In cases where a non-template function is defined inside a function
template, we don't have information about the original uninstantiated
version. In the case of concepts instantiation, we will need the
ability to get back to the original template. This patch splits a piece
of the deferred concepts instantaition patch off to accomplish the
storage of this, with minor runtime overhead, and zero additional
storage.
This reverts commit d4d47e574e.
This fixes the lldb crash that was observed by ensuring that our
friend-'template contains reference to' TreeTransform properly handles a
TemplateDecl.
This reverts commit 2f20743952 because it
triggers an assertion when building an LLDB test program:
Assertion failed: (InstantiatingSpecializations.empty() && "failed to
clean up an InstantiatingTemplate?"), function ~Sema, file
/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/Sema.cpp,
line 458.
More details in https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907.
Currently we do not in general merge attributes when importing decls from modules. This patch handles availability, but long term we need to properly handle all attributes.
I tried to use Sema::mergeDeclAttributes, but it caused test crashes as I don't think it expects to be called in this context. We really shouldn't have duplicate code for merging attributes long term, but for now this fixes availability. There's already a TODO for this in the declaration of ASTDeclReader::mergeInheritableAttributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127182
rdar://85820301
This includes a fix for the libc++ issue I ran across with friend
declarations not properly being identified as overloads.
This reverts commit 45c07db31c.
This reverts commit a97899108e.
The patch caused some problems with the libc++ `__range_adaptor_closure`
that I haven't been able to figure out the cause of, so I am reverting
while I figure out whether this is a solvable problem/issue with the
CFE, or libc++ depending on an older 'incorrect' behavior.
This reverts commit 0c31da4838.
I've solved the issue with the PointerUnion by making the
`FunctionTemplateDecl` pointer be a NamedDecl, that could be a
`FunctionDecl` or `FunctionTemplateDecl` depending. This is enforced
with an assert.
This reverts commit 4b6c2cd647.
The patch caused numerous ARM 32 bit build failures, since we added a
5th item to the PointerUnion, and went over the 2-bits available in the
32 bit pointers.
As reported here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/44178
Concepts are not supposed to be instantiated until they are checked, so
this patch implements that and goes through significant amounts of work
to make sure we properly re-instantiate the concepts correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119544
Emitting metadata for the same ivar multiple times can lead to
miscompilations. Objective-C runtime adds offsets to calculate ivar
position in memory and presence of duplicate offsets causes wrong final
position thus overwriting unrelated memory.
Such a situation is impossible with modules disabled as clang diagnoses
ivar redeclarations during sema checks after parsing
(`Sema::ActOnFields`). Fix the case with modules enabled by checking
during deserialization if ivar is already declared. We also support
a use case where the same category ends up in multiple modules. We
don't want to treat this case as ivar redeclaration and instead merge
corresponding ivars.
rdar://83468070
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121177
Without the fix ivars with anonymous types can trigger errors like
> error: 'TestClass::structIvar' from module 'Target' is not present in definition of 'TestClass' provided earlier
> [...]
> note: declaration of 'structIvar' does not match
It happens because types of ivars from different modules are considered
to be different. And it is caused by not merging anonymous `TagDecl`
from different modules.
To fix that I've changed `serialization::needsAnonymousDeclarationNumber`
to handle anonymous `TagDecl` inside `ObjCInterfaceDecl`. But that's not
sufficient as C code inside `ObjCInterfaceDecl` doesn't use interface
decl as a decl context but switches to its parent (TranslationUnit in
most cases). I'm changing that to make `ObjCContainerDecl` the lexical
decl context but keeping the semantic decl context intact.
Test "check-dup-decls-inside-objc.m" doesn't reflect a change in
functionality but captures the existing behavior to prevent regressions.
rdar://85563013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118525
This builtin returns the address of a global instance of the
`std::source_location::__impl` type, which must be defined (with an
appropriate shape) before calling the builtin.
It will be used to implement std::source_location in libc++ in a
future change. The builtin is compatible with GCC's implementation,
and libstdc++'s usage. An intentional divergence is that GCC declares
the builtin's return type to be `const void*` (for
ease-of-implementation reasons), while Clang uses the actual type,
`const std::source_location::__impl*`.
In order to support this new functionality, I've also added a new
'UnnamedGlobalConstantDecl'. This artificial Decl is modeled after
MSGuidDecl, and is used to represent a generic concept of an lvalue
constant with global scope, deduplicated by its value. It's possible
that MSGuidDecl itself, or some of the other similar sorts of things
in Clang might be able to be refactored onto this more-generic
concept, but there's enough special-case weirdness in MSGuidDecl that
I gave up attempting to share code there, at least for now.
Finally, for compatibility with libstdc++'s <source_location> header,
I've added a second exception to the "cannot cast from void* to T* in
constant evaluation" rule. This seems a bit distasteful, but feels
like the best available option.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120159
Allocate on ASTContext, rather than just on heap, so that template
parameter lists are freed up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120081
For redeclaration chains we maintain an invariant of having only a
single definition in the chain. In a single translation unit we make
sure not to create duplicates. But modules are separate translation
units and they can contain definitions for the same symbol
independently. When we load such modules together, we need to demote
duplicate definitions to keep the AST invariants.
Some AST clients are interested in distinguishing
declaration-that-was-demoted-from-definition and
declaration-that-was-never-a-definition. For that purpose introducing
`IsThisDeclarationADemotedDefinition`. No functional change intended.
rdar://84677782
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118855
Currently we are trying to implement the semantics of C++ Modules. A big
challenge would be the ODR checking. Previously we did this in
ASTReader, it would handle the cases like:
```
module;
export module a_module;
import another_module; // check the ODR consistency here
```
or
```
export module m;
import a_module;
import another_module; // check the ODR consistency here
```
However, it wouldn't handle the case:
```
import another_module; // When we check ODR here, everything looks fine.
```
In the case, the read process is ended. But we need to check the ODR
still. To reuse the facility we do in ASTReader, this patch moves the
corresponding codes into ASTContext. This should be good since there
were facilities like `hasSameTemplateName` and `hasSameType`.
Although the patch is a little bit big, all of the change should be
trivial.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118223
The compiler would judge two concepts is same by their addresses.
However, when we use modules, the addresses wouldn't be the same all the
time since one is parsed in their TU and another is imported in another
TU.
This patch fixes this by using isSameEntity to judge the two concepts.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114769
Merge definition visibility the same way we do for other decls. Without
the fix the added test emits `-Wobjc-method-access` as it cannot find a
visible protocol. Make this warning `-Werror` so the test would fail
when protocol visibility regresses.
rdar://83600696
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111860
We keep using the first encountered definition and need to take into
account visibility from subsequent definitions. For example, if the
first definition is hidden and the second is visible, we need to make
the first one visible too.
rdar://82263843
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110453
While working on https://reviews.llvm.org/D110280 I've tried to merge
decl contexts as it seems to be correct and matching our handling of
decl contexts from different modules. It's not required for the fix in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D110280 but it revealed a missing diagnostic,
so separating this change into a separate commit.
Renamed some variables to distinguish diagnostic like "declaration of
'x' does not match" for different cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110287
When have ObjCInterfaceDecl with the same name in 2 different modules,
hitting the assertion
> Assertion failed: (Index < RL->getFieldCount() && "Ivar is not inside record layout!"),
> function lookupFieldBitOffset, file llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/RecordLayoutBuilder.cpp, line 3434.
on accessing an ivar inside a method. The assertion happens because
ivar belongs to one module while its containing interface belongs to
another module and then we fail to find the ivar inside the containing
interface. We already keep a single ObjCInterfaceDecl definition in
redecleration chain and in this case containing interface was correct.
The issue is with ObjCIvarDecl. IVar decl for IRGen is taken from
ObjCIvarRefExpr that is created in `Sema::BuildIvarRefExpr` using ivar
decl returned from `Sema::LookupIvarInObjCMethod`. And ivar lookup
returns a wrong decl because basically we take the first ObjCIvarDecl
found in `ASTReader::FindExternalVisibleDeclsByName` (called by
`DeclContext::lookup`). And in `ASTReader.Lookups` lookup table for a
wrong module comes first because `ASTReader::finishPendingActions`
processes `PendingUpdateRecords` in reverse order and the first
encountered ObjCIvarDecl will end up the last in `ASTReader.Lookups`.
Fix by merging ObjCIvarDecl from different modules correctly and by
using a canonical one in IRGen.
rdar://82854574
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110280
As described on D111049, we're trying to remove the <string> dependency from error handling and replace uses of report_fatal_error(const std::string&) with the Twine() variant which can be forward declared.
When deserializing a RecordDecl we don't enforce that redeclaration
chain contains only a single definition. So if the canonical decl is not
a definition itself, `RecordType::getDecl` can return different objects
before and after an include. It means we can build CGRecordLayout for
one RecordDecl with its set of FieldDecl but try to use it with
FieldDecl belonging to a different RecordDecl. With assertions enabled
it results in
> Assertion failed: (FieldInfo.count(FD) && "Invalid field for record!"),
> function getLLVMFieldNo, file llvm-project/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGRecordLayout.h, line 199.
and with assertions disabled a bunch of fields are treated as their
memory is located at offset 0.
Fix by keeping the first encountered RecordDecl definition and marking
the subsequent ones as non-definitions. Also need to merge FieldDecl
properly, so that `getPrimaryMergedDecl` works correctly and during name
lookup we don't treat fields from same-name RecordDecl as ambiguous.
rdar://80184238
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106994
This implements the 'using enum maybe-qualified-enum-tag ;' part of
1099. It introduces a new 'UsingEnumDecl', subclassed from
'BaseUsingDecl'. Much of the diff is the boilerplate needed to get the
new class set up.
There is one case where we accept ill-formed, but I believe this is
merely an extended case of an existing bug, so consider it
orthogonal. AFAICT in class-scope the c++20 rule is that no 2 using
decls can bring in the same target decl ([namespace.udecl]/8). But we
already accept:
struct A { enum { a }; };
struct B : A { using A::a; };
struct C : B { using A::a;
using B::a; }; // same enumerator
this patch permits mixtures of 'using enum Bob;' and 'using Bob::member;' in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102241
This attribute applies to a using declaration, and permits importing a
declaration without knowing if that declaration exists. This is useful
for libc++ C wrapper headers that re-export declarations in std::, in
cases where the base C library doesn't provide all declarations.
This attribute was proposed in http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-June/066038.html.
rdar://69313357
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90188
- The failures are all cc1-based tests due to the missing `-aux-triple` options,
which is always prepared by the driver in CUDA/HIP compilation.
- Add extra check on the missing aux-targetinfo to prevent crashing.
[hip][cuda] Enable extended lambda support on Windows.
- On Windows, extended lambda has extra issues due to the numbering
schemes are different between the host compilation (Microsoft C++ ABI)
and the device compilation (Itanium C++ ABI. Additional device side
lambda number is required per lambda for the host compilation to
correctly mangle the device-side lambda name.
- A hybrid numbering context `MSHIPNumberingContext` is introduced to
number a lambda for both host- and device-compilations.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69322
This reverts commit 4874ff0241.
- On Windows, extended lambda has extra issues due to the numbering
schemes are different between the host compilation (Microsoft C++ ABI)
and the device compilation (Itanium C++ ABI. Additional device side
lambda number is required per lambda for the host compilation to
correctly mangle the device-side lambda name.
- A hybrid numbering context `MSHIPNumberingContext` is introduced to
number a lambda for both host- and device-compilations.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69322
In some cases, when deserializing a `CXXMethodDecl` of a `CXXSpecializationTemplateDecl`,
the call to `FunctionDecl::setPure()` happens before the `DefinitionData` member has been
populated (which appears to happen lower down in a `mergeRedeclarable` call), causing a
crash (https://reviews.llvm.org/P8228).
This diff fixes this by deferring the `FunctionDecl::setPure()` till after the `DefinitionData` has
been filled in.
Reviewed By: lxfind
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86853
non-type template parameters.
Create a unique TemplateParamObjectDecl instance for each such value,
representing the globally unique template parameter object to which the
template parameter refers.
No IR generation support yet; that will follow in a separate patch.
Instead of framing the interface around whether the variable is an ICE
(which is only interesting in C++98), primarily track whether the
initializer is a constant initializer (which is interesting in all C++
language modes).
No functionality change intended.
for which it matters.
This is a step towards separating checking for a constant initializer
(in which std::is_constant_evaluated returns true) and any other
evaluation of a variable initializer (in which it returns false).
When parsing a C++17 binding declaration, we first create the
BindingDecls in Sema::ActOnDecompositionDeclarator, and then build the
DecompositionDecl in Sema::ActOnVariableDeclarator, so the contained
BindingDecls are never null. But when deserializing, we read the
DecompositionDecl with all properties before filling in the Bindings.
Among other things, reading a declaration reads whether it's invalid,
then calling setInvalidDecl which assumes that all bindings of the
DecompositionDecl are available, but that isn't the case.
Deserialization should just set all properties directly without invoking
subsequent functions, so we just set the flag without using the setter.
Fixes PR34960.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86207