Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bjorn Pettersson 3f8027fb67 [test] Update some test cases to use -passes when specifying the pipeline
This updates transform test cases for
  ADCE
  AddDiscriminators
  AggressiveInstCombine
  AlignmentFromAssumptions
  ArgumentPromotion
  BDCE
  CalledValuePropagation
  DCE
  Reg2Mem
  WholeProgramDevirt
to use the -passes syntax when specifying the pipeline.

Given that LLVM_ENABLE_NEW_PASS_MANAGER isn't set to off (which is
a deprecated feature) the updated test cases already used the new
pass manager, but they were using the legacy syntax when specifying
the passes to run. This patch can be seen as a step toward deprecating
that interface.

This patch also removes some redundant RUN lines. Here I am
referring to test cases that had multiple RUN lines verifying both
the legacy "-passname" syntax and the new "-passes=passname" syntax.
Since we switched the default pass manager to "new PM" both RUN lines
have verified the new PM version of the pass (more or less wasting
time running the same test twice), unless LLVM_ENABLE_NEW_PASS_MANAGER
is set to "off". It is assumed that it is enough to run these tests
with the new pass manager now.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108472
2021-09-29 21:51:08 +02:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski 2724d45325 [ADCE][Dominators] Reapply: Teach ADCE to preserve dominators
Summary:
This patch teaches ADCE to preserve both DominatorTrees and PostDominatorTrees.

This is reapplies the original patch r311057 that was reverted in r311381.
The previous version wasn't using the batch update api for updating dominators,
which in vary rare cases caused assertion failures.

This also fixes PR34258.

Reviewers: dberlin, chandlerc, sanjoy, davide, grosser, brzycki

Reviewed By: davide

Subscribers: grandinj, zhendongsu, llvm-commits, david2050

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35869

llvm-svn: 311467
2017-08-22 16:30:21 +00:00