Commit Graph

1196 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jonas Devlieghere 888673b6e3
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit 7c51f02eff because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was  re-landed without addressing the
issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and
discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.
2022-07-14 21:17:48 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov 7c51f02eff
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
   a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
   print types as written. There are customization options there, but
   not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
   somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
   problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
   that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
   such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
   and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
   the so called canonical types.
   Example:
   ```
   namespace foo {
     struct A {};
     A a;
   };
   ```
   If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
   would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
   by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
   As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
   suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
   will make it print it accurately even when written without
   qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
   the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
   is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
   if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
   then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
   pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
   you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
   very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
   you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
   either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
   to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
   to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
   all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
   to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
   to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
   you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
   the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
   the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some
   TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
   which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
   and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
   This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
   also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
   going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
   here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
   into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
   top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
   micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
   dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
   have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
   `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
   ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
   Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
   no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
   be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
   The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
   into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
   For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-15 04:16:55 +02:00
Jonas Devlieghere 3968936b92
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit bdc6974f92 because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module.

  import-std-module/array.TestArrayFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/deque-basic.TestDequeFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/deque-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentDequeFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/forward_list.TestForwardListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/forward_list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentForwardListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/list.TestListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/queue.TestQueueFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/stack.TestStackFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector.TestVectorFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-bool.TestVectorBoolFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentVectorFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-of-vectors.TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py

https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/45301/
2022-07-13 09:20:30 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov bdc6974f92
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-13 02:10:09 +02:00
Jennifer Yu 927156a674 Generate the capture for the field when the field is used in openmp
region with implicit default inside the member function.

This is to fix assert when field is referenced in OpenMP region with
default (first|private) clause inside member function.

The problem of assert is that the capture is not generated for the field.

This patch is to generate capture when the field is used with implicit
default, use it in the code, and save the capture off to make sure it is
considered from that point and add first/private clauses.

1> Add new field ImplicitDefaultFirstprivateFDs in SharingMapTy, used to
   store generated capture fields info.
2> In function isOpenMPCaptureDecl: the caputer is generated and saved
   in ImplicitDefaultFirstprivateFDs.
3> Add new help functions:
   getImplicitFDCapExprDecl
   isImplicitDefaultFirstprivateFD
   addImplicitDefaultFirstprivateFD
4> Add addition argument in hasDSA to check default attribute for
   default(first|private).
5> The isImplicitDefaultFirstprivateFD is used in VisitDeclRefExpr to
   build the implicit clause.
6> Add new parameter "Context" for buildCaptureDecl, due to when capture
   field, the parent context is needed to be used.
7> Change in isOpenMPPrivateDecl where stop propagate the capture from
   the enclosing region for private variable.
8> In ActOnOpenMPFirstprivate/ActOnOpenMPPrivate, using captured info
   to generate first|private clause.
9> Add new function isOpenMPRebuildMemberExpr: use to determine if field
   needs to be rebuild during template instantiation.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127803
2022-07-01 17:09:01 -07:00
Erich Keane 258c3aee54 Revert "Re-apply "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation"""
This reverts commit befa8cf087.

Apparently this breaks some libc++ builds with an apparent assertion,
 so I'm looking into that .
2022-07-01 11:20:16 -07:00
Fazlay Rabbi 38bcd483dd [OpenMP] Initial parsing and semantic support for 'parallel masked taskloop simd' construct
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for
"parallel masked taskloop simd" construct introduced in
OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.10)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128946
2022-07-01 08:57:15 -07:00
Erich Keane befa8cf087 Re-apply "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation""
This reverts commit d4d47e574e.

This fixes the lldb crash that was observed by ensuring that our
friend-'template contains reference to' TreeTransform properly handles a
TemplateDecl.
2022-07-01 06:51:38 -07:00
Fazlay Rabbi d64ba896d3 [OpenMP] Initial parsing and sema support for 'parallel masked taskloop' construct
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for
"parallel masked taskloop" construct introduced in
OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.9)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128834
2022-06-30 11:44:17 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere d4d47e574e
Revert "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation"
This reverts commit 2f20743952 because it
triggers an assertion when building an LLDB test program:

  Assertion failed: (InstantiatingSpecializations.empty() && "failed to
  clean up an InstantiatingTemplate?"), function ~Sema, file
  /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/Sema.cpp,
  line 458.

More details in https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907.
2022-06-30 11:43:10 -07:00
Erich Keane 2f20743952 Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation
This is a continuation of D119544.  Based on @rsmith 's feed back
showing me https://eel.is/c++draft/temp#friend-9, We should properly
handle friend functions now.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907
2022-06-30 06:47:11 -07:00
Fazlay Rabbi 73e5d7bdff [OpenMP] Initial parsing and sema support for 'masked taskloop simd' construct
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for
"masked taskloop simd" construct introduced in OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.8)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128693
2022-06-28 15:27:49 -07:00
Fazlay Rabbi 42bb88e2aa [OpenMP] Initial parsing and sema support for 'masked taskloop' construct
This patch gives basic parsing and semantic support for "masked taskloop"
construct introduced in OpenMP 5.1 (section 2.16.7)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128478
2022-06-24 10:00:08 -07:00
Kazu Hirata ad7ce1e769 Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC) 2022-06-20 11:49:10 -07:00
Jennifer Yu bb83f8e70b [OpenMP] Initial parsing and sema for 'parallel masked' construct
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127454
2022-06-16 18:01:15 -07:00
Aaron Ballman 69da3b6aea Revert "[OpenMP] atomic compare fail : Parser & AST support"
This reverts commit 232bf8189e.

It broke the sanitize buildbot: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/24074

It also reproduces on Windows debug builds as a crash.
2022-05-25 13:34:34 -04:00
Sunil Kuravinakop 232bf8189e [OpenMP] atomic compare fail : Parser & AST support
This is a support for " #pragma omp atomic compare fail ". It has Parser & AST support for now.

Reviewed By: tianshilei1992

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123235
2022-05-24 23:56:42 -05:00
Mike Rice 9ba937112f [OpenMP] Add parsing/sema support for omp_all_memory reserved locator
Adds support for the reserved locator 'omp_all_memory' for use
in depend clauses with 'out' or 'inout' dependence-types.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125828
2022-05-24 10:28:59 -07:00
Nathan Ridge df2a4eae6b [clang] Expose CoawaitExpr's operand in the AST
Previously the Expr returned by getOperand() was actually the
subexpression common to the "ready", "suspend", and "resume"
expressions, which often isn't just the operand but e.g.
await_transform() called on the operand.

It's important for the AST to expose the operand as written
in the source for traversals and tools like clangd to work
correctly.

Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/939

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115187
2022-05-17 08:13:37 -04:00
Erich Keane 017abbb258 Revert ""Re-apply 4b6c2cd642 "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation"""""
This reverts commit a425cac31e.

There is another libc++ test, that this time causes us to hit an
assertion. Reverting, likely for a while this time.
2022-05-09 09:12:05 -07:00
Erich Keane a425cac31e "Re-apply 4b6c2cd642 "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation""""
This includes a fix for the libc++ issue I ran across with friend
declarations not properly being identified as overloads.

This reverts commit 45c07db31c.
2022-05-09 06:29:47 -07:00
Erich Keane 45c07db31c Revert "Re-apply 4b6c2cd642 "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation"""
This reverts commit a97899108e.

The patch caused some problems with the libc++ `__range_adaptor_closure`
that I haven't been able to figure out the cause of, so I am reverting
while I figure out whether this is a solvable problem/issue with the
  CFE, or libc++ depending on an older 'incorrect' behavior.
2022-05-02 11:12:14 -07:00
Erich Keane a97899108e Re-apply 4b6c2cd642 "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation""
This reverts commit 0c31da4838.

I've solved the issue with the PointerUnion by making the
`FunctionTemplateDecl` pointer be a NamedDecl, that could be a
`FunctionDecl` or `FunctionTemplateDecl` depending.  This is enforced
with an assert.
2022-05-02 07:49:26 -07:00
Erich Keane 0c31da4838 Revert "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation"
This reverts commit 4b6c2cd647.

The patch caused numerous ARM 32 bit build failures, since we added a
5th item to the PointerUnion, and went over the 2-bits available in the
32 bit pointers.
2022-05-02 06:25:38 -07:00
Erich Keane 4b6c2cd647 Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation
As reported here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/44178

Concepts are not supposed to be instantiated until they are checked, so
this patch implements that and goes through significant amounts of work
to make sure we properly re-instantiate the concepts correctly.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119544
2022-05-02 05:49:15 -07:00
Haojian Wu 864752cfeb [AST] QualifiedTemplateName::getTemplateDecl cleanup.
This is a followup cleanup of 1234b1c6d8

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124238
2022-04-22 14:28:48 +02:00
Haojian Wu 1234b1c6d8 [AST] Support template declaration found through using-decl for QualifiedTemplateName.
This is a followup of https://reviews.llvm.org/D123127, adding support
for the QualifiedTemplateName.

Reviewed By: sammccall

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123775
2022-04-21 10:53:23 +02:00
Fangrui Song c79e6007ed Revert D119136 "[clang] Implement Change scope of lambda trailing-return-type" and its follow-up
This reverts commit 69dd89fdcb.
This reverts commit 04000c2f92.

The current states breaks libstdc++ usage (https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136#3455423).
The fixup has been reverted as it caused other valid code to be disallowed.
I think we should start from the clean state by reverting all relevant commits.
2022-04-20 10:57:12 -07:00
Corentin Jabot 69dd89fdcb [Clang] Fix references to captured variables in dependant context.
D119136 changed how captures are handled in a lambda call operator
declaration, but did not properly handled dependant context,
which led to crash when refering to init-captures in
a trailing return type.

We fix that bug by making transformations more symetric with parsing,
ie. we first create the call operator, then transform the capture,
then compute the type of the lambda call operaror.

This ensures captures exist and have the right type when
we parse a trailing requires-clause / return type.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124012
2022-04-20 15:35:20 +02:00
Corentin Jabot 04000c2f92 [clang] Implement Change scope of lambda trailing-return-type
Implement P2036R3.

Captured variables by copy (explicitely or not), are deduced
correctly at the point we know whether the lambda is mutable,
and ill-formed before that.

Up until now, the entire lambda declaration up to the start of the body would be parsed in the parent scope, such that capture would not be available to look up.

The scoping is changed to have an outer lambda scope, followed by the lambda prototype and body.

The lambda scope is necessary because there may be a template scope between the start of the lambda (to which we want to attach the captured variable) and the prototype scope.

We also need to introduce a declaration context to attach the captured variable to (and several parts of clang assume captures are handled from the call operator context), before we know the type of the call operator.

The order of operations is as follow:

* Parse the init capture in the lambda's parent scope

* Introduce a lambda scope

* Create the lambda class and call operator

* Add the init captures to the call operator context and the lambda scope. But the variables are not capured yet (because we don't know their type).
Instead, explicit  captures are stored in a temporary map that conserves the order of capture (for the purpose of having a stable order in the ast dumps).

* A flag is set on LambdaScopeInfo to indicate that we have not yet injected the captures.

* The parameters are parsed (in the parent context, as lambda mangling recurses in the parent context, we couldn't mangle a lambda that is attached to the context of a lambda whose type is not yet known).

* The lambda qualifiers are parsed, at this point We can switch (for the second time) inside the lambda context, unset the flag indicating that we have not parsed the lambda qualifiers,
record the lambda is mutable and capture the explicit variables.

* We can parse the rest of the lambda type, transform the lambda and call operator's types and also transform the call operator to a template function decl where necessary.

At this point, both captures and parameters can be injected in the body's scope. When trying to capture an implicit variable, if we are before the qualifiers of a lambda, we need to remember that the variables are still in the parent's context (rather than in the call operator's).

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg, ChuanqiXu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136
2022-04-15 16:50:52 +02:00
Richard Smith 836e610d93 Revert "[clang] Implement Change scope of lambda trailing-return-type"
This reverts commit c729d5be78.

This change breaks thread safety annotations on lambdas.
2022-04-13 21:34:08 -07:00
Corentin Jabot c729d5be78 [clang] Implement Change scope of lambda trailing-return-type
Implement P2036R3.

Captured variables by copy (explicitely or not), are deduced
correctly at the point we know whether the lambda is mutable,
and ill-formed before that.

Up until now, the entire lambda declaration up to the start
of the body would  be parsed in the parent scope, such that
captures would not be available to look up.

The scoping is changed to have an outer lambda scope,
followed by the lambda prototype and body.

The lambda scope is necessary because there may be a template scope
between the start of the lambda (to which we want to attach
the captured variable) and the prototype scope.

We also need to introduce a declaration context to attach the captured
variable to (and several parts of clang assume captures are handled from
the call operator context), before we know the type of the call operator.

The order of operations is as follow:

* Parse the init capture in the lambda's parent scope
* Introduce a lambda scope
* Create the lambda class and call operator
* Add the init captures to the call operator context and the lambda scope.
  But the variables are not capured yet (because we don't know their type).
  Instead, explicit  captures are stored in a temporary map that
  conserves the order of capture (for the purpose of having a stable order in the ast dumps).

* A flag is set on LambdaScopeInfo to indicate that we have not yet injected the captures.

* The parameters are parsed (in the parent context, as lambda mangling recurses in the parent context,
  we couldn't mangle a lambda that is attached to the context of a lambda whose type is not yet known).

* The lambda qualifiers are parsed, at this point,
  we can switch (for the second time) inside the lambda context,
  unset the flag indicating that we have not parsed the lambda qualifiers,
  record the lambda is mutable and capture the explicit variables.

* We can parse the rest of the lambda type, transform the lambda and call operator's types and also
  transform the call operator to a template function decl where necessary.

At this point, both captures and parameters can be injected in the body's scope.
When trying to capture an implicit variable, if we are before the qualifiers of a lambda,
we need to remember that the variables are still in the parent's context (rather than in the call operator's).

This is a recommit of adff142dc2 after a fix in d8d793f29b

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg, ChuanqiXu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136
2022-04-13 23:07:39 +02:00
Mehdi Amini 26eec9e9db Revert "[clang] Implement Change scope of lambda trailing-return-type"
This reverts commit adff142dc2.
This broke clang bootstrap: it made existing C++ code in LLVM invalid:

llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/LiveInterval.h:630:53: error: captured variable 'Idx' cannot appear here
              [=](std::remove_reference_t<decltype(*Idx)> V,
                                                    ^
2022-04-13 19:35:13 +00:00
Corentin Jabot adff142dc2 [clang] Implement Change scope of lambda trailing-return-type
Implement P2036R3.

Captured variables by copy (explicitely or not), are deduced
correctly at the point we know whether the lambda is mutable,
and ill-formed before that.

Up until now, the entire lambda declaration up to the start of the body would be parsed in the parent scope, such that capture would not be available to look up.

The scoping is changed to have an outer lambda scope, followed by the lambda prototype and body.

The lambda scope is necessary because there may be a template scope between the start of the lambda (to which we want to attach the captured variable) and the prototype scope.

We also need to introduce a declaration context to attach the captured variable to (and several parts of clang assume captures are handled from the call operator context), before we know the type of the call operator.

The order of operations is as follow:

* Parse the init capture in the lambda's parent scope

* Introduce a lambda scope

* Create the lambda class and call operator

* Add the init captures to the call operator context and the lambda scope. But the variables are not capured yet (because we don't know their type).
Instead, explicit  captures are stored in a temporary map that conserves the order of capture (for the purpose of having a stable order in the ast dumps).

* A flag is set on LambdaScopeInfo to indicate that we have not yet injected the captures.

* The parameters are parsed (in the parent context, as lambda mangling recurses in the parent context, we couldn't mangle a lambda that is attached to the context of a lambda whose type is not yet known).

* The lambda qualifiers are parsed, at this point We can switch (for the second time) inside the lambda context, unset the flag indicating that we have not parsed the lambda qualifiers,
record the lambda is mutable and capture the explicit variables.

* We can parse the rest of the lambda type, transform the lambda and call operator's types and also transform the call operator to a template function decl where necessary.

At this point, both captures and parameters can be injected in the body's scope. When trying to capture an implicit variable, if we are before the qualifiers of a lambda, we need to remember that the variables are still in the parent's context (rather than in the call operator's).

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg, ChuanqiXu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119136
2022-04-13 20:00:03 +02:00
Jennifer Yu 187ccc66fa [clang][OpenMP5.1] Initial parsing/sema for has_device_addr
Added basic parsing/sema/ support for the 'has_device_addr' clause.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123402
2022-04-08 21:19:38 -07:00
James Y Knight d614874900 [Clang] Implement __builtin_source_location.
This builtin returns the address of a global instance of the
`std::source_location::__impl` type, which must be defined (with an
appropriate shape) before calling the builtin.

It will be used to implement std::source_location in libc++ in a
future change. The builtin is compatible with GCC's implementation,
and libstdc++'s usage. An intentional divergence is that GCC declares
the builtin's return type to be `const void*` (for
ease-of-implementation reasons), while Clang uses the actual type,
`const std::source_location::__impl*`.

In order to support this new functionality, I've also added a new
'UnnamedGlobalConstantDecl'. This artificial Decl is modeled after
MSGuidDecl, and is used to represent a generic concept of an lvalue
constant with global scope, deduplicated by its value. It's possible
that MSGuidDecl itself, or some of the other similar sorts of things
in Clang might be able to be refactored onto this more-generic
concept, but there's enough special-case weirdness in MSGuidDecl that
I gave up attempting to share code there, at least for now.

Finally, for compatibility with libstdc++'s <source_location> header,
I've added a second exception to the "cannot cast from void* to T* in
constant evaluation" rule. This seems a bit distasteful, but feels
like the best available option.

Reviewers: aaron.ballman, erichkeane

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120159
2022-03-28 18:29:02 -04:00
Aaron Ballman ca844ab01c Fix template instantiation of UDLs
Previously, we would instantiate the UDL by marking the function as
referenced and potentially binding to a temporary; this skipped
transforming the call when the UDL was dependent on a template
parameter.

Now, we defer all the work to instantiating the call expression for the
UDL. This ensures that constant evaluation occurs at compile time
rather than deferring until runtime.

Fixes Issue 54578.
2022-03-28 14:46:53 -04:00
Corentin Jabot 3784e8ccfb [Clang] Fix Unevaluated Lambdas
Unlike other types, when lambdas are instanciated,
they are recreated from scratch.
When an unevaluated lambdas appear in the type of a function,
parameter it is instanciated in the wrong declaration context,
as parameters are transformed before the function.

To support lambda in function parameters, we try to
compute whether they are dependant without looking at the
declaration context.

This is a short term stopgap solution to avoid clang
iceing. A better fix might be to inject some kind of
transparent declaration with correctly computed dependency
for function parameters, variable templates, etc.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/50376
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51414
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51416
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51641
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54296

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121532
2022-03-25 19:16:45 +01:00
Adam Czachorowski 7e45912618 [clang] Do not crash on arrow operator on dependent type.
There seems to be more than one way to get to that state. I included to
example cases in the test, both were noticed recently.

There is room for improvement, for example by creating RecoveryExpr in
place of the bad initializer, but for now let's stop the crashes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121824
2022-03-25 15:48:08 +01:00
Mike Rice f82ec5532b [OpenMP] Initial parsing/sema for the 'omp target parallel loop' construct
Adds basic parsing/sema/serialization support for the
 #pragma omp target parallel loop directive.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122359
2022-03-24 09:19:00 -07:00
Mike Rice 2cedaee6f7 [OpenMP] Initial parsing/sema for the 'omp parallel loop' construct
Adds basic parsing/sema/serialization support for the
  #pragma omp parallel loop directive.

 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122247
2022-03-22 13:55:47 -07:00
Mike Rice 6bd8dc91b8 [OpenMP] Initial parsing/sema for the 'omp target teams loop' construct
Adds basic parsing/sema/serialization support for the
 #pragma omp target teams loop directive.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122028
2022-03-18 13:48:32 -07:00
Mike Rice 79f661edc1 [OpenMP] Initial parsing/sema for the 'omp teams loop' construct
Adds basic parsing/sema/serialization support for the #pragma omp teams loop
directive.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121713
2022-03-16 14:39:18 -07:00
Yonghong Song 3251ba2d0f [Attr] Fix a btf_type_tag AST generation
Current ASTContext.getAttributedType() takes attribute kind,
ModifiedType and EquivType as the hash to decide whether an AST node
has been generated or note. But this is not enough for btf_type_tag
as the attribute might have the same ModifiedType and EquivType, but
still have different string associated with attribute.

For example, for a data structure like below,
  struct map_value {
        int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag3"))) *a;
        int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag2"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag4"))) *b;
  };
The current ASTContext.getAttributedType() will produce
an AST similar to below:
  struct map_value {
        int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag3"))) *a;
        int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag1"))) __attribute__((btf_type_tag("tag3"))) *b;
  };
and this is incorrect.

It is very difficult to use the current AttributedType as it is hard to
get the tag information. To fix the problem, this patch introduced
BTFTagAttributedType which is similar to AttributedType
in many ways but with an additional BTFTypeTagAttr. The tag itself can
be retrieved with BTFTypeTagAttr.
With the new BTFTagAttributed type, the debuginfo code can be greatly
simplified compared to previous TypeLoc based approach.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120296
2022-03-16 08:46:52 -07:00
Argyrios Kyrtzidis f2b24905bf [Sema] Mark the referenced destructor during transformation of a `CXXBindTemporaryExpr`
Otherwise we will fail to generate the definition of a defaulted destructor,
if the only reference was in a templated temporary.

rdar://89366678

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120426
2022-03-08 01:00:07 -08:00
Timm Bäder f8cedc642d [clang] Never wrap a nullptr in CXXNewExpr::getArraySize()
Otherwise callers of these functions have to check both the return value
for and the contents of the returned llvm::Optional.

Fixes #53742

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119525
2022-02-22 16:27:32 +01:00
Chuanqi Xu d30ca5e2e2 [C++20] [Coroutines] Implement return value optimization for get_return_object
This patch tries to implement RVO for coroutine's return object got from
get_return_object.
From [dcl.fct.def.coroutine]/p7 we could know that the return value of
get_return_object is either a reference or a prvalue. So it makes sense
to do copy elision for the return value. The return object should be
constructed directly into the storage where they would otherwise be
copied/moved to.

Test Plan: folly, check-all

Reviewed By: junparser

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117087
2022-02-16 13:38:00 +08:00
Corentin Jabot c151225096 [C++2b] Implement multidimentional subscript operator
Implement P2128R6 in C++23 mode.

Unlike GCC's implementation, this doesn't try to recover when a user
meant to use a comma expression.

Because the syntax changes meaning in C++23, the patch is *NOT*
implemented as an extension. Instead, declaring an array with not
exactly 1 parameter is an error in older languages modes. There is an
off-by-default extension warning in C++23 mode.

Unlike the standard, we supports default arguments;

Ie, we assume, based on conversations in WG21, that the proposed
resolution to CWG2507 will be accepted.

We allow arrays OpenMP sections and C++23 multidimensional array to
coexist:

[a , b] multi dimensional array
[a : b] open mp section
[a, b: c] // error

The rest of the patch is relatively straight forward: we take care to
support an arbitrary number of arguments everywhere.
2022-02-08 12:10:47 -05:00
Arthur O'Dwyer f6ce456707 [clang] Correctly(?) handle placeholder types in ExprRequirements.
Bug #52905 was originally papered over in a different way, but
I believe this is the actually proper fix, or at least closer to
it. We need to detect placeholder types as close to the front-end
as possible, and cause them to fail constraints, rather than letting
them persist into later stages.

Fixes #52905.
Fixes #52909.
Fixes #53075.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118552
2022-02-01 15:16:17 -05:00
Benjamin Kramer f15014ff54 Revert "Rename llvm::array_lengthof into llvm::size to match std::size from C++17"
This reverts commit ef82063207.

- It conflicts with the existing llvm::size in STLExtras, which will now
  never be called.
- Calling it without llvm:: breaks C++17 compat
2022-01-26 16:55:53 +01:00