This is the template version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251.
This patch introduces a new template name kind (UsingTemplateName). The
UsingTemplateName stores the found using-shadow decl (and underlying
template can be retrieved from the using-shadow decl). With the new
template name, we can be able to find the using decl that a template
typeloc (e.g. TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc) found its underlying template,
which is useful for tooling use cases (include cleaner etc).
This patch merely focuses on adding the node to the AST.
Next steps:
- support using-decl in qualified template name;
- update the clangd and other tools to use this new node;
- add ast matchers for matching different kinds of template names;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123127
It breaks arm build, there is no free bit for the extra
UsingShadowDecl in TemplateName::StorageType.
Reverting it to build the buildbot back until we comeup with a fix.
This reverts commit 5a5be4044f.
This is the template version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251.
This patch introduces a new template name kind (UsingTemplateName). The
UsingTemplateName stores the found using-shadow decl (and underlying
template can be retrieved from the using-shadow decl). With the new
template name, we can be able to find the using decl that a template
typeloc (e.g. TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc) found its underlying template,
which is useful for tooling use cases (include cleaner etc).
This patch merely focuses on adding the node to the AST.
Next steps:
- support using-decl in qualified template name;
- update the clangd and other tools to use this new node;
- add ast matchers for matching different kinds of template names;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123127
Current ASTContext.getAttributedType() takes attribute kind,
ModifiedType and EquivType as the hash to decide whether an AST node
has been generated or note. But this is not enough for btf_type_tag
as the attribute might have the same ModifiedType and EquivType, but
still have different string associated with attribute.
For example, for a data structure like below,
struct map_value {
int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag3"))) *a;
int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag2"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag4"))) *b;
};
The current ASTContext.getAttributedType() will produce
an AST similar to below:
struct map_value {
int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag3"))) *a;
int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag3"))) *b;
};
and this is incorrect.
It is very difficult to use the current AttributedType as it is hard to
get the tag information. To fix the problem, this patch introduced
BTFTagAttributedType which is similar to AttributedType
in many ways but with an additional BTFTypeTagAttr. The tag itself can
be retrieved with BTFTypeTagAttr.
With the new BTFTagAttributed type, the debuginfo code can be greatly
simplified compared to previous TypeLoc based approach.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120296
This reverts commit cc56c66f27.
Fixed a bad assertion, the target of a UsingShadowDecl must not have
*local* qualifiers, but it can be a typedef whose underlying type is qualified.
Currently there's no way to find the UsingDecl that a typeloc found its
underlying type through. Compare to DeclRefExpr::getFoundDecl().
Design decisions:
- a sugar type, as there are many contexts this type of use may appear in
- UsingType is a leaf like TypedefType, the underlying type has no TypeLoc
- not unified with UnresolvedUsingType: a single name is appealing,
but being sometimes-sugar is often fiddly.
- not unified with TypedefType: the UsingShadowDecl is not a TypedefNameDecl or
even a TypeDecl, and users think of these differently.
- does not cover other rarer aliases like objc @compatibility_alias,
in order to be have a concrete API that's easy to understand.
- implicitly desugared by the hasDeclaration ASTMatcher, to avoid
breaking existing patterns and following the precedent of ElaboratedType.
Scope:
- This does not cover types associated with template names introduced by
using declarations. A future patch should introduce a sugar TemplateName
variant for this. (CTAD deduced types fall under this)
- There are enough AST matchers to fix the in-tree clang-tidy tests and
probably any other matchers, though more may be useful later.
Caveats:
- This changes a fairly common pattern in the AST people may depend on matching.
Previously, typeLoc(loc(recordType())) matched whether a struct was
referred to by its original scope or introduced via using-decl.
Now, the using-decl case is not matched, and needs a separate matcher.
This is similar to the case of typedefs but nevertheless both adds
complexity and breaks existing code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251
WG14 adopted the _ExtInt feature from Clang for C23, but renamed the
type to be _BitInt. This patch does the vast majority of the work to
rename _ExtInt to _BitInt, which accounts for most of its size. The new
type is exposed in older C modes and all C++ modes as a conforming
extension. However, there are functional changes worth calling out:
* Deprecates _ExtInt with a fix-it to help users migrate to _BitInt.
* Updates the mangling for the type.
* Updates the documentation and adds a release note to warn users what
is going on.
* Adds new diagnostics for use of _BitInt to call out when it's used as
a Clang extension or as a pre-C23 compatibility concern.
* Adds new tests for the new diagnostic behaviors.
I want to call out the ABI break specifically. We do not believe that
this break will cause a significant imposition for early adopters of
the feature, and so this is being done as a full break. If it turns out
there are critical uses where recompilation is not an option for some
reason, we can consider using ABI tags to ease the transition.
The AST structural equivalence check did not differentiate between
a struct and a struct with same name in different namespace. When
type of a member is checked it is possible to encounter such a case
and wrongly decide that the types are similar. This problem is fixed
by check for the namespaces of a record declaration.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113118
The AST structural equivalence check did not differentiate between
a struct and a struct with same name in different namespace. When
type of a member is checked it is possible to encounter such a case
and wrongly decide that the types are similar. This problem is fixed
by check for the namespaces of a record declaration.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113118
1. Moves the check to ASTStructuralEquivalence.cpp like all the other checks.
2. Adds the missing checks for identifier and init expression. Also add the
respective tests for that stuff.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112804
<string> is currently the highest impact header in a clang+llvm build:
https://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-clang/llvm-include-analysis.html
One of the most common places this is being included is the APInt.h header, which needs it for an old toString() implementation that returns std::string - an inefficient method compared to the SmallString versions that it actually wraps.
This patch replaces these APInt/APSInt methods with a pair of llvm::toString() helpers inside StringExtras.h, adjusts users accordingly and removes the <string> from APInt.h - I was hoping that more of these users could be converted to use the SmallString methods, but it appears that most end up creating a std::string anyhow. I avoided trying to use the raw_ostream << operators as well as I didn't want to lose having the integer radix explicit in the code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103888
Combined with 'da98651 - Revert "DR2064:
decltype(E) is only a dependent', this change (5a391d3) caused verifier
errors when building Chromium. See https://crbug.com/1168494#c1 for a
reproducer.
Additionally it reverts changes that were dependent on this one, see
below.
> Following up on PR48517, fix handling of template arguments that refer
> to dependent declarations.
>
> Treat an id-expression that names a local variable in a templated
> function as being instantiation-dependent.
>
> This addresses a language defect whereby a reference to a dependent
> declaration can be formed without any construct being value-dependent.
> Fixing that through value-dependence turns out to be problematic, so
> instead this patch takes the approach (proposed on the core reflector)
> of allowing the use of pointers or references to (but not values of)
> dependent declarations inside value-dependent expressions, and instead
> treating template arguments as dependent if they evaluate to a constant
> involving such dependent declarations.
>
> This ends up affecting a bunch of OpenMP tests, due to OpenMP
> imprecisely handling instantiation-dependent constructs, bailing out
> early instead of processing dependent constructs to the extent possible
> when handling the template.
>
> Previously committed as 8c1f2d15b8, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted.
This reverts commit 5a391d38ac.
It also restores clang/test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp to its state before
da986511fb.
Revert "[c++20] P1907R1: Support for generalized non-type template arguments of scalar type."
> Previously committed as 9e08e51a20, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
> following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
>
> 7e84aa1b81 by Simon Pilgrim
> ed13d8c667 by me
> 95c7b6cadb by Sam McCall
> 430d5d8429 by Dave Zarzycki
This reverts commit 4b574008ae.
Revert "[msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay"
> [msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay
> applied to an array the same as the array itself.
>
> This follows MS ABI, and corrects a regression from the implementation
> of generalized non-type template parameters, where we "forgot" how to
> mangle this case.
This reverts commit 18e093faf7.
Previously committed as 9e08e51a20, and
reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
7e84aa1b81 by Simon Pilgrim
ed13d8c667 by me
95c7b6cadb by Sam McCall
430d5d8429 by Dave Zarzycki
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain GenericSelectionExpr
nodes (this is _Generic from C11). This is needed, for example, for
CTU analysis of C code that makes use of _Generic, like the Linux
kernel.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter. Additionally, this change adds support for structural
equivalence of _Generic in the AST.
Reviewed By: martong, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92600
There are several `::IsStructurallyEquivalent` overloads for Decl subclasses
that are used for comparing declarations. There is also one overload that takes
just two Decl pointers which ends up queuing the passed Decls to be later
compared in `CheckKindSpecificEquivalence`.
`CheckKindSpecificEquivalence` implements the dispatch logic for the different
Decl subclasses. It is supposed to hand over the queued Decls to the
subclass-specific `::IsStructurallyEquivalent` overload that will actually
compare the Decl instance. It also seems to implement a few pieces of actual
node comparison logic inbetween the dispatch code.
This implementation causes that the different overloads of
`::IsStructurallyEquivalent` do different (and sometimes no) comparisons
depending on which overload of `::IsStructurallyEquivalent` ends up being
called.
For example, if I want to compare two FieldDecl instances, then I could either
call the `::IsStructurallyEquivalent` with `Decl *` or with `FieldDecl *`
parameters. The overload that takes FieldDecls is doing a correct comparison.
However, the `Decl *` overload just queues the Decl pair.
`CheckKindSpecificEquivalence` has no dispatch logic for `FieldDecl`, so it
always returns true and never does any actual comparison.
On the other hand, if I try to compare two FunctionDecl instances the two
possible overloads of `::IsStructurallyEquivalent` have the opposite behaviour:
The overload that takes `FunctionDecl` pointers isn't comparing the names of the
FunctionDecls while the overload taking a plain `Decl` ends up comparing the
function names (as the comparison logic for that is implemented in
`CheckKindSpecificEquivalence`).
This patch tries to make this set of functions more consistent by making
`CheckKindSpecificEquivalence` a pure dispatch function without any
subclass-specific comparison logic. Also the dispatch logic is now autogenerated
so it can no longer miss certain subclasses.
The comparison code from `CheckKindSpecificEquivalence` is moved to the
respective `::IsStructurallyEquivalent` overload so that the comparison result
no longer depends if one calls the `Decl *` overload or the overload for the
specific subclass. The only difference is now that the `Decl *` overload is
queuing the parameter while the subclass-specific overload is directly doing the
comparison.
`::IsStructurallyEquivalent` is an implementation detail and I don't think the
behaviour causes any bugs in the current implementation (as carefully calling
the right overload for the different classes works around the issue), so the
test for this change is that I added some new code for comparing `MemberExpr`.
The new comparison code always calls the dispatching overload and it previously
failed as the dispatch didn't support FieldDecls.
Reviewed By: martong, a_sidorin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87619
Right now the ASTImporter assumes for most Expr nodes that they are always equal
which leads to non-compatible declarations ending up being merged. This patch
adds the basic framework for comparing Stmts (and with that also Exprs) and
implements the custom checks for a few Stmt subclasses. I'll implement the
remaining subclasses in follow up patches (mostly because there are a lot of
subclasses and some of them require further changes like having GNU language in
the testing framework)
The motivation for this is that in LLDB we try to import libc++ source code and
some of the types we are importing there contain expressions (e.g. because they
use `enable_if<expr>`), so those declarations are currently merged even if they
are completely different (e.g. `enable_if<value> ...` and `enable_if<!value>
...` are currently considered equal which is clearly not true).
Reviewed By: martong, balazske
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87444
This patch adds a matrix type to Clang as described in the draft
specification in clang/docs/MatrixSupport.rst. It introduces a new option
-fenable-matrix, which can be used to enable the matrix support.
The patch adds new MatrixType and DependentSizedMatrixType types along
with the plumbing required. Loads of and stores to pointers to matrix
values are lowered to memory operations on 1-D IR arrays. After loading,
the loaded values are cast to a vector. This ensures matrix values use
the alignment of the element type, instead of LLVM's large vector
alignment.
The operators and builtins described in the draft spec will will be added in
follow-up patches.
Reviewers: martong, rsmith, Bigcheese, anemet, dexonsmith, rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72281
This reverts commit 61ba1481e2.
I'm reverting this because it breaks the lldb build with
incomplete switch coverage warnings. I would fix it forward,
but am not familiar enough with lldb to determine the correct
fix.
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:3958:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:4633:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:4889:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
Introduction/Motivation:
LLVM-IR supports integers of non-power-of-2 bitwidth, in the iN syntax.
Integers of non-power-of-two aren't particularly interesting or useful
on most hardware, so much so that no language in Clang has been
motivated to expose it before.
However, in the case of FPGA hardware normal integer types where the
full bitwidth isn't used, is extremely wasteful and has severe
performance/space concerns. Because of this, Intel has introduced this
functionality in the High Level Synthesis compiler[0]
under the name "Arbitrary Precision Integer" (ap_int for short). This
has been extremely useful and effective for our users, permitting them
to optimize their storage and operation space on an architecture where
both can be extremely expensive.
We are proposing upstreaming a more palatable version of this to the
community, in the form of this proposal and accompanying patch. We are
proposing the syntax _ExtInt(N). We intend to propose this to the WG14
committee[1], and the underscore-capital seems like the active direction
for a WG14 paper's acceptance. An alternative that Richard Smith
suggested on the initial review was __int(N), however we believe that
is much less acceptable by WG14. We considered _Int, however _Int is
used as an identifier in libstdc++ and there is no good way to fall
back to an identifier (since _Int(5) is indistinguishable from an
unnamed initializer of a template type named _Int).
[0]https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/software/programmable/quartus-prime/hls-compiler.html)
[1]http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2472.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73967
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Resubmit after fixing MSAN failures caused by incomplete initialization of AutoTypeLocs in TypeSpecLocFiller.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Resubmit after incorrect check in NonTypeTemplateParmDecl broke lldb.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
Summary:
The structural equivalence check stores now pairs of nodes in the
'from' and 'to' context instead of only the node in 'from' context
and a corresponding one in 'to' context. This is needed to handle
cases when a Decl in the 'from' context is to be compared with
multiple Decls in the 'to' context.
Reviewers: martong, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: martong, a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66538
llvm-svn: 370639
Summary:
We falsely state inequivalence if the template parameter is a
qualified/nonquialified template in the first/second instantiation.
Also, different kinds of TemplateName should be equal if the template
decl (if available) is equal (even if the name kind is different).
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64241
llvm-svn: 366818
Summary:
The structural equivalence check reported false eq between lambda classes
with different parameters in their call signature.
The solution is to check the methods for equality too in case of lambda
classes.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64075
llvm-svn: 366332
template name is not visible to unqualified lookup.
In order to support this without a severe degradation in our ability to
diagnose typos in template names, this change significantly restructures
the way we handle template-id-shaped syntax for which lookup of the
template name finds nothing.
Instead of eagerly diagnosing an undeclared template name, we now form a
placeholder template-name representing a name that is known to not find
any templates. When the parser sees such a name, it attempts to
disambiguate whether we have a less-than comparison or a template-id.
Any diagnostics or typo-correction for the name are delayed until its
point of use.
The upshot should be a small improvement of our diagostic quality
overall: we now take more syntactic context into account when trying to
resolve an undeclared identifier on the left hand side of a '<'. In
fact, this works well enough that the backwards-compatible portion (for
an undeclared identifier rather than a lookup that finds functions but
no function templates) is enabled in all language modes.
llvm-svn: 360308
Summary:
Structural equivalence of methods can falsely report false when the
exception specifier is unresolved (i.e unevaluated or not instantiated).
(This caused one assertion during bitcoin ctu-analysis.)
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61424
llvm-svn: 360261
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:
struct S {
template <typename = int> explicit S();
};
struct T : S {};
struct U : T {
U();
};
U::U() {}
$ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
/tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
U::U() {}
^
/tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
because base class 'S' has no default constructor
struct T : S {};
^
1 error generated.
See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.
This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.
> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360024
this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
Changes:
- The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
- The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
- Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
- Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
- The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
- Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
Patch by Tyker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 359949
If an address_space attribute is defined in a macro, print the macro instead
when diagnosing a warning or error for incompatible pointers with different
address_spaces.
We allow this for all attributes (not just address_space), and for multiple
attributes declared in the same macro.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51329
llvm-svn: 359826
Summary:
ODR errors are not necessarily true errors during the import of ASTs.
ASTMerge and CrossTU should use the warning equivalent of every CTU error,
while Sema should emit errors as before.
Reviewers: martong, a_sidorin, shafik, a.sidorin
Reviewed By: a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58897
Patch by Endre Fulop!
llvm-svn: 357394
Summary: Operators kind was not checked, so we reported e.g. op- to be equal with op+
Reviewers: shafik, a_sidorin, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57902
llvm-svn: 353504
Erich Keane