This probably should have been part of D123089, but the effects of it
don't show up until we start removing functions from the table in
D130107. Oops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130184
We currently assume in a number of places that free-like functions
free their first argument. This is true for all hardcoded free-like
functions, but with the new attribute-based design, the freed
argument is supposed to be indicated by the allocptr attribute.
To make sure we handle this correctly once allockind(free) is
respected, add a getFreedOperand() helper which returns the freed
argument, rather than just indicating whether the call frees *some*
argument.
This migrates most but not all users of isFreeCall() to the new
API. The remaining users are a bit more tricky.
Put AllocationFn check before I->willReturn can allow CodeGenPrepare to remove useless malloc instruction
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130126
When F calls G calls H, G is nounwind, and G is inlined into F, then the
inlined call-site to H should be effectively nounwind so as not to lose
information during inlining.
If H itself is nounwind (which often happens when H is an intrinsic), we
no longer mark the callsite explicitly as nounwind. Previously, there
were cases where the inlined call-site of H differs from a pre-existing
call-site of H in F *only* in the explicitly added nounwind attribute,
thus preventing common subexpression elimination.
v2:
- just check CI->doesNotThrow
v3 (resubmit after revert at 3443788087):
- update Clang tests
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129860
powi() is not a standard math library function; it is specified
with non-strict semantics in the LangRef. We currently require
'afn' to do this transform when it needs a sqrt(), so I just
extended that requirement to the whole-number exponent too.
This bug was introduced with:
b17754bcaa
...where we deferred expansion of pow() to later passes.
Since D129288, callbr is allowed to have duplicate successors. This
patch removes a limitation which prevents optimizations from actually
producing such callbrs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129997
When F calls G calls H, G is nounwind, and G is inlined into F, then the
inlined call-site to H should be effectively nounwind so as not to lose
information during inlining.
If H itself is nounwind (which often happens when H is an intrinsic), we
no longer mark the callsite explicitly as nounwind. Previously, there
were cases where the inlined call-site of H differs from a pre-existing
call-site of H in F *only* in the explicitly added nounwind attribute,
thus preventing common subexpression elimination.
v2:
- just check CI->doesNotThrow
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129860
If DISubpogram was not cloned (e.g. we are cloning a function that has other
functions inlined into it, and subprograms of the inlined functions are
not supposed to be cloned), it doesn't make sense to clone its DILexicalBlocks
as well. Otherwise we'll get duplicated DILexicalBlocks that may confuse
debug info emission in AsmPrinter.
I believe it also makes no sense cloning any DILocalVariables or maybe
other local entities, if their parent subprogram was not cloned, cause
they will be dangling and will not participate in futher emission.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127102
As callbr is now allowed to have duplicate destinations, we can
have a callbr with a unique successor. Make sure it doesn't get
dropped, as we still need to preserve the side-effect.
Callbr is no longer an indirect terminator in the sense that is
relevant here (that it's successors cannot be updated). The primary
effect of this change is that callbr no longer prevents formation
of loop simplify form.
I decided to drop the isIndirectTerminator() method entirely and
replace it with isa<IndirectBrInst>() checks. I assume this method
was added to abstract over indirectbr and callbr, but it never
really caught on, and there is nothing left to abstract anymore
at this point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129849
This is a followup to D129630, which switches LSR to the member
isSafeToExpand() variant, and removes the freestanding function.
This is done by creating the SCEVExpander early (already during the
analysis phase). Because the SCEVExpander is now available for the
whole lifetime of LSRInstance, I've also made it into a member
variable, rather than passing it around in even more places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129769
I happened to notice a two places where the enum was being pass
directly to the bool IsSigned argument of createExtendInst. This
was functionally ok since SignExtended in the enum has value
of 1, but the code shouldn't rely on that.
Using an enum class prevents the enum from being convertible to bool,
but does make writing the enum values more verbose. Since we now
have to write ExtendKind:: in front of them, I've shortened the
names of ZeroExtended and SignExtended.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129733
Motivation here is to unblock LSRs ability to use ICmpZero uses - the major effect of which is to enable count down IVs. The test changes reflect this goal, but the potential impact is much broader since this isn't a change in LSR at all.
SCEVExpander needs(*) to prove that expanding the expression is safe anywhere the SCEV expression is valid. In general, we can't expand any node which might fault (or exhibit UB) unless we can either a) prove it won't fault, or b) guard the faulting case. We'd been allowing non-zero constants here; this change extends it to non-zero values.
vscale is never zero. This is already implemented in ValueTracking, and this change just adds the same logic in SCEV's range computation (which in turn drives isKnownNonZero). We should common up some logic here, but let's do that in separate changes.
(*) As an aside, "needs" is such an interesting word here. First, we don't actually need to guard this at all; we could choose to emit a select for the RHS of ever udiv and remove this code entirely. Secondly, the property being checked here is way too strong. What the client actually needs is to expand the SCEV at some particular point in some particular loop. In the examples, the original urem dominates that loop and yet we completely ignore that information when analyzing legality. I don't plan to actively pursue either direction, just noting it for future reference.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129710
As a followup to D129630, this switches a usage of the freestanding
function in LoopPredication to use the member variant instead. This
was the last use of the freestanding function, so drop it entirely.
isSafeToExpand() for addrecs depends on whether the SCEVExpander
will be used in CanonicalMode. At least one caller currently gets
this wrong, resulting in PR50506.
Fix this by a) making the CanonicalMode argument on the freestanding
functions required and b) adding member functions on SCEVExpander
that automatically take the SCEVExpander mode into account. We can
use the latter variant nearly everywhere, and thus make sure that
there is no chance of CanonicalMode mismatch.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/50506.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129630
Make the implementation more similar to other functions, by
explicitly skipping an unknown/undef first, and always falling
back to overdefined at the end. I don't think it makes a difference
now, but could make one once the constant evaluation can fail. In
that case we would directly mark the result as overdefined now,
rather than keeping it unknown (and later making it overdefined
because we think it's undef-based).
The value lattice explicitly represents undef, and markConstant()
internally checks for UndefValue and will create an undef rather
than constant lattice element in that case.
This is mostly a code simplification, it has little practical impact
because we usually get undef results from undef operands, and those
don't get processed.
Only leave the check behind for the CmpInst case, because it
currently goes through this incorrect code in the getCompare()
implementation: f98697642c/llvm/include/llvm/Analysis/ValueLattice.h (L456-L457)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128330
It is illegal to merge two `llvm.coro.save` calls unless their
`llvm.coro.suspend` users are also merged. Marks it "nomerge" for
the moment.
This reverts D129025.
Alternative to D129025, which affects other token type users like WinEH.
Reviewed By: ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129530
When performing a !nonnull load from uninitialized memory, we
should preserve the nonnull assume just like in all other cases.
We already do this correctly in the generic mem2reg code, but
don't handle this case when using the optimized single-block
implementation.
Make sure that the optimized implementation exhibits the same
behavior as the generic implementation.
Since the backend's codegen is capable to expand powi into fmul's, it
is not needed anymore to do so in the ::optimizePow() function of
SimplifyLibCalls.cpp. What is sufficient is to always turn pow(x, n)
into powi(x, n) for the cases where n is a constant integer value.
Dropping the current expansion code allowed relaxation of the folding
conditions and now this can also happen at optimization levels below
Ofast.
The added CodeGen/AArch64/powi.ll test case ensures that powi is
actually expanded into fmul's, confirming that this refactor did not
cause any performance degradation.
Following an idea proposed by David Sherwood <david.sherwood@arm.com>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128591
After D129205, we support SplitBlockPredecessors() for predecessors
with callbr terminators. This means that it is now also safe to
invoke critical edge splitting for an edge coming from a callbr
terminator. Remove checks in various passes that were protecting
against that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129256
Enhance memchr and strchr handling to simplify calls to the functions
used in equality expressions with the first argument to at most two
integer comparisons:
- memchr(A, C, N) == A to N && *A == C for either a dereferenceable
A or a nonzero N,
- strchr(S, C) == S to *S == C for any S and C, and
- strchr(S, '\0') == 0 to true for any S
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128939
Fix bug exposed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D125990
rewriteLoopExitValues calls InductionDescriptor::isInductionPHI which requires
the PHI node to have an incoming edge from the loop preheader. This adds checks
before calling InductionDescriptor::isInductionPHI to see that the loop has a
preheader. Also did some refactoring.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129297
This patchs adds a new metadata kind `exclude` which implies that the
global variable should be given the necessary flags during code
generation to not be included in the final executable. This is done
using the ``SHF_EXCLUDE`` flag on ELF for example. This should make it
easier to specify this flag on a variable without needing to explicitly
check the section name in the target backend.
Depends on D129053 D129052
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129151
Currently we use the `embedBufferInModule` function to store binary
strings containing device offloading data inside the host object to
create a fatbinary. In the case of LTO, we need to extract this object
from the LLVM-IR. This patch adds a metadata node for the embedded
objects containing the embedded pointers and the sections they were
stored at. This should create a cleaner interface for identifying these
values.
In the future it may be worthwhile to also encode an `ID` in the
metadata corresponding to the object's special section type if relevant.
This would allow us to extract the data from an object file and LLVM-IR
using the same ID.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129033
SplitBlockPredecessors currently asserts if one of the predecessor
terminators is a callbr. This limitation was originally necessary,
because just like with indirectbr, it was not possible to replace
successors of a callbr. However, this is no longer the case since
D67252. As the requirement nowadays is that callbr must reference
all blockaddrs directly in the call arguments, and these get
automatically updated when setSuccessor() is called, we no longer
need this limitation.
The only thing we need to do here is use replaceSuccessorWith()
instead of replaceUsesOfWith(), because only the former does the
necessary blockaddr updating magic.
I believe there's other similar limitations that can be removed,
e.g. related to critical edge splitting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129205
Debugify in OriginalDebugInfo mode, introduced with D82545,
runs only with legacy PassManager.
This patch enables this utility for the NewPM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115351
This patch adds the support for `fmax` and `fmin` operations in `atomicrmw`
instruction. For now (at least in this patch), the instruction will be expanded
to CAS loop. There are already a couple of targets supporting the feature. I'll
create another patch(es) to enable them accordingly.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127041
Fangrui Song