This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
This reverts commit b7e77ff25f.
Reason: Broke sanitizer builds bots + libcxx. 'static assertion
expression is not an integral constant expression'. More details
available in the Phabricator review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
This addresses [cpp.include]/7
(when encountering #include header-name)
If the header identified by the header-name denotes an importable header, it
is implementation-defined whether the #include preprocessing directive is
instead replaced by an import directive.
In this implementation, include translation is performed _only_ for headers
in the Global Module fragment, so:
```
module;
#include "will-be-translated.h" // IFF the header unit is available.
export module M;
#include "will-not-be-translated.h" // even if the header unit is available
```
The reasoning is that, in general, includes in the module purview would not
be validly translatable (they would have to immediately follow the module
decl and without any other intervening decls). Otherwise that would violate
the rules on contiguous import directives.
This would be quite complex to track in the preprocessor, and for relatively
little gain (the user can 'import "will-not-be-translated.h";' instead.)
TODO: This is one area where it becomes increasingly difficult to disambiguate
clang modules in C++ from C++ standard modules. That needs to be addressed in
both the driver and the FE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128981
"Ascii" StringLiteral instances are actually narrow strings
that are UTF-8 encoded and do not have an encoding prefix.
(UTF8 StringLiteral are also UTF-8 encoded strings, but with
the u8 prefix.
To avoid possible confusion both with actuall ASCII strings,
and with future works extending the set of literal encodings
supported by clang, this rename StringLiteral::isAscii() to
isOrdinary(), matching C++ standard terminology.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128762
Before D126061, Clang would warn about this code
```
struct X {
[[deprecated]] struct Y {};
};
```
with the warning
attribute 'deprecated' is ignored, place it after "struct" to apply attribute to type declaration
D126061 inadvertently caused this warning to no longer be emitted. This patch
restores the previous behavior.
The reason for the bug is that after D126061, C++11 attributes applied to a
member declaration are no longer placed in `DS.getAttributes()` but are instead
tracked in a separate list (`DeclAttrs`). In the case of a free-standing
decl-specifier-seq, we would simply ignore the contents of this list. Instead,
we now pass the list on to `Sema::ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec()` so that it can
issue the appropriate warning.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128499
For backwards compatiblity, we emit only a warning instead of an error if the
attribute is one of the existing type attributes that we have historically
allowed to "slide" to the `DeclSpec` just as if it had been specified in GNU
syntax. (We will call these "legacy type attributes" below.)
The high-level changes that achieve this are:
- We introduce a new field `Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (with appropriate
accessors) to store C++11 attributes occurring in the attribute-specifier-seq
at the beginning of a simple-declaration (and other similar declarations).
Previously, these attributes were placed on the `DeclSpec`, which made it
impossible to reconstruct later on whether the attributes had in fact been
placed on the decl-specifier-seq or ahead of the declaration.
- In the parser, we propgate declaration attributes and decl-specifier-seq
attributes separately until we can place them in
`Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` or `DeclSpec::Attrs`, respectively.
- In `ProcessDeclAttributes()`, in addition to processing declarator attributes,
we now also process the attributes from `Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (except
if they are legacy type attributes).
- In `ConvertDeclSpecToType()`, in addition to processing `DeclSpec` attributes,
we also process any legacy type attributes that occur in
`Declarator::DeclarationAttrs` (and emit a warning).
- We make `ProcessDeclAttribute` emit an error if it sees any non-declaration
attributes in C++11 syntax, except in the following cases:
- If it is being called for attributes on a `DeclSpec` or `DeclaratorChunk`
- If the attribute is a legacy type attribute (in which case we only emit
a warning)
The standard justifies treating attributes at the beginning of a
simple-declaration and attributes after a declarator-id the same. Here are some
relevant parts of the standard:
- The attribute-specifier-seq at the beginning of a simple-declaration
"appertains to each of the entities declared by the declarators of the
init-declarator-list" (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.pre-3)
- "In the declaration for an entity, attributes appertaining to that entity can
appear at the start of the declaration and after the declarator-id for that
declaration." (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.pre-note-2)
- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq following a declarator-id appertains to
the entity that is declared."
(https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.dcl#dcl.meaning.general-1)
The standard contains similar wording to that for a simple-declaration in other
similar types of declarations, for example:
- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq in a parameter-declaration appertains to
the parameter." (https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.fct#3)
- "The optional attribute-specifier-seq in an exception-declaration appertains
to the parameter of the catch clause" (https://eel.is/c++draft/except.pre#1)
The new behavior is tested both on the newly added type attribute
`annotate_type`, for which we emit errors, and for the legacy type attribute
`address_space` (chosen somewhat randomly from the various legacy type
attributes), for which we emit warnings.
Depends On D111548
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126061
C89 allowed a type specifier to be elided with the resulting type being
int, aka implicit int behavior. This feature was subsequently removed
in C99 without a deprecation period, so implementations continued to
support the feature. Now, as with implicit function declarations, is a
good time to reevaluate the need for this support.
This patch allows -Wimplicit-int to issue warnings in C89 mode (off by
default), defaults the warning to an error in C99 through C17, and
disables support for the feature entirely in C2x. It also removes a
warning about missing declaration specifiers that really was just an
implicit int warning in disguise and other minor related cleanups.
This patch removes use of the deprecated `DirectoryEntry::getName()` from `Parser` by using `{File,Directory}EntryRef` instead.
Reviewed By: bnbarham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123767
According to CWG 1394 and C++20 [dcl.fct.def.general]p2,
Clang should not diagnose incomplete types if function body is "= delete;".
For example:
```
struct Incomplete;
Incomplete f(Incomplete) = delete; // well-formed
```
Also close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52802
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122981
This is the first in a series of patches that introduce C++20 importable
header units.
These differ from clang header modules in that:
(a) they are identifiable by an internal name
(b) they represent the top level source for a single header - although
that might include or import other headers.
We name importable header units with the path by which they are specified
(although that need not be the absolute path for the file).
So "foo/bar.h" would have a name "foo/bar.h". Header units are made a
separate module type so that we can deal with diagnosing places where they
are permitted but a named module is not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121095
Move the SourceRange from the old ParsedAttributesWithRange into
ParsedAttributesView, so we have source range information available
everywhere we use attributes.
This also removes ParsedAttributesWithRange (replaced by simply using
ParsedAttributes) and ParsedAttributesVieWithRange (replaced by using
ParsedAttributesView).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121201
This implements the parsing and recognition of module partition CMIs
and removes the FIXMEs in the parser.
Module partitions are recognised in the base computation of visibility,
however additional amendments to visibility follow in subsequent patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118586
In C++20 modules imports must be together and at the start of the module.
Rather than growing more ad-hoc flags to test state, this keeps track of the
phase of of a valid module TU (first decl, global module frag, module,
private module frag). If the phasing is broken (with some diagnostic) the
pattern does not conform to a valid C++20 module, and we set the state
accordingly.
We can thus issue diagnostics when imports appear in the wrong places and
decouple the C++20 modules state from other module variants (modules-ts and
clang modules). Additionally, we attempt to diagnose wrong imports before
trying to find the module where possible (the latter will generally emit an
unhelpful diagnostic about the module not being available).
Although this generally simplifies the handling of C++20 module import
diagnostics, the motivation was that, in particular, it allows detecting
invalid imports like:
import module A;
int some_decl();
import module B;
where being in a module purview is insufficient to identify them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118893
In C++20 modules imports must be together and at the start of the module.
Rather than growing more ad-hoc flags to test state, this keeps track of the
phase of of a valid module TU (first decl, global module frag, module,
private module frag). If the phasing is broken (with some diagnostic) the
pattern does not conform to a valid C++20 module, and we set the state
accordingly.
We can thus issue diagnostics when imports appear in the wrong places and
decouple the C++20 modules state from other module variants (modules-ts and
clang modules). Additionally, we attempt to diagnose wrong imports before
trying to find the module where possible (the latter will generally emit an
unhelpful diagnostic about the module not being available).
Although this generally simplifies the handling of C++20 module import
diagnostics, the motivation was that, in particular, it allows detecting
invalid imports like:
import module A;
int some_decl();
import module B;
where being in a module purview is insufficient to identify them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118893
OpenMP 5.1 added support for writing OpenMP directives using [[]]
syntax in addition to using #pragma and this introduces support for the
new syntax.
In OpenMP, the attributes take one of two forms:
[[omp::directive(...)]] or [[omp::sequence(...)]]. A directive
attribute contains an OpenMP directive clause that is identical to the
analogous #pragma syntax. A sequence attribute can contain either
sequence or directive arguments and is used to ensure that the
attributes are processed sequentially for situations where the order of
the attributes matter (remember:
https://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.attr.grammar#4.sentence-4).
The approach taken here is somewhat novel and deserves mention. We
could refactor much of the OpenMP parsing logic to work for either
pragma annotation tokens or for attribute clauses. It would be a fair
amount of effort to share the logic for both, but it's certainly
doable. However, the semantic attribute system is not designed to
handle the arbitrarily complex arguments that OpenMP directives
contain. Adding support to thread the novel parsed information until we
can produce a semantic attribute would be considerably more effort.
What's more, existing OpenMP constructs are not (often) represented as
semantic attributes. So doing this through Attr.td would be a massive
undertaking that would likely only benefit OpenMP and comes with
additional risks. Rather than walk down that path, I am taking
advantage of the fact that the syntax of the directives within the
directive clause is identical to that of the #pragma form. Once the
parser recognizes that we're processing an OpenMP attribute, it caches
all of the directive argument tokens and then replays them as though
the user wrote a pragma. This reuses the same OpenMP parsing and
semantic logic directly, but does come with a risk if the OpenMP
committee decides to purposefully diverge their pragma and attribute
syntaxes. So, despite this being a novel approach that does token
replay, I think it's actually a better approach than trying to do this
through the declarative syntax in Attr.td.
A user reported an issue to me via email that Clang was accepting some
code that GCC was rejecting. After investigation, it turned out to be a
general problem of us failing to properly reject attributes written in
the type position in C when they don't apply to types. The root cause
was a terminology issue -- we sometimes use "CXX11Attr" to mean [[]] in
C++11 mode and sometimes [[]] in general -- and this came back to bite
us because in this particular case, it really meant [[]] in C++ mode.
I fixed the issue by introducing a new function
AttributeCommonInfo::isStandardAttributeSyntax() to represent [[]] in
either C or C++ mode.
This fix pointed out that we've had the issue in some of our existing
tests, which have all been corrected. This resolves
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50954.
Summary:
Call TryAltiVecVectorToken when an identifier is seen in the parser before
annotating the token. This checks the next token where necessary to ensure
that vector is properly handled as the altivec token.
Author: Jamie Schmeiser <schmeise@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed By: ZarkoCA (Zarko Todorovski)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100991
Drop non-conformant extension pragma implementation as
it does not properly disable anything and therefore
enabling non-disabled logic has no meaning.
This simplifies clang code and user interface to the extension
functionality. With this patch extension pragma 'begin'/'end'
and 'enable'/'disable' are only accepted for backward
compatibility and no longer have any default behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101043
Currently when including stdbool.h and altivec.h declaration of `vector bool` leads to
errors due to `bool` being expanded to '_Bool`. This patch allows the parser
to recognize `_Bool`.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast, Everybody0523
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102064
Somewhat surprisingly, signature help is emitted as a side-effect of
computing the expected type of a function argument.
The reason is that both actions require enumerating the possible
function signatures and running partial overload resolution, and doing
this twice would be wasteful and complicated.
Change #1: document this, it's subtle :-)
However, sometimes we need to compute the expected type without having
reached the code completion cursor yet - in particular to allow
completion of designators.
eb4ab3358c did this but introduced a
regression - it emits signature help in the wrong location as a side-effect.
Change #2: only emit signature help if the code completion cursor was reached.
Currently there is PP.isCodeCompletionReached(), but we can't use it
because it's set *after* running code completion.
It'd be nice to set this implicitly when the completion token is lexed,
but ConsumeCodeCompletionToken() makes this complicated.
Change #3: call cutOffParsing() *first* when seeing a completion token.
After this, the fact that the Sema::Produce*SignatureHelp() functions
are even more confusing, as they only sometimes do that.
I don't want to rename them in this patch as it's another large
mechanical change, but we should soon.
Change #4: prepare to rename ProduceSignatureHelp() to GuessArgumentType() etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98488
Reviewed by aaron.ballman, rsmith, wchilders
Highlights of review:
- avoid specifying an underlying type (unless such an enum is stored (or part of an abi?))
- avoid using enums as bit-fields, preferring unsigned bit-fields that we static_cast enumerators to. (MS's abi laysout enum bit-fields differently).
- clang-format, clang-format, clang-format.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D91035
Thank you!
Since these are scoped enumerators, they have to be prefixed by DeclaratorContext, so lets remove Context from the name, and return some characters to the multiverse.
Patch was reviewed here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91011
Thank you to aaron, bruno, wyatt and barry for indulging me.
This change implements pragma STDC FENV_ROUND, which is introduced by
the extension to standard (TS 18661-1). The pragma is implemented only
in frontend, it sets apprpriate state of FPOptions stored in Sema. Use
of these bits in constant evaluation adn/or code generator is not in the
scope of this change.
Parser issues warning on unsuppored pragma when it encounteres pragma
STDC FENV_ROUND, however it makes syntax checks and updates Sema state
as if the pragma were supported.
Primary purpose of the partial implementation is to facilitate
development of non-default floating poin environment. Previously a
developer cannot set non-default rounding mode in sources, this mades
preparing tests for say constant evaluation substantially complicated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86921
-frewrite-includes.
Remove the special-case (and highly implausible) diagnostic for a
compound token that crosses a file boundary, and instead model that case
the same as a compound token separated by whitespace, so that file
transitions and presumed file transitions behave the same way.
For example:
#define FOO(x) (x)
FOO({});
... forms a statement-expression after macro expansion. This warning
applies to '({' and '})' delimiting statement-expressions, '[[' and ']]'
delimiting attributes, and '::*' introducing a pointer-to-member.
The warning for forming these compound tokens across macro expansions
(or across files!) is enabled by default; the warning for whitespace
within the tokens is not, but is included in -Wall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86751
This is motivated by tooling (clangd, libclang etc) - headers without
declarations are legitimate even if they're not valid TUs.
The other use -x c-header cases (PCH/modules) are nonstandard anyway and this
warning doesn't seem necessary there either.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85789
name annotation.
Instead, defer forming the member access expression or DeclRefExpr until
we build the use of ClassifyName's result. Just build an
UnresolvedLookupExpr to track the LookupResult until we're ready to
consume it.
This also reverts commit 2f7269b677 (other
than its testcase). That change was an attempted workaround for the same
problem.
Summary:
DelayedTemplateParsing is marked as BENIGN_LANGOPT, so we are allowed to
use a delayed template in a non-delayed TU.
(This is clangd's default configuration on windows: delayed-template-parsing
is on for the preamble and forced off for the current file)
However today clang fails to parse implicit instantiations in a non-dtp
TU of templates defined in a dtp PCH file (and presumably module?).
In this case the delayed parser is not registered, so the function is
simply marked "delayed" again. We then hit an assert:
end of TU template instantiation should not create more late-parsed templates
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, usaxena95, cfe-commits, kadircet
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81474
Summary:
Clang crashes when trying to finish function body. MaybeODRUseExprs is
not empty because of const static data member parsed in outer evaluation
context, upon call for isTypeIdInParens() function. It builds
annot_primary_expr, later parsed in ParseConstantExpression() in
inner constant expression evaluation context.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80925
test cases
Add support for #pragma float_control
Reviewers: rjmccall, erichkeane, sepavloff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72841
This reverts commit 85dc033cac, and makes
corrections to the test cases that failed on buildbots.
in the token stream.
Previously we deleted all template-id annotations at the end of each
top-level declaration. That doesn't work: we can do some lookahead and
form a template-id annotation, and then roll back that lookahead, parse,
and decide that we're missing a semicolon at the end of a top-level
declaration, before we reach the annotation token. In that situation,
we'd end up parsing the annotation token after deleting its associated
data, leading to various forms of badness.
We now only delete template-id annotations if the preprocessor can
assure us that there are no annotation tokens left in the token stream
(or if we're already at EOF). This lets us delete the annotation tokens
earlier in a lot of cases; we now clean them up at the end of each
statement and class member, not just after each top-level declaration.
This also permitted some simplification of the delay-parsed templates
cleanup code.
scope.
There are a few contexts in which we assume a name is a template name;
if such a context is one where we should perform an unqualified lookup,
and lookup finds nothing, we would form a dependent template name even
if the name is not dependent. This happens in particular for the lookup
of a pseudo-destructor.
In passing, rename ActOnDependentTemplateName to just ActOnTemplateName
given that we apply it for non-dependent template names too.
Instead of bailing out of parsing when we encounter an invalid
template-name or template arguments in a template-id, produce an
annotation token describing the invalid construct.
This avoids duplicate errors and generally allows us to recover better.
In principle we should be able to extend this to store some kinds of
invalid template-id in the AST for tooling use, but that isn't handled
as part of this change.
Muhammad Usman Shahid