Instead of collecting all specializations and doing a post-filterin, we
can just get all targeted specializations from getPartialSpecializationsizations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89220
Summary:
This fixes a clangd rename issue, which is missing the reference of
an incomplete specialization.
Unfortunately, I didn't reproduce this issue in clang-rename, I guess
the input `FoundDecl` of AdditionalUSRFinder is different in clangd vs
clang-rename, clang-rename uses the underlying CXXRecordDecl of the
ClassTemplateDecl, which is fixed in 5d862c042b;
while clangd-rename uses the ClassTemplateDecl.
Reviewers: kbobyrev
Reviewed By: kbobyrev
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74829
Summary:
When renaming a class with template constructors, we are missing the
occurrences of the template constructors, because getUSRsForDeclaration doesn't
give USRs of the templated constructors (they are not in the normal `ctors()`
method).
Reviewers: kbobyrev
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74216
Summary:
This should be NFC to clang-rename, by default the traversal scope is
TUDecl. Traversing the TUDecl in clangd is a performance cliff, we should
avoid it.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69892
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
local-rename action
This commit introduces the clang-refactor tool alongside the local-rename action
which uses the existing renaming engine used by clang-rename. The tool
doesn't actually perform the source transformations yet, it just provides
testing support. This commit also moves only one test from clang-rename over to
test/Refactor. I will continue to move the other tests throughout
development of clang-refactor.
The following options are supported by clang-refactor:
-v: use verbose output
-selection: The source range that corresponds to the portion of the source
that's selected (currently only special command test:<file> is supported).
Please note that a follow-up commit will migrate clang-refactor to
libTooling's common option parser, so clang-refactor will be able to use
the common interface with compilation database and options like -p, -extra-arg,
etc.
The testing support provided by clang-refactor is described below:
When -selection=test:<file> is given, clang-refactor will parse the selection
commands from that file. The selection commands are grouped and the specified
refactoring action invoked by the tool. Each command in a group is expected to
produce an identical result. The precise syntax for the selection commands is
described in a comment in TestSupport.h.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36574
llvm-svn: 313244
Summary:
The use case is that renaming multiple symbols in a large enough codebase is
much faster if all of these can be done with a single invocation, but
there will be multiple translation units where one or more symbols are
not found.
Old behavior was to exit with an error (default) or exit without
reporting an error (-force). New behavior is that -force results in a
best-effort rename: rename symbols which are found and just ignore the
rest.
The existing help for -force sort of already implies this behavior.
Reviewers: cfe-commits, klimek, arphaman
Reviewed By: klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37634
llvm-svn: 312942
Kazu Hirata