Even though these deps weren't needed, this makes Fuchsia driver
better match other drivers, and it may be necessary when trying to
use different C libraries on Fuchsia.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54741
llvm-svn: 347378
-static relies on lld's behavior, but -Bstatic/dynamic is supported
across all linkers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54082
llvm-svn: 346107
This avoids introducing unnecessary DT_NEEDED entries when using
C++ driver for linking C code or C++ code that doesn't use C++
standard library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53854
llvm-svn: 346064
When using sanitizers, add <resource_dir>/<target>/lib/<sanitizer>
to the list of library paths to support using sanitized version of
runtime libraries if available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53487
llvm-svn: 345537
This ports the profiling runtime on Fuchsia and enables the
instrumentation. Unlike on other platforms, Fuchsia doesn't use
files to dump the instrumentation data since on Fuchsia, filesystem
may not be accessible to the instrumented process. We instead use
the data sink to pass the profiling data to the system the same
sanitizer runtimes do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47208
llvm-svn: 337881
This change adds a support for multiarch style runtimes layout, so in
addition to the existing layout where runtimes get installed to:
lib/clang/$version/lib/$os
Clang now allows runtimes to be installed to:
lib/clang/$version/$target/lib
This also includes libc++, libc++abi and libunwind; today those are
assumed to be in Clang library directory built for host, with the
new layout it is possible to install libc++, libc++abi and libunwind
into the runtime directory built for different targets.
The use of new layout is enabled by setting the
LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIME_TARGET_DIR CMake variable and is supported by both
projects and runtimes layouts. The runtimes CMake build has been further
modified to use the new layout when building runtimes for multiple
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45604
llvm-svn: 335809
Even though we use lld by default for Fuchsia, we use Gold plugin
arguments like all other drivers as lld supports Gold plugin options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47668
llvm-svn: 333979
The fact that libc++ depends on libc++abi and libunwind is an internal
detail that's captured by the libc++.so linker script.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46768
llvm-svn: 332138
Passing a flavor to LLD requires command line argument, but if these
are being passed through a response file, this will fail because LLD
needs to know which driver to use before processing the response file.
Use ld.lld directly instead to avoid this issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39176
llvm-svn: 316379
Summary:
* Rename -shared-libasan to -shared-libsan, keeping the old name as alias.
* Add -static-libsan for targets that default to shared.
* Remove an Android special case. It is now possible (but untested) to use static compiler-rt libraries there.
* Support libclang_rt.ubsan_standalone as a shared library.
Unlike GCC, this change applies -shared-libsan / -static-libsan to all sanitizers.
I don't see a point in multiple flags like -shared-libubsan, considering that most sanitizers
are not compatible with each other, and each link has basically a single shared/static choice.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, kcc, rsmith
Subscribers: srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38525
llvm-svn: 315015
The .gnu_hash format is superior, and all versions of the Fuchsia
dynamic linker support it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36254
llvm-svn: 310017
Projects that want to statically link their own C++ standard library currently
need to pass -nostdlib or -nodefaultlibs, which also disables linking of the
builtins library, -lm, and so on. Alternatively, they could use `clang` instead
of `clang++`, but that already disables implicit addition of -lm on some
toolchains.
Add a dedicated flag -nostdlib++ that disables just linking of libc++ /
libstdc++. This is analogous to -nostdinc++.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35780
llvm-svn: 308997
Several improvements to the Fuchsia driver:
* Search for C++ library headers and libraries in directories that
are part of the toolchain distribution rather than sysroot.
* Use LLVM support utlities to construct paths to make sure the driver
is also usable on Windows for cross-compiling.
* Change the driver to inherit directly from ToolChain rather than
Generic_GCC since we don't need any of the GCC related multilib logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35328
llvm-svn: 307856
Several improvements to the Fuchsia driver:
* Search for C++ library headers and libraries in directories that
are part of the toolchain distribution rather than sysroot.
* Use LLVM support utlities to construct paths to make sure the driver
is also usable on Windows for cross-compiling.
* Change the driver to inherit directly from ToolChain rather than
Generic_GCC since we don't need any of the GCC related multilib logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32613
llvm-svn: 307830
Summary: Pass the type of the device offloading when building the tool chain for a particular target architecture. This is required when supporting multiple tool chains that target a single device type. In our particular use case, the OpenMP and CUDA tool chains will use the same ```addClangTargetOptions ``` method. This enables the reuse of common options and ensures control over options only supported by a particular tool chain.
Reviewers: arpith-jacob, caomhin, carlo.bertolli, ABataev, jlebar, hfinkel, tstellar, Hahnfeld
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: jgravelle-google, aheejin, rengolin, jfb, dschuff, sbc100, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29647
llvm-svn: 307272
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
Petr Hosek