llvm-project

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Nick Desaulniers	79ebc3b0dd	[llvm][test] rewrite callbr to use i rather than X constraint NFC In D115311, we're looking to modify clang to emit i constraints rather than X constraints for callbr's indirect destinations. Prior to doing so, update all of the existing tests in llvm/ to match. Reviewed By: void, jyknight Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115410	2022-01-11 11:31:08 -08:00
Bill Wendling	ab6002871d	[llvm-diff] Add support for diffing the callbr instruction The only wrinkle is that we can't process the "blockaddress" arguments of the callbr until the blocks have been equated. So we force them to be "unified" before checking. This was left out when the callbr instruction was added. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104606	2021-06-22 12:23:37 -07:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Nick Desaulniers

79ebc3b0dd

[llvm][test] rewrite callbr to use i rather than X constraint NFC

In D115311, we're looking to modify clang to emit i constraints rather
than X constraints for callbr's indirect destinations. Prior to doing
so, update all of the existing tests in llvm/ to match.

Reviewed By: void, jyknight

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115410

2022-01-11 11:31:08 -08:00

Bill Wendling

ab6002871d

[llvm-diff] Add support for diffing the callbr instruction

The only wrinkle is that we can't process the "blockaddress" arguments
of the callbr until the blocks have been equated. So we force them to be
"unified" before checking.

This was left out when the callbr instruction was added.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104606

2021-06-22 12:23:37 -07:00

2 Commits