LoopSimplifyCFG may process loops that are not in
loop-simplify/canonical form. For loops not in canonical form, exit
blocks may be reachable from non-loop blocks and we cannot consider them
as dead if they only are not reachable from the loop itself.
Unfortunately the smallest test I could come up with requires running
multiple passes:
-passes='loop-mssa(loop-instsimplify,loop-simplifycfg,simple-loop-unswitch)'
The reason is that loops are canonicalized at the beginning of loop
pipelines, so a later transform has to break canonical form in a way
that breaks LoopSimplifyCFG's dead-exit analysis.
Alternatively we could try to require all loop passes to maintain
canonical form. That in turn would also require additional verification.
Fixes#54023, #49931.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121925
LoopSimplifyCFG does not need MSSA, but should preserve it if it's available.
This is a legacy PM change, aimed to denoise the test changes in D109958.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111578
This option has been enabled by default for quite a while now.
The practical impact of removing the option is that MSSA use
cannot be disabled in default pipelines (both LPM and NPM) and
in manual LPM invocations. NPM can still choose to enable/disable
MSSA using loop vs loop-mssa.
The next step will be to require MSSA for LICM and drop the
AST-based implementation entirely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108075
Add support for mixed pre/post CFG views.
Update usages of the MemorySSAUpdater to use the new DT API by
requesting the DT updates to be done by the MSSAUpdater.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93371
In addition to removing phi nodes this patch removes any
landing pad that the dead exit block might have. Without
this fix Verifier complains about a new switch instruction
jumps to a block with a landing pad.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84320
This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of recompilation.
I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the
number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits
multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the
current checkout:
recompiles touches affected_files header
342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h
314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h
162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h
158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h
131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files
to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in
an incremental rebuild.
Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
This patch applies only to the new pass manager.
Currently, when MSSA Analysis is available, and pass to each loop pass, it will be preserved by that loop pass.
Hence, mark the analysis preserved based on that condition, vs the current `EnableMSSALoopDependency`. This leaves the global flag to affect only the entry point in the loop pass manager (in FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor).
llvm-svn: 369181
Summary:
The method `getLoopPassPreservedAnalyses` should not mark MemorySSA as
preserved, because it's being called in a lot of passes that do not
preserve MemorySSA.
Instead, mark the MemorySSA analysis as preserved by each pass that does
preserve it.
These changes only affect the new pass mananger.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62536
llvm-svn: 363091
Summary:
MemorySSA is not properly updated in LoopSimplifyCFG after recent changes. Use SplitBlock utility to resolve that and clear all updates once handleDeadExits is finished.
All updates that follow are removal of edges which are safe to handle via the removeEdge() API.
Also, deleting dead blocks is done correctly as is, i.e. delete from MemorySSA before updating the CFG and DT.
Reviewers: mkazantsev, rtereshin
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58524
llvm-svn: 354613
We are planning to be able to delete the current loop in LoopSimplifyCFG
in the future. Add API to notify the loop pass manager that it happened.
llvm-svn: 354314
Known underlying bugs have been fixed, intensive fuzz testing did not
find any new problems. Re-enabling by default. Feel free to revert if
it causes any functional failures.
llvm-svn: 353911
The function `LI.erase` has some invariants that need to be preserved when it
tries to remove a loop which is not the top-level loop. In particular, it
requires loop's preheader to be strictly in loop's parent. Our current logic
of deletion of dead blocks may erase the information about preheader before we
handle the loop, and therefore we may hit this assertion.
This patch changes the logic of loop deletion: we make them top-level loops
before we actually erase them. This allows us to trigger the simple branch of
`erase` logic which just detatches blocks from the loop and does not try to do
some complex stuff that need this invariant.
Thanks to @uabelho for reporting this!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57221
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 353813
Utility function that we use for blocks deletion always unconditionally removes
one-input Phis. In LoopSimplifyCFG, it can lead to breach of LCSSA form.
This patch alters this function to keep them if needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57231
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 353803
`insert/deleteEdge` methods in DTU can make updates incorrectly in some cases
(see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40528), and it is recommended to
use `applyUpdates` methods instead when it is needed to make a mass update in CFG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57316
Reviewed By: kuhar
llvm-svn: 353502
DomTreeUpdater depends on headers from Analysis, but is in IR. This is a
layering violation since Analysis depends on IR. Relocate this code from IR
to Analysis to fix the layering violation.
llvm-svn: 353265
2nd part of D57095 with the same reason, just in another place. We never
fold branches that are not immediately in the current loop, but this check
is missing in `IsEdgeLive` As result, it may think that the edge in subloop is
dead while it's live. It's a pessimization in the current stance.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57147
Reviewed By: rupprecht
llvm-svn: 352170
When we choose whether or not we should mark block as dead, we have an
inconsistent logic in markup of live blocks.
- We take candidate IF its terminator branches on constant AND it is immediately
in current loop;
- We mark successor live IF its terminator doesn't branch by constant OR it branches
by constant and the successor is its always taken block.
What we are missing here is that when the terminator branches on a constant but is
not taken as a candidate because is it not immediately in the current loop, we will
mark only one (always taken) successor as live. Therefore, we do NOT do the actual
folding but may NOT mark one of the successors as live. So the result of markup is
wrong in this case, and we may then hit various asserts.
Thanks Jordan Rupprech for reporting this!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57095
Reviewed By: rupprecht
llvm-svn: 352024
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
During the transforms in LoopSimplifyCFG, when we remove a dead exiting edge, the
parent loop may stop being reachable from the child loop, and therefore they become
siblings. If the former child loop had uses of some values from its former parent loop,
now such uses will require LCSSA Phis, even if they weren't needed before. So we must
form LCSSA for all loops that stopped being ancestors of the current loop in this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56144
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 351434
Function `DeleteDeadBlock` requires that all predecessors of a block
being deleted have already been deleted, with the exception of a
single-block loop. When we use it for removal of dead subloops that
contain more than one block, we may not fulfull this requirement and
fail an assertion.
This patch replaces invocation of `DeleteDeadBlock` with a generalized
version `DeleteDeadBlocks` that is able to deal with multiple dead blocks,
even if they contain some cycles.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56121
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 351433
Kazu Hirata