The changeXXXAfterManifest functions are better suited to deal with
changes so we should prefer them. These functions also recursively
delete dead instructions which is why we see test changes.
The change is performed as stated by the FIXME and the tests are
adjusted. All changes look fine to me and values can be inferred as
undef without it being an error.
When we replace instructions with unreachable we delete instructions. We
now avoid dangling pointers to those deleted instructions in the
`ToBeChangedToUnreachableInsts` set. Other modification collections
might need to be updated in the future as well.
A branch is considered UB if it depends on an undefined / uninitialized value.
At this point this handles simple UB branches in the form: `br i1 undef, ...`
We query `AAValueSimplify` to get a value for the branch condition, so the branch
can be more complicated than just: `br i1 undef, ...`.
Patch By: Stefanos Baziotis (@baziotis)
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1, uenoku
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71799
Summary:
Follow-up on: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71435
We basically use `checkForAllInstructions` to loop through all the instructions in a function that access memory through a pointer: load, store, atomicrmw, atomiccmpxchg
Note that we can now use the `getPointerOperand()` that gets us the pointer operand for an instruction that belongs to the aforementioned set.
Question: This function returns `nullptr` if the instruction is `volatile`. Why?
Guess: Because if it is volatile, we don't want to do any transformation to it.
Another subtle point is that I had to add AtomicRMW, AtomicCmpXchg to `initializeInformationCache()`. Following `checkAllInstructions()` path, that
seemed the most reasonable place to add it and correct the fact that these instructions were ignored (they were not in `OpcodeInstMap` etc.). Is that ok?
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71787
_Eventually_, this attribute will be assigned to a function if it
contains undefined behavior. As a first small step, I tried to make it
loop through the load instructions in a function (eventually, the plan
is to check if a load instructions causes undefined behavior, because
e.g. dereferences a null pointer - Also eventually, this won't happen in
initialize() but in updateImpl()).
Patch By: Stefanos Baziotis (@baziotis)
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71435
Johannes Doerfert