Part of the _BitInt feature in C2x
(http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2763.pdf) is a new
macro in limits.h named BITINT_MAXWIDTH that can be used to determine
the maximum width of a bit-precise integer type. This macro must expand
to a value that is at least as large as ULLONG_WIDTH.
This adds an implementation-defined macro named __BITINT_MAXWIDTH__ to
specify that value, which is used by limits.h for the standard macro.
This also limits the maximum bit width to 128 bits because backends do
not currently support all mathematical operations (such as division) on
wider types yet. This maximum is expected to be increased in the future.
This completes the implementation of
WG14 N2412 (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2412.pdf),
which standardizes C on a twos complement representation for integer
types. The only work that remained there was to define the correct
macros in the standard headers, which this patch does.
This causes modern glibc to unset math_errhandling MATH_ERRNO. gcc 12
also sets some other macros, but most of them are associated with
flags ignored by clang, so without library examples, it is difficult to
determine whether they should be set. I think setting this one macro is
OK for now.
MSVC's libc doesn't provide thread.h, so we should set the macro to
indicate that.
We could just set it in C mode, but I noticed that Darwin sets it
unconditionally, so perhaps we should do the same here.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112081
The intent of this patch is to add support of -fp-model=[source|double|extended] to allow
the compiler to use a wider type for intermediate floating point calculations. As a side
effect to that, the value of FLT_EVAL_METHOD is changed according to the pragma
float_control.
Unfortunately some issue was uncovered with this change in preprocessing. See details in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93769 . We are therefore reverting this patch until we find a way
to reconcile the value of FLT_EVAL_METHOD, the pragma and the -E flow.
This reverts commit 66ddac22e2.
The Intel compiler ICC supports the option "-fp-model=(source|double|extended)"
which causes the compiler to use a wider type for intermediate floating point
calculations. Also supported is a way to embed this effect in the source
program with #pragma float_control(source|double|extended).
This patch extends pragma float_control syntax, and also adds support
for a new floating point option "-ffp-eval-method=(source|double|extended)".
source: intermediate results use source precision
double: intermediate results use double precision
extended: intermediate results use extended precision
Reviewed By: Aaron Ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93769
The Intel compiler ICC supports the option "-fp-model=(source|double|extended)"
which causes the compiler to use a wider type for intermediate floating point
calculations. Also supported is a way to embed this effect in the source
program with #pragma float_control(source|double|extended).
This patch extends pragma float_control syntax, and also adds support
for a new floating point option "-ffp-eval-method=(source|double|extended)".
source: intermediate results use source precision
double: intermediate results use double precision
extended: intermediate results use extended precision
Reviewed By: Aaron Ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93769
The headers shipped with the XMOS XCore compiler expect __xcore__ to be defined.
The __XS1B__ macro, already defined, is for the default subtarget.
No other targets affected.
Adds the __clang_literal_encoding__ and __clang_wide_literal_encoding__
predefined macros to expose the encoding used for string literals to
the preprocessor.
Currently the emscripten frontend driver injects this when building
with thread support. Moving this into the clang driver itself makes
the emscripten python driver less magical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96171
When the -matomics feature is not enabled, disable POSIXThreads
mode and set the thread model to Single, so that we don't predefine
macros like `__STDCPP_THREADS__`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96091
Android has a handful of API levels relevant to developers described
here: https://developer.android.com/studio/build#module-level.
`__ANDROID_API__` is too vague and confuses a lot of people. Introduce
a new macro name that is explicit about which one it represents. Keep
the old name around because code has been using it for a decade.
Some parts of the test had been extracted into separate files previously.
This patch continues the trend and extracts few more large blocks.
This reduces wall time for the test from a single 14s-long test into a set of
smaller tests that can be run in parallel.
Before/after state of the check-clang tests are here:
https://gist.github.com/Artem-B/d0b05c2e98a49158c02de23f7f4f0279
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85798
user interface and documentation, and update __cplusplus for C++20.
WG21 considers the C++20 standard to be finished (even though it still
has some more steps to pass through in the ISO process).
The old flag names are accepted for compatibility, as usual, and we
still have lots of references to C++2a in comments and identifiers;
those can be cleaned up separately.
Since 2009 (in r63846) we've been `#define`-ing OBJC_NEW_PROPERTIES all
the time on Darwin, but this macro only makes sense for `-x objective-c`
and `-x objective-c++`. Restrict it to those cases (for which there is
already separate logic).
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72970
rdar://problem/10050342
Follow-up of D72014. It is more appropriate to use a target
feature instead of a SubTypeArch to express the difference.
Reviewed By: #powerpc, jhibbits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72433
Summary:
This allows the use of '-target powerpcspe-unknown-linux-gnu' or
'powerpcspe-unknown-freebsd' to be used, instead of
'-target powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu -mspe'.
Reviewed By: dim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72014
This patch will add -mcpu=future into clang for PowerPC.
A CPU type is required for work that may possibly be enabled for some future
Power CPU. The CPU type future will serve that purpose. This patch introduces
no new functionality. It is an incremental patch on top of which Power PC work
for some future CPU can be done.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70262
Sunil Srivastava