The InstCombine test is reduced from issue #56601. Without the more
liberal match for ConstantExpr, we try to rearrange constants in
Negator forever.
Alternatively, we could adjust the definition of m_ImmConstant to be
more conservative, but that's probably a larger patch, and I don't
see any downside to changing m_ConstantExpr. We never capture and
modify a ConstantExpr; transforms just want to avoid it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130286
Replace the value-accepting isReallocLikeFn() overload with a
getReallocatedOperand() function, which returns which operand is
the one being reallocated. Currently, this is always the first one,
but once allockind(realloc) is respected, the reallocated operand
will be determined by the allocptr parameter attribute.
Use getFreedOperand() instead of isFreeCall() to remove the
implicit assumption that any pointer operand to a free function
is the operand being freed. This won't actually matter until we
handle allockind(free).
We currently assume in a number of places that free-like functions
free their first argument. This is true for all hardcoded free-like
functions, but with the new attribute-based design, the freed
argument is supposed to be indicated by the allocptr attribute.
To make sure we handle this correctly once allockind(free) is
respected, add a getFreedOperand() helper which returns the freed
argument, rather than just indicating whether the call frees *some*
argument.
This migrates most but not all users of isFreeCall() to the new
API. The remaining users are a bit more tricky.
Reapply the patch with getObjectSize() replaced by getAllocSize().
The former will also look through calls that return their argument,
and we'll end up placing dereferenceable attributes on intrinsics
like llvm.launder.invariant.group. While this isn't wrong, it also
doesn't seem to be particularly useful. For now, use getAllocSize()
instead, which sticks closer to the original behavior of this code.
-----
This code is just interested in the allocsize, not any other
allocator properties.
If we are right shifting a multiply by a negated power of 2 where
the power of 2 is the same as the shift amount, we can replace with
a negate followed by an And.
New tests have not been committed yet but the patch shows the diffs.
Let me know if you want any changes or additional tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130103
We only need to check the block for the normal/default destination,
not for other destinations. Using the value in those would be
illegal anyway.
The callbr case cannot actually happen here, because callbr is
currently limited to inline asm. Retaining it to match the spirit
of the original code.
When folding a binop into a select, we need to ensure that one
of the select arms actually does constant fold, otherwise we'll
create two binop instructions and perform the reverse transform.
Ensure this by performing an explicit constant folding attempt,
and failing the transform if neither side simplifies.
A simple alternative here would have been to limit the fold to
ImmConstants, but given the current representation of scalable
vector splats, this wouldn't be ideal.
Avoid calling ConstantExpr::get() for associative/commutative
binops, call ConstantFoldBinaryOpOperands() instead. We only
want to perform the reassociation of the constants actually fold.
Replace ConstantExpr:getFAdd etc with call to
ConstantFoldBinaryOpOperands(). I'm using the constant folding API
rather than IRBuilder here to ensure that this does actually
constant fold. These transforms don't use m_ImmConstant(), so this
would not otherwise be guaranteed (and apparently, they can't use
m_ImmConstant because they want to handle scalable vector splats).
There is an opportunity here to further migrate these to the
ConstantFoldFPInstOperands() API, which would respect the denormal
mode. I've held off on doing so here, because some of this code
explicitly checks for denormal results, and I don't want to touch
it in a mostly NFC change.
The 'and (sext (ashr X, ShiftC)), C' --> 'lshr (sext X), ShiftC'
transformation would access out of bounds bits in APInt::getLowBitsSet
if the shift count was larger than X's bit width or if it was negative.
Fixes#56424
This patch adds the support for `fmax` and `fmin` operations in `atomicrmw`
instruction. For now (at least in this patch), the instruction will be expanded
to CAS loop. There are already a couple of targets supporting the feature. I'll
create another patch(es) to enable them accordingly.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127041
As integer div/rem constant expressions are no longer supported,
constants can no longer trap and are always safe to speculate.
Remove the Constant::canTrap() method and its usages.
This removes creation of udiv/sdiv/urem/srem constant expressions,
in preparation for their removal. I've added a
ConstantExpr::isDesirableBinOp() predicate to determine whether
an expression should be created for a certain operator.
With this patch, div/rem expressions can still be created through
explicit IR/bitcode, forbidding them entirely will be the next step.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128820
In D95959, the improve analysis for "C >> X" broken the fold
((%x & C) == 0) --> %x u< (-C) iff (-C) is power of two.
It simplifies C, but fails to satisfy the fold condition.
This patch try to restore C before the fold.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128790
The test diffs are cosmetic -- but improvements -- because we
let instcombine handle replacement. Instead of dropping the
old value name, it propagates to the new instruction.
(-(X & 1)) & Y --> (X & 1) == 0 ? 0 : Y
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/rhpH3i
This is noted as a missing IR canonicalization in issue #55618.
We already managed to fix codegen to the expected form.
This transform is responsible for a long-standing miscompile
as discussed in issue #47012 (was bugzilla #47668).
There was a proposal to correct it in D88432, but that was
abandoned and there hasn't been any recent activity to fix
it AFAICT.
The original patch D45108 started with a constant-shift-only
restriction and only expanded during review, so I don't think
there's much risk of perf regression on the motivating code.
When merging GEP of GEP with constant indices, if the second GEP's offset is not divisible by the first GEP's element size, convert both type to i8* and merge.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125934
I looked at canonicalizing in the other direction, but that causes
many potential regressions and infinite loops because we already
(possibly wrongly) canonicalize "trunc X to i1" into an and+icmp.
This has a data layout restriction to avoid creating illegal
mask instructions, but we could remove that if we can show
that the backend can undo this when needed.
The motivating example from issue #56119 is modeled by the
PhaseOrdering test.
The assert was added with 0399473de8 and is correct for that
pattern, but it is off-by-1 with the enhancement in d4f39d8333.
The transforms are still correct with the new pre-condition:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/6_6ghmhttps://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/_GTBUt
And as shown in the new test, the transform is expected with
'ult' - in that case, the icmp reduces to test if the shift
amount is 0.
This removes the extractvalue constant expression, as part of
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179.
extractvalue is already not supported in bitcode, so we do not need
to worry about bitcode auto-upgrade.
Uses of ConstantExpr::getExtractValue() should be replaced with
IRBuilder::CreateExtractValue() (if the fact that the result is
constant is not important) or ConstantFoldExtractValueInstruction()
(if it is). Though for this particular case, it is also possible
and usually preferable to use getAggregateElement() instead.
The C API function LLVMConstExtractValue() is removed, as the
underlying constant expression no longer exists. Instead,
LLVMBuildExtractValue() should be used (which will constant fold
or create an instruction). Depending on the use-case,
LLVMGetAggregateElement() may also be used instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125795
These intrinsics are now fundemental for SVE code generation and have been
present for a year and a half, hence move them out of the experimental
namespace.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127976
Kazu Hirata