contents of this list. Instead,
we now pass the list on to `Sema::ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec()` so that it can
issue the appropriate warning.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128499
2022-06-28 08:52:58 +02:00
Kazu Hirata ca05cc2064 [clang] Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC)
This patch replaces x.hasValue() with x where x is contextually
convertible to bool.
2022-06-26 18:51:54 -07:00
Kazu Hirata 97afce08cb [clang] Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC)
This patch replaces Optional::hasValue with the implicit cast to bool
in conditionals only.
2022-06-25 22:26:24 -07:00
Kazu Hirata 3b7c3a654c Revert "Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC)"
This reverts commit aa8feeefd3.
2022-06-25 11:56:50 -07:00
Kazu Hirata aa8feeefd3 Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC) 2022-06-25 11:55:57 -07:00
Fazlay Rabbi 42bb88e2aa [OpenMP] Initial parsing and sema support for 'masked taskloop' construct
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for "masked taskloop"
construct introduced in OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.7)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128478
2022-06-24 10:00:08 -07:00
Stephen Long 186bea3750 [MSVC] Add initial support for MSVC pragma optimize
MSVC's pragma optimize turns optimizations on or off based on the list
passed. At the moment, we only support an empty optimization list.

i.e. `#pragma optimize("", on | off)`

From MSVC's docs:

| Parameter | Type of optimization                             |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------|
| g         | Enable global optimizations. Deprecated          |
| s or t    | Specify short or fast sequences of machine code  |
| y         | Generate frame pointers on the program stack     |

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/preprocessor/optimize?view=msvc-170

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125723
2022-06-24 08:03:42 -07:00
Serge Pavlov 706e89db97 Fix interaction of pragma FENV_ACCESS with other pragmas
Previously `#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON` always set dynamic rounding
mode and strict exception handling. It is not correct in the presence
of other pragmas that also modify rounding mode and exception handling.
For example, the effect of previous pragma FENV_ROUND could be
cancelled, which is not conformant with the C standard. Also
`#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS OFF` turned off only FEnvAccess flag, leaving
rounding mode and exception handling unchanged, which is incorrect in
general case.

Concrete rounding and exception mode depend on a combination of several
factors like various pragmas and command-line options. During the review
of this patch an idea was proposed that the semantic actions associated
with such pragmas should only set appropriate flags. Actual rounding
mode and exception handling should be calculated taking into account the
state of all relevant options. In such implementation the pragma
FENV_ACCESS should not override properties set by other pragmas but
should set them if such setting is absent.

To implement this approach the following main changes are made:

- Field `FPRoundingMode` is removed from `LangOptions`. Actually there
  are no options that set it to arbitrary rounding mode, the choice was
  only `dynamic` or `tonearest`. Instead, a new boolean flag
  `RoundingMath` is added, with the same meaning as the corresponding
  command-line option.

- Type `FPExceptionModeKind` now has possible value `FPE_Default`. It
  does not represent any particular exception mode but indicates that
  such mode was not set and default value should be used. It allows to
  distinguish the case:

    {
        #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON
	...
    }

  where the pragma must set FPE_Strict, from the case:

    {
        #pragma clang fp exceptions(ignore)
        #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON
        ...
    }

  where exception mode should remain `FPE_Ignore`.

  - Class `FPOptions` has now methods `getRoundingMode` and
  `getExceptionMode`, which calculates the respective properties from
  other specified FP properties.

  - Class `LangOptions` has now methods `getDefaultRoundingMode` and
  `getDefaultExceptionMode`, which calculates default modes from the
  specified options and should be used instead of `getRoundingMode` and
  `getFPExceptionMode` of the same class.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126364
2022-06-22 15:13:54 +07:00
Kazu Hirata ca4af13e48 [clang] Don't use Optional::getValue (NFC) 2022-06-20 22:59:26 -07:00
Kazu Hirata 452db157c9 [clang] Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC) 2022-06-20 10:51:34 -07:00
Akira Hatanaka 8fc3d719ee Stop wrapping GCCAsmStmts inside StmtExprs to destruct temporaries
Instead, just pop the cleanups at the end of the asm statement.

This fixes an assertion failure in BuildStmtExpr. It also fixes a bug
where blocks and C compound literals were destructed at the end of the
asm statement instead of at the end of the enclosing scope.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125936
2022-06-17 17:28:00 -07:00
Jennifer Yu bb83f8e70b [OpenMP] Initial parsing and sema for 'parallel masked' construct
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127454
2022-06-16 18:01:15 -07:00
Timm Bäder bce55d0690 [clang][NFC] Remove unused parameter from ActOnCXXNestedNameSpecifier 2022-06-15 16:06:06 +02:00
Martin Boehme 8c7b64b5ae [clang] Reject non-declaration C++11 attributes on declarations
For backwards compatiblity, we emit only a warning instead of an error if the
attribute is one of the existing type attributes that we have historically
allowed to "slide" to the `DeclSpec` just as if it had been specified in GNU
syntax. (We will call these "legacy type attributes" below.)

The high-level changes that achieve this are:

- We introduce a new field `Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (with appropriate
  accessors) to store C++11 attributes occurring in the attribute-specifier-seq
  at the beginning of a simple-declaration (and other similar declarations).
  Previously, these attributes were placed on the `DeclSpec`, which made it
  impossible to reconstruct later on whether the attributes had in fact been
  placed on the decl-specifier-seq or ahead of the declaration.

- In the parser, we propgate declaration attributes and decl-specifier-seq
  attributes separately until we can place them in
  `Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` or `DeclSpec::Attrs`, respectively.

- In `ProcessDeclAttributes()`, in addition to processing declarator attributes,
  we now also process the attributes from `Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (except
  if they are legacy type attributes).

- In `ConvertDeclSpecToType()`, in addition to processing `DeclSpec` attributes,
  we also process any legacy type attributes that occur in
  `Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (and emit a warning).

- We make `ProcessDeclAttribute` emit an error if it sees any non-declaration
  attributes in C++11 syntax, except in the following cases:
  - If it is being called for attributes on a `DeclSpec` or `DeclaratorChunk`
  - If the attribute is a legacy type attribute (in which case we only emit
    a warning)

The standard justifies treating attributes at the beginning of a
simple-declaration and attributes after a declarator-id the same. Here are some
relevant parts of the standard:

- The attribute-specifier-seq at the beginning of a simple-declaration
  "appertains to each of the entities declared by the declarators of the
  init-declarator-list" (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.pre-3)

- "In the declaration for an entity, attributes appertaining to that entity can
  appear at the start of the declaration and after the declarator-id for that
  declaration." (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.pre-note-2)

- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq following a declarator-id appertains to
  the entity that is declared."
  (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.meaning.general-1)

The standard contains similar wording to that for a simple-declaration in other
similar types of declarations, for example:

- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq in a parameter-declaration appertains to
  the parameter." (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.fct#3)

- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq in an exception-declaration appertains
  to the parameter of the catch clause" (https://eel.is/c++draft/except.pre#1)

The new behavior is tested both on the newly added type attribute
`annotate_type`, for which we emit errors, and for the legacy type attribute
`address_space` (chosen somewhat randomly from the various legacy type
attributes), for which we emit warnings.

Depends On D111548

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126061
2022-06-15 11:58:26 +02:00
Martin Boehme 665da187cc [Clang] Add the `annotate_type` attribute
This is an analog to the `annotate` attribute but for types. The intent is to allow adding arbitrary annotations to types for use in static analysis tools.

For details, see this RFC:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-new-attribute-annotate-type-iteration-2/61378

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111548
2022-06-15 09:47:28 +02:00
Kazu Hirata 2e603c67c2 [clang] Construct SmallVector with iterator ranges (NFC) 2022-06-10 22:45:26 -07:00
Aaron Ballman cc30d43ce4 Fix a -Wlogical-op-parentheses warning; NFC
This should address bot failures like:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/77/builds/18317
2022-06-06 07:52:12 -04:00
Aaron Ballman 881125ad91 Allow use of an elaborated type specifier in a _Generic association in C++
Currently, Clang accepts this code in C mode (where the tag is required
to be used) but rejects it in C++ mode thinking that the association is
defining a new type.

void foo(void) {
  struct S { int a; };
  _Generic(something, struct S : 1);
}
Clang thinks this in C++ because it sees struct S : when parsing the
class specifier and decides that must be a type definition (because the
colon signifies the presence of a base class type). This patch adds a
new declarator context to represent a _Generic association so that we
can distinguish these situations properly.

Fixes #55562

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126969
2022-06-06 07:17:35 -04:00
Leonard Grey dd6bcdbf21 [Attributes] Remove AttrSyntax and migrate uses to AttributeCommonInfo::Syntax (NFC)
This is setup for allowing hasAttribute to work for plugin-provided attributes

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126902
2022-06-03 12:11:48 -04:00
Paul Robinson 5a6352bc70 Tidy up `pragma comment lib` handling and testing
A bit of historical research shows that over the years:
Commit 99efc036 added `pragma comment lib` support for PS4.
Commit fd4db533 added `pragma comment lib` support for all ELF targets.
Commit 1d16515f reworked dependent-library support for all ELF targets.

The upshot is that some PS4-specific code became dead, and the
testing became somewhat fragmented.  I've removed the dead code and
combined the previous PS4-specific and linux-specific tests for the
diagnostics into one generic ELF test.
Also added a couple of PS5 runs while I was in there.
2022-06-02 07:52:26 -07:00
Michael Wyman 7689c7fc9e Create specialization of -Wgnu-statement-expression for expressions found in macros.
-Wgnu-statement-expression currently warns for both direct source uses of statement expressions but also macro expansions; since they may be used by macros to avoid multiple evaluation of macro arguments, engineers might want to suppress warnings when statement expressions are expanded from macros but see them if introduced directly in source code.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126522
2022-05-31 11:13:08 -07:00
Aaron Ballman 69da3b6aea Revert "[OpenMP] atomic compare fail : Parser & AST support"
This reverts commit 232bf8189e.

It broke the sanitize buildbot: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/24074

It also reproduces on Windows debug builds as a crash.
2022-05-25 13:34:34 -04:00
Martin Boehme 6f4644d194 [clang] Don't parse MS attributes in `ParseExportDeclaration()`.
As @rsmith commented on https://reviews.llvm.org/D111548: "That looks like it's
simply a bug as far as I can tell, and that call can be removed. MS attributes
will be parsed as part of the decl specifier sequence as needed and don't need
to be parsed as declaration attributes."

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126062
2022-05-25 17:15:41 +02:00
Sunil Kuravinakop ca27f3e3b2 [Clang][OpenMP] Support for omp nothing
Patch to support "#pragma omp nothing"

Reviewed By: tianshilei1992

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123286
2022-05-24 23:59:31 -05:00
Sunil Kuravinakop 232bf8189e [OpenMP] atomic compare fail : Parser & AST support
This is a support for " #pragma omp atomic compare fail ". It has Parser & AST support for now.

Reviewed By: tianshilei1992

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123235
2022-05-24 23:56:42 -05:00
Mike Rice 9ba937112f [OpenMP] Add parsing/sema support for omp_all_memory reserved locator
Adds support for the reserved locator 'omp_all_memory' for use
in depend clauses with 'out' or 'inout' dependence-types.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125828
2022-05-24 10:28:59 -07:00
Jennifer Yu 7aa9c39381 [Clang][[OpenMP5.1] Initial parser/sema for default(private) clause
This implements the default(private) clause as defined in OMP5.1

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125912
2022-05-19 12:43:13 -07:00
Stephen Long b147717bb3 [MSVC] Add support for pragma alloc_text
`#pragma alloc_text` is a MSVC pragma that names the code section where functions should be placed. It only
applies to functions with C linkage.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/preprocessor/alloc-text?view=msvc-170

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125011
2022-05-16 07:00:17 -07:00
Mike Rice 0d67c8a51d [OpenMP] Fix declare simd use on in-class member template function
Return the Decl when parsing the template member declaration so the
'omp declare simd' pragma can be applied to it. Previously a nullptr
was returned causing an error applying the pragma.

Fixes #52700.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125493
2022-05-13 08:24:55 -07:00
Stephen Long 3946de0456 [MSVC] Add support for pragma function
MSVC pragma function tells the compiler to generate calls to functions in the pragma function list, instead of using the builtin. Needs https://reviews.llvm.org/D124701

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/preprocessor/function-c-cpp?view=msvc-170

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124702
2022-05-13 06:39:47 -07:00
Aaron Ballman c671041720 Check for resource exhaustion when recursively parsing declarators
With sufficiently tortured code, it's possible to cause a stack
overflow when parsing declarators. Thus, we now check for resource
exhaustion when recursively parsing declarators so that we can at least
warn the user we're about to crash before we actually crash.

Fixes #51642

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124915
2022-05-12 13:20:35 -04:00
Yaxun (Sam) Liu afc9d674fe [CUDA][HIP] support __noinline__ as keyword
CUDA/HIP programs use __noinline__ like a keyword e.g.
__noinline__ void foo() {} since __noinline__ is defined
as a macro __attribute__((noinline)) in CUDA/HIP runtime
header files.

However, gcc and clang supports __attribute__((__noinline__))
the same as __attribute__((noinline)). Some C++ libraries
use __attribute__((__noinline__)) in their header files.
When CUDA/HIP programs include such header files,
clang will emit error about invalid attributes.

This patch fixes this issue by supporting __noinline__ as
a keyword, so that CUDA/HIP runtime could remove
the macro definition.

Reviewed by: Aaron Ballman, Artem Belevich

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124866
2022-05-10 14:32:27 -04:00
Volodymyr Sapsai 3b762b3ab8 [clang][NFC] In parts of Objective-C Sema use Obj-C-specific types instead of `Decl`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124285
2022-05-05 19:19:41 -07:00