This was stored in LiveIntervals, but not actually used for anything
related to LiveIntervals. It was only used in one check for if a load
instruction is rematerializable. I also don't think this was entirely
correct, since it was implicitly assuming constant loads are also
dereferenceable.
Remove this and rely only on the invariant+dereferenceable flags in
the memory operand. Set the flag based on the AA query upfront. This
should have the same net benefit, but has the possible disadvantage of
making this AA query nonlazy.
Preserve the behavior of assuming pointsToConstantMemory implying
dereferenceable for now, but maybe this should be changed.
Following some recent discussions, this changes the representation
of callbrs in IR. The current blockaddress arguments are replaced
with `!` label constraints that refer directly to callbr indirect
destinations:
; Before:
%res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,i"(i8* %x, i8* blockaddress(@test8, %foo))
to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]
; After:
%res = callbr i8* asm "", "=r,r,!i"(i8* %x)
to label %asm.fallthrough [label %foo]
The benefit of this is that we can easily update the successors of
a callbr, without having to worry about also updating blockaddress
references. This should allow us to remove some limitations:
* Allow unrolling/peeling/rotation of callbr, or any other
clone-based optimizations
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/41834)
* Allow duplicate successors
(https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/45248)
This is just the IR representation change though, I will follow up
with patches to remove limtations in various transformation passes
that are no longer needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129288
Widening a G_FCONSTANT by extending and then generating G_FPTRUNC doesn't produce
the same result all the time. Instead, we can just transform it to a G_CONSTANT
of the same bit pattern and truncate using a plain G_TRUNC instead.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56454
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129743
We shouldn't use getOpcodeDef() if we need to guarantee the def has only one
user since under the hood it may look through copies and optimization hints,
which themselves may have multiple users.
Some rework of getStackGuard() based on comments in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D129505.
- getStackGuard() now creates and returns the destination
register, simplifying calls
- the pointer type is passed to getStackGuard() to avoid
recomputation
- removed PtrMemTy in emitSPDescriptorParent(), because
this type is only used here when loading the value but
not when storing the value
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129576
When lowering llvm::stackprotect intrinsic, the SDAG implementation
checks useLoadStackGuardNode() to either create a LOAD_STACK_GUARD or use
the first argument of the intrinsic. This check is not present in the
IRTranslator, which results in always generating a LOAD_STACK_GUARD even
if the target does not support it.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129505
SelectionDAG has a target hook, getExtendForAtomicOps, which it uses
in the computeKnownBits implementation for ATOMIC_LOAD. This is pretty
ugly (as is having a separate load opcode for atomics), so instead
allow making use of atomic zextload. Enable this for AArch64 since the
DAG path defaults in to the zext behavior.
The tablegen changes are pretty ugly, but partially helps migrate
SelectionDAG from using ISD::ATOMIC_LOAD to regular ISD::LOAD with
atomic memory operands. For now the DAG emitter will emit matchers for
patterns which the DAG will not produce.
I'm still a bit confused by the intent of the isLoad/isStore/isAtomic
bits. The DAG implementation rejects trying to use any of these in
combination. For now I've opted to make the isLoad checks also check
isAtomic, although I think having isLoad and isAtomic set on these
makes most sense.
This patch adds the support for `fmax` and `fmin` operations in `atomicrmw`
instruction. For now (at least in this patch), the instruction will be expanded
to CAS loop. There are already a couple of targets supporting the feature. I'll
create another patch(es) to enable them accordingly.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127041
Before merging two instructions together, GISel does some sanity checks
that the folding is legal. However that check was missing that the
source of the pattern may be convergent. When the destination location
is in a different basic block, the folding is invalid.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128539
`commonAlignment` is a shortcut to pick the smallest of two `Align`
objects. As-is it doesn't bring much value compared to `std::min`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128345
Patch adds new GICombineRules for G_ADD:
G_ADD(x, G_SUB(y, x)) -> y
G_ADD(G_SUB(y, x), x) -> y
Patch additionally adds new combine tests for AArch64 target for
these new rules.
Reviewed by: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87936
Most clients only used these methods because they wanted to be able to
extend or truncate to the same bit width (which is a no-op). Now that
the standard zext, sext and trunc allow this, there is no reason to use
the OrSelf versions.
The OrSelf versions additionally have the strange behaviour of allowing
extending to a *smaller* width, or truncating to a *larger* width, which
are also treated as no-ops. A small amount of client code relied on this
(ConstantRange::castOp and MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::mangleNumber) and
needed rewriting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125557
I noticed https://reviews.llvm.org/D87415 added SDAG combines to fold
FMIN/MAX instrs with NaNs.
The patch implements the same NaN combines for GISel GMIR FMIN/MAX opcodes:
G_FMINNUM(X, NaN) -> X
G_FMAXNUM(X, NaN) -> X
G_FMINIMUM(X, NaN) -> NaN
G_FMAXIMUM(X, NaN) -> NaN
The patch adds AArch64 tests for these combines as well.
Reviewed by: arsenm
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125819
This change adds the constant splat versions of m_ICst() (by using
getBuildVectorConstantSplat()) and uses it in
matchOrShiftToFunnelShift(). The getBuildVectorConstantSplat() name is
shortened to getIConstantSplatVal() so that the *SExtVal() version would
have a more compact name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125516
When GlobalISel fails, we need to report the error, and we need to set
the FailedISel property. We skipped those steps if stack protector
insertion failed, which led to a very strange miscompile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125584
Previously it built MIR for the results and returned a Register.
This avoids building constants for earlier elements of the vector if
later elements will fail to fold, and allows CSEMIRBuilder::buildInstr
to avoid unconditionally building a copy from the result.
Use a new helper function MachineIRBuilder::buildBuildVectorConstant
to build a G_BUILD_VECTOR of G_CONSTANTs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117758
The most common situation where G_ASSERT_ZEXT appears for AMDGPU is a
copy from a physical register, which happens to use set the actual
register class on the virtual register. After copy coalescing, the
assert's source operand had a vreg with a set class. The verifier was
strictly rejecting cases where the set class/bank weren't an exact
match. Additionally, RegBankSelect was also expecting a register bank
to be set on the register, not a class.
This is much stricter than regular copies so relax this behavior. This
now allows these 2 cases:
1. Source register has either class or bank, and the result does not
2. Source register has a register class, and the result is a register
with a matching bank.
This should avoid needing some kind of special handling to avoid
violating this constraint when folding copies.
This patch adds support for inline assembly address operands using the "p"
constraint on X86 and SystemZ.
This was in fact broken on X86 (see example at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D110267, Nov 23).
These operands should probably be treated the same as memory operands by
CodeGenPrepare, which have been commented with "TODO" there.
Review: Xiang Zhang and Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122220
Amara Emerson