Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Florian Hahn fa74b31a3e Revert "[SCCP] Remove forcedconstant, go to overdefined instead"
This causes a crash for the reproducer below

 enum { a };
 enum b { c, d };
 e;
 static _Bool g(struct f *h, enum b i) {
   i &&j();
   return a;
 }
 static k(char h, enum b i) {
   _Bool l = g(e, i);
   l;
 }
 m(h) {
   k(h, c);
   g(h, d);
 }

This reverts commit aadb635e04.
2020-02-12 09:41:19 +00:00
Florian Hahn aadb635e04 [SCCP] Remove forcedconstant, go to overdefined instead
This patch removes forcedconstant to simplify things for the
move to ValueLattice, which includes constant ranges, but no
forced constants.

This patch removes forcedconstant and changes ResolvedUndefsIn
to mark instructions with unknown operands as overdefined. This
means we do not do simplifications based on undef directly in SCCP
any longer, but this seems to hardly come up in practice (see stats
below), presumably because InstCombine & others take care
of most of the relevant folds already.

It is still beneficial to keep ResolvedUndefIn, as it allows us delaying
going to overdefined until we propagated all known information.

I also built MultiSource, SPEC2000 and SPEC2006 and compared
sccp.IPNumInstRemoved and sccp.NumInstRemoved. It looks like the impact
is quite low:

Tests: 244
Same hash: 238 (filtered out)
Remaining: 6
Metric: sccp.IPNumInstRemoved

Program                                        base     patch    diff
 test-suite...arks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms.test     4.00    3.00  -25.0%
 test-suite...TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test    38.00   34.00  -10.5%
 test-suite...006/453.povray/453.povray.test   158.00  155.00  -1.9%
 test-suite.../CINT2000/176.gcc/176.gcc.test   668.00  668.00   0.0%
 test-suite.../CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc.test   1209.00 1209.00  0.0%
 test-suite...arks/mafft/pairlocalalign.test    76.00   76.00   0.0%

Tests: 244
Same hash: 238 (filtered out)
Remaining: 6
Metric: sccp.NumInstRemoved

Program                                        base    patch     diff
 test-suite...arks/mafft/pairlocalalign.test   185.00  175.00  -5.4%
 test-suite.../CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc.test   2059.00 2056.00 -0.1%
 test-suite.../CINT2000/176.gcc/176.gcc.test   2358.00 2357.00 -0.0%
 test-suite...006/453.povray/453.povray.test   317.00  317.00   0.0%
 test-suite...TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test    12.00   12.00   0.0%

Reviewers: davide, efriedma, mssimpso

Reviewed By: efriedma

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61314
2020-02-11 15:24:15 +00:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Davide Italiano f6fbe21bef [SCCP] Add a test for switches on undef.
Without this test, you can just remove the code fixing the
switch to the first constant in ResolvedUndefs in and everything
pass. This test, instead, fails with an assertion if the code
is removed. Found while refactoring SCCP to integrate undef in
the solver.

llvm-svn: 287731
2016-11-23 01:42:39 +00:00