D127650 removed support for non-clang-based XL compilers, but left some
of the headers used only by this compiler and included under the
__IBMCPP__ macro. This change cleans this up by deleting these headers.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast, fanbo-meng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129491
Nobody knows if there are users of libc++ with MSVC. Let's try to find that out and encourage them to upstream their changes to make that configuration work.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129055
A format string like "{}" is quite common. In this case avoid parsing
the format-spec when it's not present. Before the parsing was always
called, therefore some refactoring is done to make sure the formatters
work properly when their parse member isn't called.
From the wording it's not entirely clear whether this optimization is
allowed
[tab:formatter]
```
and the range [pc.begin(), pc.end()) from the last call to f.parse(pc).
```
Implies there's always a call to `f.parse` even when the format-spec
isn't present. Therefore this optimization isn't done for handle
classes; it's unclear whether that would break user defined formatters.
The improvements give a small reduciton is code size:
719408 12472 488 732368 b2cd0 before
718824 12472 488 731784 b2a88 after
The performance benefits when not using a format-spec are:
```
Comparing ./formatter_int.libcxx.out-baseline to ./formatter_int.libcxx.out
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_Basic<uint32_t> -0.0688 -0.0687 67 62 67 62
BM_Basic<int32_t> -0.1105 -0.1107 73 65 73 65
BM_Basic<uint64_t> -0.1053 -0.1049 95 85 95 85
BM_Basic<int64_t> -0.0889 -0.0888 93 85 93 85
BM_BasicLow<__uint128_t> -0.0655 -0.0655 96 90 96 90
BM_BasicLow<__int128_t> -0.0693 -0.0694 97 90 97 90
BM_Basic<__uint128_t> -0.0359 -0.0359 256 247 256 247
BM_Basic<__int128_t> -0.0414 -0.0414 239 229 239 229
```
For the cases where a format-spec is used the results remain similar,
some are faster some are slower, differing per run.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129426
Since the calendar classes were introduced in C++20 there's no need to
keep the old comparison operators.
This commit does the day calender class, the other calendar classes will
be in a followup commit.
Implements parts of:
- P1614R2 The mothership has landed
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128603
Change the mechanism in `iterator_operations.h` to pass around a generic
policy tag indicating whether an internal function is being invoked from
a "classic" STL algorithm or a ranges algorithm. `IterOps` is now
a template class specialized on the policy tag.
The advantage is that this mechanism is more generic and allows defining
arbitrary conditions in a clean manner.
Also add a few more iterator functions to `IterOps`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129390
This header need not be included on non-z/OS IBM platforms (and indeed
will add nothing when it is), so add a guard. This let's us remove the
header without things breaking when shipping libc++ for AIX.
Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast, fanbo-meng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129493
This is a preparation to look at possible performance improvements.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129421
In our implementation the year is always less than or equal to the
class' `max()`. It's unlikely this ever changes since changing the
year's range will be an ABI break. A static_assert is added as a
guard.
This was reported by @philnik.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129442
- create the headers (but not include them from `<algorithm>`);
- define the niebloid and its member functions with the right signatures
(as no-ops);
- make sure all the right headers are included that are required by each
algorithm's signature;
- update `CMakeLists.txt` and the module map;
- create the test files with the appropriate synopses.
The synopsis in `<algorithm>` is deliberately not updated because that
could be taken as a readiness signal. The new headers aren't included
from `<algorithm>` for the same reason.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129549
- checking that the algorithm supports predicates returning
a non-boolean type that's implicitly convertible to `bool`;
- checking that predicates and/or projections are invoked using
`std::invoke`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129414
According to @aaron.ballman this was marked Tentatively Ready as of 2022-07-07.
D129362 implemented the C counterpart.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129380
implement `std::ranges::set_intersection` by reusing the classic `std::set_intersenction`
added unit tests
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129233
This implements a not accepted LWG issue. Not doing so would require
integral types to use the handle class instead of being directly stored
in the basic_format_arg.
The previous code used `std::forward` in places where it wasn't required
by the Standard. These are now removed.
Implements:
- P2418R2 Add support for std::generator-like types to std::format
- LWG 3631 basic_format_arg(T&&) should use remove_cvref_t<T> throughout
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127570
As of now containers key_eq might get called when rehashing happens, which is redundant for unique keys containers.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128021
This is the first part of a plan to ship experimental features
by default while guarding them behind a compiler flag to avoid
users accidentally depending on them. Subsequent patches will
also encompass incomplete features (such as <format> and <ranges>)
in that categorization. Basically, the idea is that we always
build and ship the c++experimental library, however users can't
use what's in it unless they pass the `-funstable` flag to Clang.
Note that this patch intentionally does not start guarding
existing <experimental/FOO> content behind the flag, because
that would merely break users that might be relying on such
content being in the headers unconditionally. Instead, we
should start guarding new TSes behind the flag, and get rid
of the existing TSes we have by shipping their Standard
counterpart.
Also, this patch must jump through a few hoops like defining
_LIBCPP_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL because we still support compilers
that do not implement -funstable yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128927
This commit re-applies 9ee97ce3b8, which was reverted by 61d417ce
because it broke the LLDB data formatter tests. It also re-applies
6148c79a (the manual GN change associated to it).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127444
It is meant to be used in ranges algorithm tests.
It is much simplified version of C++23's tuple + zip_view.
Using std::swap would cause compilation failure and using `std::move` would not create the correct rvalue proxy which would result in copies.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129099
Since dfa88927ae, the static
libc++experimental should work in mingw dll builds. (It probably worked
all along in static mingw builds.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129270
With to_chars supporting 128-bit it's possible to support the full
128-bit range in format. This only removes the previous restrictions
and updates the tests to validate proper support.
Depends on D128929.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129007
This is required by the Standard and makes it possible to add full
128-bit support to format.
The patch also fixes 128-bit from_chars "support". One unit test
required a too large value, this failed on 128-bit; the fix was to add
more characters to the input.
Note only base 10 has been optimized. Other bases can be optimized.
Note the 128-bit lookup table could be made smaller. This will be done later. I
really want to get 128-bit working in to_chars and format in the upcomming
LLVM 15 release, these optimizations aren't critical.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128929
This removes a part of the now obsolete formater code.
The removal also removes the _v2 suffix where it's no longer needed.
Depends on D128785
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128846
This changes the implementation of the formatter. Instead of inheriting
from a specialized parser all formatters will use the same generic
parser. This reduces the binary size.
The new parser contains some additional fields only used in the chrono
formatting. Since this doesn't change the size of the parser the fields
are in the generic parser. The parser is designed to fit in 128-bit,
making it cheap to pass by value.
The new format function is a const member function. This isn't required
by the Standard yet, but it will be after LWG-3636 is accepted.
Additionally P2286 adds a formattable concept which requires the member
function to be const qualified in C++23. This paper is likely to be
accepted in the 2022 July plenary.
This is based on D125606. That commit did the groundwork and did similar
changes for the string formatters.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128785
Instead of marking private symbols with internal_linkage (which leads to
one copy per translation unit -- rather wasteful), use an ABI tag that
gets rev'd with each libc++ version. That way, we know that we can't have
name collisions between implementation-detail functions across libc++
versions, so we'll never violate the ODR. However, within a single program,
each symbol still has a proper name with external linkage, which means
that the linker is free to deduplicate symbols even across TUs.
This actually means that we can guarantee that versions of libc++ can
be mixed within the same program without ever having to take a code size
hit, and without having to manually opt-in -- it should just work out of
the box.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127444
After checking the libc++abi.dylib shipped in macOS 10.13, I can confirm
that it contains the align_val_t variants of operator new and operator
delete. However, the libc++abi.dylib shipped on macOS 10.12 does not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129198
Nikolas Klauser